CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Prop 8 Overturned!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Prop 8 Overturned!

post #1 of 145
Thread Starter 
post #2 of 145
Awesome. Finally some good news for those of us who give a shit about liberty.
post #3 of 145
Totally agree. What a great decision!
post #4 of 145
Woot! Woot!
post #5 of 145
Thread Starter 
I love how the judge pointed out that the only real internal logic one could infer from the writing of the law is that "opposite sex couples are superior to same sex couples." Which is so obvious to all of us, but seemingly oblivious to people who are allowing their ignorant beliefs to stand in the way of what our country stands for.
post #6 of 145
Hooray!

With the villainous Scott Brown having absconded with one of my beloved Bay State's senate seats, and California set to LEGALIZE POT in November, California (despite all their problems) might finally be in the running for "Greatest State in the Union"

PS: Take that, Mormons! >: )
post #7 of 145
Good news but the Fox News headline will be about a San Francisco judge undermining the will of the people. If we only had a President who would take charge on this issue.
post #8 of 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Kate View Post
California (despite all their problems) might finally be in the running for "Greatest State in the Union"
Yeah, no.

This is indeed great news though.
post #9 of 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Closer View Post
Yeah, no.

This is indeed great news though.
Yeah, I agree.. but I still am quite impressed with their progress.

You are right though; if they were truly the greatest, PROP 8 never would have succeeded in the first place. With that said, I'd really appreciate some legalized pot in Massachusetts
post #10 of 145
Awesome news!
post #11 of 145
Good news, but you guys have an odd definition of "it's over".
post #12 of 145
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Prankster View Post
Good news, but you guys have an odd definition of "it's over".
Caught up in the excitement, I guess. Naturally there will be an appeal, and yes this is going to the Supreme Court. But the actual proposition itself has been tossed out though. So that, in a sense, is over.
post #13 of 145
I wonder how much this will actually serve as a galvanizing rod for the republicans in November, though. This'll give them a real rallying point.
post #14 of 145
Sanity prevails. Wonderful news.
post #15 of 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeypants View Post
I wonder how much this will actually serve as a galvanizing rod for the republicans in November, though. This'll give them a real rallying point.
If they had any plausible person to rally behind.

This is great news, but, yeah, this is very fucking far from over. But for this brief moment: Woo hoo! Eat shit, Hatemongers!
post #16 of 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeypants View Post
I wonder how much this will actually serve as a galvanizing rod for the republicans in November, though. This'll give them a real rallying point.
Isn't the pot vote expected to really help progressives though in CA? I've heard that the turn out should be huge if people can vote to finally be able to buy pot from a store like decent citizens
post #17 of 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeypants
I wonder how much this will actually serve as a galvanizing rod for the republicans in November, though. This'll give them a real rallying point.
It's a political party that has handed the reins over to hatred and idiocy. All this could do is save them the trouble of making their rallying point up.

And while it may not be over, getting the onus put on the other side where it belongs is a very good thing.
post #18 of 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeypants View Post
I wonder how much this will actually serve as a galvanizing rod for the republicans in November, though. This'll give them a real rallying point.
I was about to say the exact same thing.
post #19 of 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeypants View Post
I wonder how much this will actually serve as a galvanizing rod for the republicans in November, though. This'll give them a real rallying point.
Urg... let's just enjoy the moment!
post #20 of 145
Kate, please stop trying to talk about legalized pot in a gay marriage thread. Your ignorance of federal law trumping any kind of state initiative is starting to grate.
post #21 of 145
I don't really buy into the idea that this could further stir up the hornets nest, as it were, when it comes to the bigoted elements of our society. Perhaps in 2004 when the election was between two white people, that might have made a difference, but the election of a guy named Barack Obama is all the catalyst the hatemongers need to show up to the polls in this or any year.

