CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › Movie Miscellany › POLL: Should JJ Abrams cast a Muslim in STAR TREK 2?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

POLL: Should JJ Abrams cast a Muslim in STAR TREK 2?

Poll Results: Should JJ Abrams enlist a Muslim in Starfleet?

 
  • 45% (21)
    Yes!
  • 54% (25)
    No!
46 Total Votes  
post #1 of 117
Thread Starter 





I ask for this reason: Roddenberry deliberately created STAR TREK to depict a future where Russians, Americans, blacks, whites and even our former enemies the Japanese could all work together as equals, as respected colleagues. It was a bit of a morality play, not at all dissimilar to the way Serling used science fiction allegory on TTZ to address larger social issues that would have been difficult to talk about on network TV otherwise

Roddenberry wanted to show that in the future, we've moved past all the petty hatreds of the present. Humanity is post war, post poverty, post race and post nation state.

Now, I never really watched that much STTOS. I've only ever really gotten into STTNG and STDS9 in depth, but from what I understand: in the future, religion doesn't exist anymore -- at least on earth. People no longer care about the dogmas of the past.

I wonder, in this age of dispiriting racist rhetoric towards Muslim Americans (and muslims in general), would it be a good idea for JJ Abrams to use his STAR TREK sandbox as a soap box of sorts to foist a Muslim hero on America?

I think it's exactly what Roddenberry would have done.

Is it more important to merely "reboot" existing characters in slavish tribute to a cult TV show, or to build on that foundation in a way that makes STAR TREK not only relevant again but culturally important?

When the actress who played Uhura was considering quitting the show, MLK called her up and told her to reconsider: it was critical for America to see here there on the ship working alongside white men

I wonder, if the director of PARK 51 could be reached for comment on the matter, would he perhaps endorse a Muslim recruitment drive for Starfleet?

Now, I know most people on CHUD are pretty enlightened. However, I can forsee alot of fanboy angst if Abrams were to force the existing crew to share the spotlight with a new cast member. They could well feel that one of their favorites was getting sidelined in order to give a (gasp!) new character screen time

What say you?

PS I'm aware of Dr Bashir but that was a long time ago and quite frankly I didn't even realize Alexander Siddig was Sundanese till a few years back
post #2 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Kate View Post
When the actress who played Uhura was considering quitting the show, MLK called her up and told her to reconsider: it was critical for America to see her fan dance on a sand dune.
Fixed.
post #3 of 117
We saw middle eastern command in Star Trek IV.
post #4 of 117
It's like asking if they should cast a Jew or a Christian. Trek doesn't do religion unless that religion can reverse the second lead dying in the previous film.

Also, this new Trek isn't about Roddenberry's vision, which was left in the dust many years ago now. Not even close.
post #5 of 117
So, what was Captain Robau's religion, Kate? The character that was raised in the Middle East? Would you just go by skin color and area raised?
post #6 of 117
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Hindmarch View Post
We saw middle eastern command in Star Trek IV.
That is pretty much meaningless today though. Where was the whole "ground zero mosque" thing when STIV came out? It would only be worthwhile if we're talking about a current blockbuster. Remember, just last year we had Jake Gyllenhal as the Prince of Persia. Trek should show that it walks the walk

I think featuring a Muslim at this point in American history would be a powerful gesture, since ST2 will be a movie that many many people will see including young folk -- who are the future, don't you know

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil View Post
It's like asking if they should cast a Jew or a Christian. Trek doesn't do religion unless that religion can reverse the second lead dying in the previous film.

Also, this new Trek isn't about Roddenberry's vision, which was left in the dust many years ago now. Not even close.
Right, I'm not asking for someone to unfurl a prayer rug on the bridge and ask the computer which way is mecca; I'm merely saying that TREK should cast a visibly middle eastern looking person. To the people who take issue with Muslim Americans, showing them that someone with dark skin and those features can still fight with the good guys would I think be a worthy thing to do

And.. TREK is still essentially about Roddenberry's vision. TREK still did well in part in 2009 because of Obama optimism and the bright vision of the future TREK represents

Now as the country and it's politics sink into tribalism, I think pulling a Roddenberry with the next film's casting could be a brilliant move
post #7 of 117
Again, Captain Richard Robau, the captain of the Kelvin in the first nu-Trek movie. Not only does he look Middle Eastern, he is Middle Eastern. Done.

