CHUD.com Community › Forums › MUSIC › Music › Sleigh Bells
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Sleigh Bells

post #1 of 34
Thread Starter 
AKA, the worst shit I've ever heard.

Seriously, is this band a joke? Is this music's version of Exit Through The Gift Shop's Mr. Brainwash?

I mean, holy crap is this shit bad. Listen for yourself. I dare you to make it through the end of that song. Can you believe this album is getting good reviews?
post #2 of 34
Worst shit you've ever heard?
post #3 of 34
Thread Starter 
Oh fuck me, I got slightly hyperbolic about bad music on a message board. You better just cut my nuts off right now, bronze them and use them as a trophy.

Seriously, did you listen to that link?

And no, Brokencyde is probably the worst shit I've ever heard. But they're so bad they're laughable and nobody takes them seriously.
post #4 of 34
It's not really my thing, but I get what they're going for. The kids are allright.
post #5 of 34
Thread Starter 
So, you think they're for real? Because I honestly can't tell...
post #6 of 34
Do I go with the standard "get off my lawn" reply, a dismissive "nice thread you got going here, man", a defensive "you just don't get it" or simple, concise "fml"?
post #7 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parker View Post
So, you think they're for real? Because I honestly can't tell...
I figured there was some humor intended in the juxtoposition of styles. But I also heard this track before the one you linked, and I have to admit to liking it. Definitely gimmicky, but the over-the-top dynamics are kind of fun in a Psalm 69-era Ministry way.

Didn't really like the one you linked or some of the others that were linked on that video, though. Too much of a loud thing, I guess. I agree the reviews are hugely overstating things, though. It's not like this is a weak enough year in music that we need to be going for novelty over quality.
post #8 of 34
The dance/rock thing doesn't really work for me, but this definitely isn't deserves-its-own-thread bad.
post #9 of 34
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveB View Post
I figured there was some humor intended in the juxtoposition of styles. But I also heard this track before the one you linked, and I have to admit to liking it. Definitely gimmicky, but the over-the-top dynamics are kind of fun in a Psalm 69-era Ministry way.
I'm honestly surprised you like that song but can't get into Dan Deacon. I just think this sounds calculated in an ironic sort of way, and if they're doing that for the sake of humor, well, I don't think it's very funny.

I don't they're capable of sounding anywhere near as good as Ministry on their best day.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Francis Wolcott View Post
Do I go with the standard "get off my lawn" reply, a dismissive "nice thread you got going here, man", a defensive "you just don't get it" or simple, concise "fml"?
So...you heard this and liked it?
post #10 of 34
That I do.

Honestly though, my exposure to them was something along the lines of "hey check this demo, its kinda loud" and thinking "its also kinda good" a few months back. I assume your reaction is more of a "read this glowing review -> wtf is this, why?" than about what the band itself is doing.
post #11 of 34
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Francis Wolcott View Post
That I do.

Honestly though, my exposure to them was something along the lines of "hey check this demo, its kinda loud" and thinking "its also kinda good" a few months back. I assume your reaction is more of a "read this glowing review -> wtf is this, why?" than about what the band itself is doing.
What do you think the band is doing?

And why do you like them? I ask as someone who is kinda mystified, it's not intended as snark. I like plenty of weird shit, but this just sounds overly calculated, humorously ironic, stylistically confused and not nearly as subversive as they think they are.

That's just my take on it and I'm willing to argue that I could be wrong. I'm pretty open minded when it comes to music, but this just screams awful to me. I'd like to know what people find interesting in their music. Dave's post helps, but the more the better.
post #12 of 34
I came into this thread hoping it would announce an album is available. I first heard of Sleigh Bells in the Sound Opinion podcast they did on SXWX and I really liked what I heard on their MysSpace.
post #13 of 34
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Alexor View Post
I came into this thread hoping it would announce an album is available. I first heard of Sleigh Bells in the Sound Opinion podcast they did on SXWX and I really liked what I heard on their MysSpace.
They do have an album available, so if you're into them, by all means.
post #14 of 34
They're fun. Very shimmery and loud and colorful. And catchy.

I can understand not liking them, but the vitriol evident in your posts Parker is surprising, to be honest.
post #15 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parker View Post
What do you think the band is doing?

And why do you like them? I ask as someone who is kinda mystified, it's not intended as snark. I like plenty of weird shit, but this just sounds overly calculated, humorously ironic, stylistically confused and not nearly as subversive as they think they are.

