Oops, I started a thread for this topic a few weeks back, not knowing it was already covered. So, if it's alright with everyone, I'll just cut and paste what I'd already written there:
Ok, so, this one has been on my mind for
weeks now. I firmly believe JFK to be the best film of the 1990s, and one of the greatest films ever made. And... I really like Kevin Costner, and am something of an apologist for him and his work. I think his Garrison has a real "Mr Smith Goes To Washington" aw-shucks appeal to it, and Costner's slightly dopey demeanor helps you to feel that he's waking up to the truth about the MIC (Military Industrial Complex) right before your eyes.
With that said, last year I went to go see a play. It was a play starring one of my favorite actors, and in that play he put on a perfect Louisiana accent. I was front row and center, and half way through I had a revelation.
THIS is the man who should have played Garrison:

I can no longer call JFK a perfect film, because true perfection would have been made with Campbell Scott in the lead role. Take a moment and picture how Mr Scott would have delivered the key moments of dialog, and then try and tell me I'm wrong
With that said, anyone else have a similar film they're convinced would have been better with a different actor in one of the roles?
I'll throw in two more to spark discussion: Gangs of NY and Kingdom of Heaven. Each starring
this man instead of DiCaprio and Bloom:

I know some people think he is dour or one note, but even his biggest critics would have to admit what he brings to the table would have been perfect for Amsterdam and Balien