The end of Brangelina?

Who gets their army of children?

I get no pleasure from seeing a family in such strife.


But with that said, it was kind of hard not to see this coming. Compulsively collecting orphans like some people collect cats is never an indicator of excellent mental health

You know how "manorexia" is the male term for "anorexia"? Well, what is the male equivolent of "battered wife syndrome"? I'm always seeing tabloid pictures of Brad Pitt with black eyes and some sort of bloody lip. That can't be good.

Angelina once bragged about bringing knives to bed for sex. She's hot, but she's crazy as a loon. That's why she adopts kids overseas, the US would never allow her to adopt here due to her mental state. That's straight from her father.

...and look how stable HE is.

Crazy in the head, crazy in the bed.

Brad's down with it:

How many times have they "broken up" in these magazines? I'll believe it when I see it.

Yeah, that's the thing - the reports of those two splitting up have been in the tabloids every other week since 2005.

And as cheesey as People magazine is, they're generally pretty factual about celeb gossip, and for now, they're saying things are still fine in Brangelina land.

How will US Weekly and InStyle and the other tabs stay in business if they can't run "Trouble in Brangelina Land" on their covers every other week?

I agree with Brad that Angie needs to eat. I mean some pics i've seen of her are pretty unbelievable. Will she ever be as Hot as she was in Tomb Raider?

Maybe it wasn't food, but when she wanted to adopt an entire orphanage in Hati, Brad had enough.

Tom Cruise and Katie will take over.

Howard Stern said the two were over. Said he had good sources.

Not Hati, 'Lidsville'.

It's funny how the tabs pen Jennifer as this sad little thing so tore up over losing Brad.

Why she had to snog Owen Wilson, John Mayer, Bradley Cooper, and Gerard Butler just to cope.

Well Jennifer certainly can't seem to hold on to a man for very long, it does make you wonder what her deal is: Boring in bed, to clingy, annoying, dull personality, all three perhaps?

Perhaps Jennifer should stop dating celebrities. Wasn't it conflicting schedules, time apart, etc. that led to most of her break-ups? It's time for her to change things up, maybe date someone not in the business.

Who says she's trying to hold on to any of them?

Maybe when Jen shops for cereal, she buys the variety pack.

Okay, fine. I'll take the bullet this time.

You da man, Leper! You show her what real lovin' truly is!

Such a good boy. Such a sweet, good, nice boy - with a huge weener.

I love that the word "Revenge Body" is now out there. Thanks Jennifer Aniston.....

Aniston has milked this thing into a sustained career, despite having not appeared in any movies people liked. But beyond that, it's too alien for me to even try to imagine what their lives must be like. I don't know how you'd possibly avoid being completely obsessed with yourself.

I'm far too lazy to dig up the link, but WWTDD.com once visualized a shrine in Aniston's house where she acts out revenge fantasies with a Barbie doll (her), a Ken (Brad), and a Tomb Raider action figure.

From yesterday's front page:

Folks call her pathetic because, truthfully, that is how she comes across. Her latest stunt, publicly snuggling up to Gerard Butler for the cameras at the Golden Globes, is just the latest of her desperate bids for attention. She has a pattern: whenever she's got a movie coming out, she's seen publicly all over some famous guy's dick (Vince Vaughn, John Mayer, now The Butler) to get some press, reassures the five people who care that she's over Brad via People Magazine, and once the publicity tour is over, so is the "showmance" with whatever guy she's with.

She's not pathetic because she's not married with kids. She's not pathetic because Brad Pitt dumped her. She's pathetic because she isn't talented or interesting enough to get press for, say, her ACTING ABILITY or something not involving who she's fucking. Yes, a lot of stars have tabloid rumors going around, but they are not solely coasting on tabloid attention. They have talent. This woman does not. She's pathetic because, save for The Good Girl, she plays Rachel from Friends in every fucking movie. She's pathetic because she doesn't have the talent to make it without some sort of rumor about whose dick she's riding, and she knows it.

Gee, still no big news about the huge breakup on People.com. Brangelina must be laying really low this time around! Or, maybe they're not breaking up? Could be another rumor for the 10x millionth time?

It's up to the director/studios to push her in other directions, or people to stop watching her films. As long as audiences show up, they figure why change the formula. Plus, the actors that star opposite her are just as guilty of milking the formula as she is.

