CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › The Chewers Catch-All › Muckety Muck
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Muckety Muck

post #1 of 64
Thread Starter 
No Diggity returned?
post #2 of 64
No Diggity? No doubt.
post #3 of 64
It's Diggity. Destroy it.
post #4 of 64
I read like two of his posts and I already agree.
post #5 of 64
He's not bringing up the zombie dinos in PJ's KONG again, is he?
post #6 of 64
Which Harry Potter thread are we talking about?
post #7 of 64
I've only seen him in the Drag Me To Hell thread. I think he's made it more interesting then it has been for a few pages. I understand banning shills and trolls but someone genuinely arguing their points without name calling or creating entire bait threads? Hell, I ain't got no problems with that.
post #8 of 64
He's an idiot, but at least he can string a sentence together.

No idea about No Diggity, though.
post #9 of 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattioli View Post
No Diggity? No doubt.
Yo Eileen, drop the verse.

I thought so as well. But with this thread he is dead meat come what may anyway.
post #10 of 64
He's giving off The Dark Shakes, but it's fun reading. And film-related.
post #11 of 64
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/40453

Ctrl + F: Diggity for the crazy.


I still peruse the talkbacks from time to time. He spams the shit out of them the same as he does here. It's why it is so easy to spot him here when he starts up with his same bizarre interpretations of films.

I honestly don't think he is a troll at this point. Just weird and persistent.
post #12 of 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jan View Post
Yo Eileen, drop the verse.
And thank you.

Yeah, Muckety Muck is doomed to be Dark Shook.
post #13 of 64
Agree with Amphib. Being out of your mind isn't trolling. But how come this dude comes back a hunnert times yet Warrior Angel is gone 4ever?
post #14 of 64
I miss Warrior. That shit was entertaining.
post #15 of 64
Muckety Muck = best boarder.
post #16 of 64
It's sort of amusing at the tail end of the DMTH thread, but nobody wants this shit anywhere else.

People were calling him NoDiggity, but I was like, "Maybe so, but I don't see any of his trademark woman hating."

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muckety Muck View Post
Christine WAS asking for it!
post #17 of 64
It's Diggity/Parsons/Dark Shape/Plant/Spinach/Turnips/The Other Names He uses
post #18 of 64
Devin's new witch hunt.
post #19 of 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by JXN1138 View Post
Devin's new witch hunt.
If you bothered reading the boards, you'd understand. So do that. Go read the Drag Me to Hell thread.
post #20 of 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil View Post
Agree with Amphib. Being out of your mind isn't trolling. But how come this dude comes back a hunnert times yet Warrior Angel is gone 4ever?
Unless they are blatant shills or relentlessly spamming a thread with nonsense until it is unreadable then I really don't see the point of banning a poster when they can just register under a new name the very next day. It's not my call, but Diggity is obviously not going away, so perhaps it is best just to leave him as Muckety Muck. The more prevalent posters around here will know not to engage him if they know who it is. Then again, some members still respond to Fleed.
post #21 of 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abbott & Prospero View Post
Then again, some members still respond to Fleed.
Those are the ones who need to be banned.
post #22 of 64
Agreed.
post #23 of 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobClark View Post
Those are the ones who need to be banned.
Exactly.
post #24 of 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by devincf View Post
No Diggity returned?
Yup. Confirmed.
post #25 of 64
DARKMITES...
PLEASE don't do that again.
post #26 of 64
Is No Diggity from the same Scorched Planet universe as Creepy Thin Man and Fishy Kotex, or is he his own thing?
post #27 of 64
Thread Starter 
His own thing.

Any internet detectives able to find anything on this guy? He lives in Long Island. I'm fascinated by him.
post #28 of 64
I'm always flabbergasted that you guys are able to pick up previously banned users just by writing style.
post #29 of 64
Before some of you posting on this thread get too sympathetic to NoDigity/Muckety Muck/Parsons, remember this is the guy who cyber stalked one of the half dozen female Chewers to the point where she no longer posts at all. I say, ban away!
post #30 of 64
I hadn't heard about that; who did he stalk?
post #31 of 64

Behold! The MeltDown of NoDiggity!

http://chud.com/forum/showthread.php...ight=NoDiggity

Read on from here through the end of the thread...but be warned! You will read some deranged postings!