My discussion of the pot thing in California was in the context of the upcoming November elections there. My point was that I don't think this "prop 8 being overturned" thing has any real potential to increase turn out among republicans beyond what we were already going to see. As a national issue "negro in the white house" trumps "gays kissing in California". I doubt that this latest prop 8 development is going to have much of an effect nationally on turn out, and what effect it might have would only be local IMHO. My point about pot was that the pot issue alone would probably erase any benefit that the hatemongers saw when it came to getting more of their people to the polls in CA
post #22 of 145
Wait, it's legal to marry another man now? Good. That was the only thing keeping me straight and married! Here I come boys!
post #23 of 145
That was fast! Here is CitizenLink's (Focus on the Family) response to the ruling:

Quote:
Prop 8 Decision Not the Last Word

Judges who ignore the law and evidence ultimately endure appellate court reversal

Colorado Springs, Colorado (August 4, 2010 )— CitizenLink Judicial Analyst Bruce Hausknecht released the following statement today in response to U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker striking down Proposition 8 and the traditional definition of marriage in a ruling today.

“Judge Walker’s ruling raises a shocking notion that a single federal judge can nullify the votes of more than 7 million California voters, binding Supreme Court precedent, and several millennia-worth of evidence that children need both a mom and a dad.

“During these legal proceedings, the millions of California residents who supported Prop 8 have been wrongfully accused of being bigots and haters. Nothing could be further from the truth. Rather, they are concerned citizens, moms and dads who simply wanted to restore to California the long-standing understanding that marriage is between one woman and one man – a common-sense position that was taken away by the actions of another out-of-control state court in May 2008.

“Fortunately for them, who make up the majority of Californians, this disturbing decision is not the last word.

“We fully expect the judge’s decision to be overturned upon appeal. The redeeming feature of our judicial system is that one judge who ignores the law and the evidence must ultimately endure the review and reversal of his actions from the appellate courts.

“We do want Americans to understand the seriousness of this decision, however. If this judge’s decision is not overturned, it will most likely force all 50 states to recognize same-sex marriage. This would be a profound and fundamental change to the social and legal fabric of this country.

“Our Founders intended such radical changes to come from the people, not from activist judges. Alexander Hamilton, in advocating for the ratification of our Constitution in 1788, argued that the judiciary would be ‘the least dangerous’ branch of government. Today’s decision shows how far we have come from that original understanding.”
post #24 of 145
I've often wondered how homophobes can stand there, smiling, saying they aren't bigoted, they just think that their love is better than your love, as if the hypocrisy detector in their brains isn't just not working, it just doesn't exist at all.

It's like the one religious debate I've ever had with a Baptist--he said that he didn't think I was wrong for not following his faith, but he did think I was going to hell for not following his faith. What. The. Fuck. How people whose logic engines are so faulty aren't walking around bleeding from the ears is beyond me.

So, one judges' opinion < 7 million assholes'. I wonder what they're gonna say when it goes to the Supreme Court, and it becomes 5 or 6 judges.

In any case, I'll just have a huzzah for today. At least for today, something resembling sanity won.
post #25 of 145
That's so cute. Hausknecht forgot that whole thing where the government is there to protect minorities.

I mean if we always listened to the will of the majority then we'd still have segregated schools.
post #26 of 145
Agree. I think there's a sickness within the minds and souls of people fighting against equal protection under the law. Their vehemence is vile and creepy and bordering on fetishism.
post #27 of 145
Wasn't trying to shit on anyone's parade up there. I agree, this is awesome and important. I was just thinking out loud.
post #28 of 145
Literally just finished watching 8: A Mormon Proposition to read this. Excellent news. (Not a very good documentary, though. At all. Cheesily narrated, horrendous reenactment scenes, and bounces all over the place. Some really strong scenes here and there, however.)

They're already issuing marriage certificates to gay couples- http://sfappeal.com/news/2010/08/prop8.php
post #29 of 145
That guy was probably browsing on rent-a-boy.com when he wrote that.

