CHUD.com Community › Forums › MUSIC › Music › Album of the Month: Rush SIGNALS/OSI OFFICE OF STRATEGIC INFLUENCE
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Album of the Month: Rush SIGNALS/OSI OFFICE OF STRATEGIC INFLUENCE

post #1 of 39
Thread Starter 
My theme: Transition

Rush: SIGNALS

The band:
Geddy Lee: Vocals, Bass, synthesizers
Alex Lifeson: Guitars
Neil Peart: Drums



Lala link

Rush started out as a Led Zeppelin-type rock band in the early 70s. By the mid-70s, they had morphed into a progressive metal band with a very loyal following. They decided that they had taken that format as far as they could go with HEMISPHERES (1978), so they embraced a more radio friendly format that reached its zenith with MOVING PICTURES (1981), their most commercially successful album. Once again, they realized that they had taken that particular format as far as it could go, so they tried something new on their next album.

SIGNALS (1982) sees the band moving the synthesizer from the background into the lead. Indeed, many of the songs on the album (especially ‘Subdivisions’, ‘Losing It’, and ‘Countdown’) are almost entirely synth driven with Alex’s guitar relegated to the background. The band also ventures into new territory rhythmically: ‘Digital Man’, ‘Chemistry’, and ‘The Weapon’ sound downright funky! There are very few guitar solos on the album, and those that are there are much more subdued than before. Neil also dials back a bit of the flash to focus more on the rhythm, delivering some of his absolute best (and most restrained) percussion work.

Track Listing:
‘Subdivisions’
‘The Analog Kid’
‘Chemistry’
‘Digital Man’
‘The Weapon’
‘New World Man’ (the band’s highest charting US single)
‘Losing It’ (featuring an electric violin)
‘Countdown’

Many of the songs still feature heavily in Rush’s live show (‘Subdivisions’, ‘the Analog Kid’, and ‘New World Man’ are almost always played).

This is an album of transition. The prior album, MOVING PICTURES, is all about the 70s. The next album, GRACE UNDER PRESSURE, fully embraces the keyboard era of the 80s. This is a great entry point for any new fans of the band. I absolutely love this album, front to back.

------

OSI: OFFICE OF STRATEGIC INFLUENCE

The Band (on this album):
Jim Matheos: Guitars
Kevin Moore: Keyboards and Vocals
Mike Portnoy: Drums
Sean Malone: Bass and Chapman Stick
Steven Wilson: Guest vocals on ‘shutDOWN’



Lala link

Jim Matheos, guitarist for the band Fates Warning, enlisted Mike Portnoy (Dream Theater) to assist him with a solo project. Jim wanted to create something different from the prog metal format that Fates Warning was bound to…something focusing more on rhythm and composition rather than wankery solos. They put together a 17 minute instrumental track that explored many different ideas in an effort to solidify the sound that they were going for. They successfully recruited Kevin Moore (ex-Dream Theater) for keyboards and Sean Malone (Gordian Knot) for bass and chapman stick duties. Together, all four took the ideas from that 17 minute song and crafted the 10 songs that eventually made up the main album for the band. Kevin Moore laid down vocals that were supposed to be temporary but, after being satisfied with the results, ended up being used in the final mix. At one point, Jim tried to recruit Steve Wilson (from the prog rock band Porcupine Tree) to sing on the project, but Wilson found that the style didn’t suit him (he did contribute vocals to one song, though).

The result, OFFICE OF STRATEGIC INFLUENCE (2003), is one of my favorite albums of all time. It’s a bridge between prog rock and synth rock that focuses on groove and melody. It also uses quite a few samples throughout (look for Dan Rather in the first track), reflecting Kevin Moore’s current style of composition. The riff-driven guitar work is restrained throughout; in fact, the entire album features only one true solo on it (on ‘Dirt From a Holy Place). Mike Portnoy dials back his very flashy style to deliver what is regarded to be some of his best percussion work. Sean Malone’s bass/chapman stick playing is very satisfying; his ability to lay down an interesting groove with Portnoy is really impressive. It’s a very accessible prog rock album for anyone scared of the genre.

The only complaint that many fans have is with the vocals. Kevin Moore is a very flat singer with a limited range. In any other band (especially a prog metal band), his vocal style would not work…it’s entirely too laid back. Here, I find that it really, REALLY works. It takes a bit of getting used to, but it actually blends nicely with the soundscape that is created by the other musicians.