That's just my take on it and I'm willing to argue that I could be wrong. I'm pretty open minded when it comes to music, but this just screams awful to me. I'd like to know what people find interesting in their music. Dave's post helps, but the more the better.
I don't think they are doing anything other than making loud noisy pop songs. And I like them because when the soundwave ferry reaches Port My Ears, I feel that "I like this" feeling and my leg gets tap-tap-tap.

Perhaps you read something different from me, with the band postulating on the depth of their subversiveness, but I don't get any "oh we think we are so subversive" vibe.
post #16 of 34
Thread Starter 
I'm clearly in the minority and I'm actually surprised more people like them. But it wouldn't be the first time I've disliked something a lot of other people got on board with, so I guess I'll just apologize to everyone who likes them for coming off like a dick. Sometimes, a band or a group has a sound that just screams disasters in your ears. That's these guys for me.

I have spoken to a couple of other music lovers that agree with me, but I guess that's another reason why CHUD is such a great board. Yall bring the perspective. Thanks.
post #17 of 34
If it weren't for the hype, would Parker's reaction be this extreme? Treats is a great summer-time album. Nothing more, nothing less.
post #18 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parker View Post
I'm honestly surprised you like that song but can't get into Dan Deacon. I just think this sounds calculated in an ironic sort of way, and if they're doing that for the sake of humor, well, I don't think it's very funny.
To my surprise, I did kind of enjoy Bromst. I can actually see disliking a full album by Sleigh Bells the same way I disliked Spiderman of the Rings, though, so that's not a bad comparison to make. Although I tend to have an easier time with deliberately unsettling heaviness (i.e., nearly clipping drums and bass) than deliberately unsettling noisiness (i.e. looping Woody Woodpecker for three minutes).

Quote:
I don't they're capable of sounding anywhere near as good as Ministry on their best day.
Well, different genre, really. I just think the absurd loudness has the same comic effect (at least, I always took Ministry's loudness as kind of good-humored).
post #19 of 34
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Abed View Post
If it weren't for the hype, would Parker's reaction be this extreme? Treats is a great summer-time album. Nothing more, nothing less.
No, it wouldn't. But if I heard it without hype, I wouldn't pay it any mind. It's not like good word of mouth alone is what's keeping me from enjoying it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveB View Post
To my surprise, I did kind of enjoy Bromst. I can actually see disliking a full album by Sleigh Bells the same way I disliked Spiderman of the Rings, though, so that's not a bad comparison to make. Although I tend to have an easier time with deliberately unsettling heaviness (i.e., nearly clipping drums and bass) than deliberately unsettling noisiness (i.e. looping Woody Woodpecker for three minutes).
Hurray! I remember in the Bromst thread, you said you were going to check some tracks out and that's the last I heard. I'm glad Spiderman of the Rings didn't keep you from checking it out.

And I agree about the loudness thing with Ministry, but here it just doesn't seem humorous to me. In fact, nothing about this band seems humorous except that they don't take themselves seriously at all, which made me question if they were meant to be taken seriously in the first place.
post #20 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Abed View Post
If it weren't for the hype, would Parker's reaction be this extreme? Treats is a great summer-time album. Nothing more, nothing less.
Yeah, I was honestly kind of surprised I liked "Tell 'Em," given the nature of the hype, so I'll admit that it did have some bearing on my reaction - just not the same bearing it had on Parker's.

And I do think it's quite relevant that some of the heavy-hitters are actually delivering in big ways this year. Insecure critics construct new narratives to make themselves seem ahead of the curve. The new Hold Steady album's great, but how many times can you write a favorable Hold Steady review without telling the readers what they already know? So you give that one a a just-decent review for not quite living up to Boys and Girls (or Separation Sunday), and you really talk up Sleigh Bells or ... well, I haven't been keeping up with Pitchfork's Best New Music selections much this year, but you get the drift.

In any case, based on the three tracks I've heard, it's ludicrous to make as big a deal out of Treats as Heaven is Whenever, High Violet, Forgiveness Rock Record, Together, or even Sisterworld, Brutalist Bricks, Have One on Me, Winter of Mixed Drinks, or The Courage of Others. But there's a place for disposable, too.
post #21 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parker View Post
No, it wouldn't. But if I heard it without hype, I wouldn't pay it any mind. It's not like good word of mouth alone is what's keeping me from enjoying it.
Fair enough. And as much as I like Treats, as DaveB already pointed out, with a year this strong, the chance of it even making my top 10 is pretty slim.

