CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Christine O'Donnell's 1996 Anti-Masturbation Campaign On MTV's 'Sex In The 90s'
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Christine O'Donnell's 1996 Anti-Masturbation Campaign On MTV's 'Sex In The 90s'

post #1 of 99
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Christine O'Donnell won the Republican nomination for senator in Delaware tonight, and Rachel Maddow wasted no time showing the footage she obtained of O'Donnell's 1996 appearance on MTV's "Sex In The 90s" TV show.

O'Donnell, it seems, is opposed to masturbation, and considers looking at pornography akin to adultery. And back in the 90s, though the hair was different and Joan Osborne's 90's mainstay "One Of Us" played in the background, O'Donnell maintained a similar stance: "The Bible says that lust in your heart is committing adultery. You can't masturbate without lust!"
VIDEO
post #2 of 99
Sinners. Aren't we all?
post #3 of 99
Why doesn't she mind her own business? What a loathsome individual.
post #4 of 99
Go masturbate a bit Kate. It will help you relax.
post #5 of 99
The bible says a lot of dumb stuff.

A nickel says she makes Senator.
post #6 of 99
Thread Starter 
post #7 of 99
They can have my masturbation when they pry it from my warm smooth hands.
post #8 of 99
Guys, don't you think this whole flap over her stand on masturbation is a little silly? Especially considering she said that AIDS sufferers shouldn't be called "victims"?

Quote:
"A lot of the money that we're spending goes to things that we know will not prevent AIDS," O'Donnell complained, "but, indeed, will continue to spread the disease -- when a lot of our money goes to distribute condoms in high schools, when a lot of our money goes to distribute material that is literally pornographic."

After a caller suggested that contracting AIDS is "like a bank robber getting shot in the head while in the act of committing the robbery," O'Donnell agreed that "he makes an excellent point."

"The caller before him referred to people who get AIDS as victims," O'Donnell continued. "It's that kind of spinning with words and manipulating with words that empowers the bias when it comes to AIDS." She went on to insist that cancer is "just an act of God" but that "your behavior is directly connected to whether you get AIDS."
post #9 of 99
Thread Starter 
It all relates to her backwards views on sex, so not really.

I kind of hoped this would become a general thread about her idiotic views anyway.
post #10 of 99
This woman feels like one of those sequels that get made despite the fact that no one liked the first movie. She's The Revenge of Kitty Galore of fringe candidates.
post #11 of 99
As I said in the other thread, I love that a dissenter in the ranks like Karl fucking Rove is being called a RINO over this shit.

This country is so doomed, and it has nothing to do with the Spender in Chief.
post #12 of 99
Just don't take the rest of us with you.
post #13 of 99
No promises.

You got a spare room, by any chance?
post #14 of 99
Like I say, though: get enough of these kinds of candidates in there and the Republican "sweep" suddenly looks a lot more uncertain.
post #15 of 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacob Singer View Post
No promises.

You got a spare room, by any chance?
Gotta share it with the cat.
post #16 of 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Prankster View Post
Like I say, though: get enough of these kinds of candidates in there and the Republican "sweep" suddenly looks a lot more uncertain.
Almost all political commentators are saying O Donnell has little or no chance of winning.
But then I have noted that a lot of the posters in Politics seem to take great joy in their doom saying.....
post #17 of 99
Bitch can take my Senate, but she'll never take my vibrator.
post #18 of 99
That's been the pattern so far. Almost all the Tea Party candidates have been washouts. Which is particularly sweet, because we're seeing the GOP being brought down by a monster they created.

EDIT: Uh, referring to Dudalb.
post #19 of 99
So if I think about my husband while I'm masturbating, I'm committing adultery?
post #20 of 99
You slut!
post #21 of 99
I have the worst family members ever.
post #22 of 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarleyQuinn22 View Post
Bitch can take my Senate, but she'll never take my vibrator.
But it would be great fun to watch her try.
post #23 of 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Prankster View Post
That's been the pattern so far. Almost all the Tea Party candidates have been washouts. Which is particularly sweet, because we're seeing the GOP being brought down by a monster they created.

EDIT: Uh, referring to Dudalb.
I am not quite that optimistic. I think that the Tea Party candidates in Alaska and Kentucky will win. But in competitive states, I think the Tea Party candidates will either be a wash out, or try to move to a more moderate position,like ANgle is trying to do in Nevada.
post #24 of 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by dudalb View Post
I am not quite that optimistic. I think that the Tea Party candidates in Alaska and Kentucky will win. But in competitive states, I think the Tea Party candidates will either be a wash out, or try to move to a more moderate position,like ANgle is trying to do in Nevada.
I hope they do win, then spend their terms introducing legislation to make Masturbation a crime, make school prayer mandatory, eliminate all AIDS research funding because it's "God's will" etc.

