Quote:
Originally Posted by The NZ Natural 
Knowing anything AT ALL about Rome was not high on the producer's list of criteria for this show, obviously. And it shouldn't be high on the viewer's list, either. It's not playing on the History Channel.
|
Look, I'm enjoying it on some levels, but it's absurd to suggest that a show either needs to make a mockery of the time period and culture it's depicting, or end up boring it's audience like a history channel special.
Exhibit A: HBO'S ROME
That show changed around the big events in order to have fun with things, and insert Pullo and Vorenus into all sorts of wacky situations, but it always felt real. Bruno Heller and a team of scholars were there, pouring over the details of every costume, prop, set and line in the script. Effort was made to present a realistic depiction of Rome's various religions and it's intensely class based society.
S:B+S makes no such effort. Just because they clearly didn't have ROME's budget, and couldn't go to Rome Italy and build the worlds largest set like HBO did, does not mean that the script had to be so bankrupt and tawdry. The WWF atmosphere at the gladiatorial bouts is frankly embarrassing to watch. Without even getting into the whole speed ramping blood thirsty asthetic, the way the crowd is depicted is unacceptable. There would be no coed seating, and women would have been farther away from combat. People were seated by class and station in life, and gladiator bouts --
especially fights to the death -- were sololmn events reserved for funerals or religious holidays (or yes, in the event of a drought fights to the death might be staged). The behavior of the crowd in S:B+D would insult the gods, and negate the entire purpose of the event. Just because Rome's society was sexually permissive in many areas does not mean that the crowd as depicted in S:B+S is accurate in any way
And knowing that the show is depicting things the way it does simply to titillate, all the while it opens each episode with a claim about how it's "intense violence adn sexuality are meant to offer an accurate depiction of Rome" , makes it all the more insulting to the viewer.
That is merely one aspect of the show, but it's chock full of more stuff like that. I'm not going to harp on it, but don't say that knowing something about Rome shouldn't be high on the producer's list. That should be the first thing on anyones list who wants to make a show about the Roman empire
Now, I am enjoying the show despite myself, as kind of a guilty pleasure. It's generally pretty good natured and I like the cast. I'm about to go watch more of it right now, but it is needlessly stupid in places. It could have been violent and cool and "hip" while still respecting the source material and the culture it's depicting. Speaking only for myself, this viewer is sad they chose to go the other direction.