CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPORTS, GAMES & LEISURE › Television › Lost: The Rewatch Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Lost: The Rewatch Thread - Page 3

post #101 of 1932
I don't really know. It just seemed like Darlton had hyped the explanation up to no end on the podcast, so I was expecting something more.
post #102 of 1932
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dross View Post
I don't really know. It just seemed like Darlton had hyped the explanation up to no end on the podcast, so I was expecting something more.
I get the feeling that, had I been listening to the podcasts, my experience with the show would have been somewhat different.

I'm glad I didn't opt into those. I seem to remember Diva making a similar comment about how the podcast had set up expectations that weren't fulfilled.

And on a related note: I'm not including any of the ancillary ARG materials in this rewatch. Nothing on Joop the Orangutang, nothing on the Valenzetti equation, and nothing on Mittlewerk, et al. It's outside the show-proper, so I'm choosing to ignore it. If others are interested in including that info, or podcast-related comments, I'd welcome the input. But speaking strictly personally, I'd like the show to account for itself, so to speak.
post #103 of 1932
I've never listened to any of the podcasts, merely read various interviews posted on CHUD or EW. I can only imagine how frustrated I'd be if I had.
post #104 of 1932
I listen to the podcasts pretty regularly and I never got the impression that the creators were over hyping any aspect of the show. In fact, I remember the podcast for the tattoo episode, and all they said is that we'd finally learn the story about Jack's tattoos. They didn't act as if it was some kind of ultimate mystery or anything. They just teased that the answer about the tattoos would be in that episode.
post #105 of 1932
It figures... I decided to get out my season 1 DVD set to try and play along and do the re-watch (in some capacity at least) too, but of course we had let one of my wife's co-workers borrow it. Of course that was months ago at this point! Dangit. ETA: Oh well, this give me an excuse, however weak it may be, to order those season 1 and 2 Blu Rays.

I'll still try to chime in if I feel I have something to add. While not entirely relevant I'll say that I had missed the boat on season 1 of the show when it originally aired. I've been trying to follow a few shows as they air in recent years, but before Lost and some of the others I watch now the last show I watche regularly was The X-Files and even that had tapered off in the later years to a degree. I think I caught the season finale in some capacity and wandered into the season 1 thread where I likely started to kick myself for not being a part of it from day 1. The season 1 DVD was devoured upon it's release by my wife and I and then I passed them on to my mom who finished just in time for the start of season 2. Since then we'd all be lost without Lost...
post #106 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Custer View Post

Am I missing something? View that moment for yourselves and weigh in, please. As it’s presented, it looks as though Charlie and Jack are wordlessly exchanging knowing glances, which makes no sense considering that neither of them know anything about the situation. For a brief moment (a very brief moment) I found myself wondering if this exchange is in fact significant in the mythology of the show – some moment that connects the Charlie and Jack who’ve just crashed on the Island with the Charlie and Jack they’d later become.

Watch it. Tell me I’m insane.

You're not insane. At this point in the series, only Jack, Kate, Charlie, Sayid, Sawyer, Boone and Shannon know about the French transmission, and thus, are the only ones who know that there were other people on the Island before them. Locke knows nothing about it, Charlie almost let it slip, and Jack gave him a "shut up you asshole" look.

This must have been very frustrating for the writers, trying to keep track of who knows what. I remember Hurley had a line in BORN TO RUN where, after he let slip that Kate was a fugitive, he says "Well I can't keep straight who knows what around here! Scott didn't even know about the polar bear!"

Oh yeah, and you neglected the most important part of WHITE RABBIT: The introduction of the greatest characters ever created ever, Scott and Steve. You think I'm joking, but there was some pretty insane need from same fans to see more of what essentially was a one scene joke.
post #107 of 1932
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Syd View Post
You're not insane.
Thank god.

And that makes even more sense. Thank you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Syd View Post
Oh yeah, and you neglected the most important part of WHITE RABBIT: The introduction of the greatest characters ever created ever, Scott and Steve. You think I'm joking, but there was some pretty insane need from same fans to see more of what essentially was a one scene joke.
Scott and who?

'splain, please?
post #108 of 1932
Ah yes. Thanks Syd. I was gonna keep an eye out for that scene whenever I got the chance to do so and you managed to put it right back into the context that I remember it originally coming across as, with it being in regards to the transmission. This yet again proves how much of a joy it is going to be to watch them all again... for the first time.
post #109 of 1932
Haha, Scott and Steve ... for some reason I never got sick of that joke. Made especially funny by the fact that I have friends named Scott and Steve who are brothers and people are always accidentally calling the other Scott or Steve.
post #110 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parker View Post
I listen to the podcasts pretty regularly and I never got the impression that the creators were over hyping any aspect of the show. In fact, I remember the podcast for the tattoo episode, and all they said is that we'd finally learn the story about Jack's tattoos. They didn't act as if it was some kind of ultimate mystery or anything. They just teased that the answer about the tattoos would be in that episode.
But that's just it. There was no answer. He just got some tattoos from an asian chick with abnormally long nipples.
post #111 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Custer View Post
Scott and who?

'splain, please?
I never really looked at Lostpedia much, but here is Scott and Steve info from there:

Scott & Steve

I'll probably use it more as I re-watch the show. Plenty there to see, that's for sure.
post #112 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Straceski
It figures... I decided to get out my season 1 DVD set to try and play along and do the re-watch (in some capacity at least) too, but of course we had let one of my wife's co-workers borrow it. Of course that was months ago at this point! Dangit. ETA: Oh well, this give me an excuse, however weak it may be, to order those season 1 and 2 Blu Rays.
I hate to keep harping on this but you can watch all of the episodes online on ABC.com for free. So if you don't really want to spend the $40 on the season again you can just watch the episodes online.
post #113 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Custer View Post


Scott and who?

'splain, please?
In WHITE RABBIT, when Claire has fainted, Michael turns to a random red shirt extra and says "Okay, Scott, help me move her." The extra then says "I'm Steve." Another extra in the background says "I'M Scott." Michael then says "Whatever."