And I hope any all moderate politicians hold these proposed laws up to the light of day every single time.
post #25 of 99
I'd love to see what a no sex for recreation or masturbation society would look like. I bet the blood would be flooding the streets like a river. I already think people are having way to little sex as it is.

I hate it when freaks like this try to pass their abnormal psychology as some kind of virtue.
post #26 of 99
So O'Donnell isn't married (was she ever married? Is she still a virgin?) and doesn't believe in masturbation.

I can't trust anyone with that much pent-up sexual frustration. She's a ticking bomb!
post #27 of 99
I would, at this point, dearly love to see John McCain and maybe even George Bush release a statement decrying these wackos. McCain especially - you KNOW he thinks these guys are crazy idiots, and he really should stand up and say it.
post #28 of 99
Standing up for anything, either physically or morally isn't a concept McCain is familiar with lately.
post #29 of 99
It certainly feels as if we're heading towards a breaking point and it can go one of two ways: cooler heads prevail and more and more "sensible" conservatives/Republicans step up, take their balls out of these whacko's purses and fucking say what needs to be said.

Alternatively: we're fucked and this is actually step 2 or 3 of "The End." The morons take over the nuthouse and we find out what post-American-dream life is really like.
post #30 of 99
Holy shit. Read this and tell me what it sounds like. If a majority of these assholes were ever allowed to take over... oh boy. Are we fucked.

Quote:
More broadly, she condemned lawmakers for fostering a pop culture that encouraged sexual harassment.

"We sit there and scratch our heads and wonder why sexual harassment is out of control in this country. It is because we are setting a precedent through our pop culture, through the songs that penetrate the airwaves and the sitcoms that are on television that are just saturated with sexual themes, that respect no boundaries," she said. "We need to just do a U-Haul of our pop culture. I think legislators, Hollywood film producers all need to reevaluate why they are doing what they are doing... We end up feeding a demon, feeding a monster and we are feeding this appetite so much that our generation is going to self-destruct quite honestly."
Good god. Spell it kids: F-A-S-C-I...
post #31 of 99
"Do a U-Haul"? What, pack it up and move it to Wisconsin?
post #32 of 99
Given her hardcore Christian beliefs I wonder if she'd submit to an examination to confirm her, uh, "purity".
post #33 of 99
How do lawmakers foster Pop Culture? I must have missed the senate hearings where they decided to go ahead and have the NEA fund SEINFELD.

PS I love that she's decrying sexual harassment while leading a crusade to lecture people on their masturbation habits
post #34 of 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dranbon View Post
So O'Donnell isn't married (was she ever married? Is she still a virgin?) and doesn't believe in masturbation.

I can't trust anyone with that much pent-up sexual frustration. She's a ticking bomb!
She can be my rebound. Five bucks says she'll do some creepy shit in the sack.
post #35 of 99
She's just vehemently opposed to the everyday mass slaughter of trillions of sperm.

I was going to make an "Every Sperm is Sacred" joke, but I doubt the likes of her even knows what Monty Python is.
post #36 of 99
What about tantric sec? Is that ok?
post #37 of 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Prankster View Post
That's been the pattern so far. Almost all the Tea Party candidates have been washouts. Which is particularly sweet, because we're seeing the GOP being brought down by a monster they created.

EDIT: Uh, referring to Dudalb.
This right here.

During the most recent Presidential election, a particularly snarky journalist coined the term "Huckenfreude" to describe the pleasure Democrats felt at the sight of Republican establishment discomfort over Mike Huckabee's strong performance in early Republican primaries.

The core concept behind Huckenfreude was that a demographic that Republicans have exploited for generations had come of age and begun to produce its own candidates. Someone from a working class or lower-middle class background isn't supposed to represent "the people;" that's work reserved for heirs of financial and political dynasties. The fact that, like O'Donnell, Huckabee has a reputation for sincere devotion to his religion instead of cynically exploiting the faith of voters to push their tribal identifier buttons was icing on the cake.

Because class identity trumps party affiliation in Washington, a lot of liberal coverage has condemned Tea Party candidates for precisely the same reasons. How many of us have derided Palin not for policy, of which she speaks very little, but for being a hillbilly? I know I'm guilty.

Salon's Glenn Greenwald has a blog entry that opened my eyes a little bit here.

