CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › The President's Address to a joint session of Congress 9/9/09
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The President's Address to a joint session of Congress 9/9/09 - Page 9

post #401 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by yt View Post
I told my accountant to take any retirement funds I have out of the market and into a money market account because--present company and the honest financial services industry professionals excepted--I don't want to contribute one dime to those @$$es. If you're that confident in the market, bless.
I debated telling you this, but money market accounts are technically mutual funds and hence are tied to the market.

Im sure my boss just bought a new helicopter thanks to you.
post #402 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Closer View Post
I debated telling you this, but money market accounts are technically mutual funds and hence are tied to the market.

Im sure my boss just bought a new helicopter thanks to you.


Are you serious? My accountant does not agree with me about staying away from Wall Street, and this has been an ongoing argument, so I'm not surprised. I mean, it's small time (meaning: your boss bought a toy helicopter thanks to me) but it's the principle of the thing. I may well just put my retirement funds in municipal bonds or something, if I even can.
post #403 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by yt View Post
You didn't read my post, did you? Also, what's Rush/Beck/Hannity/O'Reilly's excuse for the VA, a universal public program? Is that "deteriorating"?

Also, the private market has rationing and indeterminate waits, but that's just another example of righties like you cherry-picking only those fragments that fit in with your fantasies about a dun grey socialist state.
I don't have cable and both my jobs preclude me being near the radio most of the day. I haven't listened to Glenn Beck since he went off the deep end and catch so very little of Rush that I couldn't tell you what he says.

I didn't cherry pick anything, I understand that private insurance companies ration care. However I don't wish to trade that for a government entity that does. I'd prefer to address and fix the actual problem.

As for waiting periods under our current plan I'm not sure what you are referring to. If I need an MRI I can get one within the next hour not the next month. If I needed chemotherapy I could begin it within the next week not the next four months. If I needed surgery for, let's say breast cancer, I could get it within the week or month not the next fourteen months.
post #404 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson View Post
Okay, well, I don't consider buying a guaranteed treasury bond being "in the market".
But that does serve as an illustration that there are better alternatives out there. Anyone under the age of 35 who thinks they're going to get even a 1 to 1 return on investment with social security is mistaken.
post #405 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by yt View Post


Are you serious? My accountant does not agree with me about staying away from Wall Street, and this has been an ongoing argument, so I'm not surprised. I mean, it's small time (meaning: your boss bought a toy helicopter thanks to me) but it's the principle of the thing. I may well just put my retirement funds in municipal bonds or something, if I even can.
Call your accountant and ask if your money market is FDIC insured. If it is, that means its just a savings account that the bank calls a "money market" to attract new business.

If its not, then its an investment, and your money is spread across commercial paper issued by your friends Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and Citibank. The Primary Reserve money market fund had a shitload of Lehman Brother paper in it, which is why last September it broke the buck (went below $1/share).

Also, you cant (shouldnt) use municipal bonds in a retirement account as the tax free benefit is negated due to the fact that your retirement account is tax deferred and fully taxable upon withdrawl. Also, your three amigos listed above underwrite those municipal bonds, so theyre still getting paid.

When will you humans learn that you cannot get away from us!

post #406 of 489
post #407 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by TzuDohNihm View Post
Thriving? If you call rationing and interminable waits thriving then there isn't much left to say is there?
Let's be clear here: you are wrong and stupid, or else disingenuous as hell. Please acknowledge this.
post #408 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Closer View Post
This reminds me: Canada Savings Bonds go on sale again next month.
post #409 of 489
True story time. My mom just broke her arm. She had immediate treatment, but she needed some surgery to repair the bone. Total wait time at the best hospital in the province for orthopedic surgery: five days. Cost: $0.

That's the kind of creeping decay we're dealing with up here in Socialism Land, aka Canada.

TzuDoNim: You are stupid and wrong, or else disingenuously lying. Please acknowledge this.
post #410 of 489
Rich and not rich white people want V.I.P. Five day waits are for lazy people and Mexicans.
post #411 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Bateman View Post
Rich and not rich white people want V.I.P. Five day waits are for lazy people. Mexicans die in the gutter.
Fixed.
post #412 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Girma View Post
....most proponents of high deductibles and health savings accounts are also for a shift towards catastrophic health insurance, which—I imagine—would cover just that.
That's something that people who are comfortable with that risk should be able to do IMO.

