CHUD.com Community › Forums › CULTURE, HUMOR, & FREE FORM › Misc. Culture › McCarthy's Son Likely Not Autistic
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

McCarthy's Son Likely Not Autistic - Page 2

post #51 of 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake View Post
I don't want kids
Not what the rumours say, baby-lover.
post #52 of 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louris View Post
I get the logic behind "why take a chance on doing this thing that might make our kid worse." The problem is, there's as much scientific reason to believe vaccinations will make him worse as there is to believe sunshine, puppies, or rainbows will make him worse. On the other hand, catching a disease WILL affect him negatively. Instead of not taking a risk, you're instead doing the opposite and actively taking an extra risk.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan S~ View Post
I appreciate your situation and where you're coming from, Chris, but with recent evidence showing that

a) Flawed and faked evidence led to this so-called connection

b) The person who led the crusade and insisted her child's autism was caused by the MMR vaccination didn't actually have a child with autism

c) There's a rise in children catching diseases that were thought to be eliminated or neutralized years ago thank to vaccines

it's really hard not to get pissed off at these people. Partly because in this day and age of blissful ignorance people will still not allow their children to get vaccinations because of what these people have said despite the connection being proven to be complete and utter crap.

And it's not just the kids who don't get inoculated that are being harmed. It's entire communities. It has been shown recently that it is better to be the non-vaccinated person in a community of vaccinated people then it is to be the vaccinated person in a community of non-vaccinated. By talking people out of vaccinations this group has put a large number of kids (including mine and yours) at higher risk because of single minded ignorance and stupidity.

It's not a witch hunt, Chris. That would suggest that these people have done nothing to deserve scorn heaped upon them. They have risked the lives and the health of a generation because of poor science, a poor understanding of cause and effect, poor diagnosis, and poor thinking.

It also pisses me off because some of these people have made good coin feeding false hope and false cures to otherwise reasonably good parents. They make money on the false hopes of parents of autistic kids. Money that should be spent on therapy.
I take issues with these two posts in general because the information from this one doctor's research was not the beginning of autism/vaccination connections. These connections have been around since Jenny McCarthy was a baby and are multiple in probability. Between aluminum, mercury, combination shots and general brain inflammation there are multiple fronts upon which this connection can be laid. This was one flawed study.

I have seen, in the past, calls for comparative studies done on vaccinated and non-vaccinated populations to determine the rate of autism. If the non-vaccinated population shows a statistically similar rate of autism then perhaps all this could be laid to rest. Why does legislation requesting NIH do studies like this routinely get torpedoed?
post #53 of 77
Chris, Louris, and anyone else out there really dealing with autism, keep up the good work. I got caught up in my own situation as it relates to the debate, and it pales in comparison to those of you looking at the issue from the standpoint of how to treat your kids, and how to sort through the research.

I'm with Ryan and Louris philosophically, but I can see where you're coming from Chris. Terry Pratchett once said, in regards to treating his Alzheimer's, ‘I'd gnaw the arse out of a dead mole if I thought it would do any good.' There wouldn't be enough mole-ass on the planet for me to gnaw through if it were my child instead of me. So I can completely respect where you're coming from even though I think you're in error on the vaccinations. At the very least, you're making the decision with your eyes open, and are willing to admit that you could be wrong. McCarthy lost me when she started evangelizing on the subject.
post #54 of 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by TzuDohNihm View Post
I take issues with these two posts in general because the information from this one doctor's research was not the beginning of autism/vaccination connections. These connections have been around since Jenny McCarthy was a baby and are multiple in probability. Between aluminum, mercury, combination shots and general brain inflammation there are multiple fronts upon which this connection can be laid. This was one flawed study.

I have seen, in the past, calls for comparative studies done on vaccinated and non-vaccinated populations to determine the rate of autism. If the non-vaccinated population shows a statistically similar rate of autism then perhaps all this could be laid to rest. Why does legislation requesting NIH do studies like this routinely get torpedoed?
I'm putting all of this out here as second-hand information I've gleaned from conversations with my wife, so don't count me as an expert. But from what I understand, the criteria for determining autism has changed over the past thirty years as well. Since it's a broad-spectrum disorder, and the criteria have been refined, it's also entirely possible that the increase in general numbers is due to more people getting diagnosed properly...not an increase in occurrence in general.

