CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPORTS, GAMES & LEISURE › Television › Lost: The Rewatch Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Lost: The Rewatch Thread - Page 2

post #51 of 1932
Quote:
Last night, I randomly recalled the Hurley Bird - once an item of some interest, now largely forgotten. Was the Hurley Bird the MiB?
The Hurley Bird! I totally forgot about that.

re: the pilot: Best one ever? I'd say it's between this one and, coincidentally, Deadwood.

EDIT: Also, that Lost S1 thread is my official time-suck for the rest of the day. Thanks for the link!
post #52 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parker View Post
How do you define how important new characters are? I would say at this point, Lapidus is more important than say...Mr. Eko or even Libby.
Yeah, that "at this point" is so important. Lost sticks a little more closely to a novelistic formula than many TV shows in that there's an overarching structure and endpoint, but it's still episodic TV, subject to casting decisions, subplots that don't pan out due to execution and have to be revised, etc.

I'd probably have more problems with inconsistencies and dropped subplots if this were a movie or book. The medium of dramatic television tends to require a little more fluidity. If we reach the end of the show, and the biggest retcon is Rousseau's story, it'll still be a pretty impressive accomplishment.
post #53 of 1932
Does anyone have any thoughts about the shape that swooped down over the jet turbine just before it exploded in the pilot? Or are we in agreement that it was Smokey in souped-up aerodynamic form?
post #54 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Custer View Post
I liked Season 2 when it aired, even if the eventual flip-flop between Locke and Eko over the button was (to my recollection) sort of random. We'll see how it holds up now.
Eko's death is still, to me, the best character moment on the show. It's a shame he was sort of wasted in the story. But that's for future discussion.


Quote:
I was struck by Hurley's constancy on second viewing also. He is the same basically benevolent figure he's always been. Since I'm going to be referencing various schools of belief as Lost references them, I'll say that Hurley calls to mind the ideals of Taoism and the way of the Buddha. Hurley conjures the concept of 'Pu,' a Taoist concept of simplicity, or 'the uncarved block.'
I can see that.

Quote:
Charlie strikes me, even more on second viewing, as a deeply wounded and troubled soul from the word go. Not sure if the mugging you bring up involves his drug using - I found his scenes alone, discreetly getting high, to be pretty effective stuff and I like in retrospect how relatively open and vulnerable he is despite his hidden addiction. His scars are all pretty much on the surface, and I really like the way he uses his 'currency,' in the form of having been in a one-hit rock band, in an attempt to establish himself in the Islanders' pecking order. I like how relatively subtle this is. The first time he does it, with Kate, it comes off as endearing and oddball. The second time, it's needier and searching, as if saying this has paid dividends off-Island (and I'm sure it has - Brett Michaels is still using this trick) but isn't working now. He has no status to speak of on the Island, where 'being in a band' means nothing on a Boar hunt.
I was referring more to simply his "serious" face on the show. Monaghan(?) turned in a great performance, and his death was the second best character moment on the show to me.

Quote:
This was terrific to revisit. Mysterious and creepy as all get-out.

Here are the French iterations, as broadcast in the episode, if anyone's curious:


Here are the English translations of those iterations:
Nice! Because I'm a sucker for the strange and creepily mysterious, I would have preferred if we never found out the origin of those transmissions. The real answer is never quite as good as the one in my head.
post #55 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva View Post
I was just comparing the Freighter Four to each other. Daniel is clearly more important in terms of his role in the time travel arc that dominated Season 5.
I'm not following you here. I mean, you could argue that Jack is far more important in season 1 because he's a doctor. But what does that have to do with him in relation to the other characters?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveB View Post
Yeah, that "at this point" is so important. Lost sticks a little more closely to a novelistic formula than many TV shows in that there's an overarching structure and endpoint, but it's still episodic TV, subject to casting decisions, subplots that don't pan out due to execution and have to be revised, etc.

I'd probably have more problems with inconsistencies and dropped subplots if this were a movie or book. The medium of dramatic television tends to require a little more fluidity. If we reach the end of the show, and the biggest retcon is Rousseau's story, it'll still be a pretty impressive accomplishment.
Right, which is why I can never understand why some fans start hating the show because the never answer "the Libby mystery" for example. As if by answering it everything would fall into place. Really, it's not even that much of a mystery. She was in a mental hospital. There are a finite number of reasons of why she went in there. We know her husband died. Maybe it had to do with that. And ultimately, if they revealed the truth about it, people would bitch about it wasn't really that important. So who gives a shit? In the grand scheme of things, it's really not that important.