Catastrophic health insurance isn't for everyone - however a gov't guarantee to cover catastrophic occurrences could, IN THEORY, really drop the price of insurance.

I doubt that it would end up that way in practice.
post #413 of 489
Wouldn't denying illegal immigrants emergency medical care go against the Hippocratic Oath? Just a thought.
post #414 of 489
The wait time, incidentally, had everything to do with scheduling. We could have gone to a worse hospital and gotten service faster, but it wasn't life-threatening, so we waited for the best.

TzuDoNim, please acknowledge your stupidity and wrongness.
post #415 of 489
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pop Zeus View Post
Wouldn't denying illegal immigrants emergency medical care go against the Hippocratic Oath? Just a thought.
I made this same point earlier. of course it would, and thats in addition to being, you know, evil
post #416 of 489
So what part of the country do you guys live that you get insta-appointments? Many times I have to wait more than days, even weeks to get an appointment. And I don't know about you, but visits to the hospital's emergency room are often a nightmare because you have a long wait unless you're bleeding to death in front of the counter.
post #417 of 489
I also would like to meet these bartering doctors that have nothing better to do but accept trinkets from Tzu so they can get paid.

The funny thing is that a lot of good doctors in the area won't even see you if you don't have insurance, they don't care if you mean to pay cash, if it's not the insurance they take or you don't have anything you can move along.
post #418 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Prankster View Post
The wait time, incidentally, had everything to do with scheduling. We could have gone to a worse hospital and gotten service faster, but it wasn't life-threatening, so we waited for the best.

TzuDoNim, please acknowledge your stupidity and wrongness.
Nothing to acknowledge there. Your disagreement and head in the sand attitude doesn't negate my argument.

Quote:
How Canada measures up

The head of the Canadian Medical Association recently completed a fact-finding trip to five European countries, where he found negligible waiting lists for most medical procedures. Here are some comparisons with Canada:

* France is in the midst of an MRI crisis because people are waiting an average of 35 days for a scan. In Manitoba - one of the best-performing provinces with reliable, published data - the average wait is 70 days. In Ontario, the average wait is 105 days.

* The average wait for orthopedic surgery in Ontario is 26 weeks. In England, the average wait for orthopedic treatment is 12 weeks. This is one of the slowest-performing specialties in the English National Health System.

* In England, 93 per cent of all specialized treatments begin within 18 weeks of the first doctor's visit. In Canada, 50 to 91 per cent of Canadians blow past the 18-week marker while waiting for specialized treatment.

* Ophthalmology is the worst performer in Canada, with 91 per cent of patients waiting more than 18 weeks (The average wait is 450 days). Gastroenterology is the best-performing specialty. About half of patients are treated within 18 weeks.

Sources: Manitoba Health, Ontario Ministry of Health, National Health Service in England, Wait Time Alliance, Canadian Medical Association, French health ministry
post #419 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElCapitanAmerica View Post
So what part of the country do you guys live that you get insta-appointments? Many times I have to wait more than days, even weeks to get an appointment. And I don't know about you, but visits to the hospital's emergency room are often a nightmare because you have a long wait unless you're bleeding to death in front of the counter.
Primary care physician appointments or specialist appointments? I can usually get a next-day appointment with my PCP, and specialists are usually scheduled a week out.
post #420 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElCapitanAmerica View Post
So what part of the country do you guys live that you get insta-appointments? Many times I have to wait more than days, even weeks to get an appointment. And I don't know about you, but visits to the hospital's emergency room are often a nightmare because you have a long wait unless you're bleeding to death in front of the counter.
Scheduling a check-up with my primary care physician can definitely take weeks, but the couple of times I've had more pressing issues I was able to get in the day I called.

The craziest luck I had was this summer, when my regular doctor referred me to a neurologist, who I had never seen before, and somehow managed to get in to see him 15 minutes after my doctor's visit.
post #421 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chavez View Post
That's something that people who are comfortable with that risk should be able to do IMO.

Catastrophic health insurance isn't for everyone - however a gov't guarantee to cover catastrophic occurrences could, IN THEORY, really drop the price of insurance.

