CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › Movie Miscellany › What movies from last decade did you like and feel are underrated?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

What movies from last decade did you like and feel are underrated?

post #1 of 110
Thread Starter 
I was going through my DVD collection and noticed a lot of movies that I thought were great that came out between 2000-2010 but I rarely hear anything about the movies anymore.

The first one that comes to mind is one of my personal favorite movies, Almost Famous. I remember being 16 when it came out and just started really getting into that kind of music like Zeppelin, Sabbath, Floyd, AC/DC, etc. there was a record store my friends and I would go to and we'd buy vinyl. So anyways when I saw the trailer I really wanted to see it. I loved it so much I ended up seeing it 3 times at the theater. I remember going out and buying the movie poster and the soundtrack. I also had a huge crush on Kate Hudson... haha. I know it was nominated for several Oscars but I don't really see anyone talking about it that much on movie forums. I go on youtube once in a while just to watch the bus scene where they're all singing along to Elton John's - "Tiny Dancer". That's one of my absolute favorite movie scenes. I remember I even had a history teacher that year that was really into Skynyrd, Zeppelin, etc. and we had talked about the movie. I was going to bring the DVD in but didn't. I just think it's an all around great movie that still holds up today. I wish they'd release a special edition of it already.

Other movies that also come to mind...

Collateral - with Tom Cruise and Jamie Foxx. This is actually my favorite Tom Cruise movie. I also think this is actually a better Michael Mann movie than Heat.

Signs - This was pretty big when it came out but I never hear anything about it now. M. Night Shyamalan's movies have gone downhill since then but I still think this one is great.

Terminator 3 - I think it's very underrated. Sure, it's nowhere near as good as the first two but I thought the action was incredible. I love the fight in the bathroom between Arnold and Kristanna Lokken.

Blade II - I thought this was the best in the whole trilogy. Guillermo del Toro did a really good job with this one.

Final Destination 1 and 2 - I thought both of these were very good especially the second one. Seeing the car crash at the beginning of the second one at the theater was just unbelievable. I remember almost turning my head away from the screen. I think even Quentin Tarantino said that he almost had to walk out on that one it was so brutal. The third one really ruined it. I haven't seen the 4th one yet.

The Ring - I remember being really freaked out after seeing this one for some reason. It did it's job of being scary at least to me which is more than I can say about the scary movies/horror films that come out nowadays.

Blow - I really liked this movie. I thought Johnny Depp was great in it. Did he get nominated for anything for this movie? I can't remember.

I can't think of anymore right now.
post #2 of 110
There has to be a thread like this around, but maybe not specific to the 00's.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Upgrayedd View Post
Terminator 3 - I think it's very underrated. Sure, it's nowhere near as good as the first two but I thought the action was incredible. I loved the fight in the bathroom between Arnold and Kristanna Lokken. Arnold needs to quit messing around with politics and get back to making some more action movies.
Have you seen him lately? He looks 90. Arnold's probably done.

If anything, I'd say T3 is overrated. A lot of people give it a free pass because it's got a rad ending and a few good action sequences.
post #3 of 110
Thread Starter 
I wasn't even talking about the ending even though that was pretty crazy. I just thought the action scenes were done incredibly well. The whole car chase at the beginning and the fight between the two Terminators at the end were really fun to watch.
post #4 of 110
I'm totally with you on Signs and T3. Signs was such an intense film but a lot of people dismissed it for logic issues that weren't really there (i.e. the water thing).
post #5 of 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guttenberg Fan Club View Post
I'm totally with you on Signs and T3. Signs was such an intense film but a lot of people dismissed it for logic issues that weren't really there (i.e. the water thing).
Signs was really well-made, but the issues with the water thing, as I saw them anyway, weren't necessarily about logic, it was about the heavy-handed way in which he used those things as an allegory for fate and (maybe? I haven't seen it in awhile) the existence of a higher power. There are a lot of great moments in that film, but he tried too hard with the subtext and ended up undermining everything that came before it.

