CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPORTS, GAMES & LEISURE › Television › The Sopranos: Advanced Discussion Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Sopranos: Advanced Discussion Thread

post #1 of 45
Thread Starter 
I figured creating a new thread for this would be better than continuing a derail in one of the Lost-related Devin's Advocates. I also googled for other previous Sopranos threads but the closest one was a Confessions of a Sopranos Virgin thread and I'm not sure that thread should be about stuff like this.

So let's make this a thread about the oh-so-covertly way Tony's transition into Livia is marked by him literally moving into her old house and saying stuff like "Poor fucking Janice" while sitting in her couch. Or the way Tony explains to Melfi that people like him and Christopher don't deserve hell, because that's for "sick fucks that kill for pleasure" or torture kids, and then proceed to track down Bevilaqua, make it clear that he wants to kill him, have fun with him to the point that he regresses to a little kid, screaming for his mommy and, after killing him, wind up at an irish bar, with Pussy, which echoes Christopher's original description of hell.

To start, I copypasted the other thread derail:

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickP View Post
I really don't see any overall plot in any Soprano's season, untill the the last three episodes of that season. I really liked how each episode was a small storie about whatever character, made them feel real, cuase to me, life is made of small stories.

I liked Vitto's story, I mean without that being expanded out, we may have got less, or even no Johnny Cakes.

Tony B was very crucial to season 5, but his appearance really felt like it was pulled out of nowhere, like "why haven't we heard about him before", considering all the guilt Tony had inside for leaving him to take the fall. You think in 4 seasons, he would have been brought up during doctor melfi's visits. But i'm just being a nitpicky prick now, I think the Sopranos was superb in everyway, and left on a high not, unline Lost. The Sopranos story didn't end cleanly, but it told us enought as to what will happen with every character.

Janis will turn into her mother
Junior will die alone, not knowing where he is.
Sil will never awaken again.
Meadow will become her mother.
AJ will turn into a Carmine Jr type guy.
Carm will live here days out alone, in ever deterating luxury.
Tony will live out his remaining days looking over every shoulder, untill he is popped, or untill he goes to jail.

Lost writters should have been taking notes... instead of payote
Part of what I like about The Sopranos is I can see how you can come to those conclusions, but I could also argue some. I think Tony became more Livia than Janice ever did (not that she didn't of course). I think the point of Sil is that we'll never know if he ever awoke or not. And I'd argue that Meadow's role isn't going to be exactly Carmela but something else. Yeah, she is marrying Patsy's kid, but its Patsy's kid that wasn't a mafioso-in-progress and I'd bet the lawfirm that gave her that awesome job was mostly thinking about the business a daughter of a boss will bring.

What's interesting to me about Tony B, is that he feels more like a season long symbol than an actual character. Even though after literally pulling it out of nowhere, the show did a good work at "earning" his reality.

But I think the key with Tony B is how in the season 5 premiere, Tony is arguing to Melfi that all the crime stuff is really what he does for his family and says that "there are 2 Tonys, and he wants to show her the other one". Then the next episode literally a second Tony appears that wants to go legit and not do the crime thing no more, and then it makes Tony B's a sort of symbollic argument to show really Tony is the guy we know he is, even though he's not.
post #2 of 45
Tony was his mother also. But the last scene with janice, and her victimizing herself over and over again, showed how she was her mother's daughter.

As far as the finale goes, I just watched it again. It is just perfect in every way.

as for the Russian, am I the only one who thinks he just died in the woods. I mean, there is no way he escaped in Paulys car, otherwise the russians would have been down Tony's throat. I think he climbed the tree, as implied in teh show, and he died shortly after. I mean, he was shot in the head.
post #3 of 45
Just got done watching season 1 again, did a whole day marathon. God, I love the forshadowing this season did. Christopher and his screen writting attempts. Livia, and her memory loss, and how she told Junior "just wait, you will be there soon". I did feel bad for Jimmy when he got whacked, knowing that Pussy was the rat the whole time. Kind of cool to see the guy who played Vito, play someone else in Seaon 1. I think his name was Gino.