It's a little wink wink nudge nudge to the fans to show that yes, we are aware that none of the background players have any lines and are interchangable. The bizarre part is, after they appeared, certain fans were demanding to know more about them, even writing, yes, fan fiction about them. I remember for the preview for HOMECOMING, they hyped it by saying "SOMEONE...WILL...DIE"

...It was Steve. Or was it Scott? I don't really remember. Anyway, think of them as a Nikki and Paulo prototype.
post #114 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dross View Post
But that's just it. There was no answer. He just got some tattoos from an asian chick with abnormally long nipples.
There is an answer. You find out what the tattoos mean. What more could you possibly expect from that? The smoke monster gave him the tattoo? I mean, come on!
post #115 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by dontEATnachos View Post
I hate to keep harping on this but you can watch all of the episodes online on ABC.com for free. So if you don't really want to spend the $40 on the season again you can just watch the episodes online.
Yeah, I know. But I like stuff. In the end I can just wait until I eventually get the dvds back, but the desire for the Blu Ray will still be there mostly with the reason of 'just because'. I know I can watch them all online too, but I don't really like doing that. In my own strange little comfort zone I like to have more control over what I do and when and watching it on a smaller computer screen as it may burp and stutter from time to time just doesn't float my boat, as free as it may be. But then again, perhaps I'll dabble in it, if for no reason than to just check out the pilot again.
post #116 of 1932
Well, I just mean since you already own them and you know (hope) you're getting them back at some point, watching an episode on ABC.com seems like a reasonable option.

I watched the whole first 4 seasons that way and it generally worked great and saved me the cost of renting or buying those seasons just to get caught up.
post #117 of 1932
Thread Starter 

The Moth

The Moth (ep. 7)

What a moving episode.

Charlie's flashbacks tend to really hit home for me. I've never been in a rock band, or developed a heroin habit with an older brother, and yet I find Charlie's past sometimes difficult to watch. I'll say up-front that I'm already dreading the episode where Charlie becomes a copier salesman and steals his girl's stuff. That episode makes me feel dirty somehow, and I think most of the credit for that, and for the genuine power of The Moth, should go to Dominic Monaghan.

Random thoughts:

Charlie’s confession? Hilarious.

Great, subtext-laden, Confessional Priest Line #1: “We all have our temptations, but giving into them – that’s our choice. Life is a series of choices, isn’t it?”

That line ties oh-so-neatly into the various conceptions of free will and determinism that the show has so aggressively toyed with in a literal fashion this year. These concerns have been present from the word go.

The two looming themes of this episode, metaphorically-speaking, are choice and communication.

Oh, how I loathe Charlie’s brother in this episode. He’s named Liam, which solidifies the Oasis homage (something the show will comment upon directly when it has Charlie play Wonderwall in a Desmond flashback), and he’s an ass.

Granted, as nicely and subtly illustrated by the episode, Charlie’s choices were/are his own, and he cannot and should not blame his brother for his addiction, or for the obviously-gaping hole of insecurity he carries around inside of him. But all of this does not change the fact that I’d knock Liam’s smug teeth out and send those preppy, former-user-now-professor glasses of his flying.

We as an audience know that Charlie should have taken his brother’s offer – that, despite past wounds there are always opportunities for forgiveness – but we understand (horribly) why he doesn’t. Because Charlie’s right: Liam’s never looked out for him.

I’m pretty sure that The Moth is the first episode to bring up the fact that really, none of the 815ers should have survived. Sayid and Kate have this conversation as they go to triangulate a radio signal.

Hey! Neither Boone nor Shanon screws anything up this episode!

This is how you know you’re watching a well-constructed drama: you know that their attempts to contact the outside world will fail, and you know that the cave-in which buries good ol’ Jack this episode won’t kill him. And yet, the episode remains compelling. Good job, Lost.

I remember really, really hating where Michael’s character ended up, but I’m liking him right now. There’s a wonderful moment in this episode where Michael takes charge of the dig to rescue Jack, and the look of dawning pride on Walt’s face is heart-warming.

Sawyer’s arc is playing MUCH differently this time around. His interactions with Kate here are just plain sad. Holloway’s a better actor than people have given him credit for.

The moth metaphor that names the episode, and which Locke offers to Charlie as justification for the detox method Locke is using, is really lovely. And now that we’ve met Jacob, and heard him and the MiB discussing that unidentified ship (Black Rock!) on the horizon, it also encapsulates what seems to be Jacob’s philosophy:

“Struggle is nature’s way of strengthening it.”

Monaghan sells the hell out of the ending of the episode, asking Locke for the drugs a third time (and the genuine look of disgust/disappointment on Locke’s face is utterly perfect), but then burning them in the fire and making the choice to be free. I don’t believe Locke when he says that he always knew Charlie could do it, but I do believe in the awed look on Monaghan’s face just before the title card slams home at the episode’s end. There’s transcendence in that look – a kind of hard-earned elevation - and it makes the knowledge of what’s to come particularly bittersweet.
post #118 of 1932
Really enjoying your posts, Mr. Custer. Keep up the good work.
post #119 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Custer View Post
Sawyer’s arc is playing MUCH differently this time around. His interactions with Kate here are just plain sad. Holloway’s a better actor than people have given him credit for.
Absolutely. In my first go-around, I remember thinking of Sawyer as a stock redneck badass. Now, there's this sadness that informs so much of his behavior. I really felt it was noticeable in the second half of the pilot: We see him sitting among the wreckage and reading the note his younger self had written. He then decides to join the hiking expedition. When we know what's to come, that sadness and (to a lesser extent) desperation adds layers to his decision to join the hike.

Other than that, I'm enjoying your thoughts, Custer. It may be a good thing that you're out-pacing me on this rewatch because I'm not sure I have half the insight to offer that you do. Just cut me some slack if I suddenly chime in on an episode that you watched a few days ago!!!
post #120 of 1932
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacob Singer View Post
Really enjoying your posts, Mr. Custer. Keep up the good work.
Thanks, Jacob. Much appreciated.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattioli View Post
Absolutely. In my first go-around, I remember thinking of Sawyer as a stock redneck badass. Now, there's this sadness that informs so much of his behavior. I really felt it was noticeable in the second half of the pilot: We see him sitting among the wreckage and reading the note his younger self had written. He then decides to join the hiking expedition. When we know what's to come, that sadness and (to a lesser extent) desperation adds layers to his decision to join the hike.
Great point. And that's a great moment to call out generally, because it ties together so much of what we now know about Sawyer all by itself.

The first time through, Sawyer's withholding of information from Kate about Jack's cave-in shenanigans (The Moth) was just dickish and petty. Now it's still dickish and petty, but so very understandable at the same time. Let me know if you agree.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattioli View Post
Other than that, I'm enjoying your thoughts, Custer. It may be a good thing that you're out-pacing me on this rewatch because I'm not sure I have half the insight to offer that you do. Just cut me some slack if I suddenly chime in on an episode that you watched a few days ago!!!
I'm not sure what insights I have, but I appreciate that you think I do! As for the slack, it's cut. Chime in whenever you like on whatever you'd like. I know for a fact that I'm not wringing all the goodness out of these eps as I hit them. Plenty more to discuss when you get there.
post #121 of 1932
Agreed, fine job, Mr. Custer.