But, on topic - I feel like HOT ROD could be added to this list (I know I champion the hell out of this film every chance I get). It's not necessarily underRATED, but criminally underexposed.
post #6 of 110
I know its a different story round these parts but every time someone discovers how awesome Speed Racer is, an angel gets its wings.
post #7 of 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by JGButler View Post
Signs was really well-made, but the issues with the water thing, as I saw them anyway, weren't necessarily about logic, it was about the heavy-handed way in which he used those things as an allegory for fate and (maybe? I haven't seen it in awhile) the existence of a higher power. There are a lot of great moments in that film, but he tried too hard with the subtext and ended up undermining everything that came before it.

But, on topic - I feel like HOT ROD could be added to this list (I know I champion the hell out of this film every chance I get). It's not necessarily underRATED, but criminally underexposed.
I don't see how the water issue undermines everything else. The film is about fate and a higher power, and although I disagree with that philosophically, I think he handles it very well. It's pretty tough situation to tell a story about that. If he's too simple about it, he'd be accused of trying to 'sneak' a religious message into the film. I think he has to be open about it.

I was very pleasantly surprised by Hot Rod. I don't typically enjoy Samberg but this was the right vehicle for him.
post #8 of 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guttenberg Fan Club View Post
I don't see how the water issue undermines everything else. The film is about fate and a higher power, and although I disagree with that philosophically, I think he handles it very well. It's pretty tough situation to tell a story about that. If he's too simple about it, he'd be accused of trying to 'sneak' a religious message into the film. I think he has to be open about it.
I disagree completely. SIGNS was great as a tense little alien thriller and the moments that surrounded that were very nicely done. Had it been left at that I'd hold it in much higher regard. But the thing about sneaking messages into film, though - that's subtext. And it's not about sneaking, it's about tucking them away. Working them in between the lines and using the story as an allegory for the message you're trying to convey.

Just off the top of my head, UP does the fate/discovering one's purpose in life thing masterfully, with subtlety and grace, and it's tucked away in between the lines of an expertly crafted adventure film.
post #9 of 110
It may have grace, there isn't anything subtle about the message of Up, either. As with Signs, the ending pretty much pounds you on the head with it.

Note, that I'm not saying it's a weakness, I just think too often we'll throw away something because it isn't subtle. Some films just aren't meant to be subtle. Sometimes it's good to be hit over the head with something. Some emotions are too big to be hidden away.
post #10 of 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guttenberg Fan Club View Post
Note, that I'm not saying it's a weakness, I just think too often we'll throw away something because it isn't subtle. Some films just aren't meant to be subtle. Sometimes it's good to be hit over the head with something. Some emotions are too big to be hidden away.
I don't think Signs is one of those who merits such "emotions ... too big to be hidden away." It's far more effective for what it is without it.

The Coen's The Man Who Wasn't There is an excellent movie, and is far better than many people give it credit for. Billy Bob Thornton is fantastic in it, as well as James Gandolfini, Frances McDormand, Jon Polito and Tony Shalhoub. People who consider it an empty genre exercise need a good smack upside the head. It's a masterfully crafted film.
post #11 of 110
One that stands out to me as truly underrated, rather than simply not getting enough attention, is Rescue Dawn. It really bugs me every time I see it referred to as a straightforward POW film, in particular people's reaction to the "conventional" ending.
post #12 of 110
Quills and The Libertine. Both feature great turns, by Geoffrey Rush and Johnny Depp respectively, as debauched artists in decline, or rise, depending on your moral views. Both films are highly watchable and would make a great double feature. The leads are entertaining, and both movies feature at least a bit of comedy, tempered by misery and their protagonists' coming demise. But really, these are movies about rock stars. Neither one is like your mother's stuffy period piece.

Wonder Boys. I've seen this more often than any other film. The characters can be fallen in love with. I read the book and it wasn't quite as good as the movie. It's a drama slash comedy, that never tries to overemphasize either aspect. There's a great soundtrack and the movie's tone is wholly unpretentious. But what's most impressive is that it doesn't deal in the usual topics of Great movies - it's set over one weekend, and no one dies or discovers they have cancer, or anything else like that. It's fairly believable. And yet the film is poignant and insightful, only not about the Extreme subjects. A perfect movie, and I've never seen it on any Top List. What a fucking shame.
post #13 of 110
Terminator 3 is a really expensive Syfy channel movie with Arnold and an interesting ending.

