Quote:
Originally Posted by eenin 
Maybe but "Aryan" is more then just a language. They were a race or culture who influence was felt all the way to ancient Greece. The Aryans were the ones who change the ancient Greeks from Mother Earth worshiper to the Greeks who believed in the Zeus Father Pantheon. Not much is really known about the Aryans, so all you have to go on is ancient myths and writings through out the Indo- Euro regain. The whole supermen thing were made up whole cloth by 19 century Europeans, but saying Aryans are made up by Europeans is just as fucked up in different ways as what the Europeans did with the myths.
|
I didn't say Aryans were made up by Europeans. I'm saying that there's a large distinction to be made between what Europeans considered "Aryan" and what Indians considered "Aryan" - until the British conflated the two concepts in the 19th century. And, yeah, Aryan-in-its-original-sense was a culture, but it was largely defined linguistically, at least initially. It wasn't about physical features.
It sounds like it's highly arguable whether the Aryans, specifically, were responsible for the evolution of Greek religion. There's a shared background, but it's not like the magical Aryans came sailing over to Greece and introduced the Mycenaeans to polytheism. There's shared ancestry in terms of myths, language, and culture all over the middle-east, Greece, and India.
Quote:
| Not to say that the British didn't use the system to their advantages, but the system was already there way before the British got there. Read some of the history of the spread of Buddhism and Islam to India. |
Sure, the caste system was there. But the British reinterpreted it to correspond to their own class system, in part by using their mistaken idea of what "Aryan" meant. I'm not saying it was substantially worse or better (although colonization is generally pretty unpleasant, no matter how bad conditions may have been prior), but that it was changed substantially.