These characters and their backstories are so ingrained for me, that I often forget the episodes where we learned the information. The story has changed so much over the subsequent seasons that I often forget the character-based foundation that the show built in that first season. For example, I was sick and tired of Charlie by the time he died, but the moment he kicked the bucket, I was really affected, primarily because of the original fond feelings I had for the guy based on this episode.
post #122 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dross View Post
But that's just it. There was no answer. He just got some tattoos from an asian chick with abnormally long nipples.
Now I have to go home and fire up the old unfiltered google image search.


BTW, reading that out of context and with a weirdo mind, I get an image of abnormally long nipples somehow being used to draw tattoos. This would have made Jack's tattoos more awesome.

Final Thought:
You all everybody.
post #123 of 1932
Great idea for a thread, Custer. Your analysis (and those of other Chewers) are appreciated & admired.

I've rewatched S1 & S2 relatively recently, so I'll try to chime in w/my thoughts when possible, but even so, it's a great trip down memory lane for one of my all-time favorite shows. Also, it gives me my fix while waiting until January/February.

I agree that S1 was a lot better than I remembered it (although it does start to drag a bit in the 2nd half). It's a good reminder of why I'm still watching--because I grew to love all these characters so much (even Kate, a little). It was such a great balance of character & action, with a little mystery thrown in as seasoning.
post #124 of 1932
Great reads Jesse. I'm actually not particularly interested in rewatching the series, but you've done a fantastic job reminding me why I got into the show in the first place.

I watched the first season of the show in the span of 2 or 3 days. It was perfection for me. Great balance of mystery and fantastic character moments. I was honestly excited and moved by the show. Makes me sad that I know I'm watching it mostly as an obligation now.

I came to dread the wah-wah-whining of Charlie's episodes about his brother, but The Moth was fantastic.
post #125 of 1932
"Hell, give me a bottle of peroxide, some band aids: I could run this island too."-Sawyer

And how right he was! Granted he was given a position in the Dharma Initiative instead of those things, but still.

Was it not completely obvious to everyone that Locke was the one who knocked out Sayid? I remember thinking it was so obvious that it couldn't possible be him.

THE MOTH is a great episode, especially for viewers who aren't interested in big "mythology" episodes. Possibly the best example of a very entertaining character driven one. CONFIDENCE MAN is my favorite though, just because Sawyer's always been and always will be my favorite.

Between Jack and Charlie, I expected Locke to play the part of Island guru for each and every character.
post #126 of 1932
Thread Starter 
Confidence Man (ep. 8)

It's Sawyer's turn to get a flashback, and it's a doozy. Sawyer's rationale for becoming the man he was chasing didn't quite make rational sense to me the first time around. It felt too twisty to be emotionally true. But I buy it now, after seeing this episode and remembering (some of) what's to come.

This episode continues the Sawyer-sadness-parade. Watching a man attempt suicide by proxy, with full (if vaguely remembered) awareness of how he got to this point, is not fun. But it is sort of powerful.

Random thoughts:

-This episode gives us the first instance of SawyerPorn, as he emerges from the water naked in front of Kate. You're no Ursula Andress, pal. Still, the women dig you, so I can't begrudge them their beefcake.

-Great Sawyer Line #1: "Hell of a book! It's about bunnies."'

-Watership Down, as I'm sure everyone already knows, contains a character named Fiver, who has the ability to see the future in terrifying visions. If you are feeling charitable (and I am) you could suggest that this was a sneaky way for the show to plant the idea of Desmond's future flashes from the beginning. You could also point out the fact that Sawyer is reading it, and that he, Juliet, Miles and Daniel end up much like the rabbits of the book, infiltrating a potentially hostile warren (the Dharma Initiative).

-Great Boone Line #1: "Shannon has asthma...she's been embarrassed about it since she was a kid. Guess breathing's not cool."

-Jackface! makes its first appearance in this episode as Jack confronts Sawyer over the missing medication.

Everyone thinks that Sawyer has the medicine, and thanks to Locke, who uses what appear to be jedi-mind-tricks, Sayid becomes convinced that Sawyer is also the mystery-person who knocked Sayid out last episode during an attempt at radio communication.

This brings up an interesting point about Locke, and his view of the Island. He's willing to sacrifice an innocent man (at least, innocent of this particular act) to cover up his own crime and ensure they are not rescued. He arms Sayid with a knife. Locke's something of a mystic, and he seems compelled to help people to some sort of peace with themselves (See: Charlie and Jack), but he's also curiously ruthless. I'm wondering if the duality that Jacob and MiB appear to express is similarly expressed in Locke. We have the concern for others and the pattern of assisting them not through direct action, but through subtler assistance, and we have the cold manipulation of others to further his own ends. Then again, it's essentially the case that every character on this show has that same sense of duality as well. Still, it's Locke we see with one white eye and one black further along in the season in that creepy dream sequence.

-Sawyer spends this episode looking for a hurting, and he gets his wish. Jack beats on him in front of the others, again for the medicine, but instead of telling Jack that he doesn't have it (twist!), he asks for more with his sarcasm. We'll find out at some point later on that "Sawyer" was in Australia to find the real Sawyer, tipped off by the T-000 (known in human form as 'Robert Patrick'). But the T-1000 has set 'Sawyer' up, and instead of killing the man that ruined his family, he shoots someone random that owes money to Patrick's character (never trust a machine). His death wish here makes even more sense when we remember that he's carrying all that fresh guilt.

-Peter DeLuise, of 21 Jump Street fame (I'm so old), guests as the husband of the woman Sawyer is sleeping with and conning. I'd like to imagine that Lost takes place in the same universe as that show, and that DeLuise's former teen-detective is almost screwed over by Sawyer.

-Great Claire Line #1: "I'm the only Australian who loves peanut butter."

-In movies and on television, you always see people getting beaned over the head with hard objects and being knocked cleanly out. This always bothers me. It's an arguably necessary/hyper-useful contrivance though.

-Sayid is an eager torturer. We'll see in the next episode that he's struggled with this for much of his life, and Ben's comment about Sayid in Season 5, and Sayid's eventual agreement with him, seem prescient in reverse, if that makes any sense. The Iraqi really is at ease with pain and bloodshed. That he is is arguably tragic, but it doesn't make it less true.