And use of thimerosol (the mercury containing compound that I think is at the heart of the debate) used as a preservative has decreased in the past few decades to the point where most of the vaccinations recommended from children under six either don't have it, or have never had it. The link below isn't up to the minute, but gives you a good idea:

http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVac...m096228.htm#t1

So if you tell me that you don't want to give your kids one of the three DTaP vaccines that contain thimerosol, or avoid the flu shot...that's one thing. But if you're fighting things like the MMR or the Polio vaccine, you don't have much of a leg to stand on as I understand it.

I'd love to see the matter laid to rest with a comprehensive study, but there are a couple of problems. First, it's difficult to ethically set up a group of kids who will not receive vaccines as group A when current research says that the danger to your kids to not be vaccinated outweighs the possibility of increased rates of autism. Second, even if it were conclusively disproven in a perfect study, some folks wouldn't believe it.

ETA: I didn't read your link before banging this out, and as a result, pointed some things out that you had already covered. It's a complex issue that needs more study, but at the heart of it, vaccines appear to prevent more problems than they cause.
post #55 of 77
This is one of the biggest arguments my wife and I ever got into. My daughter when she turned 3 would "zone out". Stare off into space, etc followed by random bursts of crying or anger. She had an excellent vocabulary but would rarely talk during these times.

Then one day she say a report on ABC about autism, and all of the sudden, our child MUST be autistic. Which I fought tooth and nail, It is the only time I have EVER thought less of my wife, whom I put on a pedastal most of the time. So I recinded, let her take our daughter to the doctor, who immediately agreed that it could be autism, and we should get her "tested" for such. After her pediatrician looking at her ONE TIME, he thought she was autistic.

After much fighting, she agreed that since she took her, I should let her go to another specialist to get a second opinion.

What they found out was that she wasn't autistic, but having micro seizures. She was epileptic. Once they started her on a medication regime, she has no more zone out times, her speech has imporoved dramatically, etc.

Not to diminish the many many people diagnosed with Autism, but how many people are wrongfully diagnosed because some soccer mom or has been actor thinks thier child not paying attention makes them autistic.

I ate my Flutie Flakes, I read all the information, and I wholehartedly sympathize with those who raise autistic children, but some people need to get a grip.

Oh, and for those of you who say you would still "do" Jenny McCarthy, go read the book "Belly Laughs". She is damaged goods.
post #56 of 77
TzuDohNim: Pro-Jenny McCarthy's crackpot theories, anti-poor people getting access to healthcare.
post #57 of 77
As far as misdiagnoses go, elphantasmo is right. I didn't want to hear our son could be autistic, it scared the hell out of me. But after the pediatrician brought it up, we got him tested by our county system as well as Kennedy Kreiger. County said it was PDD, and Kennedy Krieger said autism, but they contain the same symptoms for him anyway. It took a lot for me to understand that a diagnosis is just a way to frame reality, not shape it.
post #58 of 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by TzuDohNihm View Post
I take issues with these two posts in general ...
Take issue with it all you want. There is near zero scientific evidence to back it up.

"“My science is Evan. He's at home."
post #59 of 77
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louris View Post
Take issue with it all you want. There is near zero scientific evidence to back it up.
And that is precisely why NIH has put no money towards research of this area. Because there is NO evidence to back it up.

Should we be getting pissed that NIH isn't studying the connection between ADHD and being exposed to elephants in utero?
post #60 of 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louris View Post
Take issue with it all you want. There is near zero scientific evidence to back it up.
Bullshit. Case studies are evidence that lead to funded studies. A child that is normal that receives a vaccine, has a marked reaction to said vaccine then immediately begins a mental regression is a case study that warrants further investigation.
post #61 of 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Merriweather View Post
Not what the rumours say, baby-lover.
Sorry, should have added "unless I've been drinking and watching Spongebob" to the end of that.
post #62 of 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by TzuDohNihm View Post
Bullshit. Case studies are evidence that lead to funded studies. A child that is normal that receives a vaccine, has a marked reaction to said vaccine then immediately begins a mental regression is a case study that warrants further investigation.
Citation required.

