I certainly don't think he should be killed. I don't think he is necessarily evil, but he is a horrible president with no experience and a Socialist agenda for America. IF his policies were to come to fruition, I don't see him as being an iron-fisted dictator, but it certainly leaves the door open for his successor to be one. A small group of people too much power is exactly what is wrong with countries like Cuba, China, North Korea and Venezuela. I don't agree with a few of you on this topic, but dammit, that's America! The very idea of flat-out silencing (or even just censoring) people we don't agree with is WRONG. Sure, Rush and Hannity are wind-bags and Beck is an idea-thieving drama queen. But that's freedom of speech! Turn the channel like I do!
On the whole health-care reform debate, the government is absolutely the last entity you want in charge. They are already showing signs of health-care rationing and getting in the way of the medical breakthroughs that our (admittedly in dire need of fixing) health care system is capable of. Where do you think the money will come from? If your employer has to pay for your health care, the only place it CAN come from is YOUR PAY, which is a new tax we can't afford! Employers won't magically get more money once this gov't takeover is passed, so lay-offs and pay-cuts here we come! I think helping those less fortunate is noble. But no one should be forced to do it. Americans are already the most generous, giving people on the planet (sure, not everyone, but compared to other cultures we certainly are!) We donate more money and time of our own free will than anyone, I dare you to argue that! If I give my time and money, THAT is GIVING. If YOU take my hard-earned money and give it to someone else, that is stealing and wealth redistributing, not charity and certainly not helping. If you believe in helping the poor, why don't you just give yourself instead of having your money be filtered through the bottomless-pit-of-waste that is the United States Government? Would you rather volunteer to feed the hungry or build a Habitat for Humanity house, or be required to?
Is anyone here aware of the
16th amendment to the Constitution? Do you realize that the government is allowed by this amendment to take up to 100% of our incomes? The only reason they don't is because of the revolt that would ensue. But, like the slowly boiling frog, they take a little more, let us adjust to the change, and then take a little more. If only we had the FairTax...(and PLEASE read about the FairTax before you comment that it is a tax increase.) That would truly give power back to the people, which is why the Government fears it. They like perpetuating the notion that the low-income people are "victims" of the wealthy. I'm low income, but I'm not a victim. I have my own damn health insurance, thank you! And I only make $10.50/hr AND have a wife and son. Nobody in this country is a victim, so stop whining and start holding these dangerous bastards accountable for the damage they are causing, and I'm talking about both sides of the aisle. They're all crooks! But they don't deserve to die.
Obama is idealistic. But I don't want a socialist state for my son. If you really, truly want to see Communism from a first-person perspective, read Solzhenitsyn. As it stands now, I disagree with the Democrats' policies and am considered a racist for it. How long until I am an enemy of the state?
I love capitalism and want to one day be rich. Don't we all? Or at least to be able to realize our full potential! I would rather have the chance and squander it than not have it at all!
Just remember: the House, the Senate and the Congress won't be Democrat-run forever. Any power you give them, any freedoms you give up to them, any control over your own life you give them will one day be in the hands of a Republican. It's fucking frightening either way.
Anyway, I wish people would stop saying everyone needs to be assassinated. I'll agree on that.
And Nancy Pelosi is ugly and evil.