Edit: Also, nu-Trek is a heck of a lot darker than many of the other Star Treks. It's about the destruction of a people to a large extent, the near destruction of a people in revenge, and ends with a galactic power becoming almost extinct. The Vulcans became an endangered species, remember?
post #8 of 117
You think some people saw the new Trek because of Obama?

Kate, seriously, have I told you lately that I love you?
post #9 of 117
Well, it did have a black man as "president" of Starfleet Academy. That's pretty much the same thing as Obama.
post #10 of 117
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by neoolong View Post
Again, Captain Richard Robau, the captain of the Kelvin in the first nu-Trek movie. Not only does he look Middle Eastern, he is Middle Eastern. Done.
I thought of him, but he's on screen for merely a minute or so. Enough to demonstrate that yes, in the future there are middle eastern people in Starfleet, but not enough time to force middle America to grudgingly learn to like and respect a Muslim in a traditional 'good guy' role. I'm talking about creating a new cast member to be a main driving force in the story as much as Uhura, Scotty or Chekov. Once the public is in the theater to watch your TREK movie, you should make that captive audience sit through fight scenes ETC where a muslim is fighting with the crew and has their back

And it wouldn't be against cannon because of the whole 'alternate timeline' thing
post #11 of 117
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattioli View Post
You think some people saw the new Trek because of Obama?

Kate, seriously, have I told you lately that I love you?
Devin said the exact same thing. That the fact the film was embraced by the public had to do partly with the national mood which was optimistic after the election/Inauguration. It's not an absurd statement by any means

And no but thanks always nice to hear!
post #12 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Kate View Post
I thought of him, but he's on screen for merely a minute or so. Enough to demonstrate that yes, in the future there are middle eastern people in Starfleet, but not enough time to force middle America to begruddingly learn to like and respect a Muslim in a traditional 'good guy' role.
Yeah, because that's the job of a summer blockbuster movie.

Quote:
I'm talking about creating a new cast member to be a main driving character in the story. Once they're in the theater to watch you TREK movie, you should make that captive audience sit through fight scenes ETC where a muslim is fighting with the crew and has their back
Unless it's the villain, no other character is going to get that much screentime. The cast is already pretty large, and there's no reason to build them up in the first movie just to marginalize them in the second. Unless you want the Muslim to be the villain. Is that what you want, Kate?

Edit: It's also hilariously on the nose. It'd be like instead of Kirk fighting Klingons, he actually fought Space Russians. Russians in space.

It occurs to me that if ST really wanted to tackle this issue, it should be something like a Vulcan officer in whatever Vulcan starship fleet they have is revealed to actually be Romulan and was hiding his Romulan heritage for fear of persecution. He can even be a new transfer to Starfleet since Starfleet and Vulcan both took big hits because of Nero and being much more allied would help both sides. It can tie into what Nero did, what's going to happen to the Vulcans now that their home planet was destroyed, as well as tie into how the galactic powers are going to evolve with what happened to Vulcan. That's at least a little less subtle than, OMG! Muslim Starfleet officer.
post #13 of 117
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by neoolong View Post
Yeah, because that's the job of a summer blockbuster movie.
There would be no need to dwell on the fact he's muslim, he'd be just like any other character.

Quote:
Originally Posted by neoolong View Post
Unless it's the villain, no other character is going to get that much screentime. The cast is already pretty large, and there's no reason to build them up in the first movie just to marginalize them in the second
.