When I first heard the album in its entirety, I knew right away it would be polarizing.
post #22 of 34
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveB View Post
So you give that one a a just-decent review for not quite living up to Boys and Girls (or Separation Sunday), and you really talk up Sleigh Bells or ... well, I haven't been keeping up with Pitchfork's Best New Music selections much this year, but you get the drift.
I have been, and I've been pleasantly surprised. In year's past I've gotten the feeling that they're doing what you're talking about, but this year I've almost agreed with all of their choices (although they've left off some big ones, like the new Ted Leo/ the new Hold Steady).

Until this album. So maybe I'm reacting in part to that kind of disappointment. You always get a few stinkers from Pitchfork, but I felt like we had a good track record so far.
post #23 of 34
Bryan Lee O'Malley, aka @radiomaru, aka the author of Scott Pilgrim, described Sleigh Bells thusly on Twitter:

Quote:
getting addicted to the sleigh bells album despite myself. it's as brain-exploding as "blueberry boat" was on first listen

it's like listening to candy! poisoned, on-fire, death candy!!!!!!

some music washes over you like waves on a beach; some music annihilates you like waves of fire in the heart of the sun
That's about the best summation of the album I've found.
post #24 of 34
I went back to their MySpace and they seem to have changed the song selection from what they had a month or two ago. What I'd heard reminded me of Atari Teenage Riot. Now, not so much.
post #25 of 34
Thread Starter 
I guess I should give it more chances. I love Blueberry Boat, for example, and to hear someone comparing it to that record makes me want to give them another chance.

But then I hear the first few notes and completely lose interest. It's rare that I can't even get myself to give something another chance. I even gave Waaves another chance or two.
post #26 of 34
I'm on the opposite end of the spectrum from Parker. I can't understand a lot of people hating this but I absolutely love it. In fact, I can't stop listening. I'll admit a large part of that is I'm getting in a major summer party mood and I know this disc will get everybody crazy on the dance floor when I throw it on. Crown on the Ground in particular.
post #27 of 34
I'm thinking the rest of the album must sound rather different than the video that Parker linked, because "dance" is not the first thing that music would impel me to do.
post #28 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeb View Post
I'm thinking the rest of the album must sound rather different than the video that Parker linked, because "dance" is not the first thing that music would impel me to do.
I dunno, it kind of gives me the urge to do a Rite of Spring style primitive sacrificial dance.
post #29 of 34
At least this band's not as bad as Deerhoof! [/old "Jake is a completely tactless douchebag" reference]

I've heard some rumblings about them but haven't taken the plunge. I'll find a stream of it or something and check it oot tonight so that I can berate Parker mercilessly.
post #30 of 34
I've only heard "Ring Ring" and I dig it. Did not like either songs linked above by Parker and DaveB, but I don't dig rock music all that much generally.
post #31 of 34
This song seems to have a mixture of sensibilities from Andrew W.K. and 90's shoegazing. I kind of dig it, but I don't know, it could get tiring after a while.
post #32 of 34
Listening to the track "Kids" and I kind of loathe it. I hate the straight-16th-subdivision-single-note style rapping. Perhaps Parker just picked their best song to lampoon?
post #33 of 34
Thread Starter 
I just wanted to apologize to Ray for starting a thread after he did, especially one so fundamentally negative in tone from the onset (after his was so positive). Didn't mean to rain on your parade like that, even if I really don't dig the band.

By the way, sorry if I linked a poor choice for a song to discuss this band. It's just the title track for their album, so I figured it would be a good fit.
post #34 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parker View Post
I just wanted to apologize to Ray for starting a thread after he did, especially one so fundamentally negative in tone from the onset (after his was so positive). Didn't mean to rain on your parade like that, even if I really don't dig the band.

By the way, sorry if I linked a poor choice for a song to discuss this band. It's just the title track for their album, so I figured it would be a good fit.
Eh, no biggie. I'm always up for hearing opposing points of view. This place would get really boring if we all agreed with each other.

Your posts did catch me my surprise, only because I thought you'd really dig their sound.

To be honest, the album's already wearing out its welcome. I think it'll be one of those albums I'll want to revisit on occasion, and that's about it.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Music
CHUD.com Community › Forums › MUSIC › Music › Sleigh Bells