Track Listing:
‘The New Math (What He Said)’
‘OSI’
‘When You’re Ready’
‘Horseshoes and B-52s’
‘Head’
‘Hello, Helicopter’
‘shutDOWN’
‘Dirt From a Holy Place’
‘Memory Lapses Daydream’
‘Standby (Looks Like Rain)’

Bonus CD Track Listing:
‘Set Your Controls for the Heart of the Sun’ (Pink Floyd cover)
‘New Mama’ (Neil Young cover)
‘The Thing that Never Was’

If possible, listen to the Bonus CD. ‘The Thing that Never Was’ is the original 17 minute instrumental that started off the project, and it’s fascinating to see how it was morphed into the original songs on the album. The Pink Floyd cover is excellent as well.

For me, ‘shutDOWN’ is the highlight of the album. It’s a 10 minute song that totally shifts gears in the middle…it turns from a slow dirge into a screaming metal song halfway through with one of the tastiest odd-time signature riffs that I’ve ever heard. Fates Warning has incorporated this song into its regular setlist, and I’d love to see it live sometime.

As I said, this is an album of transition: Various disparate prog metal musicians attempting something new, focusing on restraint and groove vs technical prowess. It’s also a transition of sorts in that Kevin Moore and Jim Matheos have put almost all of their musical focus into this band, releasing 2 more albums (and an E.P.) since this debut album was released. Portnoy and Malone have not stuck with the project, unfortunately.

I hope that you enjoy both of these albums.
post #2 of 39
I know the 1st, don't know the 2nd.

Interesting!
post #3 of 39
Nice choices. Looking forward to OSI, sounds really interesting. I'm just getting into Rush (I love Hemispheres) so I can't wait to listen to Signals.
post #4 of 39
I've heard the second and it's quite good. Doesn't sound as embarrassingly dated as its members' other groups. Actually, it's the album that weaned me off of prog rock and prog metal forever. Maybe not how Judas Booth would've liked to influence Chewers' listening habits.
post #5 of 39
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreary louse View Post
I've heard the second and it's quite good. Doesn't sound as embarrassingly dated as its members' other groups. Actually, it's the album that weaned me off of prog rock and prog metal forever. Maybe not how Judas Booth would've liked to influence Chewers' listening habits.
Oddly enough, I feel pretty much the same way. I used to live and breathe prog metal and kneel at the almighty altar of Dream Theater. I've gotten rather tired of it over the past few years...too many notes, perhaps?

All that I know is that I've beaten the crap out of this OSI album for the past 7 years and never grown tired of it.
post #6 of 39
How are the other two?
post #7 of 39
Thread Starter 
'Free' (2006) and 'Blood' (2009) are both really solid efforts. Neither of them are as experimental as their debut (they are more song oriented albums), but the musicianship is still there. I personally prefer 'Free' over 'Blood', but both of them are worth picking up/downloading. They're both on Lala, fwiw.

From 'Free', I'd recommend the following tracks:
'Free'
'Go'
'All Gone Now'
'Kicking'

From 'Blood':
'The Escape Artist'
'Terminal'
'Falst Start'
'Radiologue'
post #8 of 39
I'm listening to 'Signals' right now, doing my best to put aside my prejudices. My first impression is that I like it more than I expected to. The songwriting's straightforward and not overly indulgent, the lyrics and Lee's vocals aren't overly distracting and the musicianship is pretty impeccable. 'The Analog Kid' is particularly rocking, though I don't think the reggae tinges on 'The Digital Man' quite work. I really enjoy Lifeson's solos and wish his guitar was more prominent. My main problem with the album is probably the production. Given the vintage I'd assume the recording and the synthesizers were analog, and no doubt the album was produced with vinyl in mind rather than cd but the noise floor is barely perceptible sonically the album has the thin, chilly stamp of a poor digital recording. Still, I'm glad I took a chance on it and I wouldn't be shocked if the album grows on me some.
post #9 of 39
Slight derail, but whenever I see OSI, all I can think of is this GI Joe parody from The Venture Bros.

I'll get listening to these right away. Slight confession, like WTF, I've never made it through a whole Rush album. But I'm looking forward to the first time!
post #10 of 39
While Moving Pictures has more of the big, iconic Rush songs, Signals is its more intimate, scaled-back companion piece. Which is weird, since it's still pretty overt and flashy, generally speaking, but for that era of Rush, it practically comes across like their Blood on the Tracks or Tonight's the Night (which probably sounds insane to anyone who hasn't spent a ton of time listening to Rush*). It's a continuation of them bringing their lyrics down to earth, even if they're still characteristically overblown - for instance "Subdivisions" treats suburban teen non-conformity even more seriously than most suburban teen non-conformists do. But how much can you ask? These guys were writing about magic space guitars a couple of years earlier.