I'd have to disagree. Trek's always made room for extra characters. You could have the movie be about some super secret mission, in which case you'd need more people if you were to split the crew up with some people going on an away team
Quote:
Originally Posted by neoolong View Post
Unless you want the Muslim to be the villain. Is that what you want, Kate?
No, assuredly not
Quote:
Originally Posted by neoolong View Post
Edit: It's also hilariously on the nose. It'd be like instead of Kirk fighting Klingons, he actually fought Space Russians. Russians in space.
It's not any more "on the nose" than ensign 'Chekov, Pavel Andreivich' was in the wake of the Cuban Missile Crisis
Quote:
Originally Posted by neoolong View Post
It occurs to me that if ST really wanted to tackle this issue, it should be something like a Vulcan Starfleet officer is revealed to actually be Romulan and was hiding his Romulan heritage for fear of persecution. It can tie into what Nero did, what's going to happen to the Vulcans now that their home planet was destroyed, as well as tie into how the galactic powers are going to evolve with what happened to Vulcan. That's at least a little less subtle than, OMG! Muslim Starfleet officer.
I'd be down for that... if the actor who played said Romulan was of middle eastern origin. Actually, I think that would be really cool. Good idea, Neoolong.
post #14 of 117
I don't think they ever mention religon in Star Trek, could be wrong though. They could cast an Arab though. But I'm not sure how they'd work it in to the movie in a natural way, its not like this is the original series. I do agree, that a media presence will help stave the racsim and rage away, so I certainly see your point. Although, while you have a whole news channel, Fox News, dedicated to Islamophobia and anti Arab racism, any strides likely won't count.
post #15 of 117
Religion is really important to the Bajorans on DS9 but even then, all their scriptures/prophecies have a scientific (on the show) basis. Really the only way for them to have it both ways.
post #16 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Kate View Post
There would be no need to dwell on the fact he's muslim, he'd be just like any other character.
Only you're calling for there to be a specific muslim character.

Quote:
I'd have to disagree. Trek's always made room for extra characters. You could have the movie be about some super secret mission, in which case you'd need more people if you were to split the crew up with some people going on an away team
So, someone with the screentime of Captain Robau. Which they already did. Or I guess if they're really lucky, Pike's screentime.

Quote:
It's not any more "on the nose" than ensign 'Chekov, Pavel Andreivich' was in the wake of the Cuban Missile Crisis
That's not why Chekov, the Russian, was added to the show, and not why Chekov, another character, was added to the show. And what works on a TV show, doesn't always work in a movie.

Quote:
I'd be down for that... if the actor who played said Romulan was of middle eastern origin. Actually, I think that would be really cool. Good idea, Neoolong.
What if the actor was Indonesian? The only way that he's going to be the muslim character that you're asking for is if they specifically point out, through dialogue or visuals, that he's muslim. And for a movie, that's grating.
post #17 of 117
I don't remember Star Trek ever so much as mentioning a specific modern real world religion*, so I sort of doubt they'd start doing it now just for the sake of tokenism. As for having a major character of middle-eastern decent, that would be perfectly fitting. But then that's not the question you were asking...

*Can any knowledgeable trekkies prove me wrong on this? It's got me interested now.
post #18 of 117
Didn't the being in Stark Trek V appear as the Christian God to "better suit the expectations" of the Enterprise crew? That's what Memory Alpha says anyway.

Other than that, the references aren't particularly strong from a pure religious standpoint as far as I remember.
post #19 of 117
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul C View Post
I don't remember Star Trek ever so much as mentioning a specific modern real world religion*, so I sort of doubt they'd start doing it now just for the sake of tokenism. As for having a major character of middle-eastern decent, that would be perfectly fitting. But then that's not the question you were asking...

*Can any knowledgeable trekkies prove me wrong on this? It's got me interested now.
I'm by no means a TREK expert, but I'd very much doubt Islam still exists in the 24th century (or christianity either for that matter). Too much scientific progress would have been made for any human to actually take the bronze age religion seriously.