ETA: To stay on topic, Tantric sex is not only non-procreative, it's suspiciously Eastern and rarely missionary. So I would guess that it's out.
post #38 of 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sammy Jankis View Post
What about tantric sec? Is that ok?
Tantric sec? I thought it was supposed to take longer that way.
post #39 of 99
This coverage has all been like nails on a chalkboard for me because of the same reason Jon Stewart and gang brilliantly highlighted last night with "How will the Democrats #$@! this up".

The truth is, they already have. Did they use this opportunity to get the Dem opponents of O'Donnell etc. out in front? No. Did they amusedly chuckle on the air, looking like dickwads? Yes. Did they make the point that when niches vote, niche candidates get elected, and if people don't want to see the equivalent of Spock getting elected because only Trekkies vote, they need to light a fire under the voters' asses now? No.

Another thing I find painfully apparent is that the message of the Dems seems to be: look how bad the GOP is. There are so many important messages they could be using rather than a negative comparison. How about what Barbara Boxer is campaigning on, which is making things in America again, or talking about actual progressive results, like the fact that if you become overdrawn, you don't end up owing the bank your first child over being one or two dollars in the hole? There are palpable results of Dem legislation that the Dems don't have the good sense to book themselves on CNN to talk about.

If the Dems had a fraction of the well-funded GOP's strategic savvy, the GOP would never win another election. Unfortunately, as I've bemoaned before, the well-oiled GOP has big business' profit motive behind their strength and gusto. Doing the right thing for the people is never going to make anyone rich.
post #40 of 99
What about if you had an erotic dream and woke up woth morning wood soaked with sticky leakage that was beyond your control? Are those souls gone forever now too?

This woman is wacko!
post #41 of 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Merriweather View Post
Given her hardcore Christian beliefs I wonder if she'd submit to an examination to confirm her, uh, "purity".
I went to college down the street from O'Donnell--we were both president of the College Republicans at our respective schools in the early 90s. She spent quite a few nights in my best friend's dorm room. All an act, kids. But hey, rational GOPers don't get to be on Poltically Incorrect.
post #42 of 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator GAC View Post
What about if you had an erotic dream and woke up woth morning wood soaked with sticky leakage that was beyond your control? Are those souls gone forever now too?

This woman is wacko!
Her attitude is the legacy of a puritanical fantasy that has also given us generations of deviants, pain freaks, child molesters, animal rapists and killers.
post #43 of 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeventyOne View Post
I went to college down the street from O'Donnell--we were both president of the College Republicans at our respective schools in the early 90s. She spent quite a few nights in my best friend's dorm room. All an act, kids. But hey, rational GOPers don't get to be on Poltically Incorrect.
...or get elected apparently.
post #44 of 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reasor View Post
Salon's Glenn Greenwald has a blog entry that opened my eyes a little bit here.
Quote:
How is the current American Right -- and these Tea Party candidates -- any different? Warning that the other party is More Radical Than Ever is a reliable tactic to win elections, but in the case of Republicans, they seem every bit as radical to me now as before, just a bit more pure, primitive and aggressive about it.

Talk about answering your own question.
post #45 of 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeventyOne View Post
I went to college down the street from O'Donnell--we were both president of the College Republicans at our respective schools in the early 90s. She spent quite a few nights in my best friend's dorm room. All an act, kids. But hey, rational GOPers don't get to be on Poltically Incorrect.
All mistakes in her past which I'm sure she regrets....I bet she has an ice pack under her dress now!
post #46 of 99
Quote:
If he knows what pleases him and how to please himself then why am I in the picture?
Seriously?! She sure talks like someone who has never had sex.

And how do you know you can't masturbate without lustful thoughts unless you've tried it?
post #47 of 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cylon Baby View Post
All mistakes in her past which I'm sure she regrets....I bet she has an ice pack under her dress now!
I swear I first read this as "ice PICK under her dress" and it still totally made sense.
post #48 of 99
More brilliance, this time from a 2007 appearance on the O'Reilly factor:

Quote:
They are — they are doing that here in the United States. American scientific companies are cross-breeding humans and animals and coming up with mice with fully functioning human brains.
Any chance we could get one of those mice to run against her?
post #49 of 99
Not to Fabfunk myself, but...
Christine O'Donnell:


Porn Star Eva Angelina:


Hm.
post #50 of 99
Thanks for ruining Eva Angelina for me.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Political Discourse
CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Christine O'Donnell's 1996 Anti-Masturbation Campaign On MTV's 'Sex In The 90s'