College is the standout of the whole season, and easily ranks in as one of the top 5 Sopranos episodes. Tony is one dedicated proffesional, damn his daughters future, when theirs a hit to be made.
post #4 of 45
Thread Starter 
Well, Jimmy was a rat too. The Sopranos: where half the mafia is a rat, and the FBI is a bunch of baboons.

I do like how Christopher's immediate reaction when he feels dissatisfied with his life is to "tell stories", which obviously should concern Tony. But it's also great how in an episode concerned with the portrayal of italian americans and the stereotypes people hold, the guy that's desired all his life to be one of those guys resorts to screenwriting. And I love the ending of that episode, Christopher reading his name in the paper, realizing he is seen as one of those guys.

College is the obvious masterpiece in season 1, but I think that Christopher ep is where the kind of themes/structures the series will use very well later on begin to happen. I really like that scene, Tony and Christopher being unable to talk about depression because that'd be weak. "Bunch of losers blowing their skulls all over the bathroom"
post #5 of 45
I don't think Jimmy was a rat. I think he was just in the wrong place, wrong time, and talking to much. It was too funny when Chris goes "I called a bomb threat into his wake", and Sil says "Now, that's a bit too much"... lol, gotta love the mob ethics of conduct.

I do love that too, when Chris steals the whole stack of newspapers. I'm thinking, "what is he going to do with all of them?", but then i realized it's Christopher.

Going to start season 2 tonight. Bouth the whole series used on DVD a few weeks ago. All 6 seasons for 60 bucks. And no, it didn't involve a shake down.
post #6 of 45
Thread Starter 
I'd say its telling Jimmy didn't deny anything when he was about to get executed.
post #7 of 45
Todd VanDerWerff is starting an AV Club Classic rewatch series on The Sopranos as of today. Should be required reading for anyone interested in the show, or the medium of television, or the darker aspects of the American character in the 21st century. Same goes for his Deadwood series, while we're at it.
post #8 of 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schwartz View Post
Todd VanDerWerff is starting an AV Club Classic rewatch series on The Sopranos as of today. Should be required reading for anyone interested in the show, or the medium of television, or the darker aspects of the American character in the 21st century. Same goes for his Deadwood series, while we're at it.

Dude, THANK YOU! It's such common sense, but sometimes I need a jolt for things to read on AV Club that are sitting right there.


One day, I can't wait to dive into the Sopranos. I only ever saw like 4-5 episodes scattered throughout. The "fandom" over it put me off when it was airing.
post #9 of 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeypants View Post
Dude, THANK YOU! It's such common sense, but sometimes I need a jolt for things to read on AV Club that are sitting right there.


One day, I can't wait to dive into the Sopranos. I only ever saw like 4-5 episodes scattered throughout. The "fandom" over it put me off when it was airing.
You'll love it, pants. It's bleak, wrenching, sharply satirical, violent, and absolutely hilarious. It's also the most insanely cynical show to ever become a huge mainstream sensation, which I always found amusing. Also, it had serious issues with the fandom it developed, and addresses this in really sly and intelligent ways in later seasons. Oh, and (shakes up can of worms) the ending actually is daring and uncompromising in all the ways the Lost cheerleaders have been claiming its was.

The Deadwood reviews are really ace. I highly recommend them, especially to anyone who wrote the show off as a big pile of violence and profanity. That show's got subtext that craps bigger than you.
post #10 of 45
You'll find no such complaints about Deadwood here, I assure you, you cocksucking dirt-worshipper.

Alright, sorry for the derail. One day, I shall return to the thread.
post #11 of 45
Thread Starter 
Quote:
People who lionize Tony aren't missing the point of the show, as some critics have claimed; they're just not grasping that we get the heroes we deserve, and Tony is as much David Chase spitting in our face as anything else.
Boy, am I gonna love these write ups.
post #12 of 45
One of the posts in the A/V Club comments links to this exhaustive analysis of the final episode.

I haven't started it yet myself, so I can't comment on anything except its awe-inspiring obsessiveness.