I doubt that it would end up that way in practice.
Oh, I don’t doubt that it could produce a significant drop in cost if implemented properly, it’s just... it’s about as likely as Obama instituting an NHS style system.
post #422 of 489
Quote:
The Canadian economy lost $14.8 billion last year through lost productivity while workers languished on medical wait lists, the head of the Canadian Medical Association has charged.

Waits for health care in just four areas - cataract surgery, heart bypass, joint replacement and MRI scans - cause an excessive drain on our economy, Dr. Brian Day, president of the 67,000-strong CMA, said in a speech yesterday to the exclusive Economic Club of Toronto.

The cumulative cost of treatment waits in the four areas in 2007 was $14.8 billion in reduced economic activity, lowering government revenues by $4.4 billion, suggests new research done for the CMA by the Centre for Spatial Economics.

The loss of economic activity includes work hours lost by ailing workers, direct losses from decreased production of goods, reduced income and lowered discretionary spending, said Day.

Day did not offer any estimates on how much public investment would be needed to eliminate health care waits.

Wait times for services could grow even higher if something isn't done to solve the doctor shortage, warned Day, the founder of a private orthopaedic clinic who favours bringing in more private health measures.

In two years, 4,000 doctors in the full range of specialties will be retiring, according to the recently released 2007 National Physicians Survey. Right now nearly 4.5 million Canadians are without a family doctor, Day said.

In order to boost doctor numbers, Day told reporters he isn't averse to having private, not-for-profit medical schools set up in Canada with self-sustaining higher tuitions, not unlike the Ivy League medical schools such as Harvard's.

Day also said Canadians are suffering from a "de facto government monopoly" over hospital and doctor services. "In Canada, patients serve the system," said Day. "That's the wrong way around."

The Canadian consumer is getting "poor value" as governments control spending and how and where medical care is made available, as well as the training and employment of medical workers, said Day.

"Forcing patients to endure pain and suffering in order to sustain a social program is wrong. It is contrary to the principle that all persons should be treated as equals."

Dr. Alan Hudson, head of the drive to bring down wait times in the province, said if Ontario patients want to know what wait times exist for key procedures at a local hospital, they can find out the numbers on the health ministry website. "The very significant improvement of wait times in Ontario is available for everyone to see on the Web, with the exception of MRI," he said. "This improvement is happening very steadily within the current system. It's working very well."

The Ontario Wait Times Strategy is expanding to measure - and drive down - waits for neurosurgery, general surgery and emergency room waits, he said.

Dr. Danielle Martin, a Toronto family doctor who is chair of Canadian Doctors for Medicare, said all parties agree wait times are not acceptable but are getting better. And there is a lot that can be done to reorganize care without incurring more costs, she said.
Fifteen billion dollars in lost productivity? Nearly five billion in lost government revenue? Creeping decay. Multiply that by 10 in the U.S economy, collapse.

Quote:
The average wait time for people coming to emergency departments, and who did not ultimately need to be admitted, was nine hours. The average wait for emergency department patients who did need hospitalization was 23.5 hours.

"Much more work remains to be done," said Dr. Lorne Bellan, co-chairman of the Wait Time Alliance.

The federal and provincial governments have allotted $5.5 billion to cut wait times in the five priority areas. Bellan said billions more would be needed to fight delays in the others. But he pointed to a 2008 study that found delays in medical treatment cost the economy billions more.
Five billion and counting on how to reduce wait times? Wouldn't it make more sense to just use that five billion to hire more doctors? I mean, not having enough doctors is one thing that seems to be a problem with your system, yes?
post #423 of 489
Tzu, always source your quotes. It's essential when debating, and common courtesy besides.
post #424 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElCapitanAmerica View Post
I also would like to meet these bartering doctors that have nothing better to do but accept trinkets from Tzu so they can get paid.

The funny thing is that a lot of good doctors in the area won't even see you if you don't have insurance, they don't care if you mean to pay cash, if it's not the insurance they take or you don't have anything you can move along.
If you lack insurance, you can negotiate a better rate with doctors that accept cash and non-insurance patients, not to mention they'll more often then not help you out by giving you the 'samples' that pharma reps leave to avoid costly prescriptions. So instead of prescribing you say... 60 pills, they give you 45 in free samples and write you a prescription for 15. Not every doctor is like this but there are some real gems out there that friends and family have gone to see when they didn't have insurance for whatever reason.