Until then, all you are saying is “My science is Evan. He's at home."
post #63 of 77
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TzuDohNihm View Post
Bullshit. Case studies are evidence that lead to funded studies. A child that is normal that receives a vaccine, has a marked reaction to said vaccine then immediately begins a mental regression is a case study that warrants further investigation.
I have never heard of this being documented. I'd like some pretty damn good citations that aren't completely anecdotal.
post #64 of 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by TzuDohNihm View Post
I take issues with these two posts in general because the information from this one doctor's research was not the beginning of autism/vaccination connections. These connections have been around since Jenny McCarthy was a baby and are multiple in probability. Between aluminum, mercury, combination shots and general brain inflammation there are multiple fronts upon which this connection can be laid. This was one flawed study.

I have seen, in the past, calls for comparative studies done on vaccinated and non-vaccinated populations to determine the rate of autism. If the non-vaccinated population shows a statistically similar rate of autism then perhaps all this could be laid to rest. Why does legislation requesting NIH do studies like this routinely get torpedoed?
Actually there is NO EVIDENCE that vaccines correlate to autism.

NONE.

Show me anything beyond the most basic speculation, any evidence at all.

Aluminum, mercury, lead and other chemicals can cause nerve/brain damage in certain circumstance, so it is logical to investigate whether they play a role in any neurologic disorder. However no one has EVER found that vaccines (with or without thimerosal) play a role in autism.

One of the initial reasons vaccinations were thought to correlate to autism was because the disorder often is first noted at age 2-3 years old, shortly after vaccinations. However, a good study reviewing tapes of first birthday parties showed that doctors could accurately determine which children were autistic at one year of age - long before they were diagnosed AND before they got the MMR (first dose at 12-15 months).

So there is a good study showing that babies at 12 months (pre-MMR) had autism prior to their diagnosis. That's a good "vaccinated vs. non-vaccinated" study given the subjects were viewed before and after vaccination.
post #65 of 77
Speaking as someone with a diagnosis of Asperger's, Jenny McCarthy is an enormous asshole. First of all, for perpetuating the "vaccines cause autism" bullshit, and second for stigmatizing autism as a disease. Make no mistake, autism is genetic. Those that will tell you otherwise are full of shit. And, uh, the crusade against vaccines has had serious public health ramifications. Children have fucking died because their parents bought into this insane conspiracy theory and didn't vaccinate their children. If I believed in hell, which I don't, I'd be certain there's a special place in hell for people like McCarthy.
post #66 of 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Belethedheliel View Post
Actually there is NO EVIDENCE that vaccines correlate to autism.

NONE.

Show me anything beyond the most basic speculation, any evidence at all.

What there is evidence of, however, is that not getting your kid vaccinated -does- cause problems.

http://www.eurosurveillance.org/View...rticleId=18919

" Fourteen years after the local transmission of measles was halted in the United Kingdom (UK), the disease has once again become endemic, according to the Health Protection Agency (HPA), the public health body of England and Wales. In an update on measles cases in its weekly bulletin last week, the agency stated that, as a result of almost a decade of low mumps-measles-rubella (MMR) vaccination coverage across the UK, ‘the number of children susceptible to measles is now sufficient to support the continuous spread of measles’ "
post #67 of 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Belethedheliel View Post
Actually there is NO EVIDENCE that vaccines correlate to autism.

NONE.

Show me anything beyond the most basic speculation, any evidence at all.

Aluminum, mercury, lead and other chemicals can cause nerve/brain damage in certain circumstance, so it is logical to investigate whether they play a role in any neurologic disorder. However no one has EVER found that vaccines (with or without thimerosal) play a role in autism.

One of the initial reasons vaccinations were thought to correlate to autism was because the disorder often is first noted at age 2-3 years old, shortly after vaccinations. However, a good study reviewing tapes of first birthday parties showed that doctors could accurately determine which children were autistic at one year of age - long before they were diagnosed AND before they got the MMR (first dose at 12-15 months).

