Surprised there's not a thread for this, as I'd imagine it's one of Scorsese's most polarising movies. Deakins and Scorsese naturally create a sumptuous looking flick, the serenity, simplicity and beauty of the early scenes setting out a way of life for the Tibeten people that is gradually threatened and damaged as the movie goes on. The movie tries to cover a large period, and as such feels a little unfocused and rambling at times, without going into a lot of a political detail- I may be close to complaining because it isn't the movie I expected it to be, but I like the tone and easy pace of the movie, and it's not intended to be a political analysis.
As someone who swings between atheist and agnostic, the film is more successful when it focuses on the impact on the people, not the religion- the scene where the Lama asks the woman if she is happy and she repeats what she has been ordered to say, the dream sequence of the sea of dead monks, the Lama's guilt when he has a vision of the dead on horses as he goes into exile.
Not my favourite Scorses by any means, but definitely an interesting experiment and a semi-success.
As someone who swings between atheist and agnostic, the film is more successful when it focuses on the impact on the people, not the religion- the scene where the Lama asks the woman if she is happy and she repeats what she has been ordered to say, the dream sequence of the sea of dead monks, the Lama's guilt when he has a vision of the dead on horses as he goes into exile.
Not my favourite Scorses by any means, but definitely an interesting experiment and a semi-success.





