CHUD.com Community › Forums › ARTS & LITERATURE › Comics & Anime › Calvin Without Hobbes
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Calvin Without Hobbes - Page 2

post #51 of 59
Yeah, well, I said "in a really dark mood." Most often Watterson wasn't. I guess if he'd gone bugfuck for a week the way Jim Davis did during that infamous week where Garfield faced existential terror and total aloneness, he might've done it. Otherwise, no.
post #52 of 59
This Calvin without Hobbes thing is stupid. You can only get so far before it becomes boring. Putting a negative spin on Calvin as if he were a crazy kid is just not funny, nor does it really say anything.

The genius of Garfield Without Garfield is that it really works as a searing portrait of loneliness AND it's also very funny.
post #53 of 59
Garfield Without Garfield was kind of lame anyway. Before it there was a page that just wiped out Garfield's thought bubbles, which was actually funnier and cleverer because it didn't change what was actually happening in the comic, it just made you look at it from a different angle. You don't need to wipe out Garfield entirely to make Jon look like an alienated man on the edge. He basically was that already, just ranting at his cat.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Blank View Post
Whoever did that strip, I read it as a comment on how overmedication can kill the imagination of all the Calvins out there. On that level it works for me. I'm not saying it's genius on the level of Watterson. But it is, plausibly, a line that Watterson himself might've followed for a week if he'd been in a really dark mood.
Exactly. It's twisting the premise of Calvin and Hobbes to take a snipe at the culture of medicating children for every perceived disorder, not to take a snipe against the comic or characters themselves. It's hardly worth throwing a tantrum over.
post #54 of 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul C View Post
You don't need to wipe out Garfield entirely to make Jon look like an alienated man on the edge. He basically was that already, just ranting at his cat.
Removing Garfield and Odie from the equation makes it more potent. It's darker and funnier if he's just ranting into an empty void. With Garfield there, you think at least he has someone to talk to. Imagine Cast Away without Wilson.

The commentary on loneliness and self-pity is much more effective when it's just a guy standing there looking at himself in the mirror.
post #55 of 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matches_Malone View Post
I always liked this one:


I have never seen that before. It's great.
A lot of people would not get it, though.
post #56 of 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by dudalb View Post
A lot of people would not get it, though.
Yeah, I'm still not entirely sure I get it. But maybe I'm not as big a C & H fan as I thought I was.
post #57 of 59
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erix View Post
Yeah, I'm still not entirely sure I get it. But maybe I'm not as big a C & H fan as I thought I was.
Calvin and Hobbes were named after philosophers. Those are them.
post #58 of 59
Thanks Cameron. I didn't know that.

Now I get it and it's cute. But I don't know that it serves as a suitable "ending" for the series.
post #59 of 59
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erix View Post
Thanks Cameron. I didn't know that.

Now I get it and it's cute. But I don't know that it serves as a suitable "ending" for the series.
Its not something Watterson did.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Comics & Anime
CHUD.com Community › Forums › ARTS & LITERATURE › Comics & Anime › Calvin Without Hobbes