Quote:
Originally Posted by Louris 
Agreed. I'm not at all a NIN fan, but even if you feel they've lost the connection to the roots of rock one could argue that it's because their particular sound/style has evolved beyond the roots.
Anyone care to make that argument about Taylor Swift's music, that she's lost connection to the roots of country because her experimental artistry has taken her beyond it?
|
I'll make the argument that Taylor Swift's exposure to contemporary pop, rock, and commercial country music makes her sound very little like Patsy Cline, but that music is not a matter of "purity," anyway, so who gives a fuck? Experimental artistry, the influence of predominant styles of the time, even outright cash grabs - all of these occasionally lead to good music.
I'd wager that the music that you love -
all of it - is a hybrid of a sort. I'm not sure why I should be more concerned about Taylor Swift's work being traceable back to her country forebears than I should be about Jeff Tweedy's current work being traceable back to his (which were almost entirely arbitrary, anyway - the guy was a Ramones fan who got into folk and country and started playing it on a whim, more or less).
Argue good or bad, sure, but purity and authenticity? No thanks. Not if it's at the expense of
the Arcade Fire, Steve Earle (much of whose work probably has as much in common with Hank Williams' sonically as Taylor Swift's does), and Motown (which some surely considered just a watered-down, radio-friendly take on the "real" soul coming from the South at the time).