http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7946657.stm
I understand the guy's a lawyer, but claiming that someone is polite, sane and normal yet can enslave his own daughter, rape her repeatedly for years and let the children they've had grow up in a cellar (not to mention letting one of them die), is a "human being" and not a "monster", seriously stretches the imagination. If this guy doesn't qualify then we might as well strike that label altogether.
I'm also confused as to how being "objective", as the lawyer claims, would in anyway help the guy's case. It doesn't even look like they're trying to paint the guy as a sociopath, just a regular guy that kinda felt like turning his daughter into his sex slave for years.
To be more subjective, in my opinion, this is a rather vivid example of the horrors of human potential.
I understand the guy's a lawyer, but claiming that someone is polite, sane and normal yet can enslave his own daughter, rape her repeatedly for years and let the children they've had grow up in a cellar (not to mention letting one of them die), is a "human being" and not a "monster", seriously stretches the imagination. If this guy doesn't qualify then we might as well strike that label altogether.
I'm also confused as to how being "objective", as the lawyer claims, would in anyway help the guy's case. It doesn't even look like they're trying to paint the guy as a sociopath, just a regular guy that kinda felt like turning his daughter into his sex slave for years.
To be more subjective, in my opinion, this is a rather vivid example of the horrors of human potential.









