CHUD.com Community › Forums › CREATURE CORNER › Creature Corner Main › THE WOLFMAN's Got Nards (And A Second Trailer)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

THE WOLFMAN's Got Nards (And A Second Trailer)

post #1 of 28
10/21/09 at 2:07pm
Thread Starter 
http://chud.com/articles/articles/21...LER/Page1.html
Reply
post #2 of 28
10/21/09 at 2:17pm
Am I the only one in the whole world who wants to see a good old fashioned Hammer/Universal style moster movie? This looks like it has the look of one but none of the soul. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe it's the metal riff, maybe I'm just a cranky old fart who misses practical effects.
Reply
post #3 of 28
10/21/09 at 2:20pm
God, every time i'm reminded this hits VALENTINE'S DAY i want to punch someone.
Reply
post #4 of 28
10/21/09 at 2:29pm
Thread Starter 
I think the effects look decent enough, though. I like the bones snapping and muscle moving under the skin. No one's going to do this practically these days, sadly.

The thing I'm most terrified about is that this turns into another Van Helsing, with all of the look and none of the substance.
Reply
post #5 of 28
10/21/09 at 3:08pm
I agree about the look of it. It looks fantastic. Certainly great cinematography and i wasn't entirely convinced by the transforming effects on the first trailer, but this one gave me hope. It looks painful as hell, and that's a great thing.

The music on the trailer scares the shit out of me though.
Reply
post #6 of 28
10/21/09 at 3:36pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tati View Post
It looks painful as hell, and that's a great thing.
Yep. I'm still having issues with seeing the seams of the CG but it does look like they're going for the painful transformation.

I agree with Alex, though. I'm terrified of another Van Helsing.
Reply
post #7 of 28
10/21/09 at 3:46pm
The transformation stuff looks great. They're mixing digital with practical, which is exactly what they should do. And there's no way this will be a VAN HELSING. The footage in that trailer alone is better than the entirety of VAN HELSING. Worst case scenario is BRAM STOKER'S DRACULA.
Reply
post #8 of 28
10/21/09 at 4:03pm
Worst case scenario is Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.
Reply
post #9 of 28
10/21/09 at 4:07pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Judson View Post
Worst case scenario is Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.
That would require there being an oiled, shirtless Kenneth Brannagh in the film, which I'm confident in saying there won't be.
Reply
post #10 of 28
10/21/09 at 4:10pm
Oiled, shirtless Anthony Hopkins? (*shudder*)
Reply
post #11 of 28
10/21/09 at 5:12pm
I'd settle for oiled, shirtless Emily Blunt.

Actually, replace "settle" with "demand."
Reply
post #12 of 28
10/21/09 at 7:13pm
I don't care what the doubters say. That looks great. Wish it was out at the end of this month.
Reply
post #13 of 28
10/21/09 at 7:18pm
Well that publicty photo they keep running (Indeed, ran again with this article) looks awful. I've said it before and I'll say it again, it looks pretty fake and make-up-y and does not do a good job of selling the film.

With that said, I watched the trailer earlier today and it does look much better in motion.

As for a transformation topping "American Wearwolf in London", what about the transformations in Van Helsing? I know, I know... but they were pretty intense. The way people tore at their skin revealing fur underneath was pretty unsettling.
Reply
post #14 of 28
10/21/09 at 7:20pm
Very positive review of a recent test screening.

http://http://www.brutalashell.com/2...-the-wol fman/

This guy says a lot of stuff that gives me hope. Sounds like they've been putting the extra time to get the flick into good shape. I'm very excited.
Reply
post #15 of 28
10/21/09 at 7:33pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastian OB View Post
Very positive review of a recent test screening.

