CHUD.com Community › Forums › CULTURE, HUMOR, & FREE FORM › Gossip › Britney shows off her body
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Britney shows off her body

post #1 of 25
4/15/10 at 3:26pm
Thread Starter 
Brit Brit released two Candies pictures of her before and after being rolled through Photoshop. The Daily Mail was kind enough to point out the changes. Somehow they missed the Brit Brit's camel-toe.

I gotta say, Britney is looking good in the "before" shots. Good for her.


Reply
post #2 of 25
4/15/10 at 5:07pm
Props to her semi-recovery because as of two years ago, I thought she'd be dead by now.
Reply
post #3 of 25
4/15/10 at 6:26pm
And they ironed her knees! How nice of them.
Reply
post #4 of 25
4/15/10 at 6:31pm
Yeah, she was a real dumpster fire before those digital artists got a hold of her...
Reply
post #5 of 25
4/15/10 at 7:36pm
They also whitened her and eliminated her cankles.
Reply
post #6 of 25
4/16/10 at 1:21am
Jesus her left leg looks 50 years older than her right in the "before" shots.

Still quite doable though
Reply
post #7 of 25
4/16/10 at 4:24am
I'd smash either version and come back for seconds.
Reply
post #8 of 25
4/16/10 at 10:47am
"Cankles?"

Jesus Christ... some of you people. Her calves look way, way better simply in terms of shape in the before pics.

For my money, the bruises are the only improvement in the after photo. Everything else they fucked up.
Reply
post #9 of 25
4/16/10 at 11:54am
Thread Starter 
Yeah, she definitely doesn't have cankles. Most women put on weight in their hips and thighs as they get older, but she isn't fat in any way. But Brit is looking mighty fine from the waist up. They barely touched up her arms and face, if at all.

This is a cankle:

Reply
post #10 of 25
4/16/10 at 11:59am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva View Post

This is a cankle:
Wow....I'm sorry you have that problem, Diva. Perhaps support hose would be handy?
Reply
post #11 of 25
4/16/10 at 12:02pm
I mean, they took almost all of her good curves and tried to make her more like Twiggy or some other misguided and unhealthy shit. Ugh.

I'm certainly not a "chubby chaser," but I like some curves.
Reply
post #12 of 25
4/16/10 at 10:26pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeypants View Post

I'm certainly not a "chubby chaser," but I like some curves.
Considering Brit has popped out a coupla kids, I think she looks pretty good.
Reply
post #13 of 25
4/16/10 at 10:35pm
Yeah, I gotta echo the support she's getting here. I prefer the before pics by a country mile. I'm no fan by any stretch, but I'd be a god damn liar if I said I wouldn't hit it.
Reply
post #14 of 25
4/17/10 at 2:40am
I'm not gonna lie, there's virtually no difference between the two.
Reply
post #15 of 25
4/20/10 at 12:57pm
Me likey either version. I've always had a thing for Brittney, can't quite explain it.
Reply
post #16 of 25
4/20/10 at 1:13pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by History Buff View Post
Me likey either version. I've always had a thing for Brittney, can't quite explain it.
She's blond and has tits, and you're a heterosexual male. There. I explained it for you.
Reply
post #17 of 25
4/20/10 at 1:15pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Olson View Post
She's blond and has tits, and you're a heterosexual male. There. I explained it for you.
It's kind of terrifying how close this hits to home.
Reply
post #18 of 25
4/20/10 at 1:23pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake View Post
It's kind of terrifying how close this hits to home.
You're blond with tits?

Hello, Jake. I have many leather bound books and my apartment smells of rich mahogany.
Reply
post #19 of 25
4/20/10 at 1:23pm
I am.

*disrobes*
Reply
post #20 of 25
4/20/10 at 1:24pm
Score!
Reply
post #21 of 25
4/20/10 at 4:48pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Olson View Post
She's blond and has tits, and you're a heterosexual male. There. I explained it for you.
Then what of the Victoria Jackson theorem?
Reply
post #22 of 25
4/20/10 at 4:56pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeypants View Post
Then what of the Victoria Jackson theorem?
It even works for her! To pull from the thead on Casual Sex?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick Ripoll View Post
I saw this movie partly because I'm a fan of Victoria Jackson but mostly because I was aware that you can see her naked ass in TWO separate scenes. And it was good. Which was a socially-responsible move on the filmmaker's part, because the only sex that's 100% safe is the kind you practice with yourself.
and
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don S. View Post
I found her cute and spunky back in her SNL days. Sure, her voice was grating, but my overhyper hormones didn't care about that.
So there ya go. Holds up.
Reply
post #23 of 25
4/20/10 at 5:50pm
So I'm going to be the guy that points out they erased her camel toe? I need to stay away from these forums.
Reply
post #24 of 25
4/20/10 at 7:13pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabe Powers View Post
So I'm going to be the guy that points out they erased her camel toe? I need to stay away from these forums.
Diva beat you in post 1!!!
Reply
post #25 of 25
4/20/10 at 7:18pm
Well now I'm embarrassed that I didn't read the stuff AROUND the camel-toe.
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Gossip
CHUD.com Community › Forums › CULTURE, HUMOR, & FREE FORM › Gossip › Britney shows off her body