But you're right in that, at one time, Libby was probably going to be more important than characters they hadn't yet introduced (although I do think they plan on introducing new characters every year, save this past one, and I think they have a pretty good idea of what they're going to do with those characters, even if their exact reasons change with time, due to actor issues or other things).
post #56 of 1932
Sawyer should get some sort of reward for having the biggest arc ever. Those season one episodes...just a completely different character. I know we're not there yet, but I did like how, in season two, he completely rejected being liked by people and stole all those guns.

Also, people may complain about the time travel, but it was set up well waaay back in season three.
post #57 of 1932
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattioli View Post
Does anyone have any thoughts about the shape that swooped down over the jet turbine just before it exploded in the pilot? Or are we in agreement that it was Smokey in souped-up aerodynamic form?
I'm fairly certain that the shape was just plane debris, and that its been confirmed by Lindelof and Cuse. Couldn't tell you where I've read/heard that, though.
post #58 of 1932
Fav quote from the S1 thread:

Quote:
Let me first give my guess on something that will mean something in the future - Jack's tattoo.
DAMN YOU BAI LING!!!
post #59 of 1932
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mangy View Post
Fav quote from the S1 thread:

DAMN YOU BAI LING!!!
My favorite exchange:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prankster View Post
I freakin' know who the man in the suit is now!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hypnotoad View Post
Really? We saw the dude from behind and I've watched it like 5 times, but my best guess from seeing that is John Stewart.
What a different show that would have been.
post #60 of 1932
From Post No. 178 (dated 9/30/04) of the Season 1 thread:
Quote:
this week's questions are "Where the Hell are we?"

and "Why was (said animal) found on a freakin island?"


So it will be interesting if they answer these 2 questions next week.
Next week?!? Ha! Oh, neaux, so, so naive.
post #61 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parker View Post
I'm not following you here. I mean, you could argue that Jack is far more important in season 1 because he's a doctor. But what does that have to do with him in relation to the other characters?
Are you serious? You're debating just to debate now. My posts about the Freighter Four are specifically in reference to this

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShiftyEyes
I believe they stated up til around season 4 that Libby was important and that we'd definitely find out more about her character.
Replace Libby and those are my feelings about The Freighter Four. We can talk semantics all day about what "important" means in terms of a character's arc in the show, but the producers had a completely different take on the role these four would play on the show prior to the writer's strike. We were told Season 5 would be all about them, and we'd get backstories/flashbacks on all. Instead we got a season that revolved largely on time travel mechanics, and half the Freighter Four were relegated to one liners in the background. It's frustrating to have characters that are seemingly important to the overarching story not get fleshed out more. And the change in format to getting rid of the character-centric flashback episodes hurts this the most.
post #62 of 1932
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva View Post
Are you serious? You're debating just to debate now. My posts about the Freighter Four are specifically in reference to this



Replace Libby and those are my feelings about The Freighter Four. We can talk semantics all day about what "important" means in terms of a character's arc in the show, but the producers had a completely different take on the role these four would play on the show prior to the writer's strike. We were told Season 5 would be all about them, and we'd get backstories/flashbacks on all. Instead we got a season that revolved largely on time travel mechanics, and half the Freighter Four were relegated to one liners in the background. It's frustrating to have characters that are seemingly important to the overarching story not get fleshed out more. And the change in format to getting rid of the character-centric flashback episodes hurts this the most.
I'm not trying to be dickish or sharp with you. At all. But we're technically on Season one right now, and we're exactly four episodes in. Could you try to focus on the season at hand, and (if you are so inclined) some of the things you may have enjoyed about it? Some of the things you've noticed in retrospect? Anything, really, relating to the beginning of the show? I understand that you've got grievances, but they're several seasons away from us at this point.
post #63 of 1932
No worries. In post 46 I said I'd drop my complaints and then Parker started taking all my previous posts out of context. I was just trying to clarify.

You've guys have covered everything about these eps. There's nothing to add. They are some of the four most exciting hours on TV.
post #64 of 1932
I wasn't really debating, I just didn't understand what you meant. But I got it now.
post #65 of 1932
Thread Starter 
I'm thinking I'll start doing more eps. I'm through the first four and anxious to keep going. Any objections to picking up the pace for a bit?
post #66 of 1932
Go for it.
post #67 of 1932
Sure, I rewatched the entire series recently so i'm good.
post #68 of 1932
Thread Starter 
Good to know. Thoughts/comments on White Rabbit and House of the Rising Sun tomorrow.
post #69 of 1932
I know the four episode a week thing is set up to allow the episodes to fill the hiatus, but I don't know how it's possible to watch them like that. When I watched the whole series prior to Season 5, I think I was watching four episodes a day.
post #70 of 1932
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarthLowbudget@ View Post
I know the four episode a week thing is set up to allow the episodes to fill the hiatus, but I don't know how it's possible to watch them like that. When I watched the whole series prior to Season 5, I think I was watching four episodes a day.
I wanted to ensure that anyone here wanting to participate could, and thought the four-eps a week would be enough to discuss, but also allow flexibility in people's schedules.

But since I'm the only one who's actively re-watching Season One I don't see any reason to do that now. Full-steam ahead!
post #71 of 1932
Go for it, Jesse!

Watching Jin and Sun way back when...wow. I remember way back Daniel Dae Kim said he'd get stopped on the street and asked "Why are you so mean?"

I'm glad they went where they did with their relationship, though they both were a little shortchanged in season five. Well a lot actually, not a little. But my favorite part of season one is in the finale with the two of them...

Also, good moment with Boone and Sawyer in White Rabbit at the end there. I really like that Boone's a general fuck up and WANTS to be as good as Jack, but resents him for being able to save lives. I love that it drives him to become Locke's unquestionable lackey.
post #72 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Syd
Also, people may complain about the time travel, but it was set up well waaay back in season three.
Oh, it was set up earlier than that...

The flashbacks themselves have always been a sort of time travel, except that it's the viewer doing the travelling. But the narrative form is the same - they were playing around with time and how the past affects/dictates the future from the very beginning.

Lost was always about time, it just took us a while to realize it fully.
post #73 of 1932
That brings me to another thing...a silly thing...you think that the flashbacks are merely Smokey looking into the person's past?
post #74 of 1932
Rousseau said her team was "studying time" in the original script for her first episode. ABC said they couldn't have any sci-fi jargon or references in the first season. That's stupid, but I'm glad they didn't tip their hand right away.
post #75 of 1932
I think instead of just rewatching all of the episodes I'm going to do something even dorkier and go through the episode lists and pick out the ones I feel are going to be important to have watched going into the final season and go from there. Trying to watch all five seasons over again is to much at this point. After they release the all encompassing LOST Blu-Ray Collector's Buy This Now Limited Edition I'll watch them all again in order.
post #76 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Custer View Post
But since I'm the only one who's actively re-watching Season One I don't see any reason to do that now. Full-steam ahead!
Hey! Damn it, I'm doing my best. I watched the second half of the pilot last night.

Now, I may have missed something, but I think I caught a continuity gaff. When Jack, Charlie and Kate return from the cockpit, Boone asks if there were any survivors. After trading a look with Kate, Jack tells him there were none. Later, after Sawyer shoots the polar bear, Boone asks if that was the thing that killed the pilot. I don't recall a scene where they reveal that the pilot got murdered, but I could have missed it. Of course, Hophead Charlie could have spilled the beans during the hike in an effort to impress Shannon.

Speaking of which, the episode gives us Maggie Grace in a bikini and Evangeline Lilly in her bra and panties. So, never let it be said that "Lost" never did anything for you.

Also, watching Sawyer's earliest scenes, it's definite that he goes through the greatest character arc over the course of the series.
post #77 of 1932
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattioli View Post
Now, I may have missed something, but I think I caught a continuity gaff. When Jack, Charlie and Kate return from the cockpit, Boone asks if there were any survivors. After trading a look with Kate, Jack tells him there were none. Later, after Sawyer shoots the polar bear, Boone asks if that was the thing that killed the pilot. I don't recall a scene where they reveal that the pilot got murdered, but I could have missed it. Of course, Hophead Charlie could have spilled the beans during the hike in an effort to impress Shannon.
Nice catch. I think you're right, in that we don't see anyone directly communicate this info to Boone. I didn't notice this at all when I rewatched. I guess I'm still not prone to spotting these things, but at least its not a conscious blindness.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattioli View Post
Speaking of which, the episode gives us Maggie Grace in a bikini and Evangeline Lilly in her bra and panties. So, never let it be said that "Lost" never did anything for you.
As you'll see in House of the Rising Sun, Lost is a gift that keeps on giving. Oh, you wonderful, dangerous, naughty bees.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattioli View Post
Also, watching Sawyer's earliest scenes, it's definite that he goes through the greatest character arc over the course of the series.
It's definately the most impressive overall to me. But it's got some fine competition. I'd forgotten just how Jin and Sun's arc begins. Knowing how it's ended up so far, watching them in these opening episodes is kind of revelatory. They used to be my least-favorite flashback/storyline characters. Now, they're right at the top of my nonexistent 'best-of' list.
post #78 of 1932
Yeah, Jin gives Sawyer a big run for his money in the character arc competition.

Side note for the "Supernatural" fans in the crowd: I completely forgot that Azazel was the U.S. Marshall. I will now watch "Tabula Rasa" in half-expectation that his eyes will flicker yellow at some point.
post #79 of 1932
Thread Starter 

White Rabbit

White Rabbit (ep 5)

This was a great episode.

Boone continues to prove himself excellent Monster-fodder with his bookending idiocies. He gets a drowning woman killed by almost drowning himself, and he decides to quietly take the entire camp's water without, you know, actually telling anyone he's doing it - despite the fact that several people run around all day looking for it in a panic.

The brief shots of Christian from Walkabout are expanded on and we witness the origin of Jack's Legendary Daddy Issues.

How wonderfully strange/eerie is that shot of Christian, fuly dressed in a suit, standing knee-deep in the surf?

In the Pilot, we learned that Claire's baby hadn't moved since she'd woken on the Island. Given what we know now about the fertility issues on the Island I'm assuming that was the first hint of the problems to come. We get (potential, uncertain) hints again in this episode. Claire gets suddenly, alarmingly sick. It's attributed to heat-stroke/dehydration, but Kate makes that call, not Jack. It's left ultimately ambiguous. She recovers, so it could easily have been the heat. But it could also have been a symptom of the Island-hates-preggers-chicks plague.

We learn Claire is into astrology. She asks Kate for her sign. Kate's answer: Gemini, a sign associated with the Roman figures of Castor and Pollux, who were twins. Twins and twinning play an important part in the subtext of this show, and this is the first mention of the concept, albeit a veiled one.

We see John Terry (who looks wildly younger in this episode than he does in any other) tell Jack that his son 'doesn't have what it takes,' but it's not clear what this means. Christian claims to be able to walk away from work at the day's end, and that this means he has what it takes. Only, as he's saying this, he's drinking and pouring several whiskeys at the same time, explicitly showing the lie of that claim. Jack's inability to let a problem go is painted as, and arguably is, a real liability. But Christian's expressed ability to let the same problems go is painted as, and arguably is, a falsity.

And speaking of Christian, Jack spends much of the episode running around pursuing his 'ghost.' The same ghost that will later tell Locke that he's Jacob's emissary. I like that Jack is chasing his father in multiple senses throughout the episode. (1) while in the jungle, looking for his apparition, (2) all the way to Sydney, in order to bring him back after what Jack 'did,' and (3) professionally and personally, as if to prove and disprove his father's opening judgments all at once.

White Rabbit lends serious credence to the notion that Risen Christian is the MiB. As a result of following him through the jungle, Jack comes close to plummeting from a cliff and dying similarly to the way in which 'Dave' comes close to tempting Hurley off a cliff in Season Two. Then again, Risen Christian also ends up leading Jack to the caves - a locale I haven't thought about in years.

It's interesting to note that Locke is the one who saves him. Locke further gives Jack a pep talk on leadership, and at this moment in the show it really does appear as though Locke is untainted by the notion that he's 'special.' Locke will spend later seasons increasingly convinced of his own self-worth, but where he's happiest, most in-tune with the Island, and most sure of himself is in these first episodes, where his own ego is abandoned almost carelessly in the face of the miracle he's recieved. In a microcosmic sense, Locke here seems content to be Jack's Richard - advising, but not in control. Then again, this is the same man who wandered off for boar while his companion was bleeding from the leg, so I'm not going to claim that he's perfectly balanced here either.

Great Locke Line#1: "Crazy people don't know they're crazy. They think they're getting saner."

Jack and Locke talk very briefly about the Island itself, adn about what Locke saw. He looked into the eye of the Island, and what he saw...was beautiful. Did Smokey recognize Locke from 'the past'? Did the Monster 'read' something in Locke that was useful? If the Monster is the MiB or a servant of the MiB, did it recognize an instrument essential to the MiB's apparent 'master plan'?

At the end of the episode, Jack finds his father's coffin and it is empty. We know that Anti-Locke didn't actually possess Locke's corpse because we see it at the end of Season 5. So what happened to Christian's body? Did it land elsewhere?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattioli View Post
Side note for the "Supernatural" fans in the crowd: I completely forgot that Azazel was the U.S. Marshall. I will now watch "Tabula Rasa" in half-expectation that his eyes will flicker yellow at some point.
That actor does 'seedy and untrustworthy' really well. He's got a great face.
post #80 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Custer View Post
In the Pilot, we learned that Claire's baby hadn't moved since she'd woken on the Island. Given what we know now about the fertility issues on the Island I'm assuming that was the first hint of the problems to come. We get (potential, uncertain) hints again in this episode. Claire gets suddenly, alarmingly sick. It's attributed to heat-stroke/dehydration, but Kate makes that call, not Jack. It's left ultimately ambiguous. She recovers, so it could easily have been the heat. But it could also have been a symptom of the Island-hates-preggers-chicks plague.
I'm pretty sure in the second or third ep, Claire's baby moves after Jin feeds her some fish. But you are right that for quite some time she was worried about her baby, and that it foreshadowed the baby issues to come.

*Edit: Good ol' Lostpedia. From Pilot (part 2):

Quote:
Jin continues to offer his fish samples to the survivors, this time to Claire, who reluctantly accepts. Immediately after eating the food, Claire jumps up in emotion, having felt her baby finally kick. She comments that "he kicked", analyzing her own words that she must believe that the baby is a boy.
post #81 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Custer View Post

At the end of the episode, Jack finds his father's coffin and it is empty. We know that Anti-Locke didn't actually possess Locke's corpse because we see it at the end of Season 5. So what happened to Christian's body? Did it land elsewhere?
That's a really good question, and I don't think I know the answer. If you watch that one "Lost Moment" with Christian where he instructs Vincent to wake Jack up because he has work to do. This suggests that the MiB might have been the reason the Oceanic flight crashed in the first place, he manipulated everything for this reason, to present his loop hole. He's ready to get started on it, after all. And ultimately, for his plan to work, his "son" needs to work on getting people off the island...

But yeah, if he doesn't need Christian's body...where is Christian's body? I always loved that Jack never finds it because it fits really well with his character...and I was really surprised by it at the time. I always assumed he would find it, proving his visions to be simple dehydration or the like. Not finding it not only hints at the supernatural things to come, it also lets the viewer know that it's not going to be that easy for Jack.

I think I know how Jack's arc as a character might end. He's going to find that body. At some point, he better.
post #82 of 1932
Eh, maybe Christian's corpse is caught up in the jungle canopy somewhere. In the first episode, Jack dashes out of the jungle and past what appears to be Christian's white sneaks dangling from a tree.
post #83 of 1932
I don't know. The Losties scavenged all the airplane parts and the surrounding area. They would have found the body if it simply got flung from the plane. It's likely Jacob/MiB wanted/needed it.
post #84 of 1932
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva View Post
I don't know. The Losties scavenged all the airplane parts and the surrounding area. They would have found the body if it simply got flung from the plane. It's likely Jacob/MiB wanted/needed it.
There's some evidence to support this in later seasons, even if its completely circumstantial/tangential. I'm thinking specifically of Richard wanting the Dharma body this past season.
post #85 of 1932
Thread Starter 

House of the Rising Sun

House of the Rising Sun (ep 6)

Another solid, if less propulsive, episode. We've gotten three flashbacks thus far: Kate, Jack, and now, Sun and Jin.

As I mentioned, I'd pretty much forgotten (or the impact had faded) just how heartbreaking and redemptive the Sun/Jin arc is. The economy of the flashbacks in this ep is really impressive. In what amounts to minutes, the show sketches the arc of their relationship from discreet tryst to forbidden marriage to the triumph of their love in the face of a powerful unseen father, to the degeneration of Jin's innate goodness as a direct result OF that goodness, to Sun's desperation and desire to escape and finally, to the fragile wordless hope that floats to the surface with the reappearance of the flower Jin initially presented Sun with. It's a bravura piece of emotional, effective writing.

Jack's tattoos get their first mention! Clearly, the producers had that Bai Ling episode planned from the very beginning.

Most of the Jin/Michael conflict was less-than-compelling for me, mostly because I’d remembered the reason for Jin’s sudden, unexplained violence. The actress playing Sun even mimes the reason for us right after Jin is cuffed. She points to her wrist and indicates Michael, who is wearing Sun’s father’s watch (A watch that, to my knowledge, shouldn’t even be there. What are they doing with Paik’s watch? Does Paik give it to one of them?

This is also the episode where Locke and Charlie begin their contentious struggle over Charlie’s sobriety. Locke appears to believe that being present on the Island will help you overcome your setbacks/demons as a result of his physical healing, but he’s ignoring or unaware of the demons he still harbors – resentments and emotional pains that won’t come full circle until season 3.

Because Charlie the hophead (thanks for the fun word, Mattioli) can’t just do his smack in the open he’s got to insist on a little alone-time in the jungle, only Locke won’t give it to him – choosing to follow him around in a creepy/funny fashion that quickly reveals his gift for insight into the emotional lives of his fellow survivors. But first: BEEHIVE!

After Charlie’s endearing junkie-antics crack the hive, the resulting swarm drives Jack, Kate, Charlie and Locke to the caves, where three other pieces of mythology slot into place. But first, Evangeline Lily simply must remove her shirt again. Because of the bees, you see. When her shirt is returned to her, she explains:

Kate: “It was, um, full of bees…”

Great Charlie line #1: “I’d have thought C’s actually.” (sees Kate’s expression) “…Sorry.”

As for the mythology:

1&2) Adam and Eve – I’d falsely remembered the survivors discovering these unidentified bodies wrapped in an embrace. Actually, they’ve been laid to rest in separate locations. Jack comments that it looks as though someone else, a third party, has placed the bodies there. People have speculated that the Adam and Eve corpses are, variously, Bernard and Rose, Sawyer and Juliet, Jack and Kate, but there’s nothing in this episode to give us clues even now. What we do know/can infer: Jack states that it would take ‘at least 40-50 years for the bodies and clothing to have deteriorated to their current extent. Assuming that he knows what he’s talking about, this means that Adam and Eve died somewhere around the 1950s or 1960s. If the tropical environment makes things deteriorate even more quickly (shades of Montand’s arm!) then we’re looking at, potentially, their death in the 70’s.

3) The B&W stones – they recall Locke’s backgammon pieces of course. Not much more to go on here. They’re kept in a leather pouch, which indicates a few things: (1) the bearer did not have the resources/access to carrying cases and made a bag for themselves, (2) the stones could hold personal significance, or could simply be pieces in an old version of backgammon.

And here’s where we get a weird, inexplicable moment, where Charlie and Locke walk in on Jack and Kate examining Adam and Eve:

Charlie: (looking at Adam) “Are these the people who were here before us?”
Locke: (approaching) “What are you talking about?”
(Charlie and Jack exchange a strange, seemingly-meaningful look that, to me, makes absolutely no sense in the moment)
Charlie: “Well, just….there could’ve been people here before us.”

Am I missing something? View that moment for yourselves and weigh in, please. As it’s presented, it looks as though Charlie and Jack are wordlessly exchanging knowing glances, which makes no sense considering that neither of them know anything about the situation. For a brief moment (a very brief moment) I found myself wondering if this exchange is in fact significant in the mythology of the show – some moment that connects the Charlie and Jack who’ve just crashed on the Island with the Charlie and Jack they’d later become.

Watch it. Tell me I’m insane.

This line, uttered by Jack, stood out to me: “We don’t need to bring water to the people – we need to bring the people to the water.” He’s talking about the caves, and his desire to move people into them, but it also sounds quasi-mystic to me in the same vein as that ‘teach a man to fish’ koan. I’m reaching, I know.

Hurley again ends the episode playing his cd player. We get a montage. Can’t wait for that thing to run out of batteries.
post #86 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Custer View Post
Am I missing something? View that moment for yourselves and weigh in, please. As it’s presented, it looks as though Charlie and Jack are wordlessly exchanging knowing glances, which makes no sense considering that neither of them know anything about the situation. For a brief moment (a very brief moment) I found myself wondering if this exchange is in fact significant in the mythology of the show – some moment that connects the Charlie and Jack who’ve just crashed on the Island with the Charlie and Jack they’d later become.

Watch it. Tell me I’m insane.
Maybe Jack just wanted Charlie to not make such a big deal about the fate of the previous inhabitants of the cave, so people wouldn't lose hope about being rescued?
post #87 of 1932
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jexxon View Post
Maybe Jack just wanted Charlie to not make such a big deal about the fate of the previous inhabitants of the cave, so people wouldn't lose hope about being rescued?
That sounds plausible. It's still a weird moment, though. And that intent doesn't really come across, given the people involved in the conversation (why would Locke care if these other people were never rescued? He seems in love with the Island).

Still, the simplest explanation is probably the correct one.
post #88 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Custer View Post
Jack's tattoos get their first mention! Clearly, the producers had that Bai Ling episode planned from the very beginning.
You know, that tattoo episode is one of the LOSTs I've missed. Is it as unnecessary as everyone says?
post #89 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacob Singer View Post
You know, that tattoo episode is one of the LOSTs I've missed. Is it as unnecessary as everyone says?
Well, it's "Lost", which means that--even at the worst--it's better than 95% of television, but, yeah, it doesn't advance the show's mythology one iota. It's the very definition of treading water.
post #90 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Custer View Post
What we do know/can infer: Jack states that it would take ‘at least 40-50 years for the bodies and clothing to have deteriorated to their current extent. Assuming that he knows what he’s talking about, this means that Adam and Eve died somewhere around the 1950s or 1960s. If the tropical environment makes things deteriorate even more quickly (shades of Montand’s arm!) then we’re looking at, potentially, their death in the 70’s.
Also, this always confused me. A quick Google search shows that a human body can be reduced to bones in as little as nine days (in summer-type heat, exposed). And I'd think the style of any clothing left would date it better than its deterioration. At any rate, bodies don't last long without embalming of some sort, regardless.
post #91 of 1932
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacob Singer View Post
Also, this always confused me. A quick Google search shows that a human body can be reduced to bones in as little as nine days (in summer-type heat, exposed). And I'd think the style of any clothing left would date it better than its deterioration. At any rate, bodies don't last long without embalming of some sort, regardless.
This confuses me also. I'm going strictly by the show and it's self-generated hints/clues. Jack's estimate may be completely off, but it's what we've got to work wih so far.

And yeah, the Bai Ling episode is a water-treader alright. I do like the translation of Jack's tattoo though, via Ms. Ling. Despite the water-treading appearance of the episode as a whole, I believe that this translation is directly commenting on Jack's life and eventual fate on the show/the Island.
post #92 of 1932
The show itself contradicted the 'it was probably X time to decay' in a later season. I forget what episode it was but they basically said something like "in the island setting bodies decay really fast." For some reason I remember this little point sticking out at me when I watched the first 4 seasons all in a row.
post #93 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Custer View Post
And yeah, the Bai Ling episode is a water-treader alright. I do like the translation of Jack's tattoo though, via Ms. Ling. Despite the water-treading appearance of the episode as a whole, I believe that this translation is directly commenting on Jack's life and eventual fate on the show/the Island.
I remember liking the non-flashback elements of this episode quite a bit. The tattoo explanation is anti-climactic only if you expect Jack's tattoos to mean anything related to a mystery, which would be kind of silly. The whole reason he has a tattoo is central to his character, not a mystery, so it makes sense that the reason he gets them is related to his character, and that the episode works to counterpoint his current situation (as most of Lost's flashbacks do). The problem is that the story of him getting his tattoos is pretty boring, while the story of him learning more about the others (and frankly, accepting the others as something other than "the enemy") is pretty interesting. I particularly like the last shot, of Jack on the boat heading back to the island, embracing his future as (albeit, briefly) an other. This in conjunction with his translation of his tattoos is why I think the show is using the episode to suggest Jack's overall importance (we'll see next season).

Frustrating, though, that after hearing more about the others, their rules, their culture, and meeting a pretty important character ("The Sheriff," who is subsequently killed off screen and never seen or refereed to again) you get the idea that this was a point when the writers were considering going into further detail about the others simply to pad out the show, since they weren't sure how long it had to last at this point.

Sorry if I'm jumping the gun. Sometimes you need to look forward while you're looking back. Speaking of, I just caught the beginning of Deus Ex Machina the other day, and Locke's explanation of Mouse Trap was pretty enlightening considering the way this past season ended...
post #94 of 1932
The whole fascination with the tattoos is baffling to me considering they are the actor's real tats and not the characters. I remember that ep being the first time that I realized the show was writing stories based on fan reaction.
post #95 of 1932
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parker View Post
Sorry if I'm jumping the gun. Sometimes you need to look forward while you're looking back. Speaking of, I just caught the beginning of Deus Ex Machina the other day, and Locke's explanation of Mouse Trap was pretty enlightening considering the way this past season ended...
No worries about gun-jumping. It's only natural - I'd just prefer to keep the general conversation as a whole pointed in the direction of the season in question. The earlier seasons are now informed by the later ones so it's only natural to connect these threads as they come along.

And I agree. I made reference to the Mousetrap game in the season five thread after the finale. It's an instance where the writers crafted a pretty terrific, simple metaphor for what was coming wayyyy down the road, and it's touches like that that make this rewatch so much fun. Thanks for pointing it out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva View Post
The whole fascination with the tattoos is baffling to me considering they are the actor's real tats and not the characters. I remember that ep being the first time that I realized the show was writing stories based on fan reaction.
But that story wasn't written around fan reaction alone. The show wanted to cover Fox's tattoos at first, then concluded that they wanted to work them into the story somehow. Was there some kind of online demand to know their origins, separate and apart from the plan on the part of the show to explain one of them?
post #96 of 1932
I'm finding it amazing how little I recall about the earlier seasons. The general storylines are there in my head, but the details are gone. Custer was discussing the bee attack and I literally have no memory of that whatsoever. This is made even more shocking to me by the fact that Kate apparently strips down to her bra and I still don't remember it.
post #97 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Custer View Post
But that story wasn't written around fan reaction alone. The show wanted to cover Fox's tattoos at first, then concluded that they wanted to work them into the story somehow. Was there some kind of online demand to know their origins, separate and apart from the plan on the part of the show to explain one of them?
Yeah, plenty of people were rumoring online about what they meant and if they were clues, etc, etc. Then they found out what they meant and collectively said, "that's it?" It's like...what do you expect? They're fucking tattoos!
post #98 of 1932
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattioli View Post
I'm finding it amazing how little I recall about the earlier seasons. The general storylines are there in my head, but the details are gone. Custer was discussing the bee attack and I literally have no memory of that whatsoever. This is made even more shocking to me by the fact that Kate apparently strips down to her bra and I still don't remember it.
I'd assumed before I started watching that I might be bored by some of the relationship issues or the day-to-day stuff around the 'mythology.' I've quickly discovered that I remember broadstrokes (Charlie tries to kick heroin! Locke helps!) but verrrry little of the details. This is where the good writing on this show really pays off. These episodes sustain interest without relying on our insatiable need to solve the 'mysteries.'

And we now have an answer to the question 'Where have all the bees gone?' In retrospect, it's so obvious: They're hiding in Evangeline Lily's shirts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parker View Post
Yeah, plenty of people were rumoring online about what they meant and if they were clues, etc, etc. Then they found out what they meant and collectively said, "that's it?" It's like...what do you expect? They're fucking tattoos!
Huh.
post #99 of 1932
I remember greatly anticipating the explanation of the tattoos. And being greatly disappointed.
post #100 of 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dross View Post
I remember greatly anticipating the explanation of the tattoos. And being greatly disappointed.
Well, then, let me ask you. What did you expect? They're fucking tattoos!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Television
CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPORTS, GAMES & LEISURE › Television › Lost: The Rewatch Thread