CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Corporations can buy elections even more easily now...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Corporations can buy elections even more easily now... - Page 3

post #101 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by yt View Post
Where are the tea partiers on this Supreme Court ruling? Fox has been largely silent on it. I imagine Limbaugh, Beck, etc. quietly support it (since they're corporate and therefore on the side that's winning) but publicly will not even address it. This should be somewhat of a litmus test for tea partiers--are they serious about protesting what's rotten in Washington, or are they solely motivated by what Fox News, Limbaugh et al tell them they should be angry about?
They will never do anything to sabotage their happy little coalition of The Dumb and The Cynical. Otherwise the whole thing falls apart like a house of cards.
post #102 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Savage View Post
Wait. You ran with your car into a guy who just came out of a toxic spill and he exploded in a splosh of fluids?

I WANNA LIVE THERE!
Trust me, you don't want to live in Detroit.

Times like this just make me of Ned Beaty's speech in Network. Jesus Christ, sign the petitions people.
post #103 of 126
Passing Bills won't do any good, because eventually they'll be deemed unconstitutional as set by this precedent. The only thing Congress can do is try to amend the constitution. That takes 2/3 in each House, and 3/4 of States to ratify. Good luck.
post #104 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by yt View Post
Eenin, the government is the people. "Starve it to death" and what fills the void is private corporate forces that can't be voted out of office or forced to disclose or change anything, that can set up an economy that shuts you out and has its own private armies. You want a preview of what you seem to want, take a look at Pinochet's Chile or Mussolini's Italy.

Where are the tea partiers on this Supreme Court ruling? Fox has been largely silent on it. I imagine Limbaugh, Beck, etc. quietly support it (since they're corporate and therefore on the side that's winning) but publicly will not even address it. This should be somewhat of a litmus test for tea partiers--are they serious about protesting what's rotten in Washington, or are they solely motivated by what Fox News, Limbaugh et al tell them they should be angry about?
But the problem is the Government is no longer the people, but is now corporations.
post #105 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by eenin View Post
But the problem is the Government is no longer the people, but is now corporations.
But that's a snake eating its own tail, Eenin. Our only defense against corporations is government. But as long as we allow ourselves to be brainwashed by corporate-backed "news" and "opinion," we are being led away from the central American tenet that government is by the people and can be changed by our will, not by the monarchistic decree of a CEO or a cabal of multinational corporations. The way to make our country better is to work within the framework of a brilliant form of government laid down by the founders and framers, not turn into nihilists at the direction of corporate propagandists to allow them to more easily steal our country from us.
post #106 of 126
It's sort of a false choice, no? If government is corrupt, your options aren't to only have less government, it's also to fix it and make it work better. Like yt says, the only real defense we have against a corporate regime in this country is government, its certainly not more corporate control.

But that would mean that doctrinaire conservatives would have to do something other than pray at the altar of the private sector, and invest in ways to make the public sector function. The tragedy is that who better to do that then the people who are inherently skeptical of government? (Nixon opening up China and all that...) But sadly we don't get altruism by conservatives in power, whether it's because of partisan politics or ideological blindness we get deep cynicism that reinforces their fundamental beliefs that all (or most) government is bad. The result is a hole dug further deep.
post #107 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pop Zeus View Post
It's sort of a false choice, no? If government is corrupt, your options aren't to only have less government, it's also to fix it and make it work better. Like yt says, the only real defense we have against a corporate regime in this country is government, its certainly not more corporate control.

But that would mean that doctrinaire conservatives would have to do something other than pray at the altar of the private sector, and invest in ways to make the public sector function. The tragedy is that who better to do that then the people who are inherently skeptical of government? (Nixon opening up China and all that...) But sadly we don't get altruism by conservatives in power, whether it's because of partisan politics or ideological blindness we get deep cynicism that reinforces their fundamental beliefs that all (or most) government is bad. The result is a hole dug further deep.
Right now though the system is so broken the only way to fix it is to start over again from scratch. The constitutional need to be fix, limits on patents and copyright times need to be written in. Better definition of citizen need to be written in and corporations exuded. Make it so rights only apply to said citizens. Ban all corporations including unions, non profits, and political parties, from giving money or any other form of influence ot elected officials at any level of government.
post #108 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by eenin View Post
Right now though the system is so broken the only way to fix it is to start over again from scratch.
post #109 of 126
Remember how I get prone to hyperbole in the politics forum and throw around comments like "this is what an empire imploding looks like" and "looks like the US is going the way of the Romans" and shit like that? And ya know how some people tell me to can it and that I'm over-reacting and getting overly emotional and losing perspective and that it's not necessarily that bad (which I usually freely concede)?

I gotta say, the terrible feeling in the pit of my stomach and the hint of vomit at the back of my throat tells me this time it's really that bad.

Fucking hell guys.

