CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › "The best way to rob a bank is to own one"
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

"The best way to rob a bank is to own one"

post #1 of 9
Thread Starter 
Bill Moyers takes on financial fraud and theft! William K. Black explains how it works, how regulation plays into it, and what the executive bonuses really are.

Quote:
BILL MOYERS: Yeah. Are you saying that Timothy Geithner, the Secretary of the Treasury, and others in the administration, with the banks, are engaged in a cover-up to keep us from knowing what went wrong?

WILLIAM K. BLACK: Absolutely.

BILL MOYERS: You are.

WILLIAM K. BLACK: Absolutely, because they are scared to death. All right? They're scared to death of a collapse. They're afraid that if they admit the truth, that many of the large banks are insolvent. They think Americans are a bunch of cowards, and that we'll run screaming to the exits. And we won't rely on deposit insurance. And, by the way, you can rely on deposit insurance. And it's foolishness. All right? Now, it may be worse than that. You can impute more cynical motives. But I think they are sincerely just panicked about, "We just can't let the big banks fail." That's wrong.
This is online and can be viewed here. Transcript is here.

Another excerpt:
Quote:
BILL MOYERS: Is it possible that these complex instruments were deliberately created so swindlers could exploit them?

WILLIAM K. BLACK: Oh, absolutely. This stuff, the exotic stuff that you're talking about was created out of things like liars' loans, that were known to be extraordinarily bad. And now it was getting triple-A ratings. Now a triple-A rating is supposed to mean there is zero credit risk. So you take something that not only has significant, it has crushing risk. That's why it's toxic. And you create this fiction that it has zero risk. That itself, of course, is a fraudulent exercise. And again, there was nobody looking, during the Bush years. So finally, only a year ago, we started to have a Congressional investigation of some of these rating agencies, and it's scandalous what came out. What we know now is that the rating agencies never looked at a single loan file. When they finally did look, after the markets had completely collapsed, they found, and I'm quoting Fitch, the smallest of the rating agencies, "the results were disconcerting, in that there was the appearance of fraud in nearly every file we examined."

BILL MOYERS: So if your assumption is correct, your evidence is sound, the bank, the lending company, created a fraud. And the ratings agency that is supposed to test the value of these assets knowingly entered into the fraud. Both parties are committing fraud by intention.

WILLIAM K. BLACK: Right, and the investment banker that — we call it pooling — puts together these bad mortgages, these liars' loans, and creates the toxic waste of these derivatives. All of them do that. And then they sell it to the world and the world just thinks because it has a triple-A rating it must actually be safe. Well, instead, there are 60 and 80 percent losses on these things, because of course they, in reality, are toxic waste.

BILL MOYERS: You're describing what Bernie Madoff did to a limited number of people. But you're saying it's systemic, a systemic Ponzi scheme.

WILLIAM K. BLACK: Oh, Bernie was a piker. He doesn't even get into the front ranks of a Ponzi scheme...

BILL MOYERS: But you're saying our system became a Ponzi scheme.

WILLIAM K. BLACK: Our system...

BILL MOYERS: Our financial system...

WILLIAM K. BLACK: Became a Ponzi scheme. Everybody was buying a pig in the poke. But they were buying a pig in the poke with a pretty pink ribbon, and the pink ribbon said, "Triple-A."
And another...
Quote:
BILL MOYERS: To hear you say this is unusual because you supported Barack Obama, during the campaign. But you're seeming disillusioned now.

WILLIAM K. BLACK: Well, certainly in the financial sphere, I am. I think, first, the policies are substantively bad. Second, I think they completely lack integrity. Third, they violate the rule of law. This is being done just like Secretary Paulson did it. In violation of the law. We adopted a law after the Savings and Loan crisis, called the Prompt Corrective Action Law. And it requires them to close these institutions. And they're refusing to obey the law.

BILL MOYERS: In other words, they could have closed these banks without nationalizing them?

WILLIAM K. BLACK: Well, you do a receivership. No one -- Ronald Reagan did receiverships. Nobody called it nationalization.

BILL MOYERS: And that's a law?

WILLIAM K. BLACK: That's the law.

BILL MOYERS: So, Paulson could have done this? Geithner could do this?

WILLIAM K. BLACK: Not could. Was mandated--

BILL MOYERS: By the law.

WILLIAM K. BLACK: By the law.

BILL MOYERS: This law, you're talking about.

WILLIAM K. BLACK: Yes.

BILL MOYERS: What the reason they give for not doing it?

WILLIAM K. BLACK: They ignore it. And nobody calls them on it.

BILL MOYERS: Well, where's Congress? Where's the press? Where--
This is a must-watch!
post #2 of 9
Sorry, yt. I could only get through half of it before I was too infuriated/depressed to go on. At this point, I've heard the same song and I understand how it all went so wrong. And then I utterly despair because Obama, the guy we all cheered on, is failing us in this respect. It's heartbreaking.
post #3 of 9
WILLIAM K. BLACK: They think Americans are a bunch of cowards, and that we'll run screaming to the exits.