I'm looking at you Aaron Eckhart.

The thing is, audiences aren't showing up. The movies that she has been in that were hits cannot be attributed to her. Bruce Almighty made money because of Jim Carrey, not because of her. NO ONE saw that movie because Jennifer Aniston was in it. Along Came Polly made money because of Ben Stiller, not because of her. Marley and Me had a cute puppy and opened around Xmas. There is nothing unique, special, or extraordinary about this person. She does not take roles that challenge her or the public's perception of her. She is content to play it safe and eat off of the plates of her co-stars.

It's not up to the studios or the directors. Ultimately, it's up to her. She's the one who signs on to star in these piddling piles of shit.

Eh I still kind of think the break up is for reals this time.

Yeah, but who cares? Her real career is in the tabloids, and that's what keeps her working. None of those roles are interesting, nor are the movies. And they wouldn't be better or worse if someone else played her roles.

I'm annoyed at hearing her managed tabloid storyline constantly, but she's certainly not fucking up real movies at all.

Oh, and bad in bed? I think anything you might assume about a celeb's personal life is highly suspect to start with, but even still, that's a bit silly.

There aren't too many actresses in Hollywood who are putting butts in the seats without a strong, famous male co star to back them up. Even Saint Angie.

Jen Aniston is a desperate slut because she's had several relationships over the past 5 years, but .... all of the Hollywood guys who are doing the same = cads. George Clooney is a playboy. Aniston is bad in bed.

Movie marketing isn't just ads, trailers and TV spots...it's tabloid relationships and its fully part of the marketing plan. Like Harley said, the least talented (and sometimes talented) celebs need that extra hook to get that opening weekend so they don't end up in the next Dolph Lundgren movie. And that's tabloid hookups...the publicist takes care of this stuff. But this can totally backfire, in that you become so enshrined as a tabloid whore, people don't bother seeing your movies opening weekend because they keep reading about you in the tabloids. They know you're gonna give the same one note performance you did in your last several movies anyway. See Ben Affleck.

I remember watching the Oscars a few years ago and seeing her presenting. I immediately wondered, "THE FUCK IS SHE DOING THERE!? Yea... I know why you're there... and YOU KNOW IT TOO!!!"

But how does being the Tabloid Ho work out financially? Are they paying her to appear in these rags? Or is it the case that people who read about her in the Tabloids then go to see her films? And do they really?

I'm really interested in the economics of this

The movies definately pay the bills, but the tabloids (and the photo shoots, which also pay) keep the public profile high, which in turn raises her quote, as well as the film's profile, and thus the film's gross. This current publicity stunt for the Bounty Hunter is about as naked an attempt to generate interest as you could ask for. See also: The Break Up.

Bounty Hunter is an interesting case, of sorts, because they really are selling it all on her, and that doesn't happen very often. Maybe if it bombs she can go away a bit. Even on Friends, I never found anything to like about Rachel.

Cocoa, perhaps it's the fact that George Clooney is a good actor/producer/writer/director vs. a lame actress who need to show of her tits in every frame of her movies.

Since she doesn't get naked in her movies, I guess you are ragging on the fact that her breasts are on screen with the rest of her when she's hired?

She's bankable. Was in a HUGE sitcom. Dates actors (rare for an actress, I know.) Tabloid fodder. I mean, feel free not to feel bad for her. But the hatred is pretty hilarious. Esp. Harley's. I mean, she ain't Pol Pot.

yeah if someone can send me the titles of all those movies with Aniston's tits I'd be happy thanks

I know it's a tabloid mag but the cover of that lifestyle magazine proclaiming you can get Jen's body 15 minutes a day makes me laugh, I can just imagine people believing it (It's called going to a gym people).

I don't hate her. I just think she's pathetic and talentless.

The end of Brangelina? According to Dr Drew, it's imminent! He has some interesting insights into love and life, as well as more psycological analysis of celebrity behavior. Good read, IMHO

Aren't they ending every year?

The word PHENOMENAL, used in this fashion, seems a bit excessive in this day and age.

"Friends with money" has her in a slutty lace french maid outfit...that's all i got.

Wow. That's some really interesting insight right there. Who the hell is this Pinksy moron?

I'm no radio quack, but Jolie doesn't look like a current heroin addict to me.

She's suffering the Jennifer Connelly syndrome of needlessly losing too much weight.