Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake 
It wasn't just that but you also sucked at defending yourself since your answer to everything was "ICONOGRAPHY!!!!"
|
The character's "established iconography" was my answer to precisely
one question, Jake. As I recall, you're the one who latched on to that term and beat it relentlessly.
Since we're treading the same water here, I'll just cross-post my basic argument:
[Parker's whiteness is] no more integral to the character than the fact that he's male, or from New York, or straight. Any one of these things could be altered, and it wouldn't be anathema, but it also wouldn't be the Spider-Man that I grew up reading — and that's what I prefer to see. It's no more complex than that.
I also don't want to see a white Zatoichi, a fat Professor X, a towering Wolverine, or a hot, young Papa Smurf. As far as I can tell, this makes me not only racist, but weightist, heightist, and ageist as well. If that's the case, I'm okay with that.
I'm not angry or up in arms about a black (or Asian, or female, or centenarian) actor taking on the role. I just think it's a silly idea, because I happen to prefer classical interpretations of established characters. It's absurd that I should have to "defend" that preference, or trot out my progressive liberal credentials to shield myself from name-calling by people who don't know me from a hole in the wall.
Is some of the fanboy objection rooted in racism? Of course it is. We're nowhere near the "colorblind" society we'd like to be. But this self-righteous, condescending reaction to
any objection only serves to demonstrate that ignorant, knee-jerk generalizations aren't limited to racists. It's a human trait.