CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › The Chewers Catch-All › Princess Kate/Duke Fleed
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Princess Kate/Duke Fleed  

post #1 of 51
Thread Starter 
Please don't derail threads by attacking these two for their personalities. If you have a problem with the content of their posts, please feel free to argue with them, but when they're on topic and you're just flaming them it's shitty.

On top of that, you just shouldn't give attention to people who are craving it like that.

So if you want to engage them on topic, please do. Otherwise, add them to your ignore list.
post #2 of 51
Fleed I do not mind, but I might have to take you up on your advice on Princess Kate. I am a very, very patient person, but mine is almost out on her / him.
post #3 of 51
The comment in Nick's baby thread tips it for me. This is a lonely Suckling attack.
post #4 of 51
While I should realize this is a message board on the internet, it is definitely time to implement the ignore feature. Thanks, Phil and Devin.
post #5 of 51
Why do you people just never fucking listen?
post #6 of 51
Because this is obviously a bait thread instead of, you know, an appeal to rationale.
post #7 of 51
Easy answer. They don't listen. Too busy trying to be "first," instead of checking to see if a thread already exists.
post #8 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by HBarr View Post
Easy answer. They don't listen. Too busy trying to be "first," instead of checking to see if a thread already exists.
I think this would have been better served as a PM.
post #9 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake View Post
Because this is obviously a bait thread instead of, you know, an appeal to rationale.
You know, honestly, there's only two outcomes responding to a post from either of these people.

A - If they're for real, congratulations are in order for picking on a retarded person. Well done, I hope you feel very proud.

B - If they're fake, you keep falling for the same lousy trick over and over again, so maybe you're retarded?
post #10 of 51
I just like that the forum is having problems with a Duke and a Princess. Feudal system!
post #11 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad Millette View Post
You know, honestly, there's only two outcomes responding to a post from either of these people.

A - If they're for real, congratulations are in order for picking on a retarded person. Well done, I hope you feel very proud.

B - If they're fake, you keep falling for the same lousy trick over and over again, so maybe you're retarded?

...
post #12 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake View Post
Because this is obviously a bait thread instead of, you know, an appeal to rationale.
Why do you think this is a bait thread? Seems a pretty honest appeal to me...
post #13 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil View Post
The comment in Nick's baby thread tips it for me. This is a lonely Suckling attack.
What comment was that?

On topic how can anyone think this is a bait thread? It's actually a really kindly worded plea on Devin's behalf.
post #14 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Humanoid View Post
Why do you think this is a bait thread? Seems a pretty honest appeal to me...
He was commenting on how everyone would react to it, not how Devin intended it.
post #15 of 51
I just can't muster up rage over Duke Fleed anymore, period, and Princess Kate can at least somewhat string sentences together, so I'm doing the safe thing and just generally ignoring them (save for my usertext, obviously). I just don't get how someone can erupt in incoherent rage whenever they see either of these names attached to a post anymore.

Except for Chap Saxon, I mean, but that guy's always come off as the dude who traps squirrels just to light them on fire and jerk off as they die.

EDIT: My "bait thread" comment was pure sarcasm. I'll add more smilies next time or something.
post #16 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by bendrix View Post
He was commenting on how everyone would react to it, not how Devin intended it.
Dammit, does noone use those hilarious "[/sarcasm]" bookends anymore?
post #17 of 51
Sorry Jake, I didn't actually mean to quote you.
post #18 of 51
These two are probably the same person, so just ignore them or put them on ignore if you can't resist.
post #19 of 51
'Scool. I just think the internet is making everyone crazy or something.
post #20 of 51
I do not get enraged, just tired-head from reading the incoherent babbling. Thus, the ignore feature was used on Princess.

Jake: The net did not make me crazy. I was that long before the advent of the Internet.
post #21 of 51
Thanks Devin. I'm cool with Fleed but I will definitely ignore Princess Kate.
post #22 of 51
I'm cool with Fleed, I find his posts to be pretty entertaining and off the wall. Never saw the point in getting pissed off at someone on an internet message board.

As for Kate, well...strange but hell, who cares.
post #23 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake View Post

Except for Chap Saxon, I mean, but that guy's always come off as the dude who traps squirrels just to light them on fire and jerk off as they die.