Faaark-ing hell.
post #110 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveB View Post
This brings up an interesting idea. Exactly how far will conservatives follow this metaphorical "personhood" that we've bestowed on corporations? The next step, as I see it, is establishing citizenship, which would allow corporations to run for public office directly. General Electric for president!
Also, corporations can own one another. What about corporate slavery?
post #111 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by yt View Post
But that's a snake eating its own tail, Eenin. Our only defense against corporations is government. But as long as we allow ourselves to be brainwashed by corporate-backed "news" and "opinion," we are being led away from the central American tenet that government is by the people and can be changed by our will, not by the monarchistic decree of a CEO or a cabal of multinational corporations. The way to make our country better is to work within the framework of a brilliant form of government laid down by the founders and framers, not turn into nihilists at the direction of corporate propagandists to allow them to more easily steal our country from us.
I fear the government more then I fear corporations. What to keep the government from crushing us? what is our defense against our own government? The government seem to ignore constitutional when ever it want to at this point in time.
post #112 of 126
Yes, and corporations are all about upholding the Constitution.
post #113 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by eenin View Post
I fear the government more then I fear corporations. What to keep the government from crushing us? what is our defense against our own government? The government seem to ignore constitutional when ever it want to at this point in time.
That's IRONIC!

You someone's dellusional when he trust corporations more than his goverment.
post #114 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by eenin View Post
I fear the government more then I fear corporations. What to keep the government from crushing us? what is our defense against our own government? The government seem to ignore constitutional when ever it want to at this point in time.
Step one. Stop watching FOX.
post #115 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by eenin View Post
I fear the government more then I fear corporations. What to keep the government from crushing us? what is our defense against our own government? The government seem to ignore constitutional when ever it want to at this point in time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Savage View Post
That's IRONIC!

You someone's dellusional when he trust corporations more than his goverment.
Goddamn it, Martin.
post #116 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Savage View Post
That's IRONIC!

You someone's dellusional when he trust corporations more than his goverment.
I don't trust corporations they are just easier to get around then the government.
post #117 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by eenin View Post
I don't trust corporations they are just easier to get around then the government.
So, for services like EMS, or environmental or financial regulation you want to rely on ... self-regulation by the private sector?
post #118 of 126
post #119 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by eenin View Post
I fear the government more then I fear corporations. What to keep the government from crushing us? what is our defense against our own government? The government seem to ignore constitutional when ever it want to at this point in time.
The government is us, Eenin. If enough of us give two &^%s, we can change it. We can't change corporations. We can't vote on what they do. We can't vote the CEOs out of office. We can't control what they fill the airwaves with when it serves their agenda. We can't stop them from poisoning the air and water. We can't do $%# about their private armies. We can't prevent them from pressuring their bought and paid for politicians from keeping the war machine going because it's good for their profit margin. We can't prevent them from stealing our money through the taxes we pay and the tax breaks they get.

I think you are right not to trust the government but only insofar as the government right now is controlled by corporations that were allowed to mushroom from Reagan until now.

At its heart, the government is not the problem. The corporations are the problem and we are the problem. Either we take it back, or they take it all. You can't start a government from scratch--that's what the founders did and it cost a lot of blood and treasure. And considering how well they shaped it, with checks & balances, look what has happened to it? So, even if you did start from scratch, if you didn't constantly monitor it, constantly learn from history and make adjustments through time, it would end up in this same place.

The fact of the matter is that democracy is not a system where you press a button and everything just stays the same. If you want that, that's called a dictatorship. Democracy is messy.

What a healthy democracy needs to survive is a strong middle class (destroyed by Reagan - Bush - Clinton - Bush II), quality education for all (decimated by Reagan + Bush II) and a free press (destroyed by Reagan, who dumped the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. This wasn't accidental. Big business has been fighting this war for a LONG time and will continue to fight it. But we could start the process of fixing it by trust-busting, fixing education and, most importantly, getting corporate money out out politics.

Of course, this decision just set us back by a mile. We're like maggots facing off against the tripods from War of the Worlds. If we don't support Alan Grayson and others who are trying to pedal this stuff back -- and, most of all, be aware of and supportive of public financing of elections -- we could soon see a government by and for the corporations and the corporations alone. There is no distinction under this ruling between a Chinese-owned corporation and a US-owned corporation, btw.
post #120 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by eenin View Post
I don't trust corporations they are just easier to get around then the government.
How so? What do you mean?
post #121 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by richard dickson View Post
<3 <3 <3
post #122 of 126
Man that list of proposed bills is great.
post #123 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by yt View Post
The government is us, Eenin. If enough of us give two &^%s, we can change it. We can't change corporations. We can't vote on what they do. We can't vote the CEOs out of office. We can't control what they fill the airwaves with when it serves their agenda. We can't stop them from poisoning the air and water. We can't do $%# about their private armies. We can't prevent them from pressuring their bought and paid for politicians from keeping the war machine going because it's good for their profit margin. We can't prevent them from stealing our money through the taxes we pay and the tax breaks they get.

