CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPECIFIC FILMS › Films in Release or On Video › The Age of Innocence (1993)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Age of Innocence (1993)

post #1 of 7
Thread Starter 
In my ongoing quest for film education, I've been going through the works of Martin Scorsese; currently I've seen, in order, Goodfellas, The Aviator, The Departed and this (I currently have the second Scorsese-Day-Lewis collaboration Gangs of New York in from Netflix). It's one of those Scorsese films that doesn't seem to get talked about a lot, and that's a real shame since it's a great one. The period detail is just astonishing, for one thing; I almost felt like I had been transported back in time, the costumes and sets were so rich.

The story is obviously great, and the acting is... well, astonishing. This served as my introduction to Daniel Day-Lewis, and it'll be interesting to contrast this to his more... broad performances. I will say that the hype is true: Day-Lewis is one of the best actors of his generation. His performance is so subtle and minute throughout the film, and it's definitely one of the major reasons the ending is so moving. Michelle Pfieffer is simply luminous as the countess, and Winona Ryder does the best work of her career. The supporting cast is filled with British greats like Stuart Wilson (does this guy always play tools or what?), Michael Gough, Richard E. Grant and personal favorite Miriam Margoyles. The narration by Joanne Woodward is also excellent; Woodward's voice is soft and pleasant to listen to, and she seems objective but not completely detached.

It's a lovely film. Anyone agree?
post #2 of 7
I don't normally go for these period, Austenesque, repressed emotions type movies, but I love the ever living hell out of this. Scorsese is able to imbue the story with such electricity constantly bubbling under the surface of all these New York aristocratic rules and mores so that when they finally bubble to the surface it's like a dam bursting. Day-Lewis is astonoshing but then he very rarely isn't (seriously has he ever given a bad performance?) and everything else is so vivid and beautifully drawn.

One of my favorite Scorsese films.
post #3 of 7
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rain Dog View Post
I don't normally go for these period, Austenesque, repressed emotions type movies, but I love the ever living hell out of this. Scorsese is able to imbue the story with such electricity constantly bubbling under the surface of all these New York aristocratic rules and mores so that when they finally bubble to the surface it's like a dam bursting. Day-Lewis is astonoshing but then he very rarely isn't (seriously has he ever given a bad performance?) and everything else is so vivid and beautifully drawn.

One of my favorite Scorsese films.
Yeah, I definitely like how, because emotions are so repressed, when they do come out it's much more powerful. For example, there's only one curse word in the whole film ("With all due respect, sir, what the hell does that mean?"), and a fairly mild one, but it still comes as a shock (and not just because Scorsese's other films tend to be littered with swearing).

Rain Dog, were you as touched as I was by Scorsese dedicating the film to his recently-deceased father? I thought it was a moving gesture, especially since it came on the heels of the final scene, which is all about parenthood.
post #4 of 7
It's been a long time since I've seen this, but I remember it as a wonderful film, heartbreaking in that special Edith Wharton way.

It's interesting, RD, that you described the film as Austenesque. Wharton and Austen were writing about 100 years apart on opposite sides of the Atlantic, but they did share a similar interest in class and social mores. I think Wharton had more of a nasty streak than Austen, however, and I find her writing to be more emotionally moving (and draining) than Austen's. They do make an interesting comparrison/contrast, though.

Anyway, yeah, I'll have to revisit this one sometime soon. It's definately an overlooked film in the Scorsese canon.
post #5 of 7
I love the look of all the victorian buildings in the film. All the fireplaces ETC make it look so cozy! This is one film I can watch time and time again. It's worth it for the films excellent portrayal of late 19th century New York City. A vanished yet fascinating world.
post #6 of 7
Visconti's The Leopard felt like a major influence on this film, the roving camera through the party with ongoing narration is one example. I thought it was a superb romantic drama, I liked that Scorsese's energy managed to inject some life into a normally staid genre.
post #7 of 7

...and of course we're talking about Scorsese, so not only are the performances incredibly good across the board, old Marty can't help but punctuate the film with shots of stunning beauty...

 

5137559372_dc935c735b.jpg

4926709745_9e19d2c967.jpg

 

 

Age of Innocence, 1993

 

 

 

Age of Innocence, 1993

 

 

 

tumblr_lfd7xtf2SS1qay58d.png

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Films in Release or On Video
CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPECIFIC FILMS › Films in Release or On Video › The Age of Innocence (1993)