When I said "muslim", as I explained before I was basically talking about someone who is demonstrably middle eastern looking

The people who protested PARK 51 did not disgtinguish between Muslims and "muslim looking" people. I read a story about how there were christian Americans of middle eastern descent who were chased away with screams of "GO HOME!" when they tried to protest against the mosque

If Abrams were to cast someone whom the tea party crowd would look at and think "Muslim" even if the actual character he was portraying was someone who grew up in an age where religion has died out, I think it would be a bold move

It's not the crew members of the enterprise who need a lesson about working with arabs/persians/ETC, it's the audience. Just have the crew working with one like it's no big deal, and make the bigots at home adapt to the fact that someone with those features is a trusted officer well liked by Kirk and the others

... though I also really like Neoolong's idea, should they choose to be more 'on the nose' about it
post #20 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul C View Post
I don't remember Star Trek ever so much as mentioning a specific modern real world religion*, so I sort of doubt they'd start doing it now just for the sake of tokenism. As for having a major character of middle-eastern decent, that would be perfectly fitting. But then that's not the question you were asking...

*Can any knowledgeable trekkies prove me wrong on this? It's got me interested now.
Oh yeah, it's not canon per se, but in the Starfleet: Core of Engineers novel series, one of the main characters is Jewish and his wife was a rabbi.
post #21 of 117
I basically agree with Kate's point, but I can also see Phil's side of things. Kate's making the argument that, much like inserting a Russian or an African American onto the crew during the Cold War and the civil rights era, respectively, adding a Middle Eastern actor or character into the series would both honor the spirit of Roddenberry and the optimistic nature of Star Trek. That being said, Phil's right -- Trek has never been big on religion, so I'll agree that the character doesn't need to be a Muslim, just Middle Eastern. It would serve the same purpose as Chekov and Uhura did.

Of course, if you put a character in there as a symbol, you better make damn sure they're interesting for reasons other than being a symbol. Especially if you're going to add new crew members to a reboot of the original series.

Finally, even though humanity in the 24th century may have "evolved past bronze age religions," it makes perfect sense that the Bible and other sacred texts would be studied for their value as teaching tools/philosophies, and you could theoreticize that religion does survive that far, albiet in a form based around the traditions of a culture, rather than adherence to a sacred text. (And let's not forget that the Vulcans are basically Alien Jews, up to and including the most recent movie, which really takes that parallel and runs with it.) I ramble.
post #22 of 117
Can we all agree to stop referring to Islam as if it's a race? The overwhelming majority of muslims in America look like Sisko and Uhura.
post #23 of 117
Where's Devin when you need him?
post #24 of 117
Yeah, it would be a bit of a different question, to ask if Star Trek should possibly cast a prominent Middle Eastern character. How do you know none of the current characters are not Muslim? Like has been said, Trek doesn't hightlight religion all that much.
post #25 of 117
...and just what the hell was the wonderful Alexander Siddig? A pile of puke?!?!
post #26 of 117
To be fair, he was kinda annoying in the beginning. Funny thing though, his eventual backstory retconned some of the earlier stuff into being kinda deep.

Also, doesn't Indonesia actually have the largest Muslim population?
post #27 of 117
Wouldn't it be something if they cast Muslims as the villains? Maybe time-traveling fundamentalist Islamic terrorists hell bent on getting egg on Kirk's face?
post #28 of 117
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teitr Styrr View Post
Yeah, it would be a bit of a different question, to ask if Star Trek should possibly cast a prominent Middle Eastern character. How do you know none of the current characters are not Muslim? Like has been said, Trek doesn't hightlight religion all that much.
Because while of course anyone could convert to Islam, that's obviously much different from casting a middle eastern actor given the fact that middle eastern people are the center of much anxiety in America's psyche. Educated people know that not all muslims look the same, but we're making our point to less than educated people so you have to be clear with your visuals - it's a movie after all

Quote:
Originally Posted by neoolong View Post
Only you're calling for there to be a specific muslim character.



So, someone with the screentime of Captain Robau. Which they already did. Or I guess if they're really lucky, Pike's screentime.



That's not why Chekov, the Russian, was added to the show, and not why Chekov, another character, was added to the show. And what works on a TV show, doesn't always work in a movie.