-Lost distinguishes itself from much of the television herd by SHOVING A KNIFE THROUGH SAWYER'S ARM. And showing it. Hardcore, Lost.

-As all of this hyper-macho chest beating is going on, we catch glimpses of other castaways, including Sun and Jin. The audience, and Michael, now know that Sun can speak (surprisingly good) English. Jin and the other castaways do not. It says so much about the state of Jin and Sun's marriage that Sun hides her skill and essentially consigns him to Chewbacca status.

-The Jack-Kate-Sawyer triangle starts here! I'm sure you're all as thrilled as I am. Allow me to postulate my Obvious Rule of Attraction (for fictional women): The more tragically distant, emotionally scarred, and dark-but-potentially-redeemable you are, the more attractive you are to a woman. Add extra points if you are also (a) a criminal or (b) undead.

-The whole 'empty jar standing in for actual peanut butter' thing is enormously cheesy. And it's kind of CharliePorn. Which no one wants to see.

Sayid breaks off from the group because he's ashamed of his actions - time to become Rousseau-bait.

-And we have yet another music video ending. Oh soaring piano and scratchy white-blues vocals, oh invisible peanut butter and Korean alternative medicine, how you unite us in our strife.
post #127 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Custer View Post
-Watership Down, as I'm sure everyone already knows, contains a character named Fiver, who has the ability to see the future in terrifying visions. If you are feeling charitable (and I am) you could suggest that this was a sneaky way for the show to plant the idea of Desmond's future flashes from the beginning. You could also point out the fact that Sawyer is reading it, and that he, Juliet, Miles and Daniel end up much like the rabbits of the book, infiltrating a potentially hostile warren (the Dharma Initiative).
Too funny! Way back in the day, I posted my thoughts on the "Watership Down"-"Lost" connection in one of the season threads. The focus was specifically on The Others and Dharmaville as General Woundwort's Efrafa warren. No one seemed interested in it, however. Oh, well. At any rate, great minds, Custer, great minds.

It just occurred to me that Rousseau could be seen as mirroring Kehaar, as well.
post #128 of 1932
Those music montages... how I don't miss those.

Great write up, Jesse. Totally digging your thoughts.
post #129 of 1932
Great recap, Jesse. I'm eagerly waiting how the discussion will turn around the love triangle, newcomer Juliet and Henry Gale.
post #130 of 1932
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattioli View Post
Too funny! Way back in the day, I posted my thoughts on the "Watership Down"-"Lost" connection in one of the season threads. The focus was specifically on The Others and Dharmaville as General Woundwort's Efrafa warren. No one seemed interested in it, however. Oh, well. At any rate, great minds, Custer, great minds.

It just occurred to me that Rousseau could be seen as mirroring Kehaar, as well.
Woundwort and Ben share a lot of similarities. It seems as though, like the religious underpinnings we've seen in the show, that the books that are name-checked provide a level of subtext. Which is fun. If you're inclined you can find ways to relate the basic story of the book to both the Others and to Dharma.

It's interesting to note also that the Black Rabbit of Inle shares some similarities (in this subtextual sense) with the Smoke Monster. In WD, the black rabbit is the servant of Lord Frith, who we can compare to Jacob.

If only Rousseau spoke with the voice of Zero Mostel.
post #131 of 1932
Thread Starter 

Solitary

Solitary (ep. 9)

-Apropos of nothing in particular, I’d like to make mention of the fact that I’m watching these episodes on a wonderfully large television screen. The first time through, my wife and I huddled (relatively speaking) around the television I’d saved from college for our Lost fix. This is much better. I heartily recommend the experience if it’s available to you. It’s choice, as Ferris would say.

-Flashback-wise, it’s Sayid’s turn to ride the snake. Unlike many of the other castaways, Sayid hasn’t so much evolved away from, or built upon, his past and pain, so much as he has devolved, or deconstructed, himself from a man attempting to chase peace into a man who embraces blood. As someone who loves Naveen Andrews’ work on this show I find it terribly sad but also terribly impressive.

-Sayid’s wandering along the shoreline on his repentance hike, and this gives the show a sterling opportunity to inject another piece of mythology into the narrative. Namely, ‘the cable.’ In retrospect, we now know that this cable snakes down under the water and to the Looking Glass station, where Charlie will make his final sacrifice. For now though, it’s just a creepily-incongruous cable. Some hilarity ensues when Sayid makes a big show of lifting the cable out of the sand to examine it - only the camera angle lets us clearly see that the cable is quite visible where the sand meets the water.

-As Sayid preps to follow the cable into the jungle, we see Sawyer licking his wounds both literal and figurative, and now I’m just ticked off at him. Get your self-pitying s*** together, Sawyer/Ford/LeFleur! Fortunately, Kate speaks for the audience when she wisely advises our favorite con man to make an effort with the larger group.

-Kate and Jack talk torture, which gives me the opportunity to note that, as trenchant and relevant as much of this back-and-forth is to our current ‘War on Terror’ (and I, like may others, firmly believe that the Iraq war provides much of the subtext in this show), it’s still subtle enough that in twenty years the dialogue will still be relevant, and not particular to this time and place in history (though hopefully relevant only in an academic sense).

-This applies to the flashback sections featuring Sayid as well. Although we're clearly watching him participate in specific conflict, those scenes of him performing his 'work,' and between he and Nadia, are going to play far down the line.

-Sayid discovers jungle traps, and although he thinks he’s cleverly avoiding them, he sets one off with his steps – a nifty nod to the ease with which the Others will later be portrayed moving through the jungle, and the way in which Richard breaches the fence. Rousseau is wise to their tricks.

-There’s a lot of small directorial moments in this show that help make the experience more ‘cinematic,’ and less traditionally televisual. Two brief examples from the scene where Rousseau cuts Sayid down: the shot of the knife cutting the rope, and the shot of Rousseau approaching Sayid.

-The great Scott Paulin (Teen Wolf, as ‘Lolley,’ Captain America, as ‘The Red Skull,’ and Pump Up The Volume, as ‘Brian Hunter, aka, Christian Slater’s dad!) pops up as a dude with a bothersome rash. I like to imagine that when he’s not onscreen, Paulin is using the pirate radio methods pioneered by Happy Harry Hardon to attempt off-Island communication. Maybe he’s talking to 21 Jump Street?

-Great Hurley Delivery #1:
Jack: “Things could be worse.”
Hurley: “HOW?!”

-Rousseau’s first line, in a multitude of languages: “Where is Alex?”