So there is a good study showing that babies at 12 months (pre-MMR) had autism prior to their diagnosis. That's a good "vaccinated vs. non-vaccinated" study given the subjects were viewed before and after vaccination.
Considering prior to these first birthday party videos those children had received an average of 19 doses of various other vaccines the fact they were already autistic doesn't surprise me at all. Taking into further consideration that Pertussis toxin is implicated more often than the combination aspect of MMR or Thimerasol content really shoots your home video watching in the foot even more. Three doses of DPT or DTaP are given.

Look up Death, Pain and Trouble shot. The DPT has the longest correlation to autism because of the high amount of fever and brain inflammation associated with pertussis reactions. This severe brain inflammation is a possible link to SIDS as well as neurological damage.
post #68 of 77
Quote:
The idea that vaccines are a primary cause of autism is not as crackpot as some might wish. Autism's 60-fold rise in 30 years matches a tripling of the US vaccine schedule.
That is so moronic it's not funny, I just feel sorry for her.

NASCAR has also see a huge rise in popularity over the last 30 years... Might it also cause autism?

It's just basic common sense that just because something that happened while something else was also happening, it does not mean that one happened because of the other

Post hoc ergo propter hoc. Not necessarily words to live by, Ms McCarthy
post #69 of 77
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TzuDohNihm View Post
Considering prior to these first birthday party videos those children had received an average of 19 doses of various other vaccines the fact they were already autistic doesn't surprise me at all. Taking into further consideration that Pertussis toxin is implicated more often than the combination aspect of MMR or Thimerasol content really shoots your home video watching in the foot even more. Three doses of DPT or DTaP are given.

Look up Death, Pain and Trouble shot. The DPT has the longest correlation to autism because of the high amount of fever and brain inflammation associated with pertussis reactions. This severe brain inflammation is a possible link to SIDS as well as neurological damage.
Boy, way to not understand correlation and causation. Because something is correlated to autism doesn't mean it's the cause of autism. That's the basic failure of people who are anti-vaccine.

ETA:
Neurological complications of pertussis inoculation.

Kulenkampff M, Schwartzman JS, Wilson J.
PMID: 4818092 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Quote:
The experience with pertussis in the 1970s was also based on anecdotal case reports linking pertussis vaccination with infant brain damage.9 Again a temporal link between a vaccine and a devastating childhood condition whose natural peak onset was at the very time when most children received that vaccine was misinterpreted as a causal relation. A national study eventually showed that, while there was a temporal association with encephalopathy, any risk of lasting damage was so rare as to be unquantifiable.10 But the initial report, then as now, attracted media attention; parental and professional anxiety soared; and national immunisation rates fell from 80% to 30%. The number of susceptible children rose, and in the 12 years after 1976 three major pertussis epidemics accounted nationally for over 300000 notifications and at least 70 deaths. The suffering of families experiencing long miserable illnesses was considerable, and in some cases long term damage ensued. Some parents came to believe that an immunisation they had approved had damaged their child.
post #70 of 77
The real kicker is that the rise in Autism is due to the fact that people actually know what is is now and are willing to diagnose it. Until the late 1980s it was still something of a 'maverick' diagnosis. So the 'shocking rise' of autism over the past thirty years is due to recognition rather than an actual rise.
post #71 of 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by TzuDohNihm View Post
Considering prior to these first birthday party videos those children had received an average of 19 doses of various other vaccines the fact they were already autistic doesn't surprise me at all. Taking into further consideration that Pertussis toxin is implicated more often than the combination aspect of MMR or Thimerasol content really shoots your home video watching in the foot even more. Three doses of DPT or DTaP are given.

Look up Death, Pain and Trouble shot. The DPT has the longest correlation to autism because of the high amount of fever and brain inflammation associated with pertussis reactions. This severe brain inflammation is a possible link to SIDS as well as neurological damage.

Citation required.

Until then, all you are saying is “My science is Evan. He's at home."
post #72 of 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spike Marshall View Post
The real kicker is that the rise in Autism is due to the fact that people actually know what is is now and are willing to diagnose it. Until the late 1980s it was still something of a 'maverick' diagnosis. So the 'shocking rise' of autism over the past thirty years is due to recognition rather than an actual rise.
Listen, I know full well that some people do have autism. But I'm entirely skeptical about the whole 'Autism Spectrum' thing. I think the explosion in those kinds of diagnosis is entirely unjustified
post #73 of 77
Or it could be that Autism and Aspergers are still fairly new mental health issues and the 'explosion' in diagnoses might be more to do with diagnosing people who previously weren't classifiable than faddishness.