As for waiting time? I live on the East Coast. My daughters doctor is in upstate New York (same pediatrician that treated me when I was a baby, apparently) and my doctor is in Connecticut where we live.

Almost all Emergency Room visits me or my family had, were instantaneous but then I only go there in cases of an emergency.

As for PCP.. I can get an appointment same day if I call first thing in the morning for either me or my daughter and my PCP is the Medical Director of the facility, so you can imagine his time is tight (only one time was he unavailable and I had to see someone else at the practice). If something comes up later on in the day, I can still get a visit but they'll have to squeeze me in between other patients so I usually have to wait longer in the waiting area (5 minutes usually but those visits are 20 minutes on average.. the iphone has made that easier) Twice I've called the answering service to have the doctor see me or my daughter while the office is closed, usually its a return phone call at home and results in a prescription being sent to a 24 hour pharmacy but if it turns out the symptoms are more severe he will recommend an emergency room vist and he'll meet us down there (this hasn't happened but comforting to know you'll be in good hands at the ER). They charge extra for that and insurance doesn't cover it but it deters abuse of the service and the doctor can waive the fee... which he has done both times for us.

The key here is to have a PCP at a place that has multiple doctors so incase your doctor isn't available you can still be seen by someone else in the practice and you want to make sure that you have a doctor that has gone to a very good school, has admitting rights to hospitals in your area and has ties to the area for a long time. It prevents them moving around from place to place and dropping an insurance plan that you are on. This actually happened to us, the pediatrician dropped our insurance plan (the insurance company was screwing them out of payments and undercutting their costs) but we continued to go there out of pocket and enough parents did the same thing so they renewed that insurance plan.
post #425 of 489
Edmonton Sun.

I wonder why this guy doesn't quote the decade's worth of studies showing three things:

We pay less.

We are just as satisfied, and healthier, than insured Americans, i.e., we are as well off or better off.

We are far more satisfied and healthier than uninsured Americans.


Of course, broad statistical analysis has nothing on some guy making a speech. Now if you want some real criticism, we can talk about the upcoming cuts put in place by Conservatives who just ditched whatever revenue was gained from premiums and gave themself a nice, big, fat raise before deciding on offering early retirement to the most experience RNs to save cash. It ain't all handshakes and buns up here.

This is, of course, due to incompetent administration on the part of Conservatives and not indicative of an ideological failure. This stuff about sliding into decay, though . . . can anyone list a Canadian city as wretched as Detroit? Or a failure of our government on the scale of the debacle in New Orleans?
post #426 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by nekkerbee View Post
Tzu, always source your quotes. It's essential when debating, and common courtesy besides.
No, you are right, my bad. I was closing up shop for the day and utlilizing Lexis-Nexis and didn't have direct access to links.

"How Canada Measures Up" was a Globe and Mail article from June 19, 2009 Friday, pg. A8

The lost productivity article was from The Toronto Star January 16, 2008 Wednesday, pg A19

The Lorne Bellan quote was from The Toronto Sun June 19, 2009 Friday, pg 28.

My apologies again as I was rushing out the door at the end of the day.
post #427 of 489
You spend 15-17% of your GDP on healthcare, check out those numbers in countries that offer 100% free universal healthcare.
post #428 of 489
Which is the funniest bit about this argument, if Canada is creeping towards decay, we’re Usain Bolting.
post #429 of 489
The Sun must've reprinted it. Probably with a huge headline like "Canada Sliding Into Decay!!" and they would use double exclamation points too.

Behold our slide into decay.
post #430 of 489
Quote:
How Canada measures up

The head of the Canadian Medical Association recently completed a fact-finding trip to five European countries, where he found negligible waiting lists for most medical procedures. Here are some comparisons with Canada:

* France is in the midst of an MRI crisis because people are waiting an average of 35 days for a scan. In Manitoba - one of the best-performing provinces with reliable, published data - the average wait is 70 days. In Ontario, the average wait is 105 days.

* The average wait for orthopedic surgery in Ontario is 26 weeks. In England, the average wait for orthopedic treatment is 12 weeks. This is one of the slowest-performing specialties in the English National Health System.

* In England, 93 per cent of all specialized treatments begin within 18 weeks of the first doctor's visit. In Canada, 50 to 91 per cent of Canadians blow past the 18-week marker while waiting for specialized treatment.

