CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPORTS, GAMES & LEISURE › Television › Bored to Death
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Bored to Death

post #1 of 132
Thread Starter 
Wow. Watched the pilot a couple of days ago (btw, you can too for FREE, over at Amazon). Looks like another superb and unique HBO comedy entry.

It took a little while to get rolling, but once Schwartzman tackles his first case, it's gold. Watching it a second time, the slow start seemed to work better for me. It's a slow burn (comedically speaking) that builds to an amazing crescendo towards the end of the episode.

Loved:
-Danson! Just great, and not a retread of "himself" Curb.
-Schwartzman, of course.
-Galafianakis doing something slightly different here. He's a little restrained, which is refreshing. It's still totally him, but there's something different and subdued about his performance that I can't quite put my finger on. I was in tears at "I read them in my diary."

Hated:
-Nothing. This show is top notch, in my opinion.



I only pray that people take note of this show and allow it to thrive. I could watch season after season of this bumbling detective, his boss and his best friend.
post #2 of 132
So good. I'll be with this show till the eventual cancellation

"I read them in my diary" (weeps)
post #3 of 132
Finally caught one of the previews for this and it looks awesome, glad to hear that is not an unfounded reaction. With Hung also being some top notch, aces television, HBO is finding its step in the half hour comedy slot (here's hoping at least).

The very idea behind Schwartzmann's character is genius. Wish I had thought of it.
post #4 of 132
Yeah, just watched this and it was great. I may eventually have to break down and start ordering HBO.
post #5 of 132
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dontEATnachos View Post
Yeah, just watched this and it was great. I may eventually have to break down and start ordering HBO.
Looks like they might be offering this one continually on Amazon? I'll have to look again when I get off work, but it looked like they had some sort of season pass thing worked out.

ETA: Scratch that. Look like it's probably just for this premiere. No indication it'll be offered regularly. It wouldn't make any sense for HBO to do so, either.
post #6 of 132
A show about a pot dealer/novelist/privitate dic? The holy touchstones of all that is good and true to geeks, can't wait to check it out on Amazon.
post #7 of 132
Thread Starter 
I can't believe some of the lackluster reviews this thing has been getting.

Guess I should go ahead and brace for my one season. Goddamnit.
post #8 of 132
Well that was all sorts of amusing.
post #9 of 132
This should have been right in my wheelhouse but it just felt really flat to me. I don't know if it being set in my neighborhood helped or hurt.
post #10 of 132
None of the interactions felt that real to me. Too twee to be dangerous, in terms of the hotel and the meth-addicted boyfriend in it. The idea could work. I just need more information. I watched Schwartzman in Spun and liked it, so I'll be watching, though.
post #11 of 132
I enjoyed the first episode, and hope the cases get better with time. Once he got to the hotel room it kinda of dragged but I liked everything else.
post #12 of 132
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank The Tank View Post
I enjoyed the first episode, and hope the cases get better with time. Once he got to the hotel room it kinda of dragged but I liked everything else.
What? I thought it really started to take flight once he got to the hotel room.

"You want a hit?"
"Well, I've never, but I gues..."
post #13 of 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeypants View Post
What? I thought it really started to take flight once he got to the hotel room.

"You want a hit?"
"Well, I've never, but I gues..."
Something about the english boyfriend just seemed off to me.
post #14 of 132
Thread Starter 
I also died laughing at:

"Men face reality; women don't. That's why men drink."
"That's from my novel."
"Yeah, and you stole it from me."
post #15 of 132
Really?
post #16 of 132
That was the hipster version of a P.I. show. Bland and boring. A few bright spots, like Ted Danson and the hotel room confrontation though.
post #17 of 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cameron Hughes View Post
That was the hipster version of a P.I. show. Bland and boring. A few bright spots, like Ted Danson and the hotel room confrontation though.
Yeah. Not bad, but forgettable, even with Danson and Galafianakis.

EDIT: I won't probably watch it again.
post #18 of 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Floyd View Post
This should have been right in my wheelhouse but it just felt really flat to me.
This. I don't know why, but this just didn't grab me like I thought it would. I will give it a few more chances though. Perhaps it'll grow on me.
post #19 of 132
It has potential. Danson is as funny as always.
This may be the funniest line I've heard all year:
"I've always been fascinated by the Helsinki Syndrome. It reminds me of my childhood."
post #20 of 132
I really wanted to love the show, but the lead character just killed it for me. I love Schwartzman, but this character rubbed me the wrong way right from the start. His girlfriend left him because he drinks white wine and smokes pot? Holy shit, that's the worst lie I've ever heard when it comes to a break up. And then he prattles on about it at least 5 or 6 more times to random characters about his white wine drinking. The hotel part had me laughing because of how ludicrous it was. I get it, this isn't a gritty or realistic show, but you've got a meth addict in a skeevey hotel with his girlfriend tied to the bed, and in a desperate situation...and his big weapon is a lighter? And he's put together incredibly well physically and mentally for a meth addict.

I dunno, like said above, it fell flat. Danson and Galifinakis were great in their all too short scenes, but with such a boring and uninteresting lead character wasting an excellent actor it just annoyed me. Hopefully he gains some balls and becomes more interesting to follow as the cases go on. Oh, and the creator/writer is using his own name as the lead? Seems like a really odd decision.
post #21 of 132
I really liked it. Coughing down whiskey at the bar: "I've been laying off the whiskey. Been on a white wine regimen. Was trying to save a relationship."
post #22 of 132
Couldn't stand Schwartzman on this. The rest of the cast was very good. Dunno if i will follow through.
post #23 of 132
This show is too fucking dry. I'm giving it two more episodes to grow a soul.
post #24 of 132
I love the show, but I can see how people would find it insufferable, as it does appear to be "Look at this fucking detective hipster: the series" upon first glance.
post #25 of 132
Galifinakis is amazing. I think he is turning me off the show in an odd way. The supporting character should not be so much more interesting and appealing than the lead, but for him I will continue to tune in. The entire colonic spiel, and how when he isn't around his girlfriend he will "eat like an American" was great.
post #26 of 132
This week's show was better than the pilot. Danson and Galifinakis are enough to keep me watching this.