What if the actor was Indonesian? The only way that he's going to be the muslim character that you're asking for is if they specifically point out, through dialogue or visuals, that he's muslim. And for a movie, that's grating.
This is a lovely technicality, but if you showed an indonesian person to most of the people who are protesting PARK 51, they'd have no clue he was Muslim. Just like Chekov was a broad stereotype of a Russian, in order to make the Muslim thing clear to ignorant America, you cast a middle eastern actor.

You're right, talking out loud about an islamic heritage would be horrible and feel shoe horned in. Therefore the only way to make the point is by casting with an ethnicity that Americans universally identify as "Muslim"


Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rain Dog View Post
...and just what the hell was the wonderful Alexander Siddig? A pile of puke?!?!
I addressed him in my first post.
post #29 of 117
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RathBandu View Post
I basically agree with Kate's point, but I can also see Phil's side of things. Kate's making the argument that, much like inserting a Russian or an African American onto the crew during the Cold War and the civil rights era, respectively, adding a Middle Eastern actor or character into the series would both honor the spirit of Roddenberry and the optimistic nature of Star Trek. That being said, Phil's right -- Trek has never been big on religion, so I'll agree that the character doesn't need to be a Muslim, just Middle Eastern. It would serve the same purpose as Chekov and Uhura did.

Of course, if you put a character in there as a symbol, you better make damn sure they're interesting for reasons other than being a symbol. Especially if you're going to add new crew members to a reboot of the original series.

Finally, even though humanity in the 24th century may have "evolved past bronze age religions," it makes perfect sense that the Bible and other sacred texts would be studied for their value as teaching tools/philosophies, and you could theoreticize that religion does survive that far, albiet in a form based around the traditions of a culture, rather than adherence to a sacred text. (And let's not forget that the Vulcans are basically Alien Jews, up to and including the most recent movie, which really takes that parallel and runs with it.) I ramble.
Rath I agree you'd need to be careful about how you introduce him into the narrative, that's kind of a given. I'm not advocating turning TREK into an afternoon special on race relations. There are so many scenarios in TREK possible that I'm sure you can come up with a new cool character. It's been done before

You're probably right too that something along the lines of the Jefferson Bible would endure as far as current religions go, a 'just the non psychotic philosophy' edition. I assume it would be applied to peoples lives that way though, according to cultural traditions: as philosophy and not religion.

And.. I don't think the Vulcans as Jews thing ever really made sense outside of this current reboot. Keep in mind Vulcan's relationship with Romulus, ETC. It just doesn't fit. Vulcans were pretty much one of the supreme species in the galaxy who went about introducing themselves to new cultures and helped them advance. (though obviously the holocaust allegory now makes sense in the new series)

PS Glad you like my idea in general
Quote:
Originally Posted by neoolong View Post
To be fair, he was kinda annoying in the beginning. Funny thing though, his eventual backstory retconned some of the earlier stuff into being kinda deep.
?
He was actually one of my favorites on DS9, I'm just saying that a character on a little watched TV show from 15 years ago is different from a new character in a current blockbuster.


EDIT: And Neoolong, as I said I'd give him* equal screen time to everyone else, or nearly so

*I think it would be important for the character to be male, because America is terrified of 20 something Arab men, and that makes for the most potent imagery
post #30 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Kate View Post
When I said "muslim", as I explained before I was basically talking about someone who is demonstrably middle eastern looking
Oops.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teitr Styrr View Post
Yeah, it would be a bit of a different question, to ask if Star Trek should possibly cast a prominent Middle Eastern character. How do you know none of the current characters are not Muslim? Like has been said, Trek doesn't hightlight religion all that much.
^ This.

I think they should cast a Stonecutter, so we can see if electric cars and the metric system are still being held back in the future.
post #31 of 117
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DARKMITE8 View Post
Oops.

^ This.

I think they should cast a Stonecutter, so we can see if electric cars and the metric system are still being held back in the future.
"Should JJ Abrams cast a middle eastern looking person in STAR TREK 2?" is a horrible thread title. I'm trying to be punchy with my titles. Then I explain my point in depth in my post.


