CHUD.com Community › Forums › ARTS & LITERATURE › Books and Magazines › Behind the Scenes of the Simpsons
Join Now
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Recent Reviews
-
if u like the previous movies this one fits right in..special effects are great plenty of action from begin to end and a great plot
-
This movie was pretty awsome if u like the 80's B horror. Its on Netflix
-
Where the hell are u gonna find gravey flavored condoms in any other movie ...........huh............... I LOVE U TURKEY!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
I was very excited to see the American Reunion movie. I saw American Pie just after college and remembered it was quite funny. Jim, Michelle, Oz, Heather, Stifler reunite for their high school...
-
this is the song to have fun on.
Behind the Scenes of the Simpsons
post #2 of 8
11/19/09 at 2:20pm
- Jesse Custer
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Is A Comforting Fiction
- offline
- 4,975 Posts. Joined 3/2003
- Location: New York
- Reputation: 17
- Select All Posts By This User
I've read it. It's entertaining, but it's also curiously 'light.' Ortved injects himself into the narrative too often for my taste, and he explains things that would have been better served being explained by the people he's interviewed for the book. His opinion on the ongoing quality of the Simpsons intrudes early and often - to the point where half the purpose of the book seems to have been for Ortved to complain about the dip in quality after seasons 5 or 6. Also, he doesn't offer first-hand accounts from any of the show's originators (we get talk about Brooks, Groening and Simon, but we never hear from them outside of excerpts of other interviews).
There's a fair amount of dirty laundry that's aired, but its typically the laundry of obviously-disgruntled former writers.
Worth reading if you're a fan, but I was a little underwhelmed by what Ortved chose to include. The AV Club's review sums up my thoughts pretty well.
There's a fair amount of dirty laundry that's aired, but its typically the laundry of obviously-disgruntled former writers.
Worth reading if you're a fan, but I was a little underwhelmed by what Ortved chose to include. The AV Club's review sums up my thoughts pretty well.
- The Prankster
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Skeptical Utopian
- offline
- 10,740 Posts. Joined 1/2001
- Location: Canada
- Reputation: 946
- Select All Posts By This User
Kind of silly of me to get hung up on it, but Kyle Ryan kind of comes off as a tool for ragging on Ortved over Wayland Smithers' name, which Ortved gets right.
post #4 of 8
11/19/09 at 5:14pm
- Jesse Custer
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Is A Comforting Fiction
- offline
- 4,975 Posts. Joined 3/2003
- Location: New York
- Reputation: 17
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:
|
Kind of silly of me to get hung up on it, but Kyle Ryan kind of comes off as a tool for ragging on Ortved over Wayland Smithers' name, which Ortved gets right.
|
I think Ryan's larger point is sound, any potential tool-ishness aside - if you're going to write an unauthorized bio of The Simpsons, it behooves you to make sure you've got your I's dotted and your T's crossed. Waylon's name is small potatoes in any other context, but it's hard to give Ortved's opinions respect when he's mangling the details in his own book.
- The Prankster
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Skeptical Utopian
- offline
- 10,740 Posts. Joined 1/2001
- Location: Canada
- Reputation: 946
- Select All Posts By This User
Smithers' first name is one of those weird things that everyone gets wrong, but it's very definitely WAYLAND in the first few seasons. The name "Waylon" is more common, hence the confusion. The character is named after Wayland Flowers (as even the Wikipedia entry, which calls him Waylon, acknowledges) and Mr Burns pointedly pronounces the "D" a few times.
Given the show's lackadaisical continuity and general sloppiness, it's possible that later seasons have begun officially referring to him as "Waylon"; I wouldn't know. I mean, fuck, the guy changed race at one point. But he was originally Wayland.
Given the show's lackadaisical continuity and general sloppiness, it's possible that later seasons have begun officially referring to him as "Waylon"; I wouldn't know. I mean, fuck, the guy changed race at one point. But he was originally Wayland.
post #6 of 8
11/21/09 at 7:40pm
- Mr. Coombs
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Master of Judo
- offline
- 720 Posts. Joined 8/2008
- Location: Texas
- Reputation: 20
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:
|
The character is named after Wayland Flowers (as even the Wikipedia entry, which calls him Waylon, acknowledges) and Mr Burns pointedly pronounces the "D" a few times.
|
But as you mentioned, the dude was black for all of a day, so no need to argue over trivialities.
post #7 of 8
11/24/09 at 6:06am
- Andrew Woods
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Woodsy
- offline
- 1,440 Posts. Joined 1/2001
- Location: Earth
- Reputation: 10
- Select All Posts By This User
Yeah, this isn't very good but it's enjoyable enough. All of the oral history parts are good but when Ortved decides to throw his opinion in it just stops the book in its tracks. Makes you think how good a thorough oral history could be though. Definitely not Live From New York good.
post #8 of 8
11/24/09 at 6:54am
- Paul C
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 1,951 Posts. Joined 4/2007
- Reputation: 312
- Select All Posts By This User
I'd be interested in reading this but I get the feeling this whole thing of the author throwing in his own opinions all the time would drive me up the wall. I read this Bob Dylan biography a while back which did this all the time - even when I agreed with him I wished he's just shut up and just tell the story straight. Like that review says, you don't read these things to find out what some random guy with an axe to grind thinks.
Return Home
Back to Forum: Books and Magazines
- Behind the Scenes of the Simpsons
CHUD.com Community › Forums › ARTS & LITERATURE › Books and Magazines › Behind the Scenes of the Simpsons
Currently, there are 266 Active Users
(37 Members and 229 Guests)
Recent Discussions
- › Mad Men Season 5 2 minutes ago
- › Cinematic Shocks - In-depth analysis on horror, exploitation and... 7 minutes ago
- › CHUD NUMBERS: Box Office Discussion Thread 14 minutes ago
- › Hannibal (2001) 17 minutes ago
- › Game Of Thrones Season 2: Throne Harder SPOILER FREE 18 minutes ago
- › The Chud Beer Drinkers Thread 18 minutes ago
- › The 2012 Elections Thread 22 minutes ago
- › "Official" Game Of Thrones Discussion for those who have read the... 26 minutes ago
- › Personal Achievements 28 minutes ago
- › WHAT WB CAN LEARN ABOUT SUPERMAN FROM THE AVENGERS AND ITS HULK 28 minutes ago
View: New Posts | All Discussions
Recent Reviews
- › Transformers: Dark of the Moon(2011) by trubrat
- › Slugs (Midnight Madness) by branbran77
- › ThanksKilling(2009) by branbran77
- › American Reunion by Mom2C
- › Motivation by tameka
- › Love Again by tameka
- › Your Highness(2011) by Leviathan Joe
- › Akira(1988) by andrewhawkins
- › Trainspotting(1996) by andrewhawkins
- › Night of the Creeps [Blu-ray] by andrewhawkins
View: More Reviews
New Articles
- › Live! Manchester City vs Bayern Munich -... by ahooo
- › Chu Ishikawa by andrewhawkins
- › Followers And Following by chudlurker
- › Daily Prize Wiki by Renn Brown
- › Guy Dot Com by Glory 2my Naval
- › Glitter by Anderson
- › How To Properly Report A Bug by BruceL
- › Preventing Flame Wars by Rourkefan
- › My Fan Made Movie Posters by Litmus Configuration
- › Bruce Wayne by Hammerhead
View: New Articles | All Articles
Home | Reviews | Forums | Articles | My Profile
About CHUD.com Community | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 CHUD.com Community is powered by Huddler | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map
About CHUD.com Community | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 CHUD.com Community is powered by Huddler | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map