I mean Asperger's was only created as a diagnosis in the mid 40s and accepted as a medical diagnosis in the 1970s. Just because something has exponential growth doesn't mean that it's a fad, it just means that the remits of the diagnosis may have been extended too far OR the diagnosis is recognising symptoms that that were misdiagnosed earlier.

Also in regards to Autism there's ACTUAL NEUROLOGICAL EVIDENCE of Brain's working in and interpreting information in different ways.
post #74 of 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan S~ View Post
Boy, way to not understand correlation and causation. Because something is correlated to autism doesn't mean it's the cause of autism. That's the basic failure of people who are anti-vaccine.
Yes because my use in my post of the words "correlation" and "possible links to" suggest that I am saying autism is caused by vaccines. I believe my posts, while admittedly leaning towards the aforementioned conclusion, repeatedly say that there are multiple avenues of causality and flat out saying vaccines do not cause autism is just as wrong as saying they do.

Government Concedes Vaccine-Autism Case in Federal Court - Now What?

The Vaccine-Autism Court Document Every American Should Read
digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


And I'm glad you apparently haven't read any of my posts since you seem to think I am anti-vaccine.
post #75 of 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by TzuDohNihm View Post
Yes because my use in my post of the words "correlation" and "possible links to" suggest that I am saying autism is caused by vaccines. I believe my posts, while admittedly leaning towards the aforementioned conclusion, repeatedly say that there are multiple avenues of causality and flat out saying vaccines do not cause autism is just as wrong as saying they do.

Government Concedes Vaccine-Autism Case in Federal Court - Now What?

The Vaccine-Autism Court Document Every American Should Read
digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


And I'm glad you apparently haven't read any of my posts since you seem to think I am anti-vaccine.
Two opinion pieces written by a guy who made his name claiming autism is caused by vaccinations from a blog website is the best you can do to back up your claim that there is scientific proof of a connection?

Jesus.

If your goal was to provide some kind of proof to back up your words, you've failed. If it was to make me embarrassed for you, you've succeeded.
post #76 of 77
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TzuDohNihm View Post
Yes because my use in my post of the words "correlation" and "possible links to" suggest that I am saying autism is caused by vaccines. I believe my posts, while admittedly leaning towards the aforementioned conclusion, repeatedly say that there are multiple avenues of causality and flat out saying vaccines do not cause autism is just as wrong as saying they do.

Government Concedes Vaccine-Autism Case in Federal Court - Now What?

The Vaccine-Autism Court Document Every American Should Read
digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


And I'm glad you apparently haven't read any of my posts since you seem to think I am anti-vaccine.
There's nothing in your posts that suggest you are otherwise.

And as for your first part, there is literally NO evidence that they cause autism. I repeat, NO evidence. There may be a correlation but there is also a correlation between the amount of time kids spend in front of the computer and the rise of autism. Doesn't mean computers cause autism. There's a correlation between numbers of older parents having kids and autism. Doesn't mean one caused the other.

Here's the pisser, though, until a connection is firmly made people like you and McCarthy and her cronies are talking people out of getting their kids inoculated against deadly diseases based on correlative data. And what kills me most is that it's because people don't want a behaviourally challenged child. People are literally saying I would rather have my child die than have autism. That's a pretty dangerous game of chicken.

ETA: "pre-existing mitochondrial disorder", "regressive encephalopathy (brain disease) with features consistent with autistic spectrum disorder" None of that says the vaccination caused autism, it exasperated an existing condition in to something that had features similar to autism. That is not a healthy child becoming autistic due to vaccination. That is a child who has a disorder having the disorder made stronger due to the side effects of the vaccination. There's always risks with vaccinations but the risks in almost all cases are way less than the benefit.
post #77 of 77
Hang on, isn't TzuDoNihm the guy convinced that taxes are an institutionalised form of theft by the government? People around here still listen to this bloke?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Misc. Culture
CHUD.com Community › Forums › CULTURE, HUMOR, & FREE FORM › Misc. Culture › McCarthy's Son Likely Not Autistic