CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › CHUD.COM Main › LIOTTA AGREES TO DROP THE WANDERLUST TROUSERS
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

LIOTTA AGREES TO DROP THE WANDERLUST TROUSERS

post #1 of 4
Thread Starter 
Nude Ray?

More...
post #2 of 4
The good: Excellent chance at seeing Akerman without clothes again.
The bad: No chance of seeing Anniston without clothes.
The ugly: NAKED LIOTTA.
post #3 of 4
I'd say their most famous collaboration would be Wet Hot American Summer, but that's just me.

and Akerman gets naked everywhere. She'll even do it for free if you ask her on the street.
post #4 of 4
Drat! I saw the article title on my iPod this morning, and guessed that it was a hilarious joke about the SISTERHOOD OF THE TRAVELING PANTS.

I'm slightly disappointed, but that's OK. The movie is intriguing. I like Rudd quite alot, and Aniston is a box office draw. Hopefully the film does well and raises their star power. As for Mr Liota, he's not necessarily a great actor, and he phones it in alot, but he can be scary when he's screaming and acting unhinged, and maybe this film will give him a chance to play up that side of his character

BTW, Last year I discovered that I've lived 15 minutes from a nudist resort my entire life without any knowledge of it's existence. Those places are tucked away in surprising places, and given America's puritanical aversion to the unclothed human body, I'm sure this film has the potential to generate alot of uncomfortable laughter at middle American multiplexes.

PS Is the movie PG13 or R? I don't see how you make a PG 13 nudist colony humor film without resorting to Austin Powers style visual trickery, which was funny in 1999 or whenever, but post SUPER BAD it might feel like they're pulling their punches
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: CHUD.COM Main
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › CHUD.COM Main › LIOTTA AGREES TO DROP THE WANDERLUST TROUSERS