CHUD.com Community › Forums › CULTURE, HUMOR, & FREE FORM › Gossip › Rihanna in GQ
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Rihanna in GQ

post #1 of 13
12/7/10 at 7:34pm
Thread Starter 
She's trying too hard.
Reply
post #2 of 13
12/7/10 at 7:48pm
Yep. Nothing is less sexy than trying too hard to be sexy.

I don't even want strawberries after seeing that, and I love strawberries!
Reply
post #3 of 13
12/7/10 at 7:49pm
Everyone knows fire engine red hair and strawberries don't go together!
Reply
post #4 of 13
12/7/10 at 8:00pm
I'm all over the cover shot. The rest look kind of ridiculous.
Reply
post #5 of 13
12/7/10 at 8:11pm
Yeah, the fishnet shots are the hotness, the others not so much.
Reply
post #6 of 13
12/7/10 at 9:55pm
"Elaborately tattooed, Rhianna has reinvented herself as a fierce sexual adventurer."

Fuck this planet. Can we just give it to the the cats or the wombats or something already?
Reply
post #7 of 13
12/7/10 at 10:03pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacob Singer View Post
"Elaborately tattooed, Rhianna has reinvented herself as a fierce sexual adventurer."

Fuck this planet. Can we just give it to the the cats or the wombats or something already?
Don't worry Jacob, we're breathlessly rushing to the cliff of our own demise like the lemmings we are while we blind ourselves with this kind of nonsense that it'll be theirs soon enough my friend.
Reply
post #8 of 13
12/7/10 at 10:23pm
Something has to give with this nonsense. It may be redundant, but I don't think it's puritan of me to complain that I am bored to death of seeing every other popular female singer / musician build their career on a tacky sexed up image.
Reply
post #9 of 13
12/7/10 at 10:31pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacknifeJohnny View Post
Something has to give with this nonsense. It may be redundant, but I don't think it's puritan of me to complain that I am bored to death of seeing every other popular female singer / musician build their career on a tacky sexed up image.
Yeah but what? There's hardly going to be a corporate backlash against the concept of 'sex sells', and the next Janis Joplin's gonna need a serious makeover before anyone lets her near Mtv.

When it comes to pop, music is ancillary to branding JJ - all you can do is personally ignore it, shit aint gonna change, it'll just get worse until this current period looks quaint in retrospect.
Reply
post #10 of 13
12/8/10 at 12:56am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva View Post
i actually LOST the erection i had before clicking the link.
Reply
post #11 of 13
12/8/10 at 1:52am
Yeah, most of these celebs look better during random public appearances than in a lot of professional pictorials. I don't know if it's the photoshop gloss or the overdone hair and makeup, but there's some manufactured, generic quality that doesn't appeal to me.
Reply
post #12 of 13
12/8/10 at 5:35pm
Trying too hard? Maybe. But I wouldn't throw her out of bed for eating strawberries/crackers/knuckle sandwiches.
Reply
post #13 of 13
12/8/10 at 5:46pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacknifeJohnny View Post
It may be redundant, but I don't think it's puritan of me to complain that I am bored to death of seeing every other popular female singer / musician build their career on a tacky sexed up image.
I would tend to agree with you, but then I think of Katy Perry...

...I'm sorry. Where was I?
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Gossip
CHUD.com Community › Forums › CULTURE, HUMOR, & FREE FORM › Gossip › Rihanna in GQ