I mostly admire the band as technicians these days, but "Losing It" is one of those few Rush songs that manages to work on lyrical and melodic levels, too (I think they managed this a little on Hold Your Fire and Presto, too, but it's clearly just not a priority for them, overall). And if the synths sound too clinical elsewhere, they strike the perfect, cold tone here.

* And if you want to interpret that as "playing the drums along to Rush in the basement as a teenager," be my guest.

ETA: Thanks for that link, Parker. Completely worth it for the Destro stand-in beheading.
post #11 of 39
Great choices. Signals is one of my favorites, but I think I'll listen to it again before posting on it.

Whiskey, which version of the album are you listening to? The remastered version I have doesn't sound as cold as you describe.
post #12 of 39
Concerning 'Signals' I have always felt that Chemistry was one of Rush's weakest efforts. That being said I love the rest of the album. All of the songs have something to say...not the novel-length messages of earlier works, but smaller, more intimate thoughts. In particular, I always loved to compare and contrast Analog Kid and Digital Man. It seemed to continue the riff from Hemispheres without the big mythic archtypes.
post #13 of 39
Thread Starter 
Here's the OSI track 'The Thing that Never Was' off of youtube. Because of its length, it had to be split into two parts:
Part One
Part Two

Once again, this is the original 17 minute instrumental that started the whole project. All 10 songs from the album began as a piece from this track.

eta: Parker, that link is pure gold.
post #14 of 39
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarthLowbudget@ View Post
Whiskey, which version of the album are you listening to? The remastered version I have doesn't sound as cold as you describe.
The original cds for this do sound a bit thin. Indeed, Rush was not very happy with the overall production of this album. Terry Brown, their longtime producer, was pretty resistant to the direction that this album took. Rush parted ways with him and produced their next album ('Grace Under Pressure') on their own. Since then, they have worked with a myriad of different producers.

The remastered version of 'Signals' is a MUST.
post #15 of 39
I'll get to these soon but I'll just say after hearing Judas's constant appraisal of Rush, I decided to give them a listen and got Fly By Night, which I really like, I'm also listening to Caress the Steel. I guess you converted me Judas.
post #16 of 39
Never heard of OSI, but your description sounds prog-licious! Anything with a juicy groove/melody has already got me hook, line, and sinker.

As for Rush, I hope this Album of the Month introduces skeptical Chewers to the extremely underrated talents of the band. For me, Rush is up there with Zeppelin, The Stones, et al.
post #17 of 39
I just listened to Rush. I was more of a fan of the guitar-Rush, but Judas might turn me around. I still think it's good, but far from the greatness of Hemispheres and Moving Pictures.

Today is OSI day for me.
post #18 of 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by Judas Booth View Post
The original cds for this do sound a bit thin.
In general, early Mercury CD's sound like crap.
post #19 of 39
I like Signals but I'm also in the camp that doesn't like it as much as Moving Pictures. It still has some great tracks. I really like Subdivisions and The Analog Boy but it kind of lost me during The Weapon and then won me back by the end.

I has never heard of OSI being a big Dream Theater fan I had heard of Portnoy. I dig the sound of it but I'm not a huge fan of the singer they used. He takes away from some of it but the musicians in the band are just too insanely talented to not appreciate them. I think my favorite track was Dirt From a Holy Place which I swear was in a movie or TV show that I can't pin down off the top of my head.
post #20 of 39
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Moonrocket View Post
I think my favorite track was Dirt From a Holy Place which I swear was in a movie or TV show that I can't pin down off the top of my head.
The guitar lead section of that song reminds me of Donald Fagen's 'True Companion', which you would have heard at the beginning of the Harry Canyon sequence in 'Heavy Metal'.
post #21 of 39
Man OSI is just kicking my ass all over the place. Absolutely love it to pieces, I'm gonna need a few more listens to really get my head around why I like it so much though.

Not so sure about Signals as of yet, but I intend to listen to whilst hiking tomorrow so that might make it work more for me.
post #22 of 39
Thread Starter 
Glad that you're digging OSI, Spike. It grabbed me right away back in 2003 and has never gotten out of my system.
post #23 of 39
Resolved: I will try to catch up and listen to these (and the last picks of round one) in the next two weeks. I've said some nasty stuff (that I regret) about Rush in the past, but I'm going to go in absolutely open.

