CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › CHUD.COM Main › CARS 2: THE ROAD WARRIOR?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

CARS 2: THE ROAD WARRIOR?

post #1 of 8
11/15/10 at 5:20pm
Thread Starter 
New pic for the sequel.


More...
Reply
post #2 of 8
11/15/10 at 5:25pm
I still don't get why they chose not to use the headlights as eyes and instead put in some FINDING NEMO eyes into the windshield.
Cars look like monsters or characters naturally by the way the front is designed, putting additional eyes in just seems so uncreative.
Reply
post #3 of 8
11/15/10 at 5:25pm
Don't Toy Story 2 and 3 count as Pixar Sequels?

Still don't get all the hate for the original...then again I don't get why The Walking Dead gets so nitpicked over on the TV boards.

And I think Brad Bird has said he has no interest in doing Incredibles 2.
Reply
post #4 of 8
11/15/10 at 5:26pm
Quote:
Apparently there's a lot of new car characters in this installment. I still wonder why, of all the excellent Pixar films, this is the first one to get a sequel, considering that's its the least regarded.
Simple. Least regarded by adults doesn't mean least regarded by children. The merchandising made bajillions.
Reply
post #5 of 8
11/15/10 at 5:30pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueharvester View Post
I still don't get why they chose not to use the headlights as eyes and instead put in some FINDING NEMO eyes into the windshield.
Cars look like monsters or characters naturally by the way the front is designed, putting additional eyes in just seems so uncreative.
I think putting the eyes up on the windshield removes the possibility that there's someone in there driving the car. Maybe makes the cars seem more "alive".
Reply
post #6 of 8
11/15/10 at 5:30pm
Also: Not really the first Pixar film to be sequalized. But I'm sure you already knew that.
Reply
post #7 of 8
11/15/10 at 5:39pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abbott & Prospero View Post
Also: Not really the first Pixar film to be sequalized. But I'm sure you already knew that.
Yeah, forgot to include the "aside from Toy Story" blurb in the article. That was quickly rectified.
Reply
post #8 of 8
11/15/10 at 5:44pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abbott & Prospero View Post
Simple. Least regarded by adults doesn't mean least regarded by children. The merchandising made bajillions.
Bajillions seems a bit tame when used to describe the amount of money Disney/Pixar made off of Cars. I seriously don't know a family with a young boy that hasn't spend a decent amount of money at least, on Cars merchandise.
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: CHUD.COM Main
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › CHUD.COM Main › CARS 2: THE ROAD WARRIOR?