CHUD.com Community › Forums › CULTURE, HUMOR, & FREE FORM › Gossip › If you ever wanted to see Dolph Lundgren's...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

If you ever wanted to see Dolph Lundgren's... - Page 2

post #51 of 216
In case you haven't figured it out Stelios, foreskin mutilation is indeed ingrained into the American subculture. One wonders if it's something sliped in the fluoride?
post #52 of 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Domingo View Post
Non snipped dicks are, weird.
This is fucking moronic. Aside from the fact that circumcision is largely unnecessary, makes your cock less sensitive and is probably pretty fucking traumatic, why the hell would someone think penises in their normal configuration are "weird"? That's like thinking only fake tits look good.
post #53 of 216
I couldn't agree more.
I can't really understand how some kids might fear being traumatized by other kids if they are not circumcised. The sensitivity issue alone would make me never want to do it, not even consider it.
post #54 of 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Jim Slade View Post
This is fucking moronic. Aside from the fact that circumcision is largely unnecessary, makes your cock less sensitive and is probably pretty fucking traumatic, why the hell would someone think penises in their normal configuration are "weird"? That's like thinking only fake tits look good.
Not only that, but if the human male needed to be circumcised, it would have evolved to be that way. You can't keep your dick clean? Too bad. It's Darwinism.
post #55 of 216
I'm telling you, it's something slipped in the fluoride here. You can't have a rational discussion about foreskins with the American male. It's almost as though original sin is in the foreskin. Bizarre.
post #56 of 216
And some women think they're gross.

Funny thing is, a lot of them have been with uncircumcised guys and weren't even aware.

What an odd thread.
post #57 of 216
This thread is beyond fucked up.
post #58 of 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Savage View Post
This thread is beyond fucked up.
It's almost as weird as the "wipe standing-up or sitting-down" argument.
post #59 of 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Alexor View Post
It's almost as weird as the "wipe standing-up or sitting-down" argument.
And we never did get a definitive answer to that particular conundrum.

It would only be comparable to the sitting/standing debate, if that had spawned from a "Jack Nicholson wearing adult diapers!" discussion or something.

This is weirder.
post #60 of 216
And the circumcision question somehow soils the spectacle that seeing the penis of Dolph Lundgren would offer.

I mean come on, have some respect here for the man here!
post #61 of 216
well, there are only so many things that can be said about Dolph Lundgren's hastily photographed meat 'n' two veg. It was inevitable that this thread, much like foreskin did with penisies, would evolve. Or devolve. Depending on your view. Of foreskin. Or this thread.



eta: it has taken me four years to reach a hundred posts, and my hundredth was about Dolph Lundgren's cock. somehow that makes me sad about my life.
post #62 of 216
Why did it circumcision catch on in the States? It's something else to add to the hospital bill.

http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/video.html

Yeah, nothing wrong with that is there?
post #63 of 216
I was circumcised when I was a boy old enough to be aware of what was being done. Though I didn't know why...

Now... look into my circumcised eyes. Am I traumatized!?
post #64 of 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Jim Slade View Post
That's like thinking only fake tits look good.
I know people who think exactly that... too much porn and not enough actual fucking is all I have to say about it.
post #65 of 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcnooj82 View Post
Am I traumatized!
Not nearly enough.
post #66 of 216
Exactamundo!
post #67 of 216
Wait a second. Nooj is a white guy?...sort of.
post #68 of 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdHocken View Post
Wait a second. Nooj is a white guy?...sort of.
Applying reverse engineering with the penis and head quote at the Fox thread:

Seinfeld or Elaine will said he is Latino.
post #69 of 216
Okay, one final serious question then: Are circumcised men that wear crocs the worst people on Earth?
post #70 of 216
Why did mcnooj post that pic of a Jonas Brother?
post #71 of 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by stelios View Post
Okay, one final serious question then: Are circumcised men that wear crocs the worst people on Earth?
Only if they eat at the Olive Garden.
post #72 of 216
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcnooj82 View Post
I was circumcised when I was a boy old enough to be aware of what was being done. Though I didn't know why...

Now... look into my circumcised eyes. Am I traumatized!?
God, of all the freaky shit on Nip/Tuck, that actor tops them all. What a weird looking dude.
post #73 of 216
Why did you remind me? I hated all the family crap in that show. Not even Dinklage could save it. I'd still be watching it if it was just The Troy/McNamara Adventures. And don't get me started on the son.
post #74 of 216
Thread Starter 
Didn't he try and cut his penis off? I assume that's why mcnooj added him to this discussion.
post #75 of 216
Oh yeah, now I know who that is. That scene horrified the living shit out of me.

Guy barely has an upper lip. It's like Stephen King mouth over here.
post #76 of 216
This thread is even more fucked up than yesterday. Thanks Nooj!
post #77 of 216
I'm from Europe and circumcised but that only happened because my dick was too big for its own skin.

I have been with several women who had never seen a circumcised penis before.
post #78 of 216
According to the site linked earlier in this thread, people circumcised during adulthood (i.e. who've had it both ways and know the difference) claim (anecdotally, of course) to have lost up to 90% of the sensitivity and pleasure. Enjoy your terrible sex, Americans.
post #79 of 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Jim Slade View Post
According to the site linked earlier in this thread, people circumcised during adulthood (i.e. who've had it both ways and know the difference) claim (anecdotally, of course) to have lost up to 90% of the sensitivity and pleasure. Enjoy your terrible sex, Americans.
Good thing my schwanzstucker was circumcised when I was a baby then, otherwise at 42, I'd imagine screaming like Roger Bart in Hostel II (Life Lesson from Eli Roth: girls don't like it when you call them the "C" word).