ETA: Got through about half of it over lunch. If the Zapruder film had been scrutinized half as carefully, Stone would never have needed to make JFK.
post #13 of 45
Thread Starter 
That guy and that same post magically appears everywhere on the net where someone dares bring up The Sopranos. It's like one guy with the entire brain framework of Jehovah's Witness/Scientologist/insert-any-other-fanatic, but that decided to make his interpretation of the ending of a mob story the cradle of meaning in his world.
post #14 of 45
I don't really have a problem with the "Tony gets shot at the end" theory, if only because it would pander to my sense of justice in a way the show itself always pointedly avoided, but trying to come up with conclusive proof just seems inane. If that really was the correct way to interpret it (or if there was one correct way at all), well, they could have very easily shown us. That Chase made a point not to should tell you that there isn't a "canon" answer for what happens next.
post #15 of 45
Thread Starter 
I don't have a problem with the idea that the end can be interpreted that way, I even like the idea as an idea and the fact that some seem to interpret it that way. It adds to the series as a whole, because thinking that both "life goes on" and "Tony dies" can coexist seems appropriate to me with an ending defies ending. Unlike, say, The Wire or, perhaps more appropriately The Shield, when I think of The Sopranos now, and Tony in particular, I think (and feel) about the character in the same way I feel about characters from cancelled series. There is a certain definitive weight when a characters arc ends, in that the ending becomes sort of "part of the character". Say, Frank Sobotka or Stringer Bell are now as much about where they ended as how we experienced their scenes while we were originally watching. Somehow, The Sopranos ended with an ending that can be read as an ending and, in its way, is definitive, without being definitive and closing the experience of the character as an experience. Even more remarkable, it did close the character, because anything after the ending would destroy the effect. I can't really think of anything else that accomplishes this effect intentionally, nor am I sure it can be done again.

However, were to definitively state that the ending need be interpreted in any way, the whole effect is sort of ruined. If the Tony is dead idea wasn't taken as an idea, but as the point, I don't think how it wouldn't be contradicting a lot of the points and ambiguities throughout the years. Carmela's thoughts in Rome. The way death was portrayed as not being the end of the world, but the world sludging forward nonetheless after it which, if the series ended with Tony's death, definitely, could be seen as the series agreeing the main character's death ends everything, and by identification "yours", while an ambiguous ending doesn't do that. Also, being ambiguous it elevates the series to all sorts of other interpretations. Even Costa Mesa has a different air/feeling precisely because we know its not to be taken as a dream, but also because its not definitively stated to be anything afterlifey, and could be a metaphor, or a coma experience, but if we agree with the interpretation of the end being Livia's big nothing, then Costa Mesa begins losing possible layers. I don't see why we'd want to remove layers from this series.

But none of this matters really, my point was mostly to the cultish like behavior amongst some fans trying to actively convince and persuade others that their interpretation is correct. It's already stupid as it is when it happens worldwide with religions, but the fact that a show about sociopath mobster is generating that is something.
post #16 of 45
I've only seen the finale once, and certainly have never done a detailed analysis. But after I watched it, mt conclusion was that Tony lived, because the tension in the scene felt more like a commentary on audience expectations, given that nobody could watch it without realizing it was the final scene of this huge phenomenon, and thus not expect someone to get capped. I always go back to the tension built into Meadow parallel parking and crossing the street, and I remember laughing at it at the time, thinking Chase is totally fucking with us.

Of course, that doesn't mean Tony doesn't get shot. I've since come to the conclusion that the point is it doesn't matter if Tony lives another 50 years, or .5 seconds. As a character, he's set.
post #17 of 45
Rewatching the whole series right now. Finsihed up season 1, and just got done with the episode in Season 2 where they go to Italy.
post #18 of 45
Goddammit, now you all've got ME wanting to start up a new marathon of this show. Thanks so much, assholes.

:: reaches for Season 1, sitting on the shelf ::
post #19 of 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leto II View Post
Goddammit, now you all've got ME wanting to start up a new marathon of this show. Thanks so much, assholes.