Dream Theater I've also never liked, but the idea that OSI is some sort of simultaneous celebration/deconstruction of prog that "cured" some of you of obsessing over prog is really intriguing.

"And what about the voice of Geddy Lee?/How did it get so high?/Do you think he speaks like an ordinary guy?/(I know him, and he does!)/And you're my fact checkin' cuz" - Pavement - "Stereo"
post #24 of 39
Alright.

I like OSI. I like Dream Theater, so it helps.

Sadly, Signals is not really working up for me. I't sokay, but synth-Rush isn't working so far. I'll give it another shot this week.
post #25 of 39
Rush-Signals

I didn't get into this at first but it slowly grew on me, I've been listening to alot of Rush lately. The use of synthesizer's is prevalent on this album, I'll admit it does kind of date the album but the songs are uniformly strong and the band's interaction is effortless. I really like 'Digital Man', Peart's driving percussion on that song is great, the other highlight for me is 'Losing it', it's here the synthesizer's are used to good effect, it also has the strongest lyrics. It's been on my Ipod rotation quite regularly, so yeah, I guess you could say I dig it.

Office of Strategic Influence

It's not bad, I'm not a huge heavy metal fan though. I got a Tool vibe from most of the album, Helicopter sounded like it was influenced by Pink Floyd's Dog's. I'll give it a few more listens, the playing is technically dazzling, not surprising considering the talent involved but I couldn't help thinking this sounds like a lighter Tool album (If such a thing exists)
post #26 of 39
I'm working on them. I swear I'm working on them...
post #27 of 39
Rush - Signals

I liked this more than I expected. I think the success of Moving Pictures must have put a lot of pressure on Rush because some of these tunes sound like straight up pop songs, and some of them are refreshingly earnest. There's some seriously good songwriting here.

I have to agree with a few other folks that I miss the guitar riffs. The synths are OK (better than I expected) but all in all, other than some terrific solos in a few songs (I dig the one in The Analog Kid) I miss the insane riffs that I know from Rock Band.

Gonna tackle OSI next.
post #28 of 39
Judas, my friend, I came away from OSI...underwhelmed. Your description of their sound had me pretty excited, but, I dunno, the majority of it left me cold. More atmosphere than brute in the arrangements and instrumentation. It was lacking a visceral edge. Maybe it's a grower? An interesting pick, to be sure, and while it didn't wow me, it's a nice complement to the Rush pick.

Actually, the OSI disc reinforces what Rush did so freakin' well during their glory days. Rush knew how to incorporate electronic elements and spacey undertones into their core rock sound like few bands before and after. The subtlety of this successful hybrid is why Signals was a wonderful transition for the band, and gave their music a welcome uplifting resonance.
post #29 of 39
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Abed View Post
Judas, my friend, I came away from OSI...underwhelmed. Your description of their sound had me pretty excited, but, I dunno, the majority of it left me cold. More atmosphere than brute in the arrangements and instrumentation. It was lacking a visceral edge. Maybe it's a grower? An interesting pick, to be sure, and while it didn't wow me, it's a nice complement to the Rush pick.

Actually, the OSI disc reinforces what Rush did so freakin' well during their glory days. Rush knew how to incorporate electronic elements and spacey undertones into their core rock sound like few bands before and after. The subtlety of this successful hybrid is why Signals was a wonderful transition for the band, and gave their music a welcome uplifting resonance.
Try it again, Ray. It is indeed a grower.

Many DT and FW fans WERE initially disappointed that this album didn't sound heavier. Indeed, when word got out in 2003 that this 'supergroup' was being formed, many fans assumed that it would be a full on metal affair (listen to the albums that Dream Theater and Fates Warning put out at this time and you can see why people would have made this assumption). Time has turned many fans around on it; I hope that you continue to give it a chance.
post #30 of 39
Agreed. I love Signals. Losing it, especially. I love the idea that even the masters of form, Hemmingway (Writing), Isadora Duncan (Dance) eventually lose their ability to do those things. The song refers to Hemmingway killing himself with the line "And he stares out the kitchen door, where the sun will rise no more." The right after that line is a beautiful transition phrase that rolls into the chorus, a surprising emotional chorus if you can relate to having a skill and then looking ahead to when you may lose it. Peart explores this same theme of towering talent and it's pitfalls in "Mission" from Hold Your Fire.