This list begins with Miami Vice and ends with Hot Rod.
post #14 of 110
Great points on Signs, Gutt. I've often floundered trying to make a similar case.

I'll throw out Steve Buscemi's Animal Factory.
post #15 of 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nexus-7 View Post
There has to be a thread like this around, but maybe not specific to the 00's.
You mean like this one?

(Apologies for shilling a thread I started.)
post #16 of 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guttenberg Fan Club View Post
Signs was such an intense film but a lot of people dismissed it for logic issues that weren't really there (i.e. the water thing).
Uh, yeah, the logic issues WERE there. To me it deep-sixed what was a pretty effective flick up to that point.

EDIT - or what JG Butler said.
post #17 of 110
Dunno about "underRATED" - I saw both of them on plenty of "Best-of" lists for the aughts, but I think Hedwig and the Angry Inch and City of God are underSEEN.

As in I think both should have done like $200 million box office because they're fucking phenomenal.

Downfall has probably been seen by billions if you count the "Downfall parody" meme; I doubt that half-a-percent of that billion has gone out of their way to watch the actual, fucking phenomenal movie.
post #18 of 110
SIGNS falls apart because it's so damn woolly about what it wants to say. WHo is this higher power? Where do the aliens fit into its plans? Does each planet have its own God? Using aliens to tell an explicitly religious story is mighty tricky, and it doesn't really work.

Plus, "swing away" is just lame. "Oh my God! My dying wife was telling you to grab that baseball bat and hit the glasses of water!" What was stopping them ALL grabbing a glass and throwing it?
post #19 of 110
A.I. is due for a serious re-evaluation soon.
post #20 of 110
Michael Clayton. Maybe this is more in the under-seen category, but so few people seem to even know about it. Such a terrific fucking film: great performances, a really expensive feel and tone without losing the personal nature of the story.
post #21 of 110
Upgrayedd, I think you'll find my love of Almost Famous is well-documented around these parts. And while I'm not sure that I'd agree it's underrated per se, I have your back on all things related thereto.

Justin, I came in here to mention Speed Racer, so well done.

I'll toss in Constantine. I've never read the comic and I've heard that Keanu Reeve's doesn't really play the comic version of John Constantine, but I thought this was one hell of a supernatural mystery. Then again, I'm a sucker for that sub-genre. It pisses me off to no end that we'll never see a sequel.
post #22 of 110
Michael Clayton is much more in line with those high-end Grisham and Turow adaptations that got made all the time in the 90s -- you know, date movies for adults. Great cast, good direction, awesome score, but ultimately pretty weightless. To quote two people I like, Andre said that if it really wanted to ape the 70s feel it was trying to evoke, Michael would have taken the money, and my friend Rachel describes it as "an okay movie with a bunch of really good scenes and one really great scene at the end." We spend the whole movie seeing Clooney be the anti-Danny Ocean that it's cathardic when the smooth operator we all know and love comes out. (See also: Syriana) I think the end makes the movie more than it is (and it's a movie I like quite a bit, even love).
post #23 of 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattioli View Post
Upgrayedd, I think you'll find my love of Almost Famous is well-documented around these parts. And while I'm not sure that I'd agree it's underrated per se, I have your back on all things related thereto.
All the "Kate Hudson is a lock for Best Supporting Actress" hype and the resulting backlash towards her over it has sort of spilled over to the film a bit. But I'm with you guys, it's absolutely wonderful.
post #24 of 110
Speaking about George Clooney Good Night And Good Luck is even more relevant today than it was when it was first released. I think that this movie will age very well and will be a good mood piece about the way we looked at the media in this decade.
post #25 of 110
I think Stardust is going to one day be looked on as The Princess Bride for that generation. It's a timeless film.
post #26 of 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by RathBandu View Post
Michael Clayton is much more in line with those high-end Grisham and Turow adaptations that got made all the time in the 90s -- you know, date movies for adults. Great cast, good direction, awesome score, but ultimately pretty weightless. To quote two people I like, Andre said that if it really wanted to ape the 70s feel it was trying to evoke, Michael would have taken the money, and my friend Rachel describes it as "an okay movie with a bunch of really good scenes and one really great scene at the end." We spend the whole movie seeing Clooney be the anti-Danny Ocean that it's cathardic when the smooth operator we all know and love comes out. (See also: Syriana) I think the end makes the movie more than it is (and it's a movie I like quite a bit, even love).
But I don't think the point of MC was to "ape" films from the 70s, but take elements from them and tell its own story, in a style updated for the aughts. "A bunch of really good scenes" makes it sound disjointed, which it most definitely is not. I don't think there's a bad scene in the film.