EDIT: My "bait thread" comment was pure sarcasm. I'll add more smilies next time or something.
Perhaps... but I do agree with Devin and everyone else in this thread. Its a waste of time to engage these people (myself included) by insulting them.
post #24 of 51
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad Millette View Post
You know, honestly, there's only two outcomes responding to a post from either of these people.

A - If they're for real, congratulations are in order for picking on a retarded person. Well done, I hope you feel very proud.

B - If they're fake, you keep falling for the same lousy trick over and over again, so maybe you're retarded?
Oh, hi. Remember this wisdom?
post #25 of 51
She's shitting up every thread possible and at this point it's been noted that even when ignored it's impossible not to have the misfortune to read stuff that's been quoted. I tried to engage in conversation until it became brutally obvious that she was trolling, but a warning like this will really impact very few people.
post #26 of 51
Thread Starter 
WTF you had to read stuff that was quoted? OH MY GOD CAN WE GET YOU A COUNSELOR?
post #27 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by devincf View Post
WTF you had to read stuff that was quoted? OH MY GOD CAN WE GET YOU A COUNSELOR?
I really can't figure out why you're so anxious to nuke most trolls, but for some reason she's under your umbrella of grace. Try to be more arbitrary with shit that gets you worked up.
post #28 of 51
Good wisdom. I have benefited from using the Ignore function in the past. I think I'll do the same thing now.
post #29 of 51
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by A-Pathetic View Post
I really can't figure out why you're so anxious to nuke most trolls, but for some reason she's under your umbrella of grace. Try to be more arbitrary with shit that gets you worked up.
Because she's not a troll. She's an idiot. Just like you fucking people all thought Fleed was a troll forever. Just because someone posts in a way you don't like doesn't make them a troll.
post #30 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by devincf View Post
Because she's not a troll. She's an idiot. Just like you fucking people all thought Fleed was a troll forever. Just because someone posts in a way you don't like doesn't make them a troll.
And you thought she was Creepy Thin Man, called it out within a couple of days of her joining. Did you think that because she's an idiot, or because she sure as hell smells like a troll?

She's rapidly expanding what groups she levels insults at as she moves along during this "low profile" time. There's a difference between somebody being an idiot and somebody being so dumb that there's no way they've survived 23 years on this earth. It's possible you're right, but I'll stick with your first instinct on this one instead of your current theory.
post #31 of 51
It's really not worth worrying about.
post #32 of 51
Some people have awfully low thresholds of outrage.
post #33 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan View Post
It's really not worth worrying about.
More wisdom, and this even applies to about 95% of anything in life (I'm being generous, it's probably closer to 99%).
post #34 of 51
Princess Kate is really Christina Hendricks. She's fucking with us all.
post #35 of 51
The Ignore function is your friend.
post #36 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by A-Pathetic View Post
And you thought she was Creepy Thin Man, called it out within a couple of days of her joining. Did you think that because she's an idiot, or because she sure as hell smells like a troll?

She's rapidly expanding what groups she levels insults at as she moves along during this "low profile" time. There's a difference between somebody being an idiot and somebody being so dumb that there's no way they've survived 23 years on this earth. It's possible you're right, but I'll stick with your first instinct on this one instead of your current theory.
For a guy named A-pathetic you sure get pretty worked up about this...
post #37 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by nekkerbee View Post
Some people have awfully low thresholds of outrage.
This
post #38 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Miller View Post
For a guy named A-pathetic you sure get pretty worked up about this...
Inferring emotion on the internet is always a good idea.
post #39 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad Millette View Post
You know, honestly, there's only two outcomes responding to a post from either of these people.

A - If they're for real, congratulations are in order for picking on a retarded person. Well done, I hope you feel very proud.

B - If they're fake, you keep falling for the same lousy trick over and over again, so maybe you're retarded?
I'd just like to point out how much I missed Millette. The man speaks the truth.
post #40 of 51
Th only thing that annoys me about dumbasses like fleed is that he's impervious to enlightened opinions or spirited debate. The guy is exactly the same person as he was when he first joined the forums. I have to wonder why the idiots hang out here. There's virtually no point in engaging them in any sort of conversation. So I ignore them, and their substance-free posts are a trifle annoying, but it isn't worth getting too worked up over.
post #41 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Humanoid View Post
Dammit, does noone use those hilarious "[/sarcasm]" bookends anymore?