:: reaches for Season 1, sitting on the shelf ::
you know you wanna.... "Woke up this morning......."
post #20 of 45
Now I can kiss my whole week off from work goodbye. And here I thought I'd be getting in some Red Dead and Alan Wake time...
post #21 of 45
get some Baked Ziti, a couple CAO cigars, and some good red wine...
post #22 of 45
It was the friggin' "Season 2 Italy" mention that did it, motherfucker. Chrissy never did make it out to that volcano.

But yeah -- the wine sounds like a plan.
post #23 of 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leto II View Post
It was the friggin' "Season 2 Italy" mention that did it, motherfucker. Chrissy never did make it out to that volcano.

But yeah -- the wine sounds like a plan.
Naples University my friend
post #24 of 45
Totally forgot Michael K. Williams (Omar!) played the guy who takes in Jackie Aprile Jr. when he's on the run.
post #25 of 45
Furio just came over from Italy... I forgot how much of a badass he was in the beginning. Beating up the asian whores, and their pimp.

Great to see the T-1000 getting work, even if he is playing a degenerate gambler.
post #26 of 45
I've also just rewatched the second season, the John Faverau cameo is fantastic and really funny, the scene with him and a wired Christopher in the hotel room had me in stitches.

Also, Paulie going to see the psychic, "who da fuck are you talking to?!"
post #27 of 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Savage View Post
I've also just rewatched the second season, the John Faverau cameo is fantastic and really funny, the scene with him and a wired Christopher in the hotel room had me in stitches.

Also, Paulie going to see the psychic, "who da fuck are you talking to?!"
I think it's perfectly illustrative of his character that he inexplicably yells, "FUCKIN' QUEEAHS!" before tossing a chair into the wall.
post #28 of 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Savage View Post
I've also just rewatched the second season, the John Faverau cameo is fantastic and really funny, the scene with him and a wired Christopher in the hotel room had me in stitches.

Also, Paulie going to see the psychic, "who da fuck are you talking to?!"
who ya calling wired...
post #29 of 45
On Season 3 now. Tony's mom just died. The "get together" at the house is one of the all time classic scenes from this show. I forgot how wonderfully absurb the whole thing was. The tension, everyone doing shots just to get through it, Janis showing her Narcisstic side, Carmela's father finally blowing up, and of course, Christopher explaining the world the way only Christopher can. "that would be one big space" line had me in stitches.
post #30 of 45
I'm wondering how, with some perspective under their belts, people rank the seasons against each other. It's much harder for me to do with this one than other shows, because I can't quite decide on the criteria.

Season 1

Pros: Strongest throughline with the Tony/Junior conflict, which is the simplest way to stack seasons against each other, if not the best. The finale is an explosive payoff to everything that happened before, offering a sense of narrative closure the show would eschew in subsequent years (although 5's finale did offer a pretty final statement on those storylines). The show would never again find a consistent use for John Ventimiglia's talent. College.

Cons: It's the first season, which means it takes awhile for some of the performers to find their feet (mainly Iler, but Gandolfini also tries a few different things out before settling on the nasal, ravenous brutality that would come to define the performance), and the relationships can't be as nuanced and deep as they would later become. Father Phil is a character I like more in concept than in actually watching. Always felt like Tony having an imaginary friend was gimmicky, and the show would get much better at expressing Tony's subconscious in less literal ways. It's a bit frustrating to see people who would become some of my favorite characters (Sil and Adriana) introduced as bit players and only slowly integrated into the main stories. Junior and Mikey are a tad too buffoonish, and would be overshadowed by subsequent nemeses.

Seasons 2-3

Pros: If I were to hand out grades to each individual episode in the series, these seasons would probably be neck and neck for highest GPA. The relationships and world have deepened considerably, and they contain the most of the "classic" Sopranos elements operating simultaneously. Tony definitely in charge and Livia and Janice and dethroned Junior and Baccalla and Christopher on drugs and Christopher courting Hollywood and Furio and seriously hot Meadow and Big Pussy and Richie/Ralphie (Pants gave the better performance, but a lot of the ground he covered was already broken in S2), all going on more or less at once. The way Tony reacts to the Richie resolution. Pine Barrens.