I don't disagree that it's not the weightiest of films; the "date movie for adults" is a pretty good description. I think what I really admire about the film is how tight it is, and how it marries a very slick veneer with a very personal story. It's such a great combination of solid scripting, deft direction and immersive acting.
post #27 of 110
What I meant is, the movie is pretty good and has some great moments/individual scenes (the opening's great), but up until the ending, it's fairly light (and I mean in terms of feel, not subject matter or plot). The ending does a lot to sell the whole movie, and I think that comes from Clooney's turn/performance.
post #28 of 110
Comedy:

Made

I know Favs is big-time Director man now but I wish somewhere along the line he gets another chance to do something smaller with Vaughn. Anyone that watched the episodes he was on for Dinner for Five know the chemistry they have is legit and it shows here in spades.

Action:

Kiss of the Dragon

The scene where Li ends up in the police karate-training class (oh Besson, you scamp!) and goes to work is fucking awesome. If it weren't for FX running it every few years I don't think anyone would know it exists.

Drama:

Little Children

Can you think of another movie where JEH gets to jerk-off in the passenger seat of a car after a terrible blind date? No, seriously...I'm asking.
post #29 of 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rando View Post
Little Children

Can you think of another movie where JEH gets to jerk-off in the passenger seat of a car after a terrible blind date? No, seriously...I'm asking.
I know, I know! It is Bad News Bears, Isn´t it?

Seriously though, that is a great example. Though this movie has been championed quite a bit, and rightfully so, over here at CHUD, I agree that this movie was likely seen by next to no one in the general population. So great performances across the board. And a voice over that does rival Goodfellas. What more does one want?
post #30 of 110
I know Winslet is a stone-cold fox, but who doesn't want to do some laundry after that scene with Wilson amirite?
post #31 of 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by RathBandu View Post
What I meant is, the movie is pretty good and has some great moments/individual scenes (the opening's great), but up until the ending, it's fairly light (and I mean in terms of feel, not subject matter or plot). The ending does a lot to sell the whole movie, and I think that comes from Clooney's turn/performance.
Agreed on all points.
post #32 of 110
Sydney Pollack being it also reminds me of Three Days of the Condor, which is another movie redeemed by its ending, and Condor's ending is more ambigious than Clayton's. Although I think Clayton's a better movie, if only because it doesn't stop for 20 minutes in the middle so Robert Redford can fuck Faye Dunaway.
post #33 of 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson View Post
I think Stardust is going to one day be looked on as The Princess Bride for that generation. It's a timeless film.
A world of yes. Finally getting that film released on Blu Ray will start that train, methinks.
post #34 of 110
'Stardust' was going to be my contribution to this thread as well. LOVE the film.
post #35 of 110
Just checking in for the obligatory Kiss Kiss Bang Bang mention: outside of forums like this one, its genius went virtually unnoticed.

I keep dreaming that piles of Sherlock Holmes and Iron Man 2 money might get Downey to try reteaming with Kilmer, Monaghan, and Black.
post #36 of 110
Stardust will also be remembered as "The last time DeNiro looked like he gave a shit."
post #37 of 110
I can't believe I live in a world where The Count Of Monte Cristo isn't more appreciated.
post #38 of 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by RathBandu
Stardust will also be remembered as "The last time DeNiro looked like he gave a shit."
Actually, that would be The Good Shepherd, which is a decent entry for this thread in its own right.
post #39 of 110
See, a lot of these films were very well received critically, but just underseen.