Asshole.
post #30 of 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Clark View Post

So, one judges' opinion < 7 million assholes'. I wonder what they're gonna say when it goes to the Supreme Court, and it becomes 5 or 6 judges.
Yet did anyone complain when it was only seven million people out of a population of 36 million that were in favour of Prop 8?
post #31 of 145
If people voted for legalizing rape it wouldn't make it constitutional. These assholes don't understand the role of the judiciary.
post #32 of 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by JuddL View Post
If people voted for legalizing rape it wouldn't make it constitutional. These assholes don't understand the role of the judiciary.
Oh, Judd, don't give these troglodytes any ideas.
post #33 of 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by JuddL View Post
If people voted for legalizing rape it wouldn't make it constitutional. These assholes don't understand the role of the judiciary.
Exactly. The more and more I hear this argument I think about Stephen Douglas's Popular Sovereignty argument he made against Lincoln during the Lincoln-Douglas Debates in 1858. He thought that slavery should exist in any territory if that territory voted for it.

That argument is being expanded today in many different situations. First, this Prop 8 bullshit and also the Missouri vote last night that rejected the health care bill's individual mandate.

This is not a direct democracy and there are checks and balances. No matter how much the State of Missouri can hate the individual mandate (as I do as well), there's no way out of it by vote. It's a federal law. Federal law trumps state law and state referendums. You don't like the mandate? Vote for the politicians that will repeal it. I love hearing that two states have constitutional amendments getting out of the individual mandate as well. Good luck with that.

Just like this situation, Americans think their vote trumps all. Not true. Sorry.
post #34 of 145
I'd like to know at what point in history has any form of civil right ever been issued by popular mandate?

Granted trying to argue with some of these fucks is on par with dealing a mobius strip.

Now if we could only get initiative reform in this state. After the weed proposition, of course.
post #35 of 145
Quote:
In deciding the case, Walker offered a variety of findings that may be as important as the ruling itself. Among them were the following:

•"Sexual orientation is commonly discussed as a characteristic of the individual. Sexual orientation is fundamental to a person's identity and is a distinguishing characteristic that defines gays and lesbians as a discrete group. Proponents' assertion that sexual orientation cannot be defined is contrary to the weight of the evidence."

•"Individuals do not generally choose their sexual orientation. No credible evidence supports a finding that an individual may, through conscious decision, therapeutic intervention or any other method, change his or her sexual orientation."


•"Same-sex couples are identical to opposite-sex couples in the characteristics relevant to the ability to form successful marital unions. Like opposite-sex couples, same-sex couples have happy, satisfying relationships and form deep emotional bonds and strong commitments to their partners. Standardized measures of relationship satisfaction, relationship adjustment and love do not differ depending on whether a couple is same-sex or opposite-sex."


•"Marrying a person of the opposite sex is an unrealistic option for gay and lesbian individuals."


•"Same-sex couples receive the same tangible and intangible benefits from marriage that opposite-sex couples receive."


•"The availability of domestic partnership does not provide gays and lesbians with a status equivalent to marriage because the cultural meaning of marriage and its associated benefits are intentionally withheld from same-sex couples in domestic partnerships."


•"Permitting same-sex couples to marry will not affect the number of opposite-sex couples who marry, divorce, cohabit, have children outside of marriage or otherwise affect the stability of opposite-sex marriages."

Perhaps the most important political finding that Walker made was his conclusion that the fact that Prop 8 passed as a voter initiative was irrelevant as "fundamental rights may not be submitted to [a] vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections."
I love the fact that he pointed out all of the above. LOVE.
post #36 of 145
Quote:
“Our Founders intended such radical changes to come from the people, not from activist judges."
I love how they're implicitly saying that they know they're eventually going to lose flat-out.
post #37 of 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Prankster View Post
I love how they're implicitly saying that they know they're eventually going to lose flat-out.
It's not even true.

“It had been observed that a pure democracy if it were practicable would be the most perfect government. Experience had proved that no position is more false than this. The ancient democracies in which the people themselves deliberated never possessed one good feature of government. Their very character was tyranny; their figure deformity.”
Alexander Hamilton June 21, 1788
post #38 of 145
I'm a Debbie Downer, because the first thing I thought of when I heard this news was that it was only going to motivate bigots to vote in neanderthals in greater numbers than before.
post #39 of 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pompoussory Estoppel View Post
That guy was probably browsing on rent-a-boy.com when he wrote that.

Asshole.