Still, who the hell would want to get circumcised when you're an adult? Why, on God's green earth, would anyone put themselves through that? Hygiene reasons? Learn to use soap and water!
post #80 of 216
Well, it spared generations of American Grandmothers "Don't forget to wash between your dickskin!" after a kiss goodbye.
post #81 of 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitches Leave View Post
I'm from Europe and circumcised but that only happened because my dick was too big for its own skin.
He's not joking folks, that's a real problem. And it needs to be taken care of.
post #82 of 216
Yeah it can cause a LOT of trouble if not discovered in time.
post #83 of 216
Wtf.
post #84 of 216
Yeah a friend of mine had that problem. He was in the hospital to remove his appendix and they circumsized him while they all ready had him under. It wasn a full on cock-clipping like you yanks favor, just a bit of the tip.
post #85 of 216
Never heard of the dick being too big for its skin, but I know a guy who was medically discharged from Army Basic Training because his balls were too big. Seriously. The dude couldn't run. I don't know how he got into the army in the first place, but somehow he made it in.
post #86 of 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by stelios View Post
Serious question: Are there any actual reasons circumcision is so popular in the US? I know it's not religious, so what started this senseless bloodshed?


...Like you HAD to ask.
post #87 of 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdHocken View Post
And don't try and say it's anything like female circumcision. Cut that shit out right now.
I'll need the logic explained to me on this one.
post #88 of 216
I was on the fence about circumsizing my kids, but then i heard the horror stories from my mom (who is a seniors social worker) about infection and the like that can occur.

hygiene, its a better reason then religion.
post #89 of 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alanthar View Post
I was on the fence about circumsizing my kids, but then i heard the horror stories from my mom (who is a seniors social worker) about infection and the like that can occur.

hygiene, its a better reason then religion.
Or you could teach your kids to clean their penises.
post #90 of 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Alexor View Post
Or you could teach your kids to clean their penises.
Meh, snipping off part of it before they have a chance to really get their bearings sounds less awkward.
post #91 of 216
Btw, do you really need all those fingers?
Snipping off a few speeds up nail mantenance drastically.

I wouldn't be surprised if this baffling tradition of male circumsicion is based on a fear of masturbation.
post #92 of 216
Even though i don't want children, I have already chosen to NOT have them circumcised. I personally find it unfair altering child's body with out their knowledge and consent. Yes perhaps there is a slight hygiene benefit to having it cut but i think with proper education about proper cleaning there should be little problem.

I'm cut, but oddly enough as to my knowledge (mostly just memory) my father is not. I haven't really got the nerve to ask him why.
post #93 of 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alanthar View Post
I was on the fence about circumsizing my kids, but then i heard the horror stories from my mom (who is a seniors social worker) about infection and the like that can occur.

hygiene, its a better reason then religion.
Kids get dirty hands and feet too, how far are you prepared to take that logic?

I'm sorry, if foreskins really were superflous we wouldn't have them.

You're cutting a part of your sons dick off - a part of his dick.

Just because it's been done before doesn't make that in any way a good thing to do.
post #94 of 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rain Dog View Post

I'm sorry, if foreskins really were superflous we wouldn't have them.
They are superfluous today. Granted They weren't 10.000 years ago when you ran around with nothing but a nasty and dirty bear skin between your dick and the surroundings.

Just like we still have hair and little toes even though they are superfluous today too. But in a couple of thousand years we will be born hairless with 8 toes and be an average of 5 inches taller, so maybe the foreskin will go too. The fact is a lot of kids get trouble with their foreskin and has to be circumcised just like I was, and as the doctors say, it really is a useless leftover skin that we are better off without.

Some say bad things will happen to your sensitivity if you have itremoved as a grown up. I don't know about that but it might be true. It certainly has no effect if you have it done as a child though. But that is the same with your useless little toe. If you are born without it you'll have no trouble at all (and your body will have one less part to heat up) but if you remove it in adulthood your brain will be confused for a while and you might have trouble keeping your balance.
post #95 of 216
I think the sensitivity concept is all thats required for its integrity personally.

More to the point tho, you're born with the thing - the point should be that a case should have to be made to lop it off, not to keep it.
post #96 of 216
I'll respect everyone's opinion on this, but in regards to why do we get rid of it if we're born with it idea. We remove wisdom teeth all the time. There was a purpose for them that doesn't exist now.
post #97 of 216
I thought we only got rid of wisdom teeth because with a large majority of people they wont grow in properly and result in extreme problems.
post #98 of 216
Appendix? I dunno, is there a use for that?
post #99 of 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdHocken View Post
We remove wisdom teeth all the time. There was a purpose for them that doesn't exist now.
See also: appendix, tonsils.

Although RD's general point stands; the burden of persuasion is on the side that's for removing body parts.
post #100 of 216
The foreskin has a function, it's there to stop the penis-head from keratinizing. Oh, and it makes it possible to jack off without applying lotion.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Gossip
CHUD.com Community › Forums › CULTURE, HUMOR, & FREE FORM › Gossip › If you ever wanted to see Dolph Lundgren's...