I know it's petty, but so many of my qualms with Schwartzman would go away if they'd change up his shitty haircut.
post #27 of 132
And his tone of voice. I can't stand him. But i LOVE Galifinakis and Danson. I'm so conflicted.
post #28 of 132
Quote:
And anytime you feel inclined to smack the emo boy out of Jonathan, you’re distracted by Danson’s sensationally hilarious performance as a flamboyantly narcissistic late-middle-aged quester (a quester with a cushy life style; he asks someone, “What’s a Subaru?”), and by Galifianakis’s comic-book artist, whose understanding of relationships is stuck at the comic-book level. “Bored to Death” is best appreciated as a buddy picture. Jonathan is a low-energy thumb-sucker, Ray is a grump, and George is heedlessly enthusiastic about mixing it up with Jonathan once he finds out that he’s been dabbling in detective work.
Danson and Galifianakis steal the show, partly by design. Schwartzman’s character is tentative, provisional, making himself up as he goes along; he’s like a piece of writing as it’s being written—by definition, a work in progress.
http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critic...urrentPage=all
post #29 of 132
I can't wait for the Jim Jarmusch episode now.
post #30 of 132
the first two episodes showed promise but this was the episode that hooked me. hilarious from start to finish.
post #31 of 132
I also really liked that it was an episode that had nothing to do with his private detective side-job. The show seems to know how to take a break from its formula t focus on character when necessary, rather than awkwardly trying to shoehorn everything into a detective plot every week.

Also, I want Jim Jarmusch's creative thinking/cycling space.
post #32 of 132
This episode was much better than the first two, which is pretty shitty considering it had absolutely nothing to do with the basic premise of the series.
post #33 of 132
I don’t know, I imagine this episode felt stronger because of Danson and Galifinakis, and isn’t it inevitable that they get in on the central premise?
post #34 of 132
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyG View Post
This episode was much better than the first two, which is pretty shitty considering it had absolutely nothing to do with the basic premise of the series.
So the show would be "shitty" if it became really good despite veering from its "promised" premise?


And also, it was my understanding that Galifianakis and Danson both get in on the sleuthing, Danson compulsively so. Which should be absolutely hilarious.

Can't wait to watch these (still have only seen the pilot, which I loved).
post #35 of 132
I don't understand that complaint, either. And, hey- they fixed his hair!
post #36 of 132
Does anyone know if the psychiatrist sticks around? So far, he and Galifinakis are my favorite things about the show.
post #37 of 132
so many classic scenes, i almost forgot oliver fucking platt made an appearance. galifinakas walking away from the psychiatrist was hysterical. "vodka!"

i think the complaint that the best episode veered from the basic premise should be reversed. it proves that the characters that inhabit the show are enough to sustain it, which is a strength not a weakness. christ it was only the third episode! people are so finicky.

...and speaking of finicky, they fixed his hair.
post #38 of 132
This show is making me hate every critic in the world, as I'm loving it.

Alternate post: This show is making me "do I have bad taste?" paranoid, and I'm taking "fuck critics" therapy to reduce the tinfoil.
post #39 of 132
how fantastic would a Jarmusch/Kaufman collaboration be, though?
post #40 of 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trevor View Post
I don't understand that complaint, either. And, hey- they fixed his hair!
I guess what I mean is, the showed veered away from the premise, as well as the lead character, and it became much more enjoyable. I think it's shitty because Schwartzman feels wasted, and Danson and Galifinakis are casting a long shadow over his character.

I think the show itself was much stronger with this episode, but I want to see the shit he can get into with the fake detective nonsense, not making out with 16 (almost 17) year old girls. It would be fine to let the series breathe from the detective angle, but just three episodes in felt really early for that. If Danson and Galifinakis get in on the detective biz, the sooner the better. The show will be better for it.
post #41 of 132
I hadn't thought of the premise as some sort of contract, and I don't see how the show veered away from the main character at all. I do agree with you that the most recent episode was good, though.
post #42 of 132
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyG View Post
I think it's shitty because Schwartzman feels wasted, and Danson and Galifinakis are casting a long shadow over his character.
Well, I give you props for at least liking Schwartzman (I think?) I don't get the people in here who can't seem to stand him.
post #43 of 132
post #44 of 132
Third episode was pretty good. Danson was amazing, he totally steals every scene.
post #45 of 132
Jonathan running up to the gangsters while holding the brass knuckles like a shot put killed me. I'm hoping the Russian shows up again.
post #46 of 132
I haven't seen the last episode yet. Catching up.
But my dilemma stands.

Everything involving Jonathan bores me.
But Danson or Galifanakis show up... and i'm in love with the show. Danson in particular is Magnetic. I really think he can get away with an emmy nomination for this.
post #47 of 132
Going from the pie incident in curb to his "experimentation" in Bored to Death.. I've never been a fan of Dansons but this stuff is really turning me around on him.

Malco talking about Kinski cracked me up.
post #48 of 132
Oh god, the Kinski thing was great. This might be my favorite Danson episode.

"You mean Herzog's muse??"
post #49 of 132
Thread Starter 
So glad to hear this seems to be finding its way (and renewed!).

Can't wait to finally watch all of these.
post #50 of 132
I could watch High Danson and Galafiniakis for hours.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Television
CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPORTS, GAMES & LEISURE › Television › Bored to Death