Quote:
Originally Posted by Tati 
I don't care if he won 45 times. If Cranston continues to act the same way he's been doing, he deserves to win every year. It's supposed to be the best actor of the year. Not how many times did he already won.
|
There's a huge politics element to it, too. Let's not pretend the Emmys are a bastion of quality who have always awarded the right actors. And who has/hasn't won before plays a big part of it. One of the most common criticisms of the Emmys is that they award the same people over and over regardless of quality, but because they're the "safe" choice.
Jon Hamm and Kyle Chandler delivered some of the best work of their careers this season, and that's impressive, because Chandler has been astonishing on that show before. If Cranston was
that good, and I'm willing to bet he was, I'm wrong. I'm just saying...I'd like to see somebody else win.