-Rousseau tells part of her story to Sayid in this episode during an extended ironic 'look now the torturer is being tortured' sequence, and given Diva’s comments, I wanted to see if they matched up. I went back to This Place Is Death immediately after this episode, and compared the two. I’ll slap up that comparison after this, because it’s kind of long in and of itself. But I'll mention here that we get our first glimpse of the music box Jin will find breaking down in the sand during This Place Is Death.

-Ethan Rom! Our favorite non-815er makes his debut in this episode, and he’s introduced after having gone hunting with Locke – assumedly a very odd experience since it’s the first time Ethan has seen Locke since ol’ Col. Kurtz suddenly winked out of existence beside the Nigerian plane (Season 5).

-Interesting Rousseau Comment #1 (addressed to captive Sayid): “I know what you are.” Note that she does not say who.

-This is probably obvious, but I hadn’t noticed how well Nadia embodies the qualities that Sayid seeks to cultivate in himself: pacifism, humility, peace of spirit. I like that he chases those things literally in trying to find her, that in her absence on the Island he chases them within himself, and how the desire for those qualities seems to die when Nadia dies.

-In the finale of Season 5 the MiB comments (paraphrased) that ‘it’s always the same. They come, they fight, they corrupt…’ And he’s right, at least to an extent. Much as I love these characters they do terrible things to each other.

-I love that Hurley builds a golf course. And I love how happy it makes everyone.

-Any excuse to put Shannon in a bikini is a good excuse. It nicely balances the Sawyer/CharliePorn of last episode.

-Another slice of mythology enters the show in this episodes final moments. Sayid races through the jungle having been let go by Rousseau, and is momentarily surrounded by The Whispers. There are entire websites devoted to decoding these moments, and from what I’ve seen of the attempts at translation, they hint at a whole other level to the show – one that will be fully explored next year. Those who have a ‘Matrix’-esque theory about Lost have a fine piece of potential evidence with these Whisper incidents. What do you think they are?

A more complete Rousseau analysis to come shortly.
post #132 of 1932
Thread Starter 

Rousseau's Story (A briefish comparison between Solitary and This Place Is Death)

Rousseau's Story (A briefish comparison between Solitary and This Place Is Death)

Diva made good points earlier in the thread regarding the consistency of Rousseau's story. I wanted to see how the story from Solitary held up in light of This Place Is Death, the episode which lays out some (but nowhere near all, and this is key) of Rousseau's early Island moments. Let me know what you think.

-Rousseau tells Sayid that they were a science team that crashed on the Island, breaching their ship’s hull on the rocks. This isn’t what we see in Season 5. Instead, we see them float to shore on a raft, having rescued Jin from the water. We can rationalize this by saying that their ship ran aground on rocks that are somewhere off-shore, and that they bailed in the raft. But it still feels like a retcon.

-Rousseau then tells Sayid that the crew managed to survive for two months, but that something happened on the way back from the Black Rock (the first mention of the mysterious ship, which we now believe to be the same ship seen in the season finale, and the same ship which Richard builds in a bottle a few episodes before that – I am now near-certain that this indicates Richard was a slave on that ship, or a member of its crew).

This sounds like its inconsistent with what we’re shown in season 5, but I don’t know that it is. I’ll admit upfront and without caveat that it would have been neater and easier to stick with the story as it was originally told, and not explore the moments around that story, which is what it appears they’ve done. It seems to me that what we’re seeing are moments Rousseau didn’t tell Sayid about, mixed in with moments that she did. This ‘makes sense,’ but the approach does leave parts of her story open to fair criticism.

-Rousseau’s team is attacked immediately by Smokey in Season 5. Her story in Solitary doesn’t mention this, but that’s not an error in and of itself, more of a retcon by previous omission. I suspect that in season one, the writers had not firmed up the notion that the Monster would be in some way responsible for ‘the sickness,’ or if they had thought that far ahead, that they had a more elaborate/time-wasting way in which to tell the story.

-Montand is dragged into the Temple, and in season One she doesn’t mention this. But that’s not an error either, just another omission. Whether these two omissions are ‘acceptable’ to you is completely up to you. I’d argue that they are. They aren’t contradicting anything, they’re filling things in. The key part, I’d argue, comes in Season 5 where, just after Robert and his fellow scientist descend into the Temple, Jin disappears.

Jin leaps forward at that point, and suddenly, based on poor ol’ Montand’s arm, we’re at least a month if not two from that first day. This is consistent with Rousseau’s story. If going into the Temple somehow made Robert and the others ‘sick’ (a term the writers are careful to have Danielle use again when she confronts Robert in Season 5, also calling a startled, time-jumping Jin one of ‘the carriers’ the same word she uses in Season one) it’s very possible that this sickness did not manifest itself immediately, or was subtle in manifestation, or is not in actuality a ‘sickness’ at all, but instead the ‘enlightenment’ of the others (brainwashing?). We aren’t given any evidence, in fact, to show that the Temple made Robert and Co. ‘sick’ at all. We’re assuming that.

So, it’s logically consistent to say (for now) that between when Jin disappears and reappears, Rousseau and the rest of the remaining crew discovered the Black Rock. It’s possible to suggest that whatever the ‘sickness’ is also made Robert aware of certain facets of the Island, like the Black Rock or the ‘security system.’ Finally, it’s very possible, and backed-up by Rousseau’s warning that Sayid should watch his fellow survivors closely, that this ‘sickness’ is such that the people affected continue to act just as they always have, but are capable of turning violent on a dime (just as Robert does in This Place Is Death). All of this leads me to believe that what Rousseau believes is a sickness is actually a variation on the Room 23 training we saw Karl receive in Season 3.

But that’s so convoluted, you object. Why not simply show us Jin popping up in the jungle and Rousseau et al headed back from the Black Rock? I have no idea. What I know is that Rousseau’s story, hull breach aside, still holds. It’s just not that cleanly explicated, and I suspect that it was done this way because something about this ‘sickness’/enlightenment/mind control is a major plot point for the final season (as well as the fact that for all the obvious planning that was done in the first season, there were probably concepts being set up that weren't fully thought out yet). The alternative is that the writers attempted to retcon portions of R’s story for no real reason, or that they goofed up, and for the time being I’d prefer to believe otherwise - since the circumstances allow for that belief.
post #133 of 1932
Btw, this episode is the first evidence to support that if the castaways do get a chance to re-live their initial moments on the island, the first thing they should do is kill Locke. He's a walking monkey wrench. Anyone who wants off the island has to take Locke out. Maybe let him catch you a boar first.
post #134 of 1932
The episode that really offers comparison is part one of the season one finale. Rousseau even mentions Montand losing his arm.

