Saw this a week ago in the theater. I'm still thinking about it. I like how it takes its time, and I like how the story twists without being a "twist movie." For example, I like how the first five minutes involve a secondary character being told a story by a character we never see again. I like how Truffaut tells the story of Charlie's past without voiceover, but in a flashback that feels natural, not shoehorned in. I guess I like how natural it all feels. And it's a gorgeous movie to look at -- starting with that opening, of the man running through Paris lit by streetlights, to the shot of the girl falling down through the snow.
The running, as I think about this and type it, seems to be a theme of the movie -- but is it saying Charlie cannot out run his past? Does the ending, with the new waitress being told to go introduce herself to Charlie, indicate that as long as Charlie doesn't confront his past (which he's clearly choosing to forget about, rather than really deal with), he's going to keep getting drawn into his brother's schemes and everything will repeat itself?
The running, as I think about this and type it, seems to be a theme of the movie -- but is it saying Charlie cannot out run his past? Does the ending, with the new waitress being told to go introduce herself to Charlie, indicate that as long as Charlie doesn't confront his past (which he's clearly choosing to forget about, rather than really deal with), he's going to keep getting drawn into his brother's schemes and everything will repeat itself?




