Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Miller 
Hasn't stopped the tobacco industry. Matter of fact, the government has used the opportunity to make more money in taxes*. I haven't really kept track since I quit, but are there any less people smoking overall than there were 10 years ago?
*I've always had mixed feelings on this, on one hand it's a "wanna fuck yourself up, we'll make more money off you" tax, on the other hand, even though I don't smoke anymore and think its gross, I wouldn't want the government to eliminate it (not that they ever would).
|
You're aware that knowingly consuming a product that has been demonstrated to cause cancer costs the state and its constituents money when you receive treatment down the line, yes? The taxes associated with those products don't really "make money" off of you so much as they offset those costs to the society.
As far as bottled water is concerned, not only is there the issue that plastics are made from petrol, which adds somewhat to the energy crisis, but the bottles also don't magically disappear when someone throws them away. They end up somewhere. That could be the ocean, where they add to the mountains of plastic in the ocean and make their way into the food chain when consumed by aquatic life, which introduces the bad byproducts into the larger food chain. Conversely, it could find its way into a landfill, where the bad byproducts find their way into the water table.
The argument against product regulation is just bad. If you take the stance that you're a "classical liberal," it's important to recognize the Mill and the other actually classical liberals recognized that liberty ends when your actions demonstrably affect other persons.