Cons: When it comes to S2, not many, although the ending loses some punch in retrospect knowing that the climactic arrest will be shrugged off without any consequences at all. 3 has the horribly awkward CGI Livia (countered by the sublime wake) at the beginning and an ending that falls a little bit flat because Jackie Jr. isn't nearly as sympathetic a sacrificial figure as Big Puss, and the act is carried out at several additional steps of removal.

Seasons 4-5

Pros: Contain scattered throughout are what I consider the highest highs the show would ever reach (Whoever Did This, the intervention episode, most of Whitecaps, the Adriana arc and finale of S5). Johnny Sack and Phil Leotardo's rise in prominence, as well as long overdue appearances by Loggia and Buscemi in Sopranos-land.

Cons: Those highs come in the midst of the spottiest stretches the show had seen, side by side with many of the lowest lows. By the GPA standard, they might come out the lowest despite racking up a few A+'s. The mob storylines are at their weakest from Ralphie's departure until Buscemi snaps. Way too much time examining Janice's love life.

Season 6

Pros: The best premiere they ever did. The back nine is the longest continuous hot streak they ever hit. Stayed completely shocking and utterly cynical right to the end.

Cons: Followed that brilliant premiere with the longest continuous run of sub-par episodes they ever hit. Way too much time examining Vito's love life. Christopher's storyline just gets more and more depressing at every turn. Puts a little too much dramatic weight on AJ coming down the stretch.

Overall, I think I give the edge to 2.
post #31 of 45
I would say 3.
post #32 of 45
Thread Starter 
I think season 5 might be my favorite. I mean, by its own nature, the Sopranos isn't really suited for this kind of "best season" comparison. Best episode or personal top 10/20 would be a whole different thing. But I think Weiner's addition to the writer's room added some emotion (I half-want to say heart, but it's not what we'd normally refer to as "heart") that makes the season the most resonant to me. It's there in "Where's Johnny's?" final scene, the symbolic extrapolation of Tony B as what Tony describes to Melfi as "the other Tony, most of Cold Cuts, the final scene of the Test Dream and the final scene In Camelot.

Also, Feech La Manna might be the greatest character ever adjusted for number of episodes he appeared relative to others. I'm one of those that loves every second of The Test Dream's dream. And the Adriana/Tony B twopunch. Bonus points for Phil Leotardo and Angelo Garepe.

I do think the best run of episodes the series ever is the final nine, but there's something in season 5 that's not quite as apocalyptic that I'm very much into.

I don't think season 6's run of subpar episodes followed the premiere though. I personally love both Costa Mesa episodes and the next one with Tony still in the hospital, it's not until later in the season that everything begins to move slower. I stand by my previous comment that the tell-tale sign of season 6's weakness isn't Vito's lovelife, but spreading the hit of one minor character (even if he was technically a New York capo) over three different episodes. That's where it feels like they are dragging it out.
post #33 of 45
I should say that when I talk about a "bad" Sopranos episode, it's not like it is a really bad or uninteresting hour of television. Just ones that dragged in parts, or had repetitive elements, or generally did not fire on all cylinders at every moment and put the rest of televised element totally to shame.

Early to mid S6, while still funny and surprising and very well acted, got repetitive and especially slow paced for a show that was not blistering at the best of times. And the problem wasn't so much Vito's lovelife as his entire character. He wasn't very interesting or sympathetic (even by extremely loose Soprano standards), and I didn't really want to watch him carry a storyline, especially one that went so far afield of Jersey to so little overall effect.
post #34 of 45
Thread Starter 




I mostly agree though. However, I actually like Vito, not like, say, I like Ralph Cifaretto's whoremurdering antics, but still I like him a bit.

Confession: I think his character peaks when Christopher throws him a sandwich.

edit: I lied.
post #35 of 45
The best Vito moment is his at-best-one-sixteenth-hearted defense of Ralphie when he insists they continue their basketball game. But scattered moments and carrying an extended, dramatic storyline are very different things.