PS The stone cutters would never have survived WW3, what with the loss of their sacred text in the mid 1990s
post #32 of 117
I think he should cast an Eastern Islander.

post #33 of 117
Kate, I think what I'm saying is that I don't want to equate Middle Eastern to Muslim, and I don't want the world to either. I guess I don't want Trek to pander to what the masses may see or think.
post #34 of 117
They could go Tarantino-style and give a brief flashback-introduction showing him/her praying* after the Muslim Officer appears on screen so Abrams doesn't have to rely on physicality to portray a Muslim. This way, you can cast either Naveen Andrews or Ben Stiller for the role.

*It would be hard to pray facing the Mecca at Warp 5...
post #35 of 117
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teitr Styrr View Post
Kate, I think what I'm saying is that I don't want to equate Middle Eastern to Muslim, and I don't want the world to either. I guess I don't want Trek to pander to what the masses may see or think.
That's not what it's about. It's about going with the strongest possible image for the film. For most of the past decade, when Americans have seen 20 something men of middle eastern descent in movies, they've been playing terrorists. To have one on screen in a Star Fleet uniform is a powerful symbol

I don't know how to explain myself any more plainly than that, so I'll just stop talking I guess. Suggesting that it would somehow be more correct to go with an Indonesian because of that nation's status as the most populous muslim country is just missing the point though IMHO. The goal should be to dispel racial hatred towards middle easterners, not give rednecks a lesson in demographics.
post #36 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioJones View Post
Where's Devin when you need him?
Breaking STAR TREK 2 news on his new website!
post #37 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Kate View Post
This is a lovely technicality, but if you showed an indonesian person to most of the people who are protesting PARK 51, they'd have no clue he was Muslim. Just like Chekov was a broad stereotype of a Russian, in order to make the Muslim thing clear to ignorant America, you cast a middle eastern actor.
Yeah, because that's the only point I was making. Kate, if the issue is positive portrayals of people of Middle Eastern descent, then just cast Middle Eastern actors. They don't have to be show tenets of their faith in some over the top fashion if race is the issue.

And you really shouldn't be calling out ignorant America when you yourself assume that all Asians in action movies are ninjas.

Quote:
You're right, talking out loud about an islamic heritage would be horrible and feel shoe horned in. Therefore the only way to make the point is by casting with an ethnicity that Americans universally identify as "Muslim"
Or just start with a text box saying that not all Muslims/Middle Easterns are evil.

And to think this is the series that actually tackled social issues without overtly beating the audience on their heads with it.
post #38 of 117
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by neoolong View Post
Yeah, because that's the only point I was making. Kate, if the issue is positive portrayals of people of Middle Eastern descent, then just cast Middle Eastern actors. They don't have to be show tenets of their faith in some over the top fashion if race is the issue.

And you really shouldn't be calling out ignorant America when you yourself assume that all Asians in action movies are ninjas..

I feel like people are not reading anything I write. I explicitly stated that I wanted to simply do exactly what You've said. Cast an actor of middle eastern descent, make no mention of his racial background overt or otherwise, and make him a main character next time out.

I went as far as to suggest that I don't think Islam even exists in the TREK verse, so I don't know how you could believe that I'd desire any showing of "tenets of faith".
Quote:
Originally Posted by neoolong View Post

Or just start with a text box saying that not all Muslims/Middle Easterns are evil.

And to think this is the series that actually tackled social issues without overtly beating the audience on their heads with it.
Jiminy Cricket, I said that they should just cast a person who is obviously muslim (As in, Middle eastern) and not say a darned thing about it! How much more subtle can you get? You're the one who suggested an entire war on terror parable with the Romulans.
post #39 of 117
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by devincf View Post
Breaking STAR TREK 2 news on his new website!
Great news, Devin! Thanks for the heads up.

Would you care to weigh in on this TREK debate we're now engaged in?
post #40 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Kate View Post
I feel like people are not reading anything I write. I explicitly stated that I wanted to simply do exactly what You've said. Cast an actor of middle eastern descent, make no mention of his racial background overt or otherwise, and make him a main character next time out.
You're the one that uses muslim and Middle Eastern descent interchangeably. Hilariously, really overt positive portrayals of muslims already exist in science fiction. And the main one wasn't even played by someone of Middle Eastern descent.