* Ophthalmology is the worst performer in Canada, with 91 per cent of patients waiting more than 18 weeks (The average wait is 450 days). Gastroenterology is the best-performing specialty. About half of patients are treated within 18 weeks.

Sources: Manitoba Health, Ontario Ministry of Health, National Health Service in England, Wait Time Alliance, Canadian Medical Association, French health ministry
I sent this to my one of my best friends who's Canadian and has lived there his entire life (he's 29 or so now):

Quote:
"The healthcare thing is curious. The MRI stuff is accurate, since you never STOP hearing about our MRI shortages. Specialized treatment really does sound like bullshit to me, I've gotta say. I don't know what they regard as specialized treatment, but everybody I know who's needed anything from chemo to hernia surgery has gotten it IMMEDIATELY. Opthamology is, um, privatized in almost the entire country. I have no idea why that was brought up."
post #431 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pop Zeus View Post
Wouldn't denying illegal immigrants emergency medical care go against the Hippocratic Oath? Just a thought.
Hippocrates don't like beaners. Look it up.
post #432 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by seabass inna bun View Post
edmonton sun.

I wonder why this guy doesn't quote the decade's worth of studies showing three things:

We pay less.

We are just as satisfied, and healthier, than insured americans, i.e., we are as well off or better off.

We are far more satisfied and healthier than uninsured americans.


Of course, broad statistical analysis has nothing on some guy making a speech. Now if you want some real criticism, we can talk about the upcoming cuts put in place by conservatives who just ditched whatever revenue was gained from premiums and gave themself a nice, big, fat raise before deciding on offering early retirement to the most experience rns to save cash. It ain't all handshakes and buns up here.

This is, of course, due to incompetent administration on the part of conservatives and not indicative of an ideological failure. This stuff about sliding into decay, though . . . Can anyone list a canadian city as wretched as detroit? Or a failure of our government on the scale of the debacle in new orleans?
you lie!
post #433 of 489
Again: my mother JUST HAD ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY IN ONTARIO. At the best clinic in the province. The wait time was 5 days, and that was only because a couple of urgent trauma cases came in and then the weekend hit.

Anecdotal or not, I just directly experienced the system that Tzu is blithely claiming has hellish wait times, and I have no fucking idea how anyone arrived at an average wait time of 26 weeks. No idea. I'm sorry that your stats are lying, Tzu, but they are.
post #434 of 489
Here's a possibility: if the entire province of Ontario is being factored in, there are a lot of remote Northern towns where orthopedic surgery might require airlifting or other elaborate transportation procedures. That's all I can think of. But SOMETHING is juking those stats like crazy.
post #435 of 489
And yeah, Opthamology? What the fuck? That's privatized, and I've never had long wait times for it anyway.

Also, I'm seeing a specialist right now--it's for a very minor condition, but still, I've had no particularly unreasonable wait times. I've always been able to book appointments within days.

Something is deeply rotten with the statistics Tzu's spouting here. I don't care if the souce is Canadian--we have all the same journalism problems you guys do. I'll investigate further when I'm less busy with the TIFF.
post #436 of 489
Thread Starter 
Speaking as someone who had no insurance before Massachusetts decided to help me out, let me say this:

Regarding wait lines for an appointment?
Regarding costs to government or rich people?

WHO THE HECK CARES?!

I have had very very bad stomach pains over the past few months. Took me a week and a half to get an apointment after I asked. I now have a Rx for something to help me, that I never would have been able to get otherwise.

I did not pay for it.

Are you seriously trying to tell us uninsured people that we DON'T want a system like that? Good luck LOL
post #437 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Kate View Post
Speaking as someone who had no insurance before Massachusetts decided to help me out, let me say this:

Regarding wait lines for an appointment?
Regarding costs to government or rich people?

WHO THE HECK CARES?!

I have had very very bad stomach pains over the past few months. Took me a week and a half to get an apointment after I asked. I now have a Rx for something to help me, that I never would have been able to get otherwise.

I did not pay for it.

Are you seriously trying to tell us uninsured people that we DON'T want a system like that? Good luck LOL
Doctor's don't work for free. Sure, YOU didn't pay for it. I'm pretty sure leprechaun's aren't paying for it. So, where is the money coming from?
post #438 of 489
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sideway View Post
Doctor's don't work for free. Sure, YOU didn't pay for it. I'm pretty sure leprechaun's aren't paying for it. So, where is the money coming from?
Here is why some day everyone will have health care..... I DONT CARE WHERE THE MONEY COMES FROM.