http://http://www.brutalashell.com/2...-the-wol fman/

This guy says a lot of stuff that gives me hope. Sounds like they've been putting the extra time to get the flick into good shape. I'm very excited.
Is it too spoilerish? I'm hesitant to read it...
Reply
post #16 of 28
10/21/09 at 7:36pm
He gives a cursory rundown of the plot but avoids major spoilers. Basically nothing you couldn't discern from the trailers. No more spoilery than a regular review.
Reply
post #17 of 28
10/21/09 at 8:15pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastian OB View Post
Worst case scenario is BRAM STOKER'S DRACULA.
Actually, I'm probably one of the few people around who liked that one. But with that much being said, this looks better than Bram Stoker's Dracula.
Reply
post #18 of 28
10/21/09 at 8:23pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by LisaNY View Post
Actually, I'm probably one of the few people around who liked that one. But with that much being said, this looks better than Bram Stoker's Dracula.
I love that film. Such wonderful imagery, and some truly classic performances. Sure, there is the Keanu factor, but there is just too much to love to hold his Victorian Surfer accent against the entire film. It's one of my favorite films of all time, actually
Reply
post #19 of 28
10/21/09 at 8:53pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Riviello View Post
The thing I'm most terrified about is that this turns into another Van Helsing, with all of the look and none of the substance.

You thought Van Helsing had substance?
Reply
post #20 of 28
10/21/09 at 9:04pm
I agree Francis Ford Coppola's BRAM STOKER'S DRACULA is one of the great vampire movies, despite featuring Reeves and Ryder in the ensemble cast. They are balanced out by Oldman, Hopkins, and Tom Waits. Although the movie is closer than anything else I've seen to the Bram Stoker work, it is still different enough to make including the name in the title a bit wrong. In fact the movie is deeply informed by the historic Dracula work of Raymond T. McNally and Radu Florescu.
Reply
post #21 of 28
10/21/09 at 9:53pm
Yeah, I'm sold, and I'm pulling for Johnston a little bit as well. And I didn't really have any Van Helsing flashbacks, which is weird because this is definitely the trailer that is aimed toward a younger crowd.
Reply
post #22 of 28
10/22/09 at 12:04am
For the record, I too enjoy BRAM STOKER'S DRACULA, flawed though it may be. I just mentioned it in terms of expectations -- I think it'll be much closer to that than VAN HELSING. And everything I've heard confirms this.
Reply
post #23 of 28
10/23/09 at 11:37am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastian OB View Post
For the record, I too enjoy BRAM STOKER'S DRACULA, flawed though it may be. I just mentioned it in terms of expectations -- I think it'll be much closer to that than VAN HELSING. And everything I've heard confirms this.
Works for me. I'm a fan of Coppolla's flick. It's got atmosphere to spare.
Reply
post #24 of 28
11/6/09 at 3:56am
I really hope it is good.We need a good Werewolf movie,Zombies and Vampires are played out.
Reply
post #25 of 28
11/6/09 at 9:57am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyler View Post
I really hope it is good.We need a good Werewolf movie,Zombies and Vampires are played out.
Too true, aside from Ginger Snaps and Dog Soldiers I am struggling to think of another Werewolf flick worth mentioning in the last decade.
Reply
post #26 of 28
11/6/09 at 3:47pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrundleFlyboy View Post
Too true, aside from Ginger Snaps and Dog Soldiers I am struggling to think of another Werewolf flick worth mentioning in the last decade.
Hey, two notable werewolf films in one decade is actually pretty good when you consider the 90's yielded exactly 0 good werewolf movies.

And don't anybody bring up WOLF.
Reply
post #27 of 28
11/6/09 at 4:10pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastian OB View Post
Hey, two notable werewolf films in one decade is actually pretty good when you consider the 90's yielded exactly 0 good werewolf movies.

And don't anybody bring up WOLF.
PROJECT METALBEAST!
and
FULL ECLIPSE!

Alright, not "good", but certainly guilty pleasures of mine.
Reply
post #28 of 28
11/6/09 at 10:11pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by DARKMITE8 View Post
PROJECT METALBEAST!
and
FULL ECLIPSE!

Alright, not "good", but certainly guilty pleasures of mine.
Might as well add Eric Red's Bad Moon to that list as it goes... actually, faults aside it is one great looking beast they show off in that flick in my humble opinion.
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Creature Corner Main
CHUD.com Community › Forums › CREATURE CORNER › Creature Corner Main › THE WOLFMAN's Got Nards (And A Second Trailer)