Hardy is probably just the new District Attorney.
post #51 of 102
10/13/10 at 6:34pm
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
There's been rumors and reports, seemingly only based off the fact that other WB superhero films (Green Lantern) have utilized it for tax reasons. But that's it. They haven't even finished the script yet.
|

|
Chicago was Gotham in the previous two films, that will probably not change for this one either. And both previous films where shot in many locations around the world. Including Iceland and Tokyo. So I seriously doubt that New Orleans will stand in for Gotham this time around, it's probably just another location for God-knows-what.
I love Tom Hardy, great choice for whatever he ends up playing. But the Killer Croc rumor is retarded, especially for this Batman interpretation which is very much based in reality. Who should the villain be then? I don't know... Maybe they should come up with someone new and not from the comics. |
|
You can make New Orleans stand in for just about anything. Ditto Lafayette, which stood in for LA for the upcoming Battle: Los Angeles. And who's to say they'll be filming ONLY in New Orleans? Begins and Dark Knight both used Chicago and New York to fill in for Gotham.
Someone earlier in the thread mentioned Hardy playing Bullock. Sign me up for that one, but that's mainly because I think Bullock's a great character and would serve Nolan well to give Batman an extra hurdle to try to get past. Instead of giving us two Rogue's Gallery villains, why not do one straight up villain and another an adversary on the police force? Batman should be getting it from both sides in this one. |
|
I think it is safe to assume a picture as large as Batman 3 would have a location for principle photography set early on, even before the final draft of the script is approved. From everything we have heard the first drafts are complete, which is enough to get the ducks in a row for filming. The film as is currently written is structurally probably very similar to the final film so getting the filming locations set isn't absurd at this time.
|
|
I think it is safe to assume a picture as large as Batman 3 would have a location for principle photography set early on, even before the final draft of the script is approved. From everything we have heard the first drafts are complete, which is enough to get the ducks in a row for filming. The film as is currently written is structurally probably very similar to the final film so getting the filming locations set isn't absurd at this time.
And it isn't just speculation the reports are stating an April start date and the city of New Orleans as the place for filming... if that was an outright untruth wouldn't there have been some denial right now, wouldn't the city know yet if WB contacted them about it... there is no reason not to believe they wont be in the Big Easy in April. |
|
"I've been hearing a lot that Batman would be wearing pink spandex in the next one, and no one at WB has denied it, so it must be true!"
Well, you could check the New Orleans Film Commission and see that they have no scheduled shoot for Batman in April, so that's a hint that those aren't confirmed. |
|
Someone earlier in the thread mentioned Hardy playing Bullock. Sign me up for that one, but that's mainly because I think Bullock's a great character and would serve Nolan well to give Batman an extra hurdle to try to get past. Instead of giving us two Rogue's Gallery villains, why not do one straight up villain and another an adversary on the police force? Batman should be getting it from both sides in this one. |

|
Someone earlier in the thread mentioned Hardy playing Bullock. Sign me up for that one, but that's mainly because I think Bullock's a great character and would serve Nolan well to give Batman an extra hurdle to try to get past. Instead of giving us two Rogue's Gallery villains, why not do one straight up villain and another an adversary on the police force? Batman should be getting it from both sides in this one. |
|
Fine, I will wade into this pool: last I talked to someone from the GL crew (about 3 weeks ago), he told me WB did enjoy their time here and would like to come back. Technically they are already here doing The Lucky One.
The Film Commission site won't be updated for awhile and sometimes they hold things until the studio tells them to release it (I personally think that is annoying and makes it hard to get work). I have actually had them not release stuff until most crew positions are filled already. I have yet to meet anyone who has been contacted by them, but that isn't strange since a large part of their main unit crew was from outside of town (something which as a local I found to be very uncool; we have plenty of very well trained and very good local crew). 2nd unit did have a lot of locals, but 2nd unit on Green Lantern didn't start really until a couple of months after 1st unit. If I hear anything, and am not bound by confidentiality agreements, I will pass the info on to the boys and girls of CHUD. But really, it is as much gossip down here as elsewhere. Now if you can get a hold of an IATSE show list, well then you might have something since they had Looper on their list as far back as last Summer when I was on The Expendables (I am not a part of IATSE, so no I don't have that fun little list). But really, until you see something hard on this filming NOLA (Production Weekly or Warner Bros saying yes), it is still gossip. Green Lantern and Battleship were set to film Australia and then movie to Louisiana. Pirates 4 was set to film here and then moved to Hawaii and London. That is how this business happens and works. |

|
I think Deadshot and Black Mask seem to be the villains with the easiest "lift" into the Nolanverse.
|
| According to the writers of Batman: Gotham Knight, Deadshot was given a visual makeover for the movie. In the story, he is presented as an "anti-Batman", with a sophisticated socialite secret identity as his disguise. They also describe Deadshot and Batman's battles as very interesting because "it's battle of man using guns against one who isn't". |

| Within the DC Universe, Deadshot is often a hired assassin, regularly boasting to "never miss." He is capable of using a large variety of weapons, but is most frequently portrayed as using a pair of silenced, wrist-mounted guns. He initially appears in Gotham City as a new crimefighter, but is revealed to be an enemy of Batman when he attempts to replace the Dark Knight. He is sent to jail when Batman and Commissioner Gordon publicly expose his plot to become the king of Gotham's underworld. |
|
Someone earlier in the thread mentioned Hardy playing Bullock. Sign me up for that one, but that's mainly because I think Bullock's a great character and would serve Nolan well to give Batman an extra hurdle to try to get past.
|

|
ETA: and didn't he also make an appearance in that little piece of Nolanverse EU, Gotham Knight anyway? |
|
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say...the Penguin. I know, nobody will agree, everyone hates the Penguin, Hardy doesn't seem a natural fit for the role. But that's my guess.
That, or the Clock King. |
|
Yeah he's Deadshot and yes what a fucking marvelous choice.
Bravo Chris and Tom bravo. |
