CHUD.com Community › Forums › CULTURE, HUMOR, & FREE FORM › Gossip › Mila Kunis and Macaulay Culkin have split after 8 years
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Mila Kunis and Macaulay Culkin have split after 8 years

post #1 of 45
1/3/11 at 11:08am
Thread Starter 
http://omg.yahoo.com/news/mila-kunis...Q8Ppxx.;_ylv=3

According to a rep from the Kunis camp, their split was amicable and their remain close friends. They have been separated for a few months but did not want to make any announcements until after the promotion for Black Swan.

If you're still reeling after the Natalie Portman news, here's your chance, guys. Remember: impress her with your WoW skills.
Reply
post #2 of 45
1/3/11 at 11:36am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Draco Senior View Post
http://omg.yahoo.com/news/mila-kunis...Q8Ppxx.;_ylv=3

According to a rep from the Kunis camp, their split was amicable and their remain close friends. They have been separated for a few months but did not want to make any announcements until after the promotion for Black Swan.

If you're still reeling after the Natalie Portman news, here's your chance, guys. Remember: impress her with your WoW skills.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31g0YE61PLQ
Reply
post #3 of 45
1/3/11 at 11:47am
Mila Kunis, Rachel Weisz and Kate Winslett all on the market at the same time? I'm confused. Who should I go after?
Reply
post #4 of 45
1/3/11 at 11:55am
They were together? Had no idea.
Reply
post #5 of 45
1/3/11 at 11:59am
Our video podcast split them.
Reply
post #6 of 45
1/3/11 at 12:09pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by stelios View Post
Mila Kunis, Rachel Weisz and Kate Winslett all on the market at the same time? I'm confused. Who should I go after?
Weisz is dating Daniel Craig. So, the answer is the one least likely to have James Bond snap your fool neck like a Kit Kat.
Reply
post #7 of 45
1/3/11 at 12:15pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Nunziata View Post
Our video podcast split them.
of which the destructive power is incalculable!! all hail and fear our new over lord, the chudvideocast!
Reply
post #8 of 45
1/3/11 at 12:45pm
Reply
post #9 of 45
1/3/11 at 12:46pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ratty View Post
They were together? Had no idea.
I did not know this either.
Reply
post #10 of 45
1/3/11 at 1:19pm
There's a lot of people around who appear to ignore the CHUD video podcast. Rectify this omission gentlemen, or suffer the consequences.
Reply
post #11 of 45
1/3/11 at 1:29pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by stelios View Post
There's a lot of people around who appear to ignore Russell Brand standup. Rectify this omission gentlemen, or suffer the consequences.
Don't think you're gonna get any converts, man.
Reply
post #12 of 45
1/3/11 at 1:47pm
This is honestly the first I'd ever heard they were together, which is weird because I've been aware of both of them for at least 8 years (used to watch T70sS and saw SAVED in a theater*)


*HA2:LINY I saw in a theater as well
Reply
post #13 of 45
1/3/11 at 3:04pm
I try to stay the fuck out of this forum in general. I don't have a lot of celebrity crushes because I find actresses, pop singers, etc, unobtainable and therefore not that attractive.

But Mila Kunis is the suggestion. And she was dating Culkin, which gives me an ounce of hope that I've got a shot.

Picked a wrong year to get married....

[BASE COVER]just kidding honey in case you happen to find this [/BASE COVER]
Reply
post #14 of 45
1/4/11 at 5:10pm
One little taste of Natalie's Black Swan, and Mila was ruined for sausage. My guess is next time she's on a red carpet, she's with Amber Heard.
Reply
post #15 of 45
1/4/11 at 5:45pm
Yahoo headline reads "Caulkin and long time girlfriend split." In what world does Mac get top billing over Mila?
Reply
post #16 of 45
1/4/11 at 5:57pm
The world where Home Alone made a shit-ton of money and Mac was best friends with the King of Pop.
Reply
post #17 of 45
1/4/11 at 6:08pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by First Class 782 View Post
The world where Home Alone made a shit-ton of money and Mac was best friends with the King of Pop.
We call that world 1991.
Reply
post #18 of 45
1/4/11 at 6:57pm
Which is a year in THIS world. I loved Mila Kunis in Black Swan, but Home Alone made more money than every movie AND TV show Mila Kunis has been a part of combined. And that, $, is what drives entertainment "journalism".
Reply
post #19 of 45
1/4/11 at 7:37pm
Just saw this thread, and immediately thought of the CHUD video podcast. Maybe it is true. Maybe Nofsky traded up.
Reply
post #20 of 45
1/4/11 at 7:40pm
This is good news. We can finally date and my parents will be happy because she's Jewish. Everbody wins. Sorry Mac.
Reply
post #21 of 45
1/4/11 at 7:47pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by First Class 782 View Post
Which is a year in THIS world. I loved Mila Kunis in Black Swan, but Home Alone made more money than every movie AND TV show Mila Kunis has been a part of combined. And that, $, is what drives entertainment "journalism".
Yeah, Mac is part of pop culture forever because of that Home Alone face (and the other reasons mentioned). Even WITH Black Swan, Kunis is still "That Girl from That 70s Show" as far as middle-America is concerned, and half of THEM didn't even watch that show.
Reply
post #22 of 45
1/4/11 at 8:06pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by JGButler View Post
Yeah, Mac is part of pop culture forever because of that Home Alone face (and the other reasons mentioned). Even WITH Black Swan, Kunis is still "That Girl from That 70s Show" as far as middle-America is concerned, and half of THEM didn't even watch that show.
Agreed. Love or hate him, Culkin was/is the most famous kid since Shirley Temple.
Reply
post #23 of 45
1/4/11 at 8:20pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by JGButler View Post
Yeah, Mac is part of pop culture forever because of that Home Alone face
Pop culture forever.
Reply
post #24 of 45
1/4/11 at 8:29pm
That's probably one of my favorite gags from The Critic. His deep voiced scream and that shadow just makes that scene.
Reply
post #25 of 45
1/4/11 at 9:43pm
In theory I get it, but Kunis is more relevant. She has good press with Black Swan and Sarah Marshall. At the very least the headline could read "Caulkin and Kunis split". To not even get a mention is bizarre. Kunis is a well-known celebrity.
Reply
post #26 of 45
1/4/11 at 9:58pm
She's angling for an Oscar nomination. I wonder if someone wants to keep her name out of the headlines so that she doesn't get looked at as simply tabloid bait.
Reply
post #27 of 45
1/4/11 at 11:07pm
Hmm, that makes more sense to me.
Reply
post #28 of 45
1/4/11 at 11:29pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva View Post
In theory I get it, but Kunis is more relevant. She has good press with Black Swan and Sarah Marshall. At the very least the headline could read "Caulkin and Kunis split". To not even get a mention is bizarre. Kunis is a well-known celebrity.
Stop your average person on the street and say Macaulay Culkin then Mila Kunis. Guess how many people will go "Mila who?" Culkin has far and away more name recognition.
Reply
post #29 of 45
1/5/11 at 12:08am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambler View Post
Stop your average person on the street and say Macaulay Culkin then Mila Kunis. Guess how many people will go "Mila who?" Culkin has far and away more name recognition.
Will someone actually try this? Please?
Reply
post #30 of 45
1/5/11 at 1:45am
I did it.

