speaking of which the lack of Emma certainly did not help the last episode.
post #101 of 508
10/16/09 at 7:29pm
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
| Hey kids and parents of kids and super-old, like ancestor-old-but-not-dead-yet-type people, just poking my oversized head in to say that the rumors are true... unless something very odd happens in the next few months, I will have the privilege of shooting an episode of GLEE. Why GLEE? Because I love cops, serial killers and gritty urban drama (I haven't seen the show yet). Why me? Because they're struggling and can't afford real directors. And to head off a few queries: No, this doesn't mean Dollhouse definitely won't get a back nine. Our numbers mean that! But I kid. Okay, we're not exactly saving all the good stuff for 14-22, but nobody's closed the door. If D'House suddenly busts wide, huzzah, we'll still bring it, and I'll still go and direct an episode of Glee, because of my love of cops. These realities can co-exist. And possibly cross over, at least in fiction that I have wri - read. About. What can we expect from a 'Joss Whedon' episode of Glee? An episode of Glee. God willin' and the crik don't rise, a good one. A television director's job is, on some level, to be anonymous; to find the most compelling way to present a story without calling attention to himself. I had a wonderful time doing just that on The Office, and hope to again. A guest director can bring a huge amount to the party (we've had CRAZY talent on Dollhouse), but the party isn't his. I just want to work with good people on a show that I like enough to have watched every episode several times. (I lied: I HAVE watched the show. And seriously, when do the cops show up?) Whom will I kill? When will that go away? Is death really the only thing I'm known for? I'd hope not. You know how many people in the world actually die? ALL OF THEM. You know how many I've killed? Statistically, somewhat fewer. Can't we focus on another element of my work? Having said that, probably Principal Figgins. (No! I kid! God.) Anyway, I hope that clears things up. I'm going to do my best, and more importantly, I'm going to do my best not to gush like a fanboy for eight straight days on set. Don't worry. I practiced with Bamber. I'm a pro. Happy Monday. Especially for me. -j. http://whedonesque.com/comments/22073#345272 |
|
Maybe my ears malfunctioned for a sec but I swear I heard Will say "Nigga" at the beginning of Thong Song. Please tell me I heard that. Please?
|
|
I've getting more used to the mercurial nature of this show. It's still a bit frustrating, but there are way too many hilarious/entertaining moments to make me dislike it.
|
| Loved Emma singing and dancing in her dress, but that's simply a sign of my love for that ginger pygmy with eyes like a bush baby, to quote Sue Sylvester. Who, by the way, can rock a zoot suit like nobody's business. |
|
It's a musical. They sing their feelings and then resume with whatever they happened to be doing. They aren't performing for anyone, except for when they are actually in a singing competition (they are currently preparing for sectionals).
|
|
I'm a week behind, but for the first time in a number of episodes, the kids broke out into spontaneous song (it was during the point when the club had been racially divided and the kids covertly got together), and there was no autotuning, no noticeable instrumentation other than what was visible in the room. It sounded great, like a bunch of kids enjoying themselves!
|
|
I'm a week behind, but for the first time in a number of episodes, the kids broke out into spontaneous song (it was during the point when the club had been racially divided and the kids covertly got together), and there was no autotuning, no noticeable instrumentation other than what was visible in the room. It sounded great, like a bunch of kids enjoying themselves!
|
|
ETA: While I think it's a somewhat valid complaint, it's probably time for people to get over the over-produced-ness of the songs (see also http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b150...usic_aint.html). They're 8 eps in and at this point I highly doubt there's going to be a drastic shift in how the musical numbers are presented.
I was in the backing band for the "show choir" (aka glee club) in high school so yes I know that if Glee was reality their team would win sectionals/states/nationals with ease, |
|
No, they wouldn't. They'd get tossed out for using pre-recorded vocal tracks with gobs of autotune on them, because no one really sounds like that.
|
|
... that was my point.
Also, the only singer who's noticably autotuned is Finn. Which is a problem since he's a lead, but the rest are mostly just drenched in reverb and shit. |
|
Obvious autotune aside, the voices virtually never seem like they're coming from the appropriate singer due to all of the sweetening. This is a problem I'd expect in TV or movie musicals with non-singers cast as leads; why is it happening with a cast partially composed of professional singers? |
|
Seriously? I hear pitch-correction on just about every song, and most of them also have intentionally noticeable autotune flourishes (see the Rachel-sung beginning to "No Air" mentioned in the article you linked to, which also had a thoroughly unnecessary and distracting delay effect).
|
|
My guess is that if some had autotuned voices and some didn't, it would be noticeable to the point of distraction (especially within a single song). i'm not a fan of it, either (especially given the fact that Lea Michele can tear it up without the crutch), but it think it comes down to balance.
|

