CHUD.com Community › Forums › ARTS & LITERATURE › Budding Filmmakers › Film vs Digital Cinematography
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Film vs Digital Cinematography

post #1 of 4
4/30/10 at 3:05pm
Thread Starter 
Don't really know if this is worth a brand new thread of its own. Moderators, feel free to merge this into an existing one.

This is a fairly indepth comparison of film vs digital. But digital through DSLRs, no less. I found it interesting.

http://vimeo.com/zacutousa#11080239
Reply
post #2 of 4
5/1/10 at 2:00pm
I don't think there's an actual competition between the two. I've come to this conclusion after so many people in television have ranted to me about digital (I had a regular class practically devoted to this, in television production!), and filmmakers ranting about film versus digital (in which case any party already knows what they'll be shooting with). Digital programs are necessary for a lot in the industry, of course, and one has a choice of shooting on film (easier but expensive) or digital (cheaper but more difficult). Either format can lend itself well to different uses. If digital 'wins' (more like making film obsolete) it won't matter, it'll be like DVD replacing VHS.
Reply
post #3 of 4
5/1/10 at 9:47pm
Thread Starter 
Yeah, it's not so much that it's necessarily film vs. digital - maybe more a comparison of film & digital.

I've not shot any live action myself for any of my personal or commercial work & I'm very unlikely to be in a position to use film even if I get the opportunity, so it was enlightening to hear these folk talk openly about what is possible with DSLRs. For instance, I found it surprising how digital coped well with darkly lit areas while struggling with retaining subtle details in bright elements.

My buddy shoots with the Cannon 5D & he mentioned that he found it tricky to push the colours in post. Not sure if this is an inherent problem with loss of information from compression or what. He also mentioned that it suffers from those annoying (for us grunts in post) rolling shutter distortions.

Shooting digital is kinda the only option for a lot of folk due to cost as you've mentioned. It's just good to hear about how well (or not) it copes with common shooting conditions.

I'd welcome any folk on the boards with any experience (first hand or otherwise) to share their thoughts/feelings on the subject.
Reply
post #4 of 4
5/8/10 at 6:46pm
I'm kinda nostalgic for a time that was before my own. Today it's like you have to be a technician to make a film - as if it's a craft like computer programming or welding. And it can be, especially with certain projects. When I speak to camerapeople I hear lots of jargon - although, sometimes, this stuff doesn't have any bearing on the project - like a briefly out of focus shot, or a dolly that doesn't immediately allow the camera to find its subject. Digital filmmaking is damn intimidating.
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Budding Filmmakers
CHUD.com Community › Forums › ARTS & LITERATURE › Budding Filmmakers › Film vs Digital Cinematography