EDIT:

I even remember when is was like, 7 when MTV first came out, I saw the "Subdivisons" video and didn't know at the time that it was going to be the first band I really got into - the band that inspired me to play bass. When I saw the subdivisions video for the 1st time since 1982, I had a hard core deja vu head kick and I totally remember seeing that video at my neighbors house. Awesome.
post #31 of 39
I've given both albums several plays (the Rush one was released before I was working for their label, so I don't recall listening to it all the way through before), and I just can't work up any affection for them.

I can admire the skillful playing, the occasional nice riff (though I could live without the synths), and I find the odd song here and there kind of listenable ("The Analog Kid," "When You're Ready," "The Weapon," "Shutdown"-- which has rather a "No Quarter" vibe), but in the end, with both albums, I feel like I'm back in a music-apprecation class, where I'm learning all about the notes that make up the music, but little to nothing about the creative impulse, and emotional connection, that makes any art form important (to me, at any rate). And I honestly can't even bring myself to address my reservations about the lyrics, or the singing (Lee in particular).

I acknowledge that it's likely my own failing, not the musicians'. And, again, thanks for giving me the excuse to try and stretch my horizons.
post #32 of 39
It's not your own failing Jeb because I feel the same way too. It's not for a lack of muscianship anyone with a working pair of ears can tell that both bands are filled with phenomenal musicians but I haven't found myself getting lost while listening to them. While both have enjoyable songs I haven't found myself able to get sucked into the album to the point where it's just flowing. But that's the fun thing about a club like this. Rush has always been on my list of bands I've wanted to try out but never got around to it so I really appreciate the chance to listen to one of their albums that isn't Moving Pictures.
post #33 of 39
Thread Starter 
Thanks for the feedback. A lot of people find these bands to be cold and distant, and I honestly would have been surprised if at least SOME of you didn't find a way to connect to the music.
post #34 of 39
Just recently watched I LOVE YOU, MAN. Hopefully film's affection for the group has lowered defenses enough for me to overcome prejudices and aversion to what Rush always represented. Regardless, I'm giving your picks a long listen tonight.
post #35 of 39
I could have written Jeb's or Steve's posts.

I'll just add that I actually liked both vocalists. That flatter, afefct-less style on OSI is something I dig in general, and it worked well in contrast with the (IMO) overcooked music.

And I've always thought Geddy was over-hated. I just wish Rush had more melody, taste, and passion to go with the chops.
post #36 of 39
I was kind of taken aback by Rush's induction into the Canadian Songwriter's Hall of Fame. You really have to ignore Peart's lyrics to enjoy their music.
post #37 of 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by Judas Booth View Post
Try it again, Ray. It is indeed a grower.

Many DT and FW fans WERE initially disappointed that this album didn't sound heavier. Indeed, when word got out in 2003 that this 'supergroup' was being formed, many fans assumed that it would be a full on metal affair (listen to the albums that Dream Theater and Fates Warning put out at this time and you can see why people would have made this assumption). Time has turned many fans around on it; I hope that you continue to give it a chance.
I'll definitely be giving it more spins. If I listed all of the albums that didn't connect with me on the first few listens then eventually won me over later on (sometimes years later), I'd probably namecheck at least a quarter of my collection.
post #38 of 39
I really like OSI now. But the Signal is lost on me.
post #39 of 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by Judas Booth View Post

OSI: OFFICE OF STRATEGIC INFLUENCE...Jim tried to recruit Steve Wilson (from the prog rock band Porcupine Tree) to sing on the project, but Wilson found that the style didn’t suit him (he did contribute vocals to one song, though).
This cracks me up, because about 3 songs in I was thinking "damn, this sounds a shit-ton like Porcupine Tree."

"Shutdown" actually kinda reminds me of VoiVod (who nobody has heard of, but I digress...) for some reason - the riff totally sounds like Piggy and the weird time signature Judas was talking about is a very VV move as well. Judas, I'd recommend VoiVod's The Outer Limits to you for a listen, seems like it would be right up your alley. The first half "Dirt from a Holy Place" sounds like a Ronnie Montrose instrumental crossed with a Cinemax score before getting into a very King Diamond vibe (but without his thoroughly ridiculous vocal stylings, thank the FSM).

Overall, I quite like it. I can see this, like PT, being a bit of a grower.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Music
  • Album of the Month: Rush SIGNALS/OSI OFFICE OF STRATEGIC INFLUENCE
CHUD.com Community › Forums › MUSIC › Music › Album of the Month: Rush SIGNALS/OSI OFFICE OF STRATEGIC INFLUENCE