Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan S~ 
They took them from being unknowable killing machines to being big bugs. Suddenly, they have an explanation for the horrors they are reigning down. They're protecting the Queen and their species. It's interesting in one film (particularly as there's a mother/daughter issue throughout Aliens) but now the next two get handcuffed to "canon" in regards to the Xenomorphs and the Xenos just become boring bugs in the next two films without a nest to protect.
The tension never worked for me in Aliens. Which is weird because it's the one thing I give credit to Cameron for, he's usually capable of ratcheting up the tension (the first Terminator is great for that). Maybe part of it is that it's essentially a haunted house story in space and I have a tough time buying into haunted house stories. Maybe part of it is that I was just bored of the characters by the time the middle of the movie came. I didn't care if they lived or died (well, not quite true, the Paul Reiser character needed to die but that's because he was played by Paul Reiser)
|
In a horror film (
Alien, even if it is in sci-fi clothing), keeping the antagonist/s mysterious works. In an action film (
Aliens, even if it is in sci-fi clothing), unraveling the antagonist/s works. The last part of that first paragraph, also, isn't strictly relevant as
Alien 3 and
Resurrection have no bearing on the quality of
Aliens. Again, the tension didn't work for you - fair enough. I'm not trying to take you to task; the movie isn't film's apex. Your response just sounds unsure of itself, so it's less than persuasive to me.
By the way, Phil, some of the posts in that thread are... bold (James May, for example, dismissing the movie as a "mindless romp.") At least with Spike's opening post - see how I keep it relevant? - there's something to chew on.