What really is a big "huh?" is when Rousseau says she's never seen an Other, but in "Dead is Dead" Ben clearly confronts her and takes her baby at gun point. Also, she actually captures Ben in a net in season two, but doesn't seem to remember that he's the same other who took her baby. But hey, it was dark. And it was season two. But yeah, the finale is where you really need to look if you want to look at inconsistencies.

One thing that bothered me was how, after Sayid returns, they don't bother to seek Rousseau out until Hurley's episode. If I was stuck on an Island with weird stuff happening daily, the very first thing I'd do is seek out the person who's been here the longest.

It's weird to think that, during all the shenanigans of season one, Rousseau was over there, Desmond was down in the Hatch, Ben and the others were chilling in the Barracks, Widmore was setting up a fake plane crash and MiB was in Jacob's cabin and Jacob was eating fish over by the foot statue.
post #135 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Custer View Post
So, it’s logically consistent to say (for now) that between when Jin disappears and reappears, Rousseau and the rest of the remaining crew discovered the Black Rock. It’s possible to suggest that whatever the ‘sickness’ is also made Robert aware of certain facets of the Island, like the Black Rock or the ‘security system.’ Finally, it’s very possible, and backed-up by Rousseau’s warning that Sayid should watch his fellow survivors closely, that this ‘sickness’ is such that the people affected continue to act just as they always have, but are capable of turning violent on a dime (just as Robert does in This Place Is Death). All of this leads me to believe that what Rousseau believes is a sickness is actually a variation on the Room 23 training we saw Karl receive in Season 3.
I appreciate your analysis, but this is isn't the stuff people have issues with. It mainly has to do with what she says about her associations with various aspects of the island and the Others.
post #136 of 1932
There's still a huge chunk missing from Rousseau's story - namely why her husband/lover/baby-daddy coldly tried to gun her down. Unless/until we get a better explanation for that, it's difficult to evaluate her. We don't even know how crazy she is.
post #137 of 1932
What kind of explanation do you want? All we need to know is that all of the people who went into Smokey's lair came out "changed". And that the change happened gradually, hence Danielle referring to it as a "sickness". I'm not sure what else you are expecting to find out.
post #138 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva
What kind of explanation do you want?
I don't recall seeing another case in the entire show of somone being "changed" in this manner. Before he goes into Smokey's lair, her husband is protective and caring... flash forward a month and he's trying to kill her and their unborn child. It doesn't fit with any of the other island phenomenae we've seen.

Is there even a "sickness"? It seems unlikely, since only crazy Rousseau claims it's real. It's just as likely that she or her friends got twisted around by Smokey's apparitions and turned on each other. Either way, some kind of explanation (for her case specifically or the behavior in general) is warranted. And if she's not just a little crazy, but rather kill-all-my-friends-crazy, then her stories don't have to align with reality at all.
post #139 of 1932
I don't know, I think your issues have less to do with Rousseau's story - we saw her husband try and kill her so she's not all that crazy (at least not at that time) - and more to do with the writer's having a different plan in the beginning than what we ended up with.

For a few seasons "the sickness" was a huge part of the storyline. Multiple hatches had QUARANTINE across their doors, Desmond continued to inject himself with a vaccine long after he found out that Inman was leaving the hatch and taking off his protective suit, and people were committing suicide on the Freighter. Something is definitely affecting certain people and I agree with you that on a larger level - above and beyond Rousseau - the show needs to explain this or risk looking like they fucked up big time.

As for not seeing another case, let me introduce you to Locke. He certainly came back changed and the show specifically made a point of having Ben and Richard talk about this. Of course we know know that MiB was responsible for the change, so maybe he was related to the other instances.
post #140 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva
we saw her husband try and kill her so she's not all that crazy
Or maybe he tried to kill her because she -was- that crazy! We never saw the circumstances of the other two deaths...

Quote:
Desmond continued to inject himself with a vaccine long after he found out that Inman was leaving the hatch and taking off his protective suit
Desmond was being duped though. His buddy wasn't actually worried about any "infection".

Quote:
people were committing suicide on the Freighter
That has been explained. Those people were suffering the same time disconnection as Desmond as a result of exposure to the field of "time radiation" that surrounds the island. They were also shown to lose all rational thought as they deteriorated, while Rousseau's husband seemed completely in control.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva
As for not seeing another case, let me introduce you to Locke. He certainly came back changed and the show specifically made a point of having Ben and Richard talk about this. Of course we know know that MiB was responsible for the change, so maybe he was related to the other instances.
That's certainly possible, but there are two big problems with the theory that Rousseau's husband was actually MiB:

1) Rousseau killed 3 people. Everything we've seen suggests MiB can only be one person at a time.

2) Rousseau killed her husband. It has been strongly hinted that MiB is -not- immortal. He appears to be similar to Jacob, who we saw was -very- mortal. Plus, note how adamantly (as Alex) he emphasized to Ben NOT TO KILL FAKE LOCKE. That was self-preservation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva
more to do with the writer's having a different plan in the beginning than what we ended up with.
If that were the case, I don't think they would have revisited the issue this season and stuck to a storyline that implied she was telling the truth. If they were just playing service to the plot thread, they could have had Jin walk in just as she shot her husband, or right after. Instead they showed us him trying to trick her. To me, that scene seemed to hint at a bigger picture, but we'll see in 9 months-ish.
post #141 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Farsight View Post
2) Rousseau killed her husband. It has been strongly hinted that MiB is -not- immortal. He appears to be similar to Jacob, who we saw was -very- mortal. Plus, note how adamantly (as Alex) he emphasized to Ben NOT TO KILL FAKE LOCKE. That was self-preservation.
I don't think we know that it was self-preservation. I think it is much more likely it was "loophole" preservation. Had Ben made an attempt to kill "Locke", whether it really killed him or not, it could have blown MiB's cover to some degree. Plus, having Ben's cooperation likely made it that much easier to get into the statue to see Jacob. That's not to say that MiB isn't mortal, but I don't think we can draw any conclusions as to his mortality based on his actions as Alex.

Personally, I am of the opinion that MiB CAN appear as more than one person at a time (or more to the point, Smokey can at his direction). I think there is a reason that Smokey sometimes just outrights kills a person (see Eko) and sometimes attempts to drag a person down a hole where no one can verify what happens to the body (see Rousseau's husband/crew and Locke). If Smokey/MiB intends to impersonate someone, it does away with the body so no one will have a point of reference.

