That plus the fact that there was never a chance that BP wouldnt do it anyway.
post #51 of 124
6/16/10 at 9:00am
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
I realize that hindsight is 20/20, but if Obama's gonna be blamed with anything about this he's gotta take the fall for allowing something like this to happen.
He was the one who told us time and time again that lobbyists will have little say so in his administration, yet the whole process of giving BP this deep water license just smells of special interest lobbying. MMS's role, the lack of research done on the effects, the sheer lack of governmental oversight, the complete ignorance of BP's contingency plans, etc. This list goes on and on. He doesn't deserve as much blame for the aftermath, but this whole process of how BP got a hold of this license is really sickening to me. |
|
I'm not going to apologize for Obama because I'm beyond pissed off about how this whole ungodly debacle is playing out, but the regulatory dysfunction can't be laid at his feet. That is 100% Bush and Cheney, entrenched civil servants and the laissez faire political philosophy that the right, corporate democrats and misled masses have been parroting at the direction of these gigantic multinational corporations making unprecedented riches the "smaller" and less powerful government becomes.
Obama is screwing the pooch in a lot of ways, but the mechanisms that led to the spill are only marginally one of them. Before the gusher exploded, you have to remember the mindset and the corporate-funded attacks that have been thrown at him at even the suggestion that government should actually have a function where big multinational corporations are concerned. Now, it's a different story. Now, I think the people by and large are finally getting it through their skulls that government does and SHOULD have a function. The people are behind him if he takes bold steps. He needs to act and act now. The jury's still out on if he will but so far no soap. |

|
Yeah, I don't buy it. Sure, you can blame Bush and Cheney all you want, but as soon as Obama steps in the office he has/had every opportunity to clean house at MMS and at Interior. This is stuff he doesn't need Congressional approval for. He doesn't need Republicans or Blue Dogs. He can and should have done something. He should have had a detailed oil drilling policy from the get-go. As far as I'm concerned it seems as if he took the Bush-Cheney template and hoped for the best.
![]() |
|
I realize that hindsight is 20/20, but if Obama's gonna be blamed with anything about this he's gotta take the fall for allowing something like this to happen.
He was the one who told us time and time again that lobbyists will have little say so in his administration, yet the whole process of giving BP this deep water license just smells of special interest lobbying. MMS's role, the lack of research done on the effects, the sheer lack of governmental oversight, the complete ignorance of BP's contingency plans, etc. This list goes on and on. |
| He doesn't deserve as much blame for the aftermath, but this whole process of how BP got a hold of this license is really sickening to me. |
|
I can't reply in earnest to this thread yet because Rachel Maddow doesn't come on MSNBC until late afternoon
|
|
Yeah, I don't buy it. Sure, you can blame Bush and Cheney all you want, but as soon as Obama steps in the office he has/had every opportunity to clean house at MMS and at Interior. This is stuff he doesn't need Congressional approval for. He doesn't need Republicans or Blue Dogs. He can and should have done something. He should have had a detailed oil drilling policy from the get-go. As far as I'm concerned it seems as if he took the Bush-Cheney template and hoped for the best.
![]() |
|
That's the impression I got from the article as well. It does indeed make the case that simply blaming the usual suspects (Bush/Cheney/free market fasco-racists/etc) is a bit naive. It's like Obama came into the picture talking a good game but not even trying to follow through.
|
|
Just because Dad didn't make it all better his first year in doesn't mean you can't still blame Bush/Cheney/free market fiasco. I was shaking with rage after reading the Rolling Stone piece, a lot of it directed at Obama, but that does not negate the fact that Reagan's "the eight scariest words in the English language are 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help'" and Bush/Cheney's wrecking crew of deregulation and cronyism didn't lead directly, powerfully and precisely to this moment.
|
|
I have to stress that a) I haven't finished the article, and b) a LOT of it right off the bat smelled of exaggeration. I'm not saying the guy's lying or whatever.
But any article or piece of "journalism" that throws out sensationalist accusations of "...while they were flying to coke parties" etc. sends up a red flag to me. And the fact that he glosses over those things like they're just common everyday knowledge with no back up or sources makes me wonder. |
|
Oh come on -- that's fucking ridiculous. That's some serious 20/20 hindsight. I know everything's rosey in the world right now, but remember, when Obama took office America was facing many, many challenges that had to be addressed immediately. I'm sure auditing the drilling policy was down somewhere around the middle of the list, right after health care and making sure America's economy didn't melt down.
And really, this is a perfect example why we shouldn't elect nihilistic clowns that hate government (yet do everything in their power to get elected). These agencies get staffed with fellow zealots and their influence is like a hidden time bomb. When you're least expecting it, it'll explode and fuck everything up. Elect competent people and, hopefully, you'll get experts with knowledge in the federal agencies. Elect assholes you'd like to have a beer with, and you get horse lawyers in charge of FEMA. |
|
Did you all read that Rolling Stone piece? I haven't finished it yet, but what I'd gotten to seemed to imply that Obama began to dismantle/fix the MMS but essentially stopped half-way in. Or at least, the guy he put in charge did.
|
| President Obama's speech on the gulf oil disaster may have gone over the heads of many in his audience, according to an analysis of the 18-minute talk released Wednesday. Tuesday night's speech from the Oval Office of the White House was written to a 9.8 grade level, said Paul J.J. Payack, president of Global Language Monitor. The Austin, Texas-based company analyzes and catalogues trends in word usage and word choice and their impact on culture. Though the president used slightly less than four sentences per paragraph, his 19.8 words per sentence "added some difficulty for his target audience," Payack said. He singled out this sentence from Obama as unfortunate: "That is why just after the rig sank, I assembled a team of our nation's best scientists and engineers to tackle this challenge -- a team led by Dr. Steven Chu, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist and our nation's secretary of energy." "A little less professorial, less academic and more ordinary," Payack recommended. "That's the type of phraseology that makes you (appear) aloof and out of touch." |
|
Originally Posted by Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX)
"I think it's a tragedy of the first proportion that a private corporation can be subjected to what I would characterize as a shakedown," he continued, "in this case, a $20 billion shakedown with the Attorney General of the United States -- who is legitimately conducting a criminal investigation and has every right to do so to protect the interests of the American people -- participating in what amounts to a $20 billion slush fund that's unprecedented in our nation's history, that's got no legal standing, and that I think sets a terrible precedent for the future."
"I'm only speaking for myself," Barton repeated. "I'm not speaking for anybody else, but I apologize. I do not want to live in a country where any time a citizen or a corporation does something that is legitimately wrong and is subject to some sort of political pressure that is, again, in my words, amounts to a shakedown. So I apologize." |
|
Joe Barton doesn't have any problem with that. But when the President does something that favors the country and its citizens, that's a tragedy. What an unbelievable douche. I hope Texans throw him out of office.
|
|
Originally Posted by Rep. Michelle Bachman (R-MN)
“This is a complete difference in the way that the United States was run 18 months ago. But today, it seems like the automatic effort from the government is ‘let’s have the federal government take over private industry.’ We don’t want that to be the automatic response from government because we are a free-market economy. And, unfortunately, the Obama administration hasn’t been making any efforts to unwind the government out of these private industries.” |
|
http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/06/...ee-membership/
Representative Jeff Miller (R-FL) asks Barton to step down from committee. |