Quote:
I went as far as to suggest that I don't think Islam even exists in the TREK verse, so I don't know how you could believe that I'd desire any showing of "tenets of faith".
According to you, apparently skin color is all that's necessary.

Quote:
Jiminy Cricket, I said that they should just cast a person who is obviously muslim (As in, Middle eastern) and not say a darned thing about it!
How much more subtle can you get? You're the one who suggested an entire war on terror parable with the Romulans.
I'd not keep saying that Middle Easterns are obviously muslim for one.
post #41 of 117
If you clearly understand that race and religion are two separate things, and if you also clearly understand that current Earth Religions will most likely not be recognized in any Star Trek movie, why didn't you name this ridiculous thread "Should JJ Abrams cast someone of Middle Eastern Descent in Star Trek 2"?

That would have saved a lot of "Well, not actually Muslim" posts.
post #42 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andres View Post
They could go Tarantino-style and give a brief flashback-introduction showing him/her praying* after the Muslim Officer appears on screen so Abrams doesn't have to rely on physicality to portray a Muslim. This way, you can cast either Naveen Andrews or Ben Stiller for the role.

*It would be hard to pray facing the Mecca at Warp 5...
Just have an ethnic wail every time he/she enters the room. Problem solved!
post #43 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by devincf View Post
Breaking STAR TREK 2 news on his new website!
A fantastic article. I read it even before I posted here.
post #44 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andres View Post
They could go Tarantino-style and give a brief flashback-introduction showing him/her praying* after the Muslim Officer appears on screen so Abrams doesn't have to rely on physicality to portray a Muslim. This way, you can cast either Naveen Andrews or Ben Stiller for the role.
Now now now, let's get serious here. The right way is to go the KKBB route: call the character Muslim Joe, have a couple of other characters talk about him after he's introduced delivering necessary exposition like "I heard from a friend at the Academy he was the best at [skill that will be needed in the third act]. Also he's Muslim."
post #45 of 117
Cue Scott Pilgrim: "This is Habib. He's my Muslim Friend. And he's Muslim"
post #46 of 117
Ugh. Wish I had read the thread before voting. I would then vote no.

According to this, Southeast Asians make up the largest percentage of North American Muslims. Secondly, where are all the Asians at in Star Trek? It was the same failing with Serenity. The culture and language seem to be an English/Chinese mix. Just by sheer population, I should see someone of Chinese, Indian, Indonesian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, and Brazilian, in addition to the Americans. Those 7 nations account for 3.7 billion of the people in this world. It shouldn't be Irish Iowan James Kirk. It should be Captain Jayanth J. Chandrasekhar. He offers mustache rides to all the Alien ladies and would meow the Klingons back to their petaQ's home.
post #47 of 117
It may have been not that long in terms of screentime, but I think it's significant that the first Starfleet captain we've seen on the big screen in 7 years is played by a Pakistani-American actor.

Serenity is worse than Star Trek on the Asian point since it makes much more of a point that the Chinese are a significant influence in the universe, though Sulu is Asian in nu-Trek by virtue of Sulu being Asian in the original series.

At least he ended up being a badass captain, and the only one that had a kid that didn't get killed by a Klingon. Ha!
post #48 of 117
Serenity is worse in that we should have seen more Asian than American characters.

Original Star Trek did a damn fine job with ethnicity, which New Trek was emulating.
post #49 of 117
Perhaps to solve our problems, Chekov could claim to be a Chechnyan Muslim Russian? A trip to the ship's non-denominational worship center is in order.
post #50 of 117
Heavy sigh.

Kate is the new brand of ugly American. Instead of being hateful and bigoted, they spread ignorance in the name of being helpful and tolerant.

Besides, as Rain Dog pointed out, Trek has already had a positive portrait of a Middle Eastern character on a long-running series. It's not new ground.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movie Miscellany
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › Movie Miscellany › POLL: Should JJ Abrams cast a Muslim in STAR TREK 2?