Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil 
Why would it be a mockery, though? I've heard both terms but I don't know what the perceived difference is in your language.
|
I'd make an example in English but I'm afraid I'm not knowledgeable enough to find a suitable one...
so well, -esco is a desinence you can legitimately use to "build" composite terms, but the thing is, if the composite term hasn't got already a dignity of it's own (that is, is commonly used) it comes across as "purposedly non serious".
(I don't know how to explain it better than this, it's really a subtlety).
Which after all, would fit well to that specific subset of movies.
My generation was overexposed to them of course, but nobody really credited them of having some kind of artistic value... not in that timeframe, anyway

So I can definitely see someone coming up with that term in a sort of mild mockery of those movies

It's just surprising to me that the term appears to actually *be* commonly used, only not here..