If you ever wanted to see Dolph Lundgren's...

Moltisanti coming in in 5...4...3...

Disappointing length, but there are some nice veins on there. 6/10.

Much funnier if you had wrote:

Moltisanti cumming in 5....4....3.....

Tempted, oh so tempted to click that link but alas at work.

I'm really wondering what score Molti will give it.

Disappointing? Really? That's the word you would use? You would want it to be longer? Size queens can be found everywhere.

And thus the B-Movie Action thread orgasmed at once.

Nah, I like it clean.

Well, it confirms he's not jewish. *shrugs*

Really?
Is circumcision so common there?
Here it's only within the Jewish community. I find that cultural difference to be fascinating. Latin men will KILL you if you try to cut something off their penises.

Definitely a European thing. From what I understand, there is now a shift underway in the US to not snip at birth.

I haven't clicked on the link, but somehow, I feel this exchange is appropriate:

Brandon Lee: "Kenner, just incase we get killed, I wanted to tell you that you have the biggest dick I've ever seen on a man."

Dolph: "Thank you."

He's right, it's far more common here in the US although the rates are not as high as they were. And while I don't want to turn this into a circumsision thread, it's actually picking up in Africa.

But hey, to me. It's one less thing to wash.

Like I said, I don't want to derail the thread. But anyone who believes that is fucking insane.

It's very common in Latin America. Tati don't forget that you guys down there are proto-European.

He's got a point. And who in the fuck is gettin circumsised as an adult? Africa notwithstanding.

Last figures I saw....roughly 77% of US boys undergo circumcision.

Never mind then.

which begs the question: Why was Brandon Lee's character staring at Kenner's erect penis? Also, why isn't Tia Carrera naked in every movie?

Since the Brandon quote is already taken, I'll go with:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ee6pg95EmIM

Just substitute "long black limousine" with "saab compact" and you're good.

Just like everything else in life, it's always a euphemism about ass sex.

Circumcision IS mutilation....ever see one done? No anesthesia given to the baby, which screams like crazy.
I'd say the foreskin accounts for 40-50% of the pleasure down there. Think about that next time you're enjoying yourself.

Unless you're Jewish, American or Muslim, how common is it?

For the recrod, when it comes to the bris. Anestic in the form of wine is given: Very diluted wine.

And don't try and say it's anything like female circumcision. Cut that shit out right now.

It cums in peace.

Pretty sure it's standard procedure at birth here (Australia) actually.

Don't forget Canadian.

You would have too, Ed, but you shot your load in the furries thread.

It used to be Matt, not anymore.

My parents had to actually request it not be done on me back in '76 tho.

Never went near that thread

Makes sense, wouldn't want that extra chafing during those rugby matches, am I right?

I am Canadian.....I wasn't snipped...I think it runs 50 / 50 around here.

I had no idea having the snip was so common, you crazy Americans with your genital modifications. Stop tinkering! It works fine as it is.

Serious question: Are there any actual reasons circumcision is so popular in the US? I know it's not religious, so what started this senseless bloodshed?

Serious question: Why is there a serious question in the Dolph's cock thread?

Serious question: You don't consider photos of Dolph's cock the kindling from which a great fire of serious debate about cocks in general can arise?

In the words of Seinfeld "They look like shy turtles or something." Non snipped dicks are, weird.

I agree. Fuck the foreskin; it's about as useful as the appendix.

I've heard this bandied about for reasons on more than one occasion (so there is probably a kernal of truth in it). From this article: http://www.thelaboroflove.com/articl...-nowhere-else/

I'd be inclined to agree, and add that it's a bit cleaner without it. But SneakyPete says that it accounts for 40% of sexual stimulation, and that sounds, like, totally scientific.

Mostly it was promulgated as a cure for masturbation, by John Kellogg of cornflake fame no less!

Hygiene was probably the biggest reason for the next big push towards circumcision. In the WW years it was pushed on soldiers. The prevailing wisdom was that it was too difficult to teach men how to clean themselves.

Once this was deemed to be an erroneous assumption the medical establishment began to report that cases of HPV transmission and thus cervical cancer in females whose partners were uncircumcised were higher. This has not been supported in studies.

The rates of HPV infection in males came next(HIV is making the rounds as the next big circumcision reason) and it may indeed be slightly higher but teaching proper hygiene techniques should reduce this significantly.

UTI's, penile cancer, HPV all have, and I dare say that the research out of South Africa concerning HIV transmission will eventually as well, proved unable to stand up to proper hygiene.

Many ideas have come and gone and outside of religious reasons they all seem to be lacking. Many American fathers when presented with information about circumcision will readily agree that it is an unnecessary medical procedure but will still insist on it so that their boy "looks like them". Locker room humiliation for being different seems to be a big motivator for "informed" fathers.

Ed, circumcision is indeed genital mutilation no matter how you slice it(pun not intended). You are performing a mostly unnecessary surgery on someone's body without their consent.

Removal of the foreskin causes the glans penis to be subjected to constant rubbing inside the clothing and thus keratinizes, or hardens/toughens, the skin. This reduces sensation and sexual pleasure down the line. Look up the gliding mechanism and you will get a picture of how circumcision changes the natural dynamics of sex.

So it's basically mass delusion. I see.

I have no idea how it became so mainstream here in the USA. It may have to do with the same reason we won't use the metric system.

I do know that if the tip of my penis were any more sensitive, i'd be busting a nut everytime i took a step. So maybe it's a good thing.

Apparently, but then why publish these reports? What exactly is there to gain from this that we must continue to snip the tip? Is there a secret cabal of moyles out there?

And as for the HIV reports, those studies have been pretty consistent about it reducing infection. Either way, I don't want to get into an argument about nor do I have the time to sift after report and report to somehow change your mind even though you won't. Why the fuck do I care what you think even though I find what you think to be complete nonsense. You want your forskin go get some bullshit surgery to reattch it. Otherwise, knock that shit off.

Is there any way to get it unremoved? Or to grow some more? Please advise.

I dunno about foreskin, but if you want more hair, you can always try The Magic Peanut Butter Solution.

Google "foreskin restoration". Where there's a will, there's a way.