I've caught flak for this before, but a film that was mauled by the critics and bombed at the box office, but that I love and think has a lot of quality not to mention pedigree behind it is The Majestic. Its gorgeous, has a pretty great central everyman performance from Jim Carrey, a stellar supporting cast and is as warming as a blanket by the fire on a sunday afternoon.

Everyone I know in the "real" world who has seen this loves it. Everyone I mention it to online despises it. That's just the way it is, I guess, but I think if there's room in your collection for cheesy films and romantic comedies, there's room in there for a fantasy of a different kind, a slightly corny, Capra-esque throwback to a simpler time.

Its not Darabont's best film, sure, but its by no means the disaster people make it out to be. If nothing else, there's an interesting subtext of celluloid as life and some grandstanding courtroom scenes in the final act. I'll defend this film to the death.
post #40 of 110
Stardust and The Good Shepherd both came out around the same time, but yeah. That's a very flawed movie, but I'm a big cheerleader for it.
post #41 of 110
CHANGING LANES. Who the fuck is this guy that looks like Samuel L. Jackson but seems to be a completely different person?
post #42 of 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Merriweather View Post
SIGNS falls apart because it's so damn woolly about what it wants to say. WHo is this higher power? Where do the aliens fit into its plans? Does each planet have its own God? Using aliens to tell an explicitly religious story is mighty tricky, and it doesn't really work.
Come on! You really need the movie to give you all that.

And the "Swing away!" reveal works on such a powerful emotional level and as metaphor. Picking it apart is missing the point.

I'll also nominate again: Down With Love
post #43 of 110
I don't need the movie to give me all that. It's just broken on a conceptual level. And "swing away"...well, it just didn't work for me. Or the majority, it seems. I don't get hnow it works as a metaphor for anything.
post #44 of 110
The conceptual level on which Signs breaks down for me is aliens who can be killed with water landing on a planet that's 70% composed of the stuff and where it frequently falls from the sky.
post #45 of 110
I almost brought that up, but the standard response to that is that there's a contamination in Earth water that the aliens didn't know about. Still, awful.
post #46 of 110
My biggest gripe was that God did all of these awful, awful things to Mel Gibson just so he could prove to Mel what a badass he is and why he should believe in him. And it works!
post #47 of 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Merriweather View Post
CHANGING LANES. Who the fuck is this guy that looks like Samuel L. Jackson but seems to be a completely different person?
The actor, you mean? You may remember him from such films as Caveman's Valentine, Unbreakable, and Black Snake Moan.

I wish that guy was more prolific.
post #48 of 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Elvis View Post
I'll also nominate again: Down With Love
Seconded. A great little film with a ton of laughs, solid performances and a wonderful nod to early and mid-60s sensibilities.
post #49 of 110
'Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World'. Dammit, I really REALLY wish that this film had done better. I'm not sure if it was some sort of Russell Crowe backlash or just a lack of 'caring' about the subject matter...whatever it was, a lot of people missed out on making this a major success. I still know a ton of people who have never seen it (and don't want to see it), and that's a real shame. This should have kicked off a major franchise.
post #50 of 110
Stardust is fantastic. I'll echo the Princess Bride sentiment, we'll see in 10 years, of course. If anything, it showed Matthew Vaughn can wear a different hat as a director and not just be some limey Brit who makes movies about limey Brits. (Huh, he's married to Claudia Schiffer, I hate him...)

I'll add two of my favorite comedies Accepted and Grandma's Boy, such wonderful and hilarious movies that have only gotten better with each subsequent viewing. Jonah Hill was great in them (shockingly) and Long is fantastic in Accepted, and why Allen Covert isn't headlining more movies is beyond me. Great, classic comedies there.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movie Miscellany
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › Movie Miscellany › What movies from last decade did you like and feel are underrated?