As previously stated, if we want to instate a "Loot homes of rich people and sell their stuff back to them on ebay" financing policy for health care, I'd be for that.
post #439 of 489
Could I request Kate go to the other side of the debate? TIA.
post #440 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Prankster View Post
Something is deeply rotten with the statistics Tzu's spouting here. I don't care if the souce is Canadian--we have all the same journalism problems you guys do. I'll investigate further when I'm less busy with the TIFF.
I’d be curious to see what you find as, even the economists I’ve heard who want Medicare for all in this country appear to believe the wait times in Canada are a significant issue, not enough to throw the entire system under the bus (as Tzu seems to be doing), but enough to point to it as a serious problem with the system.
post #441 of 489
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chavez View Post
Could I request Kate go to the other side of the debate? TIA.


Fine, I'll leave the arguing to you guys, but let me close with this:

No matter how it's paid for at first, financing WILL be found later. Want to know why? Because once people get free health care, they will NEVER let it be taken away. Once we win just this once, the other side will have forever lost this issue.
post #442 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by sideway View Post
Doctor's don't work for free. Sure, YOU didn't pay for it. I'm pretty sure leprechaun's aren't paying for it. So, where is the money coming from?
Hey, dipshit.

Stop being a dipshit.
post #443 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Kate View Post
Here is why some day everyone will have health care..... I DONT CARE WHERE THE MONEY COMES FROM.

As previously stated, if we want to instate a "Loot homes of rich people and sell their stuff back to them on ebay" financing policy for health care, I'd be for that.
Until you actually get a REAL job and START paying taxes, I'm sure you DON'T care.
post #444 of 489
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sideway View Post
Until you actually get a REAL job and START paying taxes, I'm sure you DON'T care.
I work at a real job. I pay real taxs. You don't know what you are talking about. Seriously , how dare you lecture me on my job and what I pay in taxs?
post #445 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Kate View Post
Fine, I'll leave the arguing to you guys, but let me close with this:

No matter how it's paid for at first, financing WILL be found later. Want to know why? Because once people get free health care, they will NEVER let it be taken away. Once we win just this once, the other side will have forever lost this issue.
Even a blind nut finds a squirrel eventually. Power and control.
post #446 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Kate View Post

WHO THE HECK CARES?!
People with common sense and an IQ higher than a wristwatch.
post #447 of 489
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Closer View Post
People with common sense and an IQ higher than a wristwatch.
Not if they are uninsured and have stomach pains they don't
post #448 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Kate View Post
I work at a real job. I pay real taxs. You don't know what you are talking about. Seriously , how dare you lecture me on my job and what I pay in taxs?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Kate View Post
You may or may not have seen me say before, but I am not well off.


I would tell you to go bother someone making more than 10 000$ a year.
I'm assuming you make less than $10,000 a year based on your statement. If that is true, then frankly, you aren't making shit, and you definitely aren't paying much in the way of taxes.
post #449 of 489
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sideway View Post
I'm assuming you make less than $10,000 a year based on your statement. If that is true, then frankly, you aren't making shit, and you definitely aren't paying much in the way of taxes.
NOR SHOULD I. If you are making more than a million dollars a year, lets tax you at 50 %. Then you still have 500 000 dollars, which is fifty times more than I make in a year and more than enough money for any sane/non greedy person.
post #450 of 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Kate View Post
NOR SHOULD I. If you are making more than a million dollars a year, lets tax you at 50 %. Then you still have 500 000 dollars, which is fifty times more than I make in a year and more than enough money for any sane/non greedy person.
Sure, sounds like a lot of money, but when people who own small businesses have to give away half their income, what do you think will happen?

They will start lowering salaries, cutting jobs, or closing their businesses.

Consider that small firms represent 99.7 percent of all employer firms, employ over half of all private sector employees, pay 44 percent of total U.S. private payroll, and have generated 64 percent of net new jobs over the past 15 years. [URL="http://www.sba.gov/advo/stats/sbfaq.pdf"]

Over taxation will be disastrous for this country.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Political Discourse
CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › The President's Address to a joint session of Congress 9/9/09