I think you are right not to trust the government but only insofar as the government right now is controlled by corporations that were allowed to mushroom from Reagan until now.

At its heart, the government is not the problem. The corporations are the problem and we are the problem. Either we take it back, or they take it all. You can't start a government from scratch--that's what the founders did and it cost a lot of blood and treasure. And considering how well they shaped it, with checks & balances, look what has happened to it? So, even if you did start from scratch, if you didn't constantly monitor it, constantly learn from history and make adjustments through time, it would end up in this same place.

The fact of the matter is that democracy is not a system where you press a button and everything just stays the same. If you want that, that's called a dictatorship. Democracy is messy.

What a healthy democracy needs to survive is a strong middle class (destroyed by Reagan - Bush - Clinton - Bush II), quality education for all (decimated by Reagan + Bush II) and a free press (destroyed by Reagan, who dumped the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. This wasn't accidental. Big business has been fighting this war for a LONG time and will continue to fight it. But we could start the process of fixing it by trust-busting, fixing education and, most importantly, getting corporate money out out politics.

Of course, this decision just set us back by a mile. We're like maggots facing off against the tripods from War of the Worlds. If we don't support Alan Grayson and others who are trying to pedal this stuff back -- and, most of all, be aware of and supportive of public financing of elections -- we could soon see a government by and for the corporations and the corporations alone. There is no distinction under this ruling between a Chinese-owned corporation and a US-owned corporation, btw.
I don't trust people in general, the bigger the group they less I trust them. The biggest group is the government.

Quote:
What a healthy democracy needs to survive is a strong middle class
you mean it was destroyed by the two party system. It was not the Presidents, as they don't have any real power, but both parties.
post #124 of 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by eenin View Post
I don't trust people in general, the bigger the group they less I trust them. The biggest group is the government.
That's fine, but you and your family and everyone you know with be subjected to their decisions, whether you like it or not. At least with government there is the possibility of changing what you and your relatives are subjected to. If you want to go off and live by yourself, that will be fine until the energy companies boil over the earth or manipulate us into more overseas imperialism that creates enough blowback to affect you where you live. You can opt out but it's selfish if you have children (which I do).

Quote:
Originally Posted by eenin View Post
you mean it was destroyed by the two party system. It was not the Presidents, as they don't have any real power, but both parties.
The two party system is a disaster. We need public financing of elections and instant run-off voting like a lot of European nations have.

The Presidents have leadership. That's the point of a President.
post #125 of 126
And things could be getting even worse.

Quote:
Nonetheless, under campaign finance law, SpeechNow.org is forced to register as a “political committee.” That imposes on the organization a host of burdensome regulations that carry the threat of fines and even jail time. Although an individual may spend an unlimited amount of his or her own money to advocate for and against candidates, an individual can contribute no more than $5,000 to a political committee that is doing the exact same thing.

“The government is forcing individuals to sacrifice their First Amendment right to associate in order to exercise their First Amendment right to speak,” said Steve Simpson, a senior attorney for the Institute for Justice, which together with the Center for Competitive Politics, represents SpeechNow.org.

“Campaign finance laws hamstring a most-basic form of American political participation—individuals banding together to pledge their fortunes to a political cause,” Simpson said. “If individuals have the right to spend as much money on speech as they wish, then groups of individuals must have the same right.”
So we've been told that corporations have the right to spend whatever they want on political causes. Now this could open the way for a group of billionaires to get together and spend as much as they want.
post #126 of 126
Douglas Rushkoff had one of the best pieces about this decision that I've seen:
http://rushkoff.com/2010/01/22/corpo...uber-citizens/

Quote:
Luckily for corporations, the activist justices appointed by an earlier version of our corporatist government (the Bush 2 regime) have decided to reverse this process. Instead of acting as as stopgap to preserve constitutional rights, they are serving as a new legislative branch – rewriting the law by declaring it unconstitutional. It is a violation of corporations’ civil liberties to limit their influence over the political process. Even though they are artificial entities, with greater access to capital, infinite longevity, and no interest in or connection to humanity, we now guarantee them the right of free speech.
Of course, the right of free speech was created in order for human beings to have the ability to talk back to the corporation – the British East India Trading Company – that was running the colonies before the Revolutionary War. And it was upheld a century later so that laborers could organize unions or speak out against industrial abuses without fear of getting killed. (Even though most unions, perhaps predictably, ended up becoming as abstracted as the corporations they were created to counteract.) Freedom of speech was intended a way for human beings to guarantee their ability speak out against largely systemic and structural repression. Now, that structural repression itself has that same guarantee.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Political Discourse
CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Corporations can buy elections even more easily now...