I love the film because it's a bunch of things. It's a classic piece of social commentary, it has some of the most extreme (if not super well done) gore for its time, the character work was quite good IMO, and the focus was not just the zombies, but telling a STORY. To me, it was unique blending. As stated, it's not a totally HORROR horror movie.
It was a story about surviving a horror predicament. It wasn't about the coming of the end of the world. It was happening. And these people were trying to survive this undead apocalypse. That's different, creative, original to me. Or was when I saw it. There's another reason I love it.
As well, the script is well-written. I was taking a looksee at one of Romero's drafts for it a few weeks ago at the Script-O-Rama and I personally was taken aback by how well it was written. He has a certain writing style (I kinda noticed it in his RE draft, too) that I just really dig, and he transfers it beautifully into his films.
Sure, it ain't done perfectly or done really REALLY well. Low-budget, the era it was made in, tons of things attribute to it. If Romero wanted to redo it now with better quality - he could, and he'd probably knock you on your ass with it.

But, really - could you, under those same circumstances, have made a better movie? I'd love to see you try.

The zombies themselves aren't supposed to look scary, if you ask me - they're just supposed to be scary when you see about 30 of them hungry fuckers staring you down. But, that's just me, I guess.
Pity ya didn't dig it...or maybe not. Better to have you not appreciate it than appreciate it in the wrong way. wink
And Otik, I think you deserve another smackdown for reiterating your Troma comment.
*grabs a mallet and smashes Otik on the head with it, splattering blood and brain matter everywhere*
And indeed, this thread depresses me. frown