9 for Culkin. 1 for Kunis.

Thomas J. wins again.
Reply
post #31 of 45
1/5/11 at 2:10am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rene (Mr.Eko) View Post
Just saw this thread, and immediately thought of the CHUD video podcast. Maybe it is true. Maybe Nofsky traded up.
Haven't checked out the podcast, but I got that theory bouncing around in my head today when I was at work. I was thinking that maybe they could be keeping it low-key until the awards season is over so that any BLACK SWAN talk stays on the awards buzz, & keeping it away from becoming simple tabloid fodder...
Reply
post #32 of 45
1/5/11 at 2:18am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambler View Post
Stop your average person on the street and say Macaulay Culkin then Mila Kunis. Guess how many people will go "Mila who?" Culkin has far and away more name recognition.
The Resident Evil girl!? Those movies are awesome!
Reply
post #33 of 45
1/6/11 at 3:40pm

This doesn't negate my suggestion that both names go in the headline. It's been made abundantly clear Caulkin is the draw, but as a celebrity Kunis' name will be a draw too. Just not as big as Caulkin. It even takes up less space to to "Caulkin and Kunis split " rather than "Caulkin and long time girlfriend".

Reply
post #34 of 45
1/7/11 at 1:43pm

Just wanted to weigh in: Culkin is known the world over. Kunis is a cast member from THAT 70s SHOW. Her career may be taking off, but I'd have to disagree with Diva here. It makes perfect sense that Culkin would get mentioned by name but not Kunis (IMHO)

Reply
post #35 of 45
1/7/11 at 6:25pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diva View Post

This doesn't negate my suggestion that both names go in the headline. It's been made abundantly clear Caulkin is the draw, but as a celebrity Kunis' name will be a draw too. Just not as big as Caulkin. It even takes up less space to to "Caulkin and Kunis split " rather than "Caulkin and long time girlfriend".


 

She is well known, so she should have been mentioned, I agree.  But I can see the disparity between the two and why they'd pull something like that.

Reply
post #36 of 45
1/9/11 at 3:36pm

I always thought Mila Kunis was super-duper cute, but after seeing her this past weekend in Black Swan she might be the most incredible twentysomething girl on Earth. Its no wonder Timberlake was completely ga-ga over her.

 

 I never actually been with a jewish girl, as Kunis is, anyone want to clue me in whether its any different from being with a Hispanic, Black, or Asian girl.   

Reply
post #37 of 45
1/9/11 at 3:51pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by History Buff View Post

 I never actually been with a jewish girl, as Kunis is, anyone want to clue me in whether its any different from being with a Hispanic, Black, or Asian girl.   


There's about forty years of comedy history based around this question.

Reply
post #38 of 45
1/9/11 at 3:56pm

Yeah, nobody ever cracked jokes about being with Jewish women before 1970.

Reply
post #39 of 45
1/9/11 at 4:00pm

I personally feel the golden age of Jewish comedy was 1934-1974. But you can read more about that in my upcoming book "Comedy Went Boom: The Death of the Catskills".

Reply
post #40 of 45
1/9/11 at 4:07pm

But Billy Crystal didn't even get on Soap until '77?

Reply
post #41 of 45
2/1/11 at 1:53pm

Saw this cover in the supermarket aisle recently. Gorgeous...

 

mila-kunis-in-cosmo-cover-3.jpg fb172_mila-kunis-cosmo-pink-01.jpg

Reply
post #42 of 45
2/1/11 at 2:11pm

75 Very Naughty Moves? I'm genuinely curious.

Reply
post #43 of 45
2/1/11 at 2:55pm

With your socks... OFF!

Reply
post #44 of 45
2/4/11 at 6:37am

Honestly, I think Aronofskys eye capturer her beauty much more effectively...

 

mila-kunis-black-swan.jpg 

 

Reply
post #45 of 45
2/4/11 at 7:23am
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rain Dog View Post

Honestly, I think Aronofskys eye capturer her beauty much more effectively...

 

mila-kunis-black-swan.jpg 

 



I agree! She's damn beautiful!

Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Gossip
CHUD.com Community › Forums › CULTURE, HUMOR, & FREE FORM › Gossip › Mila Kunis and Macaulay Culkin have split after 8 years