I'm afraid I'm inclined to agree with this statement (not that the Obama Administration believes it, that it is true)

How ling have we heard the Major US car makers whine that they just can't make a fuel efficient car, a Hybrid car, an electric car etc etc etc 'cause it's just so hard?! Even in the face of foreign car makers doing all of the above?!
post #4 of 9
Thread Starter 
Yeah on both counts.

But you should really watch the whole thing. The most potent bit comes at the end, and fwiw, I just filled out the email form at whitehouse.gov with this quote along with a note asking Obama if he will reconsider his current policy:
Quote:
William K. Black: We're hiding the losses, instead of trying to find out the real losses. Stop that, because you need good information to make good decisions, right? Follow what works instead of what's failed. Start appointing people who have records of success, instead of records of failure. That would be another nice place to start. There are lots of things we can do. Even today, as late as it is. Even though they've had a terrible start to the administration. They could change, and they could change within weeks. And by the way, the folks who are the better regulators, they paid their taxes. So, you can get them through the vetting process a lot quicker.
post #5 of 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Goldberg View Post
Sorry, yt. I could only get through half of it before I was too infuriated/depressed to go on. At this point, I've heard the same song and I understand how it all went so wrong. And then I utterly despair because Obama, the guy we all cheered on, is failing us in this respect. It's heartbreaking.
Said it many times before, but the new boss is the same as the old boss.
post #6 of 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by eenin View Post
Said it many times before, but the new boss is the same as the old boss.
Actually, nope. Its just that in this case, and many others like it, the very rules that govern, supposedly, the US economy simply dont allow enough leverage for the president to put a definite stop on this.
Doesnt matter if its Obama, Bush or Lincolns restless ghost himself, you'd have to pass a lot of very intrusive, and most likely "socialist"-labeled legislature to fight this.... at which point those willing to sacrifice thousands of jobs and possibly lives for their gain will simply find the next loophole.

You know, before laying the blame at the feet of a president barely in office yet, after almost a decade of the worst kind of abuse of power in a long time, one would think people would stop and check if a) the presidents powers at this moment make intervention possible, sensible and legal, and b) if this whole mess is maybe, JUST maybe, too complicated to be solved within a few months with a hatchet, spit and a roll of proverbial duct tape.

You cant have your free market economiy, meritocracy and rags-to-riches stories without taking the bad with it, namely greed, corruption and power in private hands that at times can outweigh even the government.
post #7 of 9
Thread Starter 
Khaunshar makes an excellent point. And I agree that we need to give him time to negotiate this treacherous situation (even though it's hard not to put one's head through the wall). That said, I read about two positive developments:

Eric Holder wants to put together a criminal task force to look at fraud (from the WSJ).

And this:
Quote:
Elizabeth Warren, chief watchdog of America's $700bn (£472bn) bank bailout plan, will this week call for the removal of top executives from Citigroup, AIG and other institutions that have received government funds in a damning report that will question the administration's approach to saving the financial system from collapse.

Warren, a Harvard law professor and chair of the congressional oversight committee monitoring the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program (Tarp), is also set to call for shareholders in those institutions to be "wiped out". "It is crucial for these things to happen," she said. "Japan tried to avoid them and just offered subsidy with little or no consequences for management or equity investors, and this is why Japan suffered a lost decade." She declined to give more detail but confirmed that she would refer to insurance group AIG, which has received $173bn in bailout money, and banking giant Citigroup, which has had $45bn in funds and more than $316bn of loan guarantees.

Warren also believes there are "dangers inherent" in the approach taken by treasury secretary Tim Geithner, who she says has offered "open-ended subsidies" to some of the world's biggest financial institutions without adequately weighing potential pitfalls. "We want to ensure that the treasury gives the public an alternative approach," she said, adding that she was worried that banks would not recover while they were being fed subsidies. "When are they going to say, enough?" she said.

She said she did not want to be too hard on Geithner but that he must address the issues in the report. "The very notion that anyone would infuse money into a financially troubled entity without demanding changes in management is preposterous."
From the Observer.

I hope neither of them is obstructed.
post #8 of 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cylon Baby View Post
WILLIAM K. BLACK: They think Americans are a bunch of cowards, and that we'll run screaming to the exits.

I'm afraid I'm inclined to agree with this statement (not that the Obama Administration believes it, that it is true)
The American financial public IS a bunch of hyperactive screaming childish cowards. The stock market is a big glowing neon sign proclaiming this fact every day.
post #9 of 9
Thread Starter 
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Political Discourse
CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › "The best way to rob a bank is to own one"