Obligatory text below so that it's not just a photo post!
post #40 of 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercury318 View Post
That's so cute. Hausknecht forgot that whole thing where the government is there to protect minorities.

I mean if we always listened to the will of the majority then we'd still have segregated schools.
Obviously he hasn't read his John C Calhoun!
post #41 of 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Kate View Post
Hooray!

With the villainous Scott Brown having absconded with one of my beloved Bay State's senate seats, and California set to LEGALIZE POT in November, California (despite all their problems) might finally be in the running for "Greatest State in the Union"

PS: Take that, Mormons! >: )
Has anyone pointed out yet that, while Massachusetts is pretty cool, it's not a state. It's a commonwealth.
post #42 of 145
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zhukov View Post
Has anyone pointed out yet that, while Massachusetts is pretty cool, it's not a state. It's a commonwealth.
All of the United States are states. Four of them also identify themselves as commonwealths. But that has more to do with their constitution and governments then their identity as states.
post #43 of 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parker View Post
All of the United States are states. Four of them also identify themselves as commonwealths. But that has more to do with their constitution and governments then their identity as states.
Okay, corrected. Apologies.

California represent!!
post #44 of 145
Good job, California. You've finally caught up to Iowa in the realm of civil liberties!

I kid, I kid.

Seriously, though, anyone who has a problem with gay marriage should be barred from referring to themselves as Conservative.
post #45 of 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Clark View Post
So, one judges' opinion < 7 million assholes'. I wonder what they're gonna say when it goes to the Supreme Court, and it becomes 5 or 6 judges.
This has me worried (and quite a few gay brothers and sisters too). The Supreme Court is leaning decidedly right. An unfortunate ruling from them could set the cause back years.
post #46 of 145
I wouldn't worry about the courts fucking this up. From everything I know about this the anti gay marriage argument is, as Louis CK puts it, "But your honor, they're queeeeer!"
post #47 of 145
CHUD Republicans are so much better than regular ones.

Except Snaieke, obviously.
post #48 of 145
Don't get too excited, they'll find someway to fuck it up. Kudos to Arnie for supporting it.
post #49 of 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Closer View Post
Yeah, no.

This is indeed great news though.
Name another state that has nearly every kind of landscape in nature represented in its borders--glaciers, mountains, deserts, forests, volcanoes, lake and ocean beaches--has contributed two additions to the periodic table, the best public university on Earth, one of the best private universities, hosts almost all the major players of the computing industry, is the home of the film industry, has the market corned on the emerging green and nano technology industries, and boasts one of the largest economies on the planet.

Yes, Prop 13 was retarded and basically crushed public services in the state and bankrupted us. Yes, the combo of Prop 13's legacy and the direct ballot initiative make the state pretty much ungovernable. Yes, the ungovernable nature of the state has resulted in the state government that governs one of the biggest generators of wealth on Earth receiving a junk bond rating. All that means is that our state constitution is in desperate need of reform. It in no way challenges the greatness of California.

By any objective standard, California is the crown jewel of the United States. The last century was only the "American Century" because of California. The only state that even comes close to matching us in terms of our contribution to the country is New York and they don't have a fraction of the natural resources or capability to generate wealth that we have.

On the topic of the court decision, I would keep the party contained. Remember, this is definitely going to the Roberts Court, which has a majority of social conservatives on the bench, four of whom are four of the most batshit insane right-wing jurists in the history of the institution. Scalia in particular has written opinions that can honestly be described as homophobic. The cause for equality might be worse off than it was before the decision when this gets settled.
post #50 of 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuchulain View Post
By any objective standard, California is the crown jewel of the United States. The last century was only the "American Century" because of California. The only state that even comes close to matching us in terms of our contribution to the country is New York and they don't have a fraction of the natural resources or capability to generate wealth that we have.
As far as contributing to the country? There are 7 states that contribute more (based on a percentage). But hey, if you're talking gross dollars Texas is pretty friggin close AND has more natural resources than poor little California. Get back to us when your state taxes aren't quite so high.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Political Discourse
CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Prop 8 Overturned!