I'm also a bit resentful that Vito got his run of episodes while my favorite side character, Silvio, got only one or two throughout the whole run where he was a main focus. He was never an Emmy threat or anything, but I think Steven Van Zandt actually put in a great, understated comic performance over the years.
post #36 of 45
Thread Starter 
Silvio sure could've used a few more poker playing scenes. Vito kinda replaced him there too, so yeah I can see the resentment.
post #37 of 45
That scene where Vito is telling himself not to look at his watch is worth any amount of clunky gay romance. What a wonderful sequence.
post #38 of 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick Ripoll View Post
That scene where Vito is telling himself not to look at his watch is worth any amount of clunky gay romance. What a wonderful sequence.
It was a little offsetting to hear voice-over in the show, but I wholeheartedly agree.
post #39 of 45
Silvio in Season 2, where he was playing Poker was some of the funniest things I've ever seen on TV. Leave the fucking cheese where it is, I like cheese on my feet...

I love every eisode of the Sopranos, but the weakest one for me, is the colombus day one.. with the Indians protesting the parade. Meh...
post #40 of 45
My biggest problem with the Vito storyline in season six is that I thought Johnny Cakes looked a little too much like Morgan Spurlock.
post #41 of 45
My biggest problem with it is how completely removed it is from the rest of the action for 3-4 episodes. Oh, and I don't think Gannascoli is that good of an actor. Although he's better in the episode where he finally comes back.
post #42 of 45
My rewatch has finally brought me to Pine Barrens, holy shit, as great and funny as I remember. As good as all the stuff in the woods is there is so much other hilarious stuff going on, it seems like they tried to be as funny as possible for this episode - Paulie getting a manicure, Bobby in his hunting gear, Tony wearing the Kaftan, Tony getting clocked with the steak, Junior's "you been eating steak?" line.
I think the "He killed sixteen Czechoslovakians. Guy was an interior decorator." "His house looked like shit." is the best gag they ever did.

I also love this quote from David Chase about Valery,
Quote:
They shot a guy. Who knows where he went? Who cares about some Russian? This is what Hollywood has done to America. Do you have to have closure on every little thing? Isn't there any mystery in the world? It's a murky world out there. It's a murky life these guys lead. And by the way, I do know where the Russian is. But I'll never say because so many people got so pissy about it.
post #43 of 45
I'm kind of amazed that they were able to take AJ, a character I thought was a little underdeveloped, and transform him into one of the most interesting characters in the second half of the six season.
post #44 of 45
Due to this thread I've started to revisit the show, I'm currently on season 3, episode 4: Employee of the Month. Lorraine Bracco was phenomenal in this episode, just devestating work, and that final scene is one of the few moments in the shows history where morality won out. I was relieved and proud when Melfi decided not to tell Tony who raped her. The long pause still manages to be deeply tense, despite now knowing how it resolves. I didn't want to see her compromise herself

I can't really pick a favourite season just yet, will need to get through the rest but running from memory I and drawn between 2 and 5. The Pussy storyline in 2 was one of my favourites of the series, his delusions of , whilst Adriana's covered similiar ground but with a far more gutpunching resolution. The scene where Adriana confesses to Christopher (closely followed by her death) was probably the most emotionally harrowing the show has had.

On the topic of AJ, on my first viewing I found him boring and aimless, due to the contrast between him and the more colourful, dynamic adult characters - but in hindsight I realize the aimlessness is entirely the point. I can empathize with his lack of direction, and the awkward frustration that comes with that. He doesn't get a lot to do throughout most of the series, but the little moments we do get from him are quite poignant at times. His relationship with Tony is actually one of my favourites in the show.
post #45 of 45
I don't know why, but Paulie losing his temper with his 'mother' when he finds out that she's not his biological mother just genuinely upset me. It's a perfectly played scene, and Paulie's harshness (which is abundant throughout the entire season) is perfectly encapsulated by it being focused on this little old woman.

It's amazing how monstrous the show is willing to make these people, all these people, and it kind of makes for some interesting emotional connections. I feel for Johnny Sack at his daughter's wedding way more than any other character because despite him being the closest thing the show has to an antagonist there's something truthful about his joy and sorrow in those scenes which you never get with Tony's crew.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Television
CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPORTS, GAMES & LEISURE › Television › The Sopranos: Advanced Discussion Thread