Quote:
Originally Posted by AlmightyShmun 
I All of this misogynistic nerd rage surrounding her is pretty baffling.
|
For certain fanboys, Cody is the funky Argento-loving chick who won't fuck them. And Fox is the popular girl who won't fuck them. How dare they have opinions and continue to make movies that we're all forced to watch at gunpoint!
As has been said elsewhere, Fox isn't the problem with any of the movies she's been in. I'm not a "fan" of hers, but I'm not a hater either. From what I've seen so far she does what she's been hired to do. She's 24. Time will tell if she turns out to be Charlize Theron (I certainly couldn't have anticipated
Monster from her work in
2 Days in the Valley) or a PG-13 Sasha Grey. She needs to work with John Waters; if anyone could bring something interesting out of her, it's the man who made Patty Hearst into an actress (and, arguably, helped Johnny Depp take the first steps toward getting away from
21 Jump Street).
I used to look forward to Fox's interviews for the what-will-she-say-next factor, but sadly she's starting to recycle the same soundbites.
I've liked what I've seen from Cody so far (haven't caught
US of Tara). Some aspects of her work aren't for everyone (I gather her dialogue legitimately bothers a lot of people more than it bothers me), but then the whole tattooed ex-stripper narrative gets brought into it, as if that had much to do with what's on the screen. And
she's only 32. And so far she's done a teen-pregnancy comedy, a teen horror movie, and a multiple-personality disorder TV show — not
Juno,
Juno Clone 1, and
Juno Clone 2. I like that she seems to have a variety of stories she wants to tell about women. Whatever people find irritating or overly quirky in her writing may iron itself out or get more finessed over time. Her winning the Oscar first time out of the gate probably didn't help the resentful perception of her as a manic pixie chick who got lucky.