The guy from Herman's Hermits? How should we know?
post #42 of 51
What's the big deal anyway? Kate's illiterate but so is half of the internet. Fleed has childish tastes, meanwhile you guys post page after page fretting over the minutiae of comic book movies. In any event neither of them are getting banned anytime soon so maybe concern yourselves a little more with things that actually matter.
post #43 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Read View Post
Princess Kate is really Christina Hendricks. She's fucking with us all.
I'd love it if this was true.
post #44 of 51
I know wisdom states that you should ignore her (and I do have her on Ignore), but as stated, people quoting her - enagaging her - still helps ruin otherwise interesting threads. Her completely sub-inane posting in the Basterds post-release thread epitomises this.

Not getting worked up, just hate the "i'm going to skip watching/discussing this film" attention whoring that she's particularly bad at.
post #45 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by whiskey tango foxtrot View Post
What's the big deal anyway? Kate's illiterate but so is half of the internet. Fleed has childish tastes, meanwhile you guys post page after page fretting over the minutiae of comic book movies. In any event neither of them are getting banned anytime soon so maybe concern yourselves a little more with things that actually matter.
I disagree strongly with Fleed on most things, but at least he is honest about liking what he likes. Case in point; he abhors the new Battlestar Galactica but loves the 70's version. He can articulate why he likes one and dislikes the other. It's just that he chooses to do so in an extremely annoying way.

I have no idea what's up with Princess Kate 2.0
post #46 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by A-Pathetic View Post
And you thought she was Creepy Thin Man, called it out within a couple of days of her joining. Did you think that because she's an idiot, or because she sure as hell smells like a troll?

She's rapidly expanding what groups she levels insults at as she moves along during this "low profile" time. There's a difference between somebody being an idiot and somebody being so dumb that there's no way they've survived 23 years on this earth. It's possible you're right, but I'll stick with your first instinct on this one instead of your current theory.
If you'd actually read Devins thread where he called her out as Creepy Thin Man then surely you'd have read that an IP check was done and it was found she is not - hence Devin changing his tune as he did.

It's called 're-assessing after new information comes to light', you may have heard of it.

Again, Millettes words are wisdom and truth and ignore is your friend, how is this so fucking hard?
post #47 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Thomas View Post
I know wisdom states that you should ignore her (and I do have her on Ignore), but as stated, people quoting her - enagaging her - still helps ruin otherwise interesting threads. Her completely sub-inane posting in the Basterds post-release thread epitomises this.

Not getting worked up, just hate the "i'm going to skip watching/discussing this film" attention whoring that she's particularly bad at.
Seriously? How is someone talking to her ruining any thread? You have a scroll-wheel (or if you're on a Mac the little scrolly-ball thing) - just roll past it. Is that REALLY that much trouble? The fact that you're even commenting on it means that you're "worked up" past the point of reason.

She's just TALKING. She's not abusing the boards, the staff, the members or the rules in any way - she's just participating. So I honestly can't tell if you guys are just too overly sensitive or if this is just some incredible sense of entitlement that makes you demand that everything has to be catered to YOUR specific tastes. But either way - please please please please please just let it the fuck go. If you don't like her don't talk to her. If you wanna call her (or anyone) on some bullshit then please do - but do it like Devin said: ON TOPIC.

And even though I quoted you, Sackley, I'm not singling you out. All of you guys need to relax.
post #48 of 51
Part of the problem here is people start thinking of the boards as their safe haven from the real world where everyone thinks along the same lines as they do. The problem with this is that a)the internet should never be a safe haven from anything, and b)trying to completely remove yourself from opposing thought is never a good thing either. Or would we prefer to have the boards moved to a town hall format?

It's ok to wish someone would go away, not ok to make somebody go away, if all they're doing is being kinda irritating.
post #49 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by JGButler View Post
And even though I quoted you, Sackley, I'm not singling you out. All of you guys need to relax.
Point taken. Moving on.
post #50 of 51
*sigh* I fell into this trap yesterday and got into a really juvenile pissing contest when I should have been an adult and walked away. It really just made me look bad. I shall follow this advice in the future.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Chewers Catch-All
This thread is locked  
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › The Chewers Catch-All › Princess Kate/Duke Fleed