Quote:
Originally Posted by neoolong 
People calling SCOTT PILGRIM hipster make me think they either don't know what the word means, or that it has to do with music by people that they've never heard of.
|
It
is hugely disheartening when an honest, legitimately fresh film is lumped in with with stuff it really has nothing to do with. Though, obviously, if it's just not to your taste, that's fair enough.
I think it really boils down to this: some people who don't know the books but know what's happening cinematically and are of a certain intelligence level look at it as too good to be true. They see so many elements that they love (rock 'n' roll, comic book fighting, video games, hot chicks/strong, witty relationship storytelling) and think "nah, this is too good to be true." They see it like it's the result of the ultimate focus group (a bit like some people's reactions to the
Sucker Punch trailer.) Then, rather hastily, they dismiss it as a cynical ploy to hit all the boxes, missing all the warmth and touches that let you know it's the real deal.
The best example of this stuff probably comes from the books when Scott tries to talk Envy back into playing
Bomberman multiplayer with Stephen and all because it's not as much fun with only 3 players. That's absolutely right and a great little observation that fits the story. Had these people experienced it themselves in real life, maybe the penny would've dropped with them about this property.
The film's filled with little moments like that, just waiting for people to identify with them. "Launchpad McQuack" being another fine example. If you've been in bands, chances are you'll remember multiple names for songs and have your own short-hand, just like Sex Bob-Omb. If the movie/books were vacuous "hipster" fodder, none of that would be in there. It'd just be cool stuff for its own sake.
Some people just refuse to notice, though. S'easier to just slag it off.