post #51 of 77
3/12/10 at 8:13am
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
I get the logic behind "why take a chance on doing this thing that might make our kid worse." The problem is, there's as much scientific reason to believe vaccinations will make him worse as there is to believe sunshine, puppies, or rainbows will make him worse. On the other hand, catching a disease WILL affect him negatively. Instead of not taking a risk, you're instead doing the opposite and actively taking an extra risk.
|
|
I appreciate your situation and where you're coming from, Chris, but with recent evidence showing that
a) Flawed and faked evidence led to this so-called connection b) The person who led the crusade and insisted her child's autism was caused by the MMR vaccination didn't actually have a child with autism c) There's a rise in children catching diseases that were thought to be eliminated or neutralized years ago thank to vaccines it's really hard not to get pissed off at these people. Partly because in this day and age of blissful ignorance people will still not allow their children to get vaccinations because of what these people have said despite the connection being proven to be complete and utter crap. And it's not just the kids who don't get inoculated that are being harmed. It's entire communities. It has been shown recently that it is better to be the non-vaccinated person in a community of vaccinated people then it is to be the vaccinated person in a community of non-vaccinated. By talking people out of vaccinations this group has put a large number of kids (including mine and yours) at higher risk because of single minded ignorance and stupidity. It's not a witch hunt, Chris. That would suggest that these people have done nothing to deserve scorn heaped upon them. They have risked the lives and the health of a generation because of poor science, a poor understanding of cause and effect, poor diagnosis, and poor thinking. It also pisses me off because some of these people have made good coin feeding false hope and false cures to otherwise reasonably good parents. They make money on the false hopes of parents of autistic kids. Money that should be spent on therapy. |
|
I take issues with these two posts in general because the information from this one doctor's research was not the beginning of autism/vaccination connections. These connections have been around since Jenny McCarthy was a baby and are multiple in probability. Between aluminum, mercury, combination shots and general brain inflammation there are multiple fronts upon which this connection can be laid. This was one flawed study.
I have seen, in the past, calls for comparative studies done on vaccinated and non-vaccinated populations to determine the rate of autism. If the non-vaccinated population shows a statistically similar rate of autism then perhaps all this could be laid to rest. Why does legislation requesting NIH do studies like this routinely get torpedoed? |
|
Take issue with it all you want. There is near zero scientific evidence to back it up.
|
|
Bullshit. Case studies are evidence that lead to funded studies. A child that is normal that receives a vaccine, has a marked reaction to said vaccine then immediately begins a mental regression is a case study that warrants further investigation.
|
|
I take issues with these two posts in general because the information from this one doctor's research was not the beginning of autism/vaccination connections. These connections have been around since Jenny McCarthy was a baby and are multiple in probability. Between aluminum, mercury, combination shots and general brain inflammation there are multiple fronts upon which this connection can be laid. This was one flawed study.
I have seen, in the past, calls for comparative studies done on vaccinated and non-vaccinated populations to determine the rate of autism. If the non-vaccinated population shows a statistically similar rate of autism then perhaps all this could be laid to rest. Why does legislation requesting NIH do studies like this routinely get torpedoed? |
|
Actually there is NO EVIDENCE that vaccines correlate to autism.
NONE. Show me anything beyond the most basic speculation, any evidence at all. |
|
Actually there is NO EVIDENCE that vaccines correlate to autism.
NONE. Show me anything beyond the most basic speculation, any evidence at all. Aluminum, mercury, lead and other chemicals can cause nerve/brain damage in certain circumstance, so it is logical to investigate whether they play a role in any neurologic disorder. However no one has EVER found that vaccines (with or without thimerosal) play a role in autism. One of the initial reasons vaccinations were thought to correlate to autism was because the disorder often is first noted at age 2-3 years old, shortly after vaccinations. However, a good study reviewing tapes of first birthday parties showed that doctors could accurately determine which children were autistic at one year of age - long before they were diagnosed AND before they got the MMR (first dose at 12-15 months). So there is a good study showing that babies at 12 months (pre-MMR) had autism prior to their diagnosis. That's a good "vaccinated vs. non-vaccinated" study given the subjects were viewed before and after vaccination. |
| The idea that vaccines are a primary cause of autism is not as crackpot as some might wish. Autism's 60-fold rise in 30 years matches a tripling of the US vaccine schedule. |
|
Considering prior to these first birthday party videos those children had received an average of 19 doses of various other vaccines the fact they were already autistic doesn't surprise me at all. Taking into further consideration that Pertussis toxin is implicated more often than the combination aspect of MMR or Thimerasol content really shoots your home video watching in the foot even more. Three doses of DPT or DTaP are given.
Look up Death, Pain and Trouble shot. The DPT has the longest correlation to autism because of the high amount of fever and brain inflammation associated with pertussis reactions. This severe brain inflammation is a possible link to SIDS as well as neurological damage. |
The experience with pertussis in the 1970s was also based on anecdotal case reports linking pertussis vaccination with infant brain damage.9 Again a temporal link between a vaccine and a devastating childhood condition whose natural peak onset was at the very time when most children received that vaccine was misinterpreted as a causal relation. A national study eventually showed that, while there was a temporal association with encephalopathy, any risk of lasting damage was so rare as to be unquantifiable.10 But the initial report, then as now, attracted media attention; parental and professional anxiety soared; and national immunisation rates fell from 80% to 30%. The number of susceptible children rose, and in the 12 years after 1976 three major pertussis epidemics accounted nationally for over 300 000 notifications and at least 70 deaths. The suffering of families experiencing long miserable illnesses was considerable, and in some cases long term damage ensued. Some parents came to believe that an immunisation they had approved had damaged their child. |
|
Considering prior to these first birthday party videos those children had received an average of 19 doses of various other vaccines the fact they were already autistic doesn't surprise me at all. Taking into further consideration that Pertussis toxin is implicated more often than the combination aspect of MMR or Thimerasol content really shoots your home video watching in the foot even more. Three doses of DPT or DTaP are given.
Look up Death, Pain and Trouble shot. The DPT has the longest correlation to autism because of the high amount of fever and brain inflammation associated with pertussis reactions. This severe brain inflammation is a possible link to SIDS as well as neurological damage. |
|
The real kicker is that the rise in Autism is due to the fact that people actually know what is is now and are willing to diagnose it. Until the late 1980s it was still something of a 'maverick' diagnosis. So the 'shocking rise' of autism over the past thirty years is due to recognition rather than an actual rise.
|
|
Boy, way to not understand correlation and causation. Because something is correlated to autism doesn't mean it's the cause of autism. That's the basic failure of people who are anti-vaccine.
|
|
Yes because my use in my post of the words "correlation" and "possible links to" suggest that I am saying autism is caused by vaccines. I believe my posts, while admittedly leaning towards the aforementioned conclusion, repeatedly say that there are multiple avenues of causality and flat out saying vaccines do not cause autism is just as wrong as saying they do.
Government Concedes Vaccine-Autism Case in Federal Court - Now What? The Vaccine-Autism Court Document Every American Should Read digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS And I'm glad you apparently haven't read any of my posts since you seem to think I am anti-vaccine. |
|
Yes because my use in my post of the words "correlation" and "possible links to" suggest that I am saying autism is caused by vaccines. I believe my posts, while admittedly leaning towards the aforementioned conclusion, repeatedly say that there are multiple avenues of causality and flat out saying vaccines do not cause autism is just as wrong as saying they do.
Government Concedes Vaccine-Autism Case in Federal Court - Now What? The Vaccine-Autism Court Document Every American Should Read digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS And I'm glad you apparently haven't read any of my posts since you seem to think I am anti-vaccine. |