Quote:
Originally Posted by JGButler 
So, in all seriousness, do we think this whole reception/bad press fiasco is a bit sensationalistic? I'm about ready to buy a new phone and have been on the iPhone bandwagon since First Gen, but all this business has kinda stymied my desire to keep going with the brand. But if only...what did he say...0.55% of the users are complaining about it (and the few people I've asked personally, save for one - who got a fucking BUGGY one - all love theirs), I'm thinking it wouldn't be quite as risky as I'd previously imagined to stay on board.
|
I get what you are saying, but it's not like Consumer Reports has a reputation for being sensationalistic. Consumer Reports said that while the other phone do experience a drop in signal with human touch the iPhone 4's was significantly worse.
I'd say the .55% is a really soft number as many people probably chalked it up to AT&T network, hearing about the issue beforehand and hoping a fix would come (friends) or people who knew that there really wasn't much Apple could do (me).
What was interesting was Jobs really dodged the design issues. You know that whatever update there is for next year will have a redesign on the antennae. Jobs will sell it as reducing human interference more than any other phone, but really it's a fix of the flaw. The September 30th date is especially curious. It feels like Apple has either discovered a manufacturing fix and that will be the time to "tweek" or worse enough time to discover a workable fix. If Jobs was so confident as to the quality of the phone, it'd be for people who purchased up through today or for maybe a month. To to put it out there for that long, it seems like Apple is scrambling.
My phone will lose signal at the slightest touch of the corner and even has issues after getting the bumper (I'm returning this weekend, I waiting to see if it was the logarithm issue).
I love my phone. It's easier, faster and more entertaining than my previous iPhone. However, it'd be nice to have a consistent signal.