CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPORTS, GAMES & LEISURE › Television › The 'goddamit I kinda like Supernatural' thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The 'goddamit I kinda like Supernatural' thread

post #1 of 398
Thread Starter 
I tried to DARKMITE some older threads on Supernatural, but Advanced Google Search was being an unwieldy behemoth so I thought I'd set up a new thread, because I kind of want to talk about the show without spoilering myself so apologies for not posting in the current Season 4 thread.

After dealing with some militant (borderline antagonistic) fans of the show, both on here and in real life, I vowed to never bother with this show. But I was eventually pressed into watching the first two episodes and unfortunately, even with my inbuilt stubborn prejudices, I kind of loved what I saw. I'm kind of busy watching Angel at the moment and the one thing I love about this show thus far, taken that I'm only a few episodes in, is that they're shooting for generally creepy monsters and spectres. The ghost in the first episode and that opening scene with the Winchester's mother was actually kind of creepy for a TV show and the stuff with the Wendigo was probably some of the tensest TV I've seen since X-Files was at it's peak.

It's well written, well scored, got a great mythos, well shot, and the two leads are kind of great together. So yeah looks like I'm a Supernatural douchebag too.
post #2 of 398
Dammit, i've been trying to NOT get into this show for years now. I keep reading the praise and the acclaim it gets from people whose opinion i respect. But it looks.. kinda.. gay... dunno... Plus, i hate that i have already 4 years to catch up. Is there a season that's way way way better than the rest?
post #3 of 398
A newish friend of mine and I are having a 'cultural exchange' and alternating Supernatural with Deadwood on thursday nights. It gets better as it goes, and is fuckloads better than a lot of the shit on network television. coughHeroescough. I mean, it's no Deadwood, but what is (besides Mad Men). I got a review copy of the third season had some really solid Ben Edlund written episodes, and I don't think there's such a thing as bad Ben Edlund.

Speaking of gay, this friend actually writes slashfiction about it.(involving the two leads) ...I could direct you to her blog if you'd like...

I've never actually read it myself.
post #4 of 398
The show is fucking awesome. Just wait.
post #5 of 398
Thread Starter 
Okay, that's weird. The start of the fourth episode seems to be done entirely ADR. The voices are just completely disambiguated from the actors. So odd.

The third episode was kind of cool and the show is maintaining it's 'awesome looking monsters/ghosts' deal.
post #6 of 398
Ok, you've done it.
I'll finally start watching this thing. I have the first season here somewhere.
This better be good!
post #7 of 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabe Powers View Post
Speaking of gay, this friend actually writes slashfiction about it.(involving the two leads) ...I could direct you to her blog if you'd like...
The world doesn't need more Wincest. Thanks.

Quote:
I've never actually read it myself.
Sure. I believe you. No really. I do.
post #8 of 398
Thread Starter 
Yikes I had a look on the TWOP forums, the worst place in the world, to see what the general reaction to the pilot was and amount of menopausal women getting all hot and bothered about the brothers fighting was kind of hideous.
post #9 of 398
Yeah. I'd avoid that if I was you. It gets even funnier due to the "fan" response of Episode 18 from the fourth season. But, I'll let you discover that for yourself.
post #10 of 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by neoolong View Post
The world doesn't need more Wincest. Thanks.
HA HA HA HA, Wincest!!! That's the best thing I've heard all day!!!
post #11 of 398
Damn it. Where's Domingo?

I didn't make up that term. Really. I didn't.
post #12 of 398
I actually believe you. When I got the BR in the mail to review (with no warning) I immediately assumed it was a show about gay people. The cover art alone brought about the assumption. When I found out about all the slashfic I wasn't even a little bit surprised.

I really haven't read the slashfic though, sometimes you want to keep illusions about when hanging with sweet, petite girls.
post #13 of 398
Gay isn't natural. It's supernatural?

Freakin' CW.
post #14 of 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tati View Post
Ok, you've done it.
I'll finally start watching this thing. I have the first season here somewhere.
This better be good!
The first season is kinda hit or miss, it gets better in later seasons. But the show does have one of the best soundtracks on TV.
post #15 of 398
Thread Starter 
The first four episodes have all been hits so far, and Bloody Mary seems to be continuing the streak. Very gooey and gory and creepy already. I've heard that Bugs is a bit of a nasty stumbling block for the show.
post #16 of 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spike Marshall View Post
I've heard that Bugs is a bit of a nasty stumbling block for the show.
I'd say you should actually skip that one. One or two promising bits, but mostly just stupid, and I don't recall any important continuity in it.
post #17 of 398
It's probably a lesser Supernatural episode, but I still found it enjoyable. It's filler.
post #18 of 398
Its the rare show that actually gets better the further you go in as it builds its surprisingly mature mythology.

Monster Movie is re-airing tomorrow. That might be my favorite episode of the series.
post #19 of 398
I stand by my claim that Supernatural is the best genre show currently on television and is in the top five of stuff being broadcast.
post #20 of 398
Thread Starter 
The Ringu reference at the end of Bloody Mary did the Sadako walk better than the remake. That wigged me out just like Ringu did when I first saw it.
post #21 of 398
I'm actually in the same position as you Spike. I put off watching it forever because I thought it looked horrible, but I kept on hearing good things from people whose opinion I respected. Then I saw the first season for $20 and had to pick it up. It's pretty good.
post #22 of 398
Yeah I remember not thinking much of Season 1 at all. Mainly because it's ALL stand alone episodes and it started to get somewhat tiresome. But about 6 episodes from the end (Presumably when they knew they were getting a Season 2) things start picking right up and just get better from there.
post #23 of 398
Thread Starter 
The creature shedding it's Skin in....Skin was surprising in its graphicness. It's possibly the gooeist, goriest prime time show I've seen in a long, long time. Like I said next to the tameness of Angel it's quite eye opening. I've also just watched seven episodes of the show until dawn and I'm about to start on the next seven.
post #24 of 398
I'm in the same boat as you are, Spike. I'd been hearing about it for years, and dealing with some of the fans of the show is like dealing with Browncoats times HELL - so I stayed away (insane fans kept me from Firefly, as well). I found the first season for 14.99 and did a blind buy. I'm seriously in love with this show. Bugs is the weakest episode in terms of creatures and mythos - but it excels in character development and the family dynamic (and if you're not a fan of spiders, you might shitsmear your sofa), so don't skip it. It's a lesser episode of the series, but better than any X-Files anything I've ever seen.

I literally got the first season on the 6th of this month - and I just finished the third. Everything I dislike about Buffy, Angel, Smallville (I like those shows, but unlike far too many acolytes - I can call the flaws and shittyness when I see it) is nonexistent here, and the production never feels hokey or cheap.

There's a great goof on reality TV called "Ghostfacers"...a really awesome and "inside" Hollywood episode (featuring Gary Cole as a douchey studio exec) - the third season has a John Carpenter homage episode that is literally one of my favorite things I've ever seen on television. It's tense and hilarious and comical and tragic and propels the mythos and introduces a villain - how do you juggle all of that stuff? Supernatural does. Really love this show.

And yeah - gory as fuck. Something happens at the end of the third season that's more over the top and unflinchingly gory than many slasher films. Think the first death in Nightmare on Elm Street turned up to 11 with the knob ripped off. I was stunned.
post #25 of 398
I avoided the first 2 seasons mainly due to its perceived "tweenness" - basically, I thought it was a guy version of CHARMED or something. I started somewhere in the middle of the third, and I was hooked. The fourth is one of the best seasons of episodic television I've ever seen.
post #26 of 398
The skin shedding scene still amazes me at just how fucked up it is. That and about 7 other scenes across the seasons have convinced me censors/CW just don't watch the show because they get away with some damn awesome gore, violence and general levels of fuckedupedness that wouldn't come close to passing in the neutered PG-13 horror that passes itself off as horror these days.

Also, the show is damn entertaining and has kickass music.
post #27 of 398
It's sad that Eric Kripke wasn't happy with some of the effects of the first Season, and so we don't get a return to the fucked up stuff like the skin shredding. If I can complain about the other Seasons that would be it really, the MOTW are never quite as 'icky' as that one.
post #28 of 398
Thread Starter 
The reconstruction of the hook man urban legend at the start of episode 7 was pitch perfect. A lot of the references are really obvious but they're done with such skill and passion that it's never anything less than charming.

However I do see where the 'gay' vibes come from. Despite Dean talking about it now and then the Winchester boys are essentially sexless entities and any female characters are either 'victims of the week' who have a saintly relationship with the boys or they're evil/potentially evil.
post #29 of 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spike Marshall View Post
However I do see where the 'gay' vibes come from. Despite Dean talking about it now and then the Winchester boys are essentially sexless entities and any female characters are either 'victims of the week' who have a saintly relationship with the boys or they're evil/potentially evil.
That does sort of change. For a while it's just references to Women etc, but later on they both get some booty.

Hell if you like the show now your head is going to explode from Season 2 onwards Spike.
post #30 of 398
Great show.

I've never had any contact with rabid fans of the show (thankfully!) though I have been to the TWoP forums. Yeahh... I don't go in there anymore. I avoided the show during it's first season mainly because I hated that the network cancelled Angel and I also thought it would be some bullshit like Charmed. Watching the first season during a summer when I was out of school was pretty great. I enjoyed it even though it never really gelled till the end of the season (and HOLY SHIT, how about that final scene in the season 1 finale!!!). From there on they keep upping the ante by deepening the mythology and the show gets better and better. I'm glad a lot more people are getting into the show. The Season 5 thread should be great!
post #31 of 398
I've bought the first 2 seasons out of the sheer praise Mattioli and couple others gave it along the years. Did not regret, as it's not only highly entertaining, but really good. I'm waiting for season 4 to come out on DVD so I can snag it along season 3, but it's well worth my money.
post #32 of 398
Welcome to the party, Spike. Don't forget to drink the Kool Aid.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabe Powers View Post
HA HA HA HA, Wincest!!! That's the best thing I've heard all day!!!
No, no it's not.

For anyone interested, here are the threads I could Darkmite. Enjoy Season 4, it's a doozy:
Season One
Season Two
Season Three
Season Four

Oh, and "Bugs" is probably the worst episode of the series. After that, it's more or less clear sailing.
post #33 of 398
So alot of people haven't watched it because it looks too "gay"? That's fucking sad.
post #34 of 398
Thread Starter 
I didn't watch it because of the Domingo factor.
post #35 of 398
Hey Spike, I'm just glad you finally checked it out for yourself. Strap in, because it's going to be a hell of a ride. Oh and those wonderful gory moments you've mentioned? They do NOT let up. Even into last season they were still pulling off better and more gory kills than any PG-13 film as referred to earlier.
post #36 of 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattioli View Post
Oh, and "Bugs" is probably the worst episode of the series. After that, it's more or less clear sailing.
I expected much much worse. It still wasn't as bad as Battlestar's Sine Qua Non or Black Market.
post #37 of 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Savage View Post
I expected much much worse. It still wasn't as bad as Battlestar's Sine Qua Non or Black Market.
You're insane. Supernatural is a fine diversion but its best episodes aren't even as good as Battlestar's worst. Bugs was one of the worst episodes of television I have ever seen. It made me drop the show for two years. I recently picked it back up, and I'm enjoying it just fine, but it's disposable entertainment even on its best day. The fact that some of you guys are putting it in the same league as some of this decade's best shows is nuts.
post #38 of 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spike Marshall View Post
I didn't watch it because of the Domingo factor.
He does tend to talk the show up as the Second Coming.

Glad to see so many folks jumping on the train. I loved the concept for the show when I heard it, watched the pilot/premiere with my now-wife, and we've been hooked ever since. Kripke's description of it as 'a different horror movie every week' is perfectly apt, especially in the first season. If you're enjoying the season one episodes you're going to love the other seasons. It gets much, much better.

This show introduced me to Ted Nugent's Cat Scratch Fever, which sounds like it should be a bad thing, but is in fact pure awesome. The blue-collar, classic rock backdrop is potentially my favorite aspect of the show's design.

And just wait til you meet Bobby..
post #39 of 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquafresh View Post
You're insane. Supernatural is a fine diversion but its best episodes aren't even as good as Battlestar's worst. Bugs was one of the worst episodes of television I have ever seen. It made me drop the show for two years. I recently picked it back up, and I'm enjoying it just fine, but it's disposable entertainment even on its best day. The fact that some of you guys are putting it in the same league as some of this decade's best shows is nuts.
We'll agree to disagree then. Battlestar bored me to tears, so much so that I could not finish the first season. I'm sure that makes me some sort of frakin moron in your eyes but it could just be that we like different things. Maybe.
post #40 of 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquafresh View Post
You're insane. Supernatural is a fine diversion but its best episodes aren't even as good as Battlestar's worst. Bugs was one of the worst episodes of television I have ever seen. It made me drop the show for two years. I recently picked it back up, and I'm enjoying it just fine, but it's disposable entertainment even on its best day. The fact that some of you guys are putting it in the same league as some of this decade's best shows is nuts.
First off, I'm as big a Battlestar fan you'll ever find here, and Supernatural, while great, ain't on the same quality platform as Battlestar.

But fuck off if you think Sine Qua Non was not a horrible piece of shit episode. It was so poorly written Moore never bothered explaining them, let alone defend them. These were shitty shitty episodes, and your argument doesn't hold up because I don't expect the same quality from Supernatural.
post #41 of 398
My wife and I are about six episodes into Season 3, so we also started late. It's been pretty damn excellent so far though, and certainly the best genre show on TV now that BSG is gone.

My only real complaint are the few WBish episodes like the werewolf one in Season 2, and the fact that they simply cannot write likable female characters. Maybe Ruby and Bela get better later on, but they're shite now.

I laugh out loud at genuinely funny stuff in Supernatural more than I do at 90% of the comedies on TV, too.
post #42 of 398
Relax dudes, not saying anyone is a moron and I use the terms "insane" and "nuts" in the most affectionate possible ways.

I am an insanely huge horror fan and there is nothing I want more than for Supernatural to be a great show. As it stands, I feel it's a good show, but it's way to formulaic (every episode has pretty much the exact same dramatic beats) to be one of the greats. I'm only on season 2 though so maybe it'll get there, I dunno.
post #43 of 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquafresh View Post
I'm only on season 2 though so maybe it'll get there, I dunno.
And I say again, wait till you hit Season 4 (I'd say Season 3, as well, but it suffers a little from the truncated writer's strike syndrome).
post #44 of 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquafresh View Post
Relax dudes, not saying anyone is a moron and I use the terms "insane" and "nuts" in the most affectionate possible ways.

I am an insanely huge horror fan and there is nothing I want more than for Supernatural to be a great show. As it stands, I feel it's a good show, but it's way to formulaic (every episode has pretty much the exact same dramatic beats) to be one of the greats. I'm only on season 2 though so maybe it'll get there, I dunno.
Yeah, but when Supernatural drops the ball it's one thing. When BSG had the episode where everybody was acting out of character, near the end of the st half of season 4, then it's a bigger WTF than one bad standalone episode about (shitty) bugs.

I love this show like I love Chuck (but not as much, but close). A bit flawed, but so much fun.
post #45 of 398
Jesus, this show has an episode actually titled "Criss Angel Is a Douchebag"? That is fucking -fantastic-.
post #46 of 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Savage View Post
But fuck off if you think Sine Qua Non was not a horrible piece of shit episode. It was so poorly written Moore never bothered explaining them, let alone defend them. These were shitty shitty episodes, and your argument doesn't hold up because I don't expect the same quality from Supernatural.
I don't recall that ep of BSG so you may have a point there, but as a general rule I'll take Moore trying something and failing over Supernatural's paint-by-numbers scripts any day.
post #47 of 398
Thread Starter 
Ooh, I was going to make a thread about Chuck. Marathoned the whole series over six weeks, fucking awesome stuff.

Now continue your bitching about the relative merits of two shows which operate on completely different levels.
post #48 of 398
Do you want me to bring James Cameron and Aliens into this thread to really fuck it up, Marshall?
post #49 of 398
Thread Starter 
I'd figure out a way to burn internet code to the ground if you did.

Also I don't get the 'holy shit, huge quality dip' bit about Bugs. It wasn't as riveting as the other episodes but it was still really well done, and it helped flesh out the brothers a bit more. Also after watching the ninth episode the female leads are so far dead, troubled/menaced teens/or mums (I'm counting the sister from ep 2 in the 'moms' category because of her primary concern for her brother), which is kind of odd. I don't know why, but now I know it's viewed as a gay show I'm desperate for these, ahem, motherfuckers to get their dicks wet just to validate me.
post #50 of 398
Considering that what happened to Sam's girlfriend is still pretty recent and that they're hunting for their missing father, why would anybody expect them to go chase tail so quick?

They have bigger concerns at the present moment than sex.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Television
CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPORTS, GAMES & LEISURE › Television › The 'goddamit I kinda like Supernatural' thread