Going off that assumption, I think Smokey/MiB most certainly killed all of Rousseau's crew when they went down in that hole. Everything she saw of them after that was MiB/Smokey. Now WHY he would choose to wait months before deciding to kill her remains unclear. Perhaps he thought he could use her somehow (or her child) and when she got wise to the "sickness" he decided to ditch that plan and start over the next time someone shows up on the island.

At any rate, that is the best reason I can come up with that Rousseau's husband would suddenly decide to shoot her.
post #142 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Turner
Had Ben made an attempt to kill "Locke", whether it really killed him or not, it could have blown MiB's cover to some degree
Why? Locke has Jesus powers! If killing Not-Locke wouldn't work, it would only -strengthen- his cover. The only reason to specifically order Ben not to try to kill Not-Locke again is if it -would- work.

Quote:
I don't think we can draw any conclusions as to his mortality based on his actions as Alex.
I'd say we can infer at least one thing from someone shouting, "Do not kill me!!!"

Besides, Jacob is mortal, so why wouldn't MiB be? It requires a much more complicated explanation for them to operate under wildly different rules. I prefer to apply Occam's Razor.

Quote:
Personally, I am of the opinion that MiB CAN appear as more than one person at a time
Why? If he could, why haven't we seen it? It would seem pretty useful to have a sounding chamber whenever he tries to convince somone of something. More importantly, in the episode where Ben and Locke visit Smokey, why would MiB jump through all the hoops to make sure Locke, Smokey and Alex weren't ever in the same place at the same time unless they physically couldn't be?

Quote:
Going off that assumption, I think Smokey/MiB most certainly killed all of Rousseau's crew when they went down in that hole. Everything she saw of them after that was MiB/Smokey.
So now he's impersonating rotting corpses?

I suspect that Jacob and MiB are going to end up being a lot less magical than some of you guys are expecting.
post #143 of 1932
Have you all forgotten The Cost of Living, where Eko was surrounded by numerous war lords he murdered in that church? If we assume that they were all Smokey apparitions, Smokey can most certainly be more than one person at a time. Maybe he just chooses not to.
post #144 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Farsight View Post
I'd say we can infer at least one thing from someone shouting, "Do not kill me!!!"
Not necessarily. Don't forget that don't kill him was followed by "do whatever he says!" - which was crucial to his plan.
post #145 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Farsight View Post
Or maybe he tried to kill her because she -was- that crazy! We never saw the circumstances of the other two deaths...
No, but we saw the circumstances of that interaction. Her husband was ranting on about Smokey being a security system. He seemed crazier than Danielle in that instance, but I'm willing to say its open to interpretation.

Quote:
Desmond was being duped though. His buddy wasn't actually worried about any "infection".
Please reread my quote. Desmond continued to utilize the vaccines well after Inman had died on the rocks and Desmond found out the suits were useless. He obviously thought they were necessary. And the death of Radzinsky (who blew his own head off) certainly suggests that something made him snap.

Quote:
That has been explained. Those people were suffering the same time disconnection as Desmond as a result of exposure to the field of "time radiation" that surrounds the island. They were also shown to lose all rational thought as they deteriorated, while Rousseau's husband seemed completely in control.
They were shown to be NOT suffering the same thing as Minkowski, who's condition we later learned is due to a combination of exposure to extreme radiation/electromagnetism and crossing to the island outside of a prescribed heading. The only other person to possibly die the way Minkowski did was a guy named Brandon, whom toured the island in a helicopter with Minkowski.

But there were other people on the boat who were acting strangely. The Death Proof chick who committed suicide had never been to the island and as far as I recall, was not exposed to any radiation/electromagnetism. The captain also tells Sayid and/or Desmond that others on the boat had been acting strangely as well. There's something else going on that was making people do crazy things (which the show has yet to readdress). Whether its what Rousseau is calling "the sickness" remains to be seen. But I can unequivocally say that those people were not experiencing time displacement ala Desmond and Minkowski as no one else had crossed over to the island at that point.

Quote:
That's certainly possible, but there are two big problems with the theory that Rousseau's husband was actually MiB:

1) Rousseau killed 3 people. Everything we've seen suggests MiB can only be one person at a time.

2) Rousseau killed her husband. It has been strongly hinted that MiB is -not- immortal. He appears to be similar to Jacob, who we saw was -very- mortal. Plus, note how adamantly (as Alex) he emphasized to Ben NOT TO KILL FAKE LOCKE. That was self-preservation.
Smokey has been referred to as Cerebrus and Radzinsky drew a picture on the hatch door of it as having three heads. I think we even see it separate into three sections when the sonic fence scares it away after Juliette switches it on. While there is no direct evidence that Smokey can be three places at once, there certainly isn't any evidence disputing this either.

I'm not convinced Jacob is dead (we see him fall into a fire, but we don't see the result of that). He's quite capable of living more than mere human lengths of time as evidenced by him seeing the Black Rock arrive and appearing the same age during his different interactions with the Losties as kids.

And as others have already described above, I think MiB/Smokey was not worried about self-preservation per se, but needed to scare Ben enough into doing whatever Not-Locke told him to do, which in turn is part of the loophole he found. (It seems likely MiB can't kill Jacob himself.)

Quote:
If that were the case, I don't think they would have revisited the issue this season and stuck to a storyline that implied she was telling the truth. If they were just playing service to the plot thread, they could have had Jin walk in just as she shot her husband, or right after. Instead they showed us him trying to trick her. To me, that scene seemed to hint at a bigger picture, but we'll see in 9 months-ish.
Not true. I think they originally intended the sickness to be a real physical disease. But what they needed to show now since its currently not, is how Danielle could call it that. They had to establish that a traumatic event occurred, and that some time passed before her crew members started acting strangely. I do think her original statement that "the Others were carriers" of the sickness doesn't hold up with the new scene, but that's one nitpick I'm willing to not harp on given the other inconsistencies with her story.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Syd View Post
Have you all forgotten The Cost of Living, where Eko was surrounded by numerous war lords he murdered in that church? If we assume that they were all Smokey apparitions, Smokey can most certainly be more than one person at a time. Maybe he just chooses not to.
Great point.
post #146 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Syd
Have you all forgotten The Cost of Living, where Eko was surrounded by numerous war lords he murdered in that church? If we assume that they were all Smokey apparitions, Smokey can most certainly be more than one person at a time.
Actually I had... you made me curious, so I re-watched that scene. Except for one quick glimpse of two barely moving, badly mangled zombies, Eko never sees more than one person at a time. He keeps turning away from one person and seeing another. Whenever an apparition speaks or physically acts, there's only one person. I'd consider the zombies manifested 'props', like the knife Smokey threw at Eko. It's interesting nevertheless.

(That episode is also about as clear as possible that Smokey and MiB are the same entity, now that we know that MiB exists)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Humanoid
Don't forget that don't kill him was followed by "do whatever he says!" - which was crucial to his plan.
Exactly my point! Why emphasize so strongly (with yelling, violence and threats of violence) not to kill NotLocke if all you really care about is that Ben follows his orders? If all a murder attempt would result in is a double-resurrected and siper-pissed NotLocke, all it could do is strengthen Smokey's plan. The only reason to try to preempt a murder attempt is if it could work.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva
Desmond continued to utilize the vaccines well after Inman had died on the rocks and Desmond found out the suits were useless. He obviously thought they were necessary.
So? He was wrong... The guy who told him he needed the vaccine was lying. Just because Desmond didn't want to admit that doesn't mean the vaccine fought a mysterious infection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva
But I can unequivocally say that those people were not experiencing time displacement ala Desmond and Minkowski as no one else had crossed over to the island at that point.
But your theory is that they caught an infection before any of them ever reached the island?!?

"Acting crazy" matches up pretty well with how people would describe Desmond and Daniel's symptoms if they couldn't see in their heads like we can. Memory loss, severe confusion, severe disorientation (regarding both space and time) and splitting headaches are the symptoms we know of. All are consistent with what little we saw of the ship's crew. We've seen that the effects of exposure to the island's "time radiation" are cumulative, and the two people who took the smaller boat nearer to the island were the first to die. The people on the main ship were less affected, as if exposed to a smaller amount of radiation, but it continued to build up.

The boat was close enough to the island that the captain mentions that he believes the "cabin fever" is caused by its proximity and that he intends to pull it back "to a safe distance" (on orders from Widmore IIRC) once the engines are repaired.

Quote:
While there is no direct evidence that Smokey can be three places at once, there certainly isn't any evidence disputing this either.
The episode where Ben and NotLocke go to Smokey has a ton of evidence. I'm sure there's more, but it'll require a rewatch of my own with the new perspective we have now.

Quote:
I'm not convinced Jacob is dead (we see him fall into a fire, but we don't see the result of that).
Stabbed in the chest and kicked into a fire... what more do you need? For Smokey to rip him to pieces, a boar to eat the pieces, and for it to poop him out in 108 separate piles?

Barring some time travel hijinks, I'd bet the only way we see Jacob again is as his younger self (in flashbacks or otherwise).

(Sorry Custer, I've pretty effectively derailed your thread! Maybe you should watch faster?)
post #147 of 1932
Hey I was having an argument with a friend who said Sawyer was reading Land of Laughs in an episode, I don't rememeber this, does anyone remember this? I'm a fairly big Jonathan Carol fan, so I would think I'd pick up on this.
post #148 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Farsight View Post
Exactly my point! Why emphasize so strongly (with yelling, violence and threats of violence) not to kill NotLocke if all you really care about is that Ben follows his orders? If all a murder attempt would result in is a double-resurrected and siper-pissed NotLocke, all it could do is strengthen Smokey's plan. The only reason to try to preempt a murder attempt is if it could work.
Now that I think about it, you might be right. It kind of stands to reason that if Jacob could be "killed" by Ben, then so can MiB.
post #149 of 1932
Farsight, I'm not going to respond quote by quote because we can nit pick each other forever. My overall point, is that there have been numerous instances of people acting crazy that seem to suggest the writers initially intended to have "the sickness" - whatever that means - play out differently. I personally don't believe the sickness is the same thing as Desmond and Minkowski's time displacement, and from what we saw of Danielle's most recent flashback, I'm willing to believe her story (at least in terms of her crew acting weird after interacting with Smokey) for the moment.


As for the Jacob/MiB parallels, I'm not sure I buy it. It's clear they are meant to be polar opposites. Just because Jacob can be killed (again, I don't think its clear this is the case) doesn't mean MiB can. It's quite possible they have different "powers" (loosely used term) just as they have different philosophies. MiB may not be able to directly interact with humans the way Jacob can, thus he uses Smokey and/or possesses dead bodies. There are just too many unknowns to say anything about what he can and can't do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Farsight View Post
Stabbed in the chest and kicked into a fire... what more do you need? For Smokey to rip him to pieces, a boar to eat the pieces, and for it to poop him out in 108 separate piles?
We saw the Freighter blow up, yet Jin survived. We had a hydrogen bomb detonate, yet I'm sure we'll see all the Losties survive. Jacob ain't dead untll we see his cold dead corpse.
post #150 of 1932
Not sure if this goes here, but since its the most current thread:

Yahoo!

Quote:
Matthew Fox is using words such as "amazing," "incredibly satisfying," "very surprising" and "fairly confusing" to describe Lost's sixth and final season, which kicks off sometime in early 2010.

Emerging from the cone of silence lowered onto stars and producers after the Season 5 finale aired, Fox shared gave the crowd at the 49th Monte-Carlo Television Festival a glimpse at the final 17 episodes. (CineTVBuzz.com posted video of the event.)

The season will begin with the aftermath of Juliet seemingly detonating the Jughead bomb's explosive core, in a development Fox said will be "very surprising — and probably fairly confusing, initially, to the audience."

About a third of the way into the season, Fox said, the show's two separate timelines — in 1977 and 2007 — "are going to be solidified into one, and we will be operating in a more linear time, to the end of the series." Once the show moves to one timeline, he said, flashbacks will cease, and the series will resolve on the island.

Oh, and about that big finish: "I do know how the show's going to end, I know what the last images will be," said Fox, who only would hint at it all leading to "a final conflict."

Perhaps — or not — on a related note, he mentioned that Jack and Locke "will come head-to-head again." But since the Season 5 finale seemed to indicate the real Locke is very dead, it's unclear if Fox was foretelling a showdown with Locke or the person or entity posing as Locke.

With just 17 hours remaining, can Lost possibly tie together all of its narrative threads and loose ends — from Dharma and the Others to Jacob's seemingly epic feud with the entity known in scripts as "Man No. 2"?

Fox feels confident that the writers "will prove that they did know all along where they were heading with it," he said. "All the pieces will come back into play."

But he also acknowledged: "You're not going to please all the people all the time."
A third of the way through? What the?!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Television
CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPORTS, GAMES & LEISURE › Television › Lost: The Rewatch Thread