EDITED TO NoDignity's first post announcing his woman "issues"
post #32 of 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cylon Baby View Post
http://chud.com/forum/showthread.php...Diggity&page=7

Read on from here through the end of the thread...but be warned! You will read some deranged postings!
I participated in that thread. And I just skimmed the last couple of pages. You mentioned cyberstalking. What am I missing?
post #33 of 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cylon Baby View Post
Before some of you posting on this thread get too sympathetic to NoDigity/Muckety Muck/Parsons, remember this is the guy who cyber stalked one of the half dozen female Chewers to the point where she no longer posts at all. I say, ban away!
To be entirely fair, I don't think that guy's why Zooey's such a rare sight around here, since I can't imagine her disappearing due to some creepy dorkus on a message board. She's tougher than that.
post #34 of 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abbott & Prospero View Post
I participated in that thread. And I just skimmed the last couple of pages. You mentioned cyberstalking. What am I missing?
Eh you have to start from the beginning (I just changed the link so it starts on page one with NoDiggity's first post. There is a series of posts where he starts attacking said female chewer then suddenly starts flirting with her!

EDITED TO ADD: And I now do not see them. Either I got mixed up and they are on another thread, or they were removed....like his picture of DaveB!
post #35 of 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anderson View Post
It's Diggity/Parsons/Dark Shape/Plant/Spinach/Turnips/The Other Names He uses
But I don't hate women...
post #36 of 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake View Post
To be entirely fair, I don't think that guy's why Zooey's such a rare sight around here, since I can't imagine her disappearing due to some creepy dorkus on a message board. She's tougher than that.
Yeah, I can definitively state that he didn't bother her. She used that thread to raise some issues that were tangential to the conversation and concerned with guy-centric fan communities in general, but Diggity, himself? Definitely not a factor. Also, she's just busier these days.
post #37 of 64
We could use more women around here to pick up all these beer cans.
post #38 of 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by romeosolo View Post
We could use more women around here to pick up all these beer cans.
And there you go.
post #39 of 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dark Shape View Post
But I don't hate women...
Sorry, dude. I meant Dark Shake. Typo.
post #40 of 64
Fucker tried stalking MissZooey?! This defies belief.
post #41 of 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by IggytheBorg View Post
Fucker tried stalking MissZooey?! This defies belief.
Stalking may have been something of an overstatement on Jake's part, though his point stands. "Aggressively harassing" are probably the words that I would used. Though I do feel I'm now part of some sort of sisterhood of women who have had sexually suggestive images of "themselves" posted on the internet without their consent. Makes me all tingly just thinking about it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by romeosolo
We could use more women around here to pick up all these beer cans.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveB View Post
And there you go.
What Dave said. It was less NoDiggity and his ilk and more "jokes" like this combined with having a grownup job that I simply cannot neglect. But, as long as I have a moment between classes here, let me invite romeosolo there to get fucked, if only so he can respond and let us all know that he was "just joking!" Because it's so. fucking. funny. Amirite, guys?
post #42 of 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissZooey View Post
Stalking may have been something of an overstatement on Jake's part, though his point stands. "Aggressively harassing" are probably the words that I would used. Though I do feel I'm now part of some sort of sisterhood of women who have had sexually suggestive images of "themselves" posted on the internet without their consent. Makes me all tingly just thinking about it.

What Dave said. It was less NoDiggity and his ilk and more "jokes" like this combined with having a grownup job that I simply cannot neglect. But, as long as I have a moment between classes here, let me invite romeosolo there to get fucked, if only so he can respond and let us all know that he was "just joking!" Because it's so. fucking. funny. Amirite, guys?
HEY WHOA I DIDN'T SAY STALKING

Also, the Sisterhood of the Traveling MSPaint Vaginas might be an interesting read if the concept itself wasn't so frigging weird.
post #43 of 64
Oh MissZooey, please come back from times to times to use some random "funny" poster as a personal punching bag. It's really appreciated.
post #44 of 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Savage View Post
Oh MissZooey, please come back from times to times to use some random "funny" poster as a personal punching bag. It's really appreciated.
Or my co-worker who just sent me an oh-so-funny and original chain e-mail about how beer contains female hormones.

I need to push this guy down the stairs already.
post #45 of 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake View Post
HEY WHOA I DIDN'T SAY STALKING
Whoops. Someone else said stalking. My bad.
post #46 of 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissZooey View Post
Stalking may have been something of an overstatement on Jake's part, though his point stands. "Aggressively harassing" are probably the words that I would used. Though I do feel I'm now part of some sort of sisterhood of women who have had sexually suggestive images of "themselves" posted on the internet without their consent. Makes me all tingly just thinking about it.

For the record, my comment "I like the way you work it, MissZooey. How would you manage it?" was NOT "flirting" with MissZooey. The comment has to be see in context of the ongoing conversation.

Previously, MissZooey had randomly and gratuitiously expressed her displeasure with my nickname, because it "ruined the song" for her. So using a line in the song was merely a mild dig at her for being nasty about my nickname, and saying I had "ruined" the song.

Previously in the thread I had had an argument with MissZooey about feminist topics, and been besieged by male defenders of MissZooey, who I had stated that I felt were doing so ONLY because she was a rare female, not because she was making any valid points. So "I like the way you work it" also referred to my feeling that she was deliberately courting such gallantry so that she could be defended. It also mocked her avatar, of the the actress from "The Office", which would help elicit such gallantry from lonely internet Knights.

The sentence "How would you manage it?" referred to the ongoing conversation about "armchair sex", and was in response to MissZooey dismissing the subject as beneath contempt, or silly. "We aren't going to discuss the logistics of armchair sex, are we" was what she said, I believe. Since I thought that the rather difficult logistics of armchair sex (in the movie Juno) were a valid point, and didnt' like having it so airily and contemptuously dismissed, I actually wanted an answer as to WHY MissZooey thought that the logistics weren't worth discussing "How would you manage it?" meant, do you really have in mind a way such would be realistic and comfortable for two 16 year olds to have sex for the first time?

The question was also RHETORICAL, in that I didn't think the question could be believably answered, and I didn't expect MissZooey to answer it, as I didnt' believe she could possiblly have a satisfying answer on the subject. It was not "flirting" or an attempt to "turn MizzZooey on" or elicit details about her private life, if that is what everyone is implying.

As for the "obscene drawing", let me unveil the mystery so that it doesn't take on depths of depravity limited only by people's imaginations. The picture was based on the previous Microsoft Paint pictures posted by Abbot & Prospero, which humorously depicted the logistics of Armchair Sex using stick figures. (Abbot's had someone with a helicopter hat descending into someone else's lap). I had just created one where the armchair was empty, but the stick figures were happily making love on a nearby bed, while the armchair looked sad. I then, fired up with creativity, created one that mocked MissZooey's sniffy dismissal of the subject, depiciting a stick figure with lipstick and horn rimmed glasses reading a book with her elbows resting in the seat of the armchair, her back to a stick figure labeled "DaveB" who looked sad, implying that there was going to be no sex if the lady-stick figure did not stop reading her book. The whole point of it was to make fun of "Armchair sex" by depicting sex involving armchairs that was NOT anything like the scenario in the movie "Juno", as in the previous cartoon where the stick figures were having sex while ignoring the armchair completely. It also made fun of MissZoeey because she is a librarian (or teacher, or something).

The much laughed at "penis" of DaveB, which people claimed had "fallen off" was in fact the foot of an incompletely erased stick figure.

If MissZooey was truly offended by the "obscene" picture, I apologize, but I honestly thought the silliness, and stick-figuriness of it all would be laughed at, not taken as a horrendous crime against MissZooey's southern-belle-like femininity. Just to make things clear, there was no stick-figure penis in the picture, nor were there any stick figure boobs or vaginas. Although the picture WAS labeled "armchair sex with MissZooey", I must point out that it depicted MissZooey and DaveB NOT having sex, and unlikely TO have sex anytime in the near future, repeating the idea that armchairs and sex just don't mix.

I would like to thank MissZooey for saying that I was NOT "stalking" her. The myth I was seeing developed was beginning to become rather depressing.

P.S.

I realize now that having MissZooey sitting in the armchair, reading a book, while DaveB looked sad, would have made the same point and caused less offense.
post #47 of 64
post #48 of 64
Boy, someone's had an awful lot of sugar today, hasn't he?
post #49 of 64
Yay, Dave got his penis back!
post #50 of 64
Well kudos for doing something different and actually admit who you are NoDiggity. Although, it will most likely result in a re-banning.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Chewers Catch